SMAN 1 Sidoarjo Ismurroozi Arianto Ahmad Dzulfiqar Adi Praja Case n-1-A, on the matter of the allegation of the

e defamation of a hospital by Prita. Hospital defamation as the allegation by Prita The Government side would like to ask the court to decide that, 1. Whether in any manner Prita has no practiced an action of democracy
2. Whether the courts decision has been a fair judgment in any manner towards the society

Statement of facts In making policy, government always upholds the right all of society such as consumer and the company. Societies have a right to say what they want but company also has a right to keep their name. Because of that, government makes UU ITE which control and limit societys activities in the internet. In section 27 subsection 3 UU ITE which says that everyone who deliberately or without right to distribute or transmitted or make something accessed in IT or Electronic Document which consist of defamation. Summary of Pleadings First, government pleads the court to decide that Prita has no practiced an action of democracy. Democracy in the case of Prita means that freedom of speech of Prita to say something to public. Since the government makes UU ITE, societies may not to say freely what they want to say. Societies have a right to say what they want but they may not to defame company. Government should be tight to apply a policy, when government say that the one who defame another . Second, government pleads the court to decide a fair judgment in any manner towards the society. Society are all of peoples or organizations which exist in the country and fulfill all of their activities to their country and country should protect them. In this case, Government should protect Prita and also the hospital. So that why court should be fair and consistent to apply a policy such as the UU ITE prove that the defamation which done by Prita is wrong and fairly court should give some punishment to Prita because of defamation.
Berdasarkan UU ITE pasal 27 ayat 3

SMAN 1 Sidoarjo Ismurroozi Arianto Ahmad Dzulfiqar Adi Praja Case n-1-A, on the matter of the allegation of the defamation of a hospital by Prita. Hospital defamation as the allegation by Prita The Government side would like to ask the court to decide that, 1. Whether in any manner Prita has practiced an action of democracy 2. Whether the courts decision has not been a fair judgment in any manner towards the society Statement of facts To make sure that all of consumers are safe enough, government make a constitution about consumer protection (UU Number 8 year 1999) which consists of consumer may to choose and may to comment based on reality. Its a kind of form of protection from government to consumer of all of product such as food, drink, hospital, and everything. Summary of pleadings First, Government pleads the court to decide that Prita has practiced an action of democracy in any manner. From UU number 8 year 1999 shows that actually as a consumer, Prita has a right whether she wants to complain or not. When someone complain that should be a real case. Prita teel the truth to the court by giving some prove which support complains. Actually complain is not a kind of defame but its a kind of reminding the company to be a better one. Second, Government pleads the court to be fair to the society. When government makes a policy which is support societies complain. When government apply those policy means that all of complain from society even if its trough social network or not is legal. So that why, how ever the Pritas activities in complain about the hospital is legal.

Berdasarkan UU Nomor 8 Tahun 1999