Professional Documents
Culture Documents
History 386: The Holocaust – Professor Howard Lupovitch and GSI Andrew Cavin
The Holocaust was a devastating episode of catastrophes that led to the demise of
millions of people. A targeted group during the Holocaust was the Jews. Starting in 1933, with
the rise of the Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party, a strategy for the systematic genocide of European
Jewry was implemented and almost successfully carried out. One of the particular means in
which the Nazis organized Jews was through a strategy of Ghettoization. Ghettoes were
extremely dense quarters in which Jews were localized. The living conditions of the Ghetto were
ultimately led to a highly inflated mortality rate (Bauer, 169). Ghettoes were in unusually poor,
underdeveloped areas outside of the main area of town (Bauer, 160). Caged like animals with
fences or walls surrounding the exterior of the Ghetto, Jews were forced to survive under these
conditions. The reality of the situation, however, is that Jews did in fact find a way to continue
their way of life in spite of all of these hardships. Within the Ghettoes, Jews devised a way of life
that worked for them. Yet, there is much debate as to whether the Jews organized and achieved
aims that furthered their own interests, or rather, were simply pawns of the Nazi regime.
Within the Ghettoes there were mandated Jewish Councils called Judenrat. Reinhard
Heydrich, a high ranking official in the Nazi Party, “decreed the establishment of Councils of
Jewish Elders [in the Ghetto] composed of twenty-four ‘of the remaining influential personalities
and rabbis’” (Bauer, 171). In effect, the Nazi Party was creating an entity through which they
could centralize their demands. They banded the leaders of the Ghetto together so that actions
dictated by the Nazis could be enacted swiftly and without much dissent. It was an effective plan
of molding the actions and thoughts of the members of the Ghetto so that they would be in line
with the Nazi Party’s decree of “The Final Solution.” The Judenrat was “responsible for the
accountability of some of the requests made by the Nazi Party on to the leaders of the Ghetto
This raises a phenomenally complex argument that will be at the core of discussion for
the remainder of this paper. Considering that the Judenrat would often take orders from the Nazi
Party and help execute their objectives, can one consider the Judenrat an organized body that
intentionally collaborated with the Nazi Party, thereby assisting them in achieving their aims?
This is quite a profound assertion. However, the intention of this paper will be to reveal beyond a
reasonable doubt that the Judenrat was not in fact a collaborator with the Nazi Party. In order to
illustrate this premise, the events, actions, and life of Adam Czerniakow (Czerniakow from this
point forth), the leader of the Warsaw Judenrat, will be unpacked and discussed. In order to
provide a complete picture detailing some of the decisions made by the Warsaw Judenrat,
thoughts relating to both sides of the argument will be explored and weighed against one another.
This holistic view of the assertion at hand should indicate conclusively that the Warsaw Judenrat
was not collaborating with the Nazi Party. Instead, the actions of the Judenrat will reveal the
council’s attempts at maintaining culture, identity, and safety, which will go a long way in
refuting the contention of the Judenrat complying with the Nazi Party to actualize “The Final
Solution.”
In order to gain a sense of the Warsaw Judenrat, one has to begin the analysis with the
leader, Czerniakow. Czerniakow became an active member of Polish Jewish public life prior to
World War I (Hilberg, 1). Professionally, he was an engineer and was a member of the Engineers
Association in Poland (Hilberg, 2). Prior to leading the Warsaw Judenrat, Czerniakow was
elected to represent several organizations including the Jewish artisans on the National Jewish
November 24, 2008 History 386
2
list in the Warsaw Municipal Council (Hilberg, 2). Furthermore, he was appointed to the
Executive Council of the Warsaw Jewish Community as a representative of the Jewish craftsmen
(Hilberg, 2). It is quite evident that Czerniakow was already a prominent figure in the Polish
Jewish community. He had gained the respect of his peers and had worked hard to establish a
Czerniakow provides modern day scholars with a unique perspective due to the diary or
collection of notebooks he kept in which he provides an organized and logical account of the
events that transpired while leader of the Warsaw Judenrat and Ghetto. The diary is in itself a
massive collection of thoughts spanning from September 6, 1939, until July 23, 1942, the day
before Czerniakow committed suicide. There are nine notebooks that comprise Czerniakow’s
experiences which equate to over 1000 pages of primary documentation. Unfortunately, one of
Despite the enormity of the task before him, Czerniakow expresses an understanding of
the historic task facing him and his determination to meet the challenge (Hilberg, 2). On
September 23, 1939, the day that Czerniakow took over the Judenrat, he writes in his diary,
“Mayor Starzynski named me Chairman of the Jewish Community in Warsaw. A historic role in a
besieged city. I will try to live up to it” (Hilberg, 76). Czerniakow’s moral fiber isn’t hard to find
either as the events detailed in his diary make him “emerge as a man who tried to do his utmost
to alleviate the suffering of [his] ghetto’s inhabitants” (Bauer, 179). At this point, it would be
beneficial to begin the discussion of some of the occurrences that afflicted Czerniakow in his role
worked hard to keep the members of their community alive, which gave the Nazis a continued
supply of temporary labor (Bauer, 172). The contention made here is that due to the submission
of the Judenrat, they essentially became a tool that the Nazi regime could manipulate in order to
accomplish their goals. While Czerniakow is indeed guilty of trying to keep his community
members alive, it becomes far more evident that his acts are like a nurturing father rather than a
knifing collaborator.
Perhaps one of Czerniakow’s most selfless acts was the negotiation and release of several
members of the Warsaw Ghetto from Jewish prison. On two separate occasions, Czerniakow
fought for the lives of Jewish prisoners. On March 11, 1942 and then a month later on April 10,
1942, Czerniakow orchestrated the release of hundreds of Jewish members from unlawful
detention by the Nazis. Czerniakow writes on March 11, 1942, “At 3 PM I released from the
Jewish prison 151 people […] I addressed the prisoners; everyone was deeply moved. A crowd
of people gathered in the street to wait for the released” (Hilberg, 334). This example provides
clear insight of Czerniakow’s intent of trying to save the lives of the members of his community.
In stark contrast to a collaborating theory, one notices the deep sense of satisfaction he feels for
saving life. The reason that Czerniakow provides details regarding the emotion of the prisoners
indicates the empathy and compassion that he possesses for them. If he were releasing the
prisoners to provide work for the Nazis, he would not reasonably care about their emotional
state. Furthermore, Czerniakow also makes reference to the solidarity of his Warsaw community.
He views this event as one that provides a great deal of hope to the people of his community
which unites them. If Czerniakow’s intention was to supply his community members to the Nazis
for labor alone, then he would not waste his time in taking note of the impact of releasing them.
a month later, when he “released 260 prisoners from the detention facility […]” (Hilberg, 341).
To convince the Nazis to release prisoners was an uphill battle for Czerniakow and the entire
Judenrat. It is not logical to deduce from this timeline of events that Czerniakow acts on the
premise that another life is just another laborer. He cared very deeply about saving these people’s
lives and worked tirelessly to free them of injustice and death, if only for a short while. Clearly,
Czerniakow is not motivated by interests that are aligned with a collaborator whose sole purpose
was to provide temporary labor for the Nazis. Rather, Czerniakow is a leader invested in the well
being of his community who went through great lengths to save life.
Another argument made about Judenrat and Nazi collaboration is that, “in keeping the
Jews under control, the Judenräte were an instrument of the German bureaucracy” (Bauer, 172).
This makes the case that by following the rules ordered by the Nazis, the submissive Judenrat
was conforming to German and Nazi standards. Yet again, one will see from the actions of
Czerniakow was a huge proponent of maintaining and furthering Jewish culture in the
“backed actors, musicians, and artists,” in the Ghetto and worked hard for their public
appearance (Hilberg, 8). On May 5, 1942 Czerniakow makes reference to the Jewish Children’s
Holiday, Lag B’Omer, and the children’s performance that occurred on that day (Hilberg, 350).
This was an extremely important aspect of Jewish life in the Ghetto that Czerniakow kept intact.
Czerniakow realized that it was significantly important to the overall morale of the Ghetto to
complacency of the Jewish character within the Ghetto. Although the Nazis had taken much
November 24, 2008 History 386
5
away from the Jews in terms of rights and had forcibly lowered their standard of living,
Czerniakow thought that it was vitally important to ensure that culture continued. With this
stance, Czerniakow indicates that while certain provisions were made to maintain the peace
between the Nazis and the Jews, he forbid the society from losing all sense of self by infusing
Another way that Czerniakow refused to conform to institutional German and Nazi
establishment was through his efforts involving the youth of the Warsaw Ghetto, specifically the
education system.
worked in secret or semi-secret in the ghetto. Under cover of children’s homes run
by Centos, an orphans’ aid society with 50,000 children in its various institutions,
Jewish schools such as Tarbut, Zisho, Shulkult, Yavneh, Horev, and Beth Yacov
Czerniakow cared deeply about continuing education for the children of his Ghetto. It is
extremely important to focus on education as a defense of Judenrat collaboration with the Nazis,
due to the fact that it reveals a belief in the continuation of the Jewish people. Education is
essentially an investment in the future. If Czerniakow was under the impression that he, along
with the members of the Judenrat and Warsaw Ghetto were inevitably going to be killed, he
would not have gone through such great lengths to ensure that education was widely available in
May 1941 and May 1942 (Hilberg, 7). When it came to matters of education, Czerniakow did not
spare labor or financial resources for students (Hilberg, 7). Czerniakow would even take part in
lessons or discussion groups and was an avid participant in the various research studies that were
done on starvation and typhus fever in the Ghetto (Hilberg, 8). Perhaps,for Czerniakow,
education embodied hope. If Czerniakow was indeed a collaborator with the Nazis, he would
have chosen to eliminate all traces of hope. Czerniakow believed that there was a way, and he
A final analysis of the lack of collaboration between the Judenrat and the Nazis is
embodied by the caring and compassionate nature that Czerniakow espoused throughout the
course of his term as the Judenrat leader. One of the best illustrations of Czerniakow as a
compassionate man is when he interacts with the children in the Ghetto. Depressed by their frail,
malnourished bodies, he breaks down and weeps for them (Hilberg, 366). Czerniakow
legitimately cares for their well being. To end his entry on June 14, 1942, he states, “Damned be
those of us who have enough to eat and drink and forget about these children” (Hilberg, 366).
Ultimately, Czerniakow cares very deeply about the people who are living in his Ghetto. He feels
personally liable for them and is moved to points of physical distress when he sees that they are
not doing well. This much emotional remorse cannot be attributed to collaboration with the
Nazis.
Finally, if there was still any lingering doubt whether Czerniakow’s actions were
motivated by anything either than care and compassion for the members of his Ghetto, the final
act of taking his own life dispels any such notion. After close to three years of leading the
Judenrat of the Warsaw Ghetto, Czerniakow finds the emotional anguish and toll far too much
November 24, 2008 History 386
7
and is forced to take his own life by ingesting a cyanide pill (Hilberg, 23). The event that pushed
Czerniakow to this point was the expulsion of 4,000 members of the Warsaw Ghetto to death
camps (Hilberg, 385). This was also just the first of many waves that were to occur over the
coming week (Hilberg, 23). Death at this point was looming over Czerniakow and the entire
Ghetto. The story of ‘expulsion’ to death camps arose like a rumor, and Czerniakow heavily
doubted the reliability of the rumors and the accounts were even denied by the Nazis in the
In an attempt to garner support for the continuation of the Warsaw Ghetto, Czerniakow
wrote up a brief report in which he detailed the economic and industrial production of the
Ghetto, which he thought would provide evidence of significant output that may hold the key to
the Ghetto’s salvation (Hilberg, 22). Unfortunately, work was never the intention that the Nazis
had for the Jews of the Warsaw Ghetto. Panic spread throughout the Ghetto as Czerniakow
attempted to keep people calm and tranquil insisting that there had been some sort of
misunderstanding (Hilberg, 23). Just as had been rumored, the expulsion of the Jews from the
Warsaw Ghetto to the death camps began on July 23, 1942. Czerniakow decided when first
becoming the head of the Judenrat that if he ever received “an order which went against his
conscience,” he would forcibly take his own life (Hilberg, 23). He could not reasonably hand
over all of the hopeless children of the Ghetto, knowing that destruction awaited them (Hilberg,
23). He therefore took his own life. In a suicide note, he writes, “I am powerless, my heart
trembles in sorrow and compassion. I can no longer bear all this. My act will show everyone the
right thing to do” (Hilberg, 23). Czerniakow cared so deeply for his Ghetto. It is unfathomable to
think that any of his acts or intentions was to collaborate with the Nazis. He, along with the
Judenratand the members of the Warsaw Ghetto, was fighting for his life during the Holocaust.
Judenrat, was collaborating with the Nazi Party. After assessing the historical situation of Adam
Czerniakow, the leader of the Warsaw Judenrat, it can conclusively be determined that there was
indeed no such collaboration between the two entities. There are several pieces of evidence from
Czerniakow’s notebooks that support this point. First, Czerniakow never viewed the members of
his Ghetto community as a labor supply. This is one of the prominent arguments in favor of
collaboration. Instead, Czerniakow cared deeply for his community and worked hard to further
their interests. Second, the Judenrat was not a body intended to further German or Nazi
bureaucracy. The Judenrat acted in the best interests of the community. It provided them with
education and Jewish cultural experiences, which collectively maintained hope and a sense of
identity. These elements speak volumes about the nature of the Judenrat as a positive and helpful
component of the Ghetto. Finally, the care and compassion exhibited by Czerniakow indicate just
how invested he was in his community, and therefore, it is illogical to assume that he was a
collaborator with the Nazis. It becomes especially clear that the ideas of the Nazis are not aligned
with the Judenrat when their leader, Czerniakow, takes his own life in protest as thousands of
members of his Ghetto are transported to Death Camps. The diary and notebooks of Adam
Czerniakow tell a tragic story of a man and community regrettably destined for death.
Works Cited
Bauer, Yehuda, and Nili Keren. A History of the Holocaust. NEW YORK: Franklin Watts, 2001.
Hilberg, Raul, Stanislaw Staron, and Josef Kermisz, eds. The Warsaw Diary of Adam