Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stress comparison.
The stress level reductions Ior diIIerent load case at Iailure location were compared Ior diIIerent designs as shown below.
The stress levels in iteration-1 & iteration-2 is reduced up to 44 while comparing to initial design.
Table. Stress comparison
Benefits Summary
The stress level reduced up to 44 in the Iailure location by adding the stiIIener at critical stress location oI the chassis.
Testing iterations and thus development time reduced on chassis design by using FEM.
Future Plans
Transient Response analysis to be perIormed on the chassis
Optimization oI chassis stiIIener to achieve weight reduction based on dynamic results
Stress level reduction,
Load case
Initial design Iteration-1 Iteration-2
Vertical 100 41 43
Braking 100 41 43
Cornering 100 41 43
Front LH wheel in ditch 100 41 44
Rear LH wheel in ditch 100 39 41
Front both wheels in ditch 100 41 43
Rear both wheels in ditch 100 40 42
Front LH and Rear LH wheel in ditch 100 39 42
Front LH and Rear RH wheel in ditch 100 40 43
Iteration-2 CAD model (400mm length with
height of 50mm stiffener at critical area)
Iteration-2 design Stress Plot
Driving Innovation with Enterprise Simulation 5
Conclusions
The analysis was carried out Ior diIIerent iterations and Iinally stress level has been reduced in the critical location. The
analysis was useIul to design the chassis with all possible load cases thus reducing the test iterations and development time.
REFERENCES
|1| Nitin S. Gokhale 'Practical Finite Element Analysis, Finite to InIinite
|2| Julian Happian-Smith 'An introduction to Modern Vehicle Design, Butterworth Heinemann
|3| Cicek Karao and N.SeIa Kuralay 'Stress analysis oI a truck chassis with riveted joints, Science Direct, Volume 38
|3| Altair HyperWorks 8.0 user manual