Request for a Criminal Lawsuit in Perjury from the Government of Canada

Written by - Sid Senadheera This is a request for a lawsuit. It consists of details regarding how perjury and corruption was used to cover up inconsistencies in testimony under oath in the academic firing of Sid Senadheera. In 2009 at Ryerson University, which was taken up by the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) in 2011. Please see [APPENDIX - A] for the partial details of that Trial and the File # at HRTO. The Alleged Perpetrators :: some suspects here have only civil violations, they will be separated in the formal Lawsuit From Ryerson University : 1. Dean Maurice Yeates -- Perjury (Alleged Criminal) 2. Krishnan Venkatakrishnan -- Perjury (Alleged Criminal) 3. Bo Tan -- Civilian Charges 4. Cathy Faye -- Perjury (Alleged Criminal) 5. Sivakumar Manickam -- An accomplice in Civilian Crime 6. Hicks Morley Human Resources Lawyer - Elizabeth Kosmidis --Perjury (Alleged Criminal) 7. HRTO Judge - Judith Allen -- Perjury (Supported perjury -- Alleged Criminal) 8. Criminal Lawyer -- Adam Goodman (From Toronto) Supported a charge put under perjury and threatening to drop the HRTO Lawsuit. Criminal charge yet to be decided formally by a Lawyer.

All these individuals with their alleged charges and evidence will be summarized below.

Who is Cathy Faye ? [ all suspects will be exposed individually before a new trial ]

TITLE : Director of Academic Administrative Services, Ryerson University CRIMINAL VIOLATION (S) : False testimony under oath (Perjury) at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) CIVIL VIOLATION(S) : Deliberately made false statements to support the firing of Sid Senadheera to the Ryerson University Attorney, Elizabeth Kosmidis and Judge Judith Allen. Fired while accommodation has been requested by the University Physician violating the Canadian Disability Act. EVIDENCE :: USING FACTUAL INFORMATION FROM THE TRIAL (at HRTO) AND EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE : *Has clear inconsistency in the testimony at trial, email correspondence and police statements. DOCUMENT BELOW - Written by Lawyer Elizabeth Kosmidis :

Disagreement in Testimony 1

[ Supporting evidence for perjury ]

Cathy Faye says she had no idea that Sid Senadheera had bipolar disorder before the firing. He was officially fired in November 2009. This is to save herself and the rest of the Ryersons collaborators from being accused for firing Sid Senadheera without offering the requested accommodation by the Physician. Again if I may reword her statement as Cathy Faye says along with the rest of the Ryersons staff, that they had no clue that Sid Senadheera had bipolar illness while he was fired in November when the official letter was issued. On the morning of 27th Oct 2009 at 10.00 am Sid Senadheera received the following email. [full email will be provided to court]

email correspondence circulated between Sid Senadheera, K. Venkatakrishnan and Maurice Yeates (below). The police officers that arrested Sid Senadheera for questioning in the evening on the same day under a false testimony given by Maurice Yeates and K. Venkatakrishnan to be dealt separately, mentioned to him that he has been fired from Ryerson. On October 27th. The above email also mentions I told Ms. Cathy Faye to pass you the message that I am sick. She knew exactly what the sickness was. The police officers that arrested Sid also knew he had bipolar illness and asked him if he needs to see a Doctor. They found out this information from Maurice Yeates and K. Venkatakrishnan according to the Crown's disclosure.

Ms. Cathy Faye knew Sid Senadheera had bipolar illness before the firing, and so did Maurice Yeates, K. Venkatakrishnan and Bo Tan. This fabricated evidence was put forth to the Court by Lawyer Elizabeth Kosmidis. Ms. Cathy Faye Lied at the court giving an internally inconsistent statement deliberately while under oath. Therefore she is an alleged criminal for perjury. Ms. Faye also suffers from delusions of grandeur about Ryerson's exalted prestige. Makes bold statements such as Ryerson's academic standards are so high that not even a Scientist from Caltech could survive their engineering program. You can be the judge of that... http://t.co/Ogzh2AQ - (See if Ryerson is anywhere to be found here).

Disagreement in Testimony 2 [ Supporting evidence for perjury ]

There was a meeting of some importance on 15th Oct at the Ryerson University. The meeting was all about Sid Senadheera and his safety towards faculty and students. Why safety? If he had a disability with a broken arm, would there be a meeting? If he had a disability with hearing would the university call for a safety meeting? No! The meeting was held because Sid's disability was bipolar illness. Why would there be representatives from Security Services and Access Center? Is the person from Access Center not aware that person being discussed is having a disability, and if so what is that disability?

When asked about this contradiction at the trial, both Imrie Juuralink and Cathy Faye fabricated the truth. This was their answer Bipolar illness was not discussed in this particular meeting, it was discussed in another meeting. According to her previous testimony unless that other meeting was in December after the firing letter has been mailed she has an internal contradiction in the statement made under oath. She contradicts already with the evidence given about the other meeting by the police evidence and the disclosure again as well. Conclusion :: There is a clear cut case for perjury here. That involves all members listed from Ryerson University and their Attorney Elizabeth Kosmidis and also Imrie Juuralink (a witness at the Trial). All persons will be analyzed and profiled similar to Ms. Cathy Faye within the next few days to forward towards formal litigation. APPENDIX - A

APPENDIX - B Sid Senadheera's Supervisor Professor Krishnan Venkatakrishnan denied this request by the University Doctor for accommodation, violating the Canadian Disability Act. Instead of accommodation he looked for ways of firing him because of the fear of the Bipolar illness.