Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ms. Gita Sabharwal Deputy Country Representative The Asia Foundation, Sri Lanka
The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank ADB), or its Board of Governors, or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The countries listed in this paper do not imply any view on ADB's part as to sovereignty or independent status or necessarily conform to ADB's terminology.
Content
1.
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Urban growth in South Asia Nature of urban poverty Framework principles Policy framework priorities Regulatory framework priorities Legal framework priorities Sum Up
Rapid urbanization defining feature of the century. In South Asia 1 in 3 people (2010) live in cities. By 2030, over 40% (691m) & by 2050, nearly 60% (1.03b) will reside in cities. Despite slower rates of urbanization in the region, absolute number of people living in cities will be amongst the highest. Secondary cities driving force of urban growth.
Urban Growth
Transition from largely rural/agrarian society to urban. Poor the invisible face of urbanization. 1 in 4 urban people are poor in India, 1 in 5 in Bangladesh, 1 in 6 in Nepal & nearly 1 in 18 in Sri Lanka. Poverty and number of poor people increase exponentially with $/day or 2$/day. Typically urban poor live in slums &informal settlements, limited access to basic services, & informally employed. Larger share of poor live in secondary cities & town. PSIA and PPAs indicate that poor people priorities survival (i.e. employment), security (asset, tenure), & services (water, sanitation, safety).
Urban Poverty
# ADB/UNDP (2009)
Framework Principles
Prioritized 2 issues Selected measures with high impact on poor and women Policies not exclusive categories, but mutually reinforcing Highlighted best practice from across Asia Provided evidence of what works and why
I. Policy Framework
1. Inclusive planning
2. Security of tenure
Sri Lanka successful in property tax assessment & collection, which has resulted in >25% increase in revenue generation. Indonesia has used one stop shop models to register all businesses in cities including the informal sector. It has resulted in increased revenue generation. Ahmedabad introduced areas based property tax assessment & GIS mapping to increase collection to >70%.
Economic costs for accessing services high through intermediaries for poor settlements. Incremental upgrading of service provision. Over time move from community connections to household connections. Find options for full cost recovery. In Andhra Pradesh, the cost of HH water connection payable in 12 monthly installments of $2, metered services in slums, pay as per affordability.
Evidence suggests that poor at times pay over 10 times more for access to water and other basic services.
1. Affirmative law
Affirmative policy ensured municipalities in Gujarat allocate 20% of municipal budgets, West Bengal allocates 25% & Andhra Pradesh allocates 40%. Secondary cities in Sri Lanka have used increases in revenue generation through property tax collection to provide pro-poor public good like market places, street lighting, & bus stops. Set quotas for womens participation for bottom-up planning.
Evidence suggests that reservation of seats for women in ULBs results in increased allocation of budgets for services that impact women.
To Sum-Up
Urban growth an opportunity! No quick fix or magic bullet for inclusive cities. Generating revenues backed with affirmative policies ensures protection of urban poor. Institutionalizing participation of women in urban governance translates into dividends for poor men & women. Municipal planners should not equate security of tenure with only full title or ownership but incrementally upgrade service provision while partnering with the private sector to secure housing and basic services for the poor.