Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TIJUANA
Unidad Otay
Tecnologías de la información y
comunicacion
Ingeniería en nanotecnología
3
1359-835X/$ - see front matter _ 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023
1. Introduction........................................................................................3
2. Experimental.........................................................................................3
2.1. Materials.........................................................................................3
4. Conclusions.........................................................................................12
Acknowledgement..................................................................................12
References..............................................................................................12
4
Ilustración 1..............................................................................................6
Ilustración 2..............................................................................................7
Ilustración 3..............................................................................................8
Tabla 1 ……………………………………………………………………………….
4
Tabla 2......................................................................................................5
Tabla 3......................................................................................................6
Tabla 4......................................................................................................6
5
1359-835X/$ - see front matter _ 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023
4 in thermoplastics. Natural fibres, such as wood fibre, wheat straw, jute fibre and bagasse fibre
5 have several benefits: low cost, low density, high toughness, acceptable specific strength
6 properties, enhanced energy recovery and biodegradability [1–3]. The use of natural fibres in
7 plastic matrix includes many benefits, such as low volumetric cost,
13 of fibre or compatibilization of the two materials is developed, the weak interfacial adhesion
14 between fibre and
15 matrix usually results in poor mechanical properties of the composites. Obviously, improvement of
16 the compatibility between the two components is a key to success in the area. In order to
17 introduce natural fibres profitably into hydrophobic thermoplastics, such as HDPE, PP and PVC, a
18 pretreatment
19 of the fibre surface or the incorporation of interface modifiers is generally required. In order to
20 improve the compatibility of the wood fibre/polymer composites, a lot of chemicals and methods
21 have been developed, such as the different treatments [7,8] of the polymer matrices (e.g. graft
22 copolymerization or grafting fibre), coupling agents [9–11] (e.g. silanes and isocyanates) and
23 interface compatibilizer [11–14] (e.g. maleic anhydride grafted polyolefin or elastomer). In the
24 previous studies, the use of the organic carboxylic acids [15–17] (e.g. stearic acid, acetic
25 anhydride, maleic anhydride and phthalic anhydride) have also drawn considerable attention, due
26 to their effectiveness in improving adhesion between natural fibre and thermoplastic matrix.
27 According to the principles of interface coupling, the hydrophilic carboxyl group of organic acid as
28 the modifier is expected to react with the hydroxyl groups of natural fibre in the surface, and the
29 hydrophobic group should react or have relatively high compatibility with the polymer matrix. The
30 combined effects of these interactions will effectively improve the fibre dispersion and resultant
31 adhesive coupling. In this work we focused on the effect of benzoic acid as the surface modifier on
32 the mechanical properties of the natural fibres/reinforced plastic composites. The surface of BF
33 was modified by benzoic acid, and then compounded with PVC resin to prepare the composite. The
34 main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the content of BF, the content of benzoic
35 acid and BF-treated temperature on the mechanical properties of BF/PVC composites by the
36 orthogonal optimal method. The processing conditions was used according to the general
37 procedure [18].
6
38 2.Experimental
39 2.1. Materials
40 PVC (LS080S, K value 84), supplied by LG Chem.; Waste BF (100-mesh); Liquid tin stabilizer (SS-
41 218, Shanghai Plastic Auxiliary Co., China); Calcium stearate and household PE wax (H110,
42 Shanghai Naduo Co., China);
44 2.2. Treatment of BF
45 BF (150-lm sieve) was treated with H2O2 solution under ultrasonic condition for 15 min and dried at
46 60 _C for 48 h. BF was then mixed at room temperature with the solution of benzoic acid in a small
47 quantity of ethanol. After the solvent was evaporated, BF was dried in air circulating oven at 105
48 _C for 24 h. The treated-BF was added to the rolls, heated at different temperature (140 _C, 150 _C
7
1359-835X/$ - see front matter _ 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023
51 grinding.
51 Tabla 1
51 and 170 _C, respectively. After the addition of the matrix, the fibre was added as soon as the
52 polymer had reached a steady plastifying state which needed about 3 min. After mixing for 3–4
53 min, the resulting mixture was compressionmolded into panels to produce the specimens for
54 mechanical property test. All of the samples were performe in a preheated press at 185–190 _C
55 under a pressure of 10 MPa for 8 min, and followed by cooling to room temperature in another
56 press equipped with refrigeration
51 facilities. The dogbone-shaped specimens were made for tensile test (1.0 mm thick, 4.0 mm
52 width). Rectangular specimens were cut from the pressed sheet (80 * 10 * 4 mm) for impact
51 test. The untreated BF/PVC composite was prepared with BF (25%) and the same dosage in Table
52 1.
51 measurements.
8
51 3. Results and discussion
52 A L9(33) three factor three-level orthogonal optimal method was chosen by Orthogonal Experiment
53 Assistant
52 II 3.1 (Sharetop Software Studio). BF content (A), content of benzoic acid (B) and fibre-
53 treated temperature (C) were the three key variables, whereas the mechanical properties were the
54 variable responses. The analysis of the data was made to identify the key factors which affected
55 the tensile and impact strength properties.
52 Table 2 presents these factors with their normalized levels. Factor A is BF content, Factor B is the
53 content of benzoic acid, and Factor C is the fibre-treatment temperature. Table 3 shows the
54 corresponding experimental units and the results of the experimental matrix. The mechanical data
55 generated by Orthogonal Experiment Assistant II 3.1 software were entered into the design matrix
56 (Table 3) and a corresponding analysis was carried out. Table 4 shows
52 Tabla 2
52 indicates that the content of BF (A) and content of benzoic acid (B) had more e ect
53 than
52 the fibre-treated temperature (C) on the tensile strength123 of the rigid BF/PVC
53 composites. Content of BF was theLevel most significant factor.Fig. 1
9
1359-835X/$ - see front matter _ 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023
53 Table 3
10
53 Tabla 3
53 Tabla 4
11
1359-835X/$ - see front matter _ 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023
53 and
53 Fig. 2
53 .
53 From
53 Table 4
12
53 we can see that the content of BF was the
54 Table 3
54 Ilustración 2
13
1359-835X/$ - see front matter _ 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023
54 2
54 ABC
54 three variables. (j) BF content, (n) benzoic acid content, (.) treatment
54 temperature.
54 Figs. 1 and 2
14
54 ) was obtained
55 2
55 in
55 Table 3
55 was shown in
55 Table 4
55 and
55 Fig. 3
55 .
55 Table 4
55 indicates that
55 7.0
55 tion at break.
15
1359-835X/$ - see front matter _ 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023
56 6.5
56 6.0
56 PVC matrix. As in the case of the benzoic acid treatment,
56 5.5
56 5.0
56 123
56 e ect.
56 Level
56 Fig. 2
56 shows a
16
56 modulus for BF/PVC composites is shown in
57 Table 4
57 and
57 Fig. 4
57 Fig. 2
17
1359-835X/$ - see front matter _ 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023
58 2
58 comparing to
58 (7.5 kJ/m
58 Table 3
58 ).
18
58
59 composites
59 Fig. 5
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023
61 shows their
61 Fig. 5
63 Fig. 5
65 acid at 1714 cm
67 À1
69 Fig. 5
70 a. But these
20
72 empty spaces disappeared mostly in the treated BF/PVC
73 1735 cm
75 À1
76 composites as shown in
77 Fig. 5
84 4. Conclusions
85 natural fibre in the surfa ce, and the hydrophobic group
21
1359-835X/$ - see front matter _ 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023
100 posites and the fact that the addition of benzoic acid
101 BF1
104 BF3
106 BF5
107 Acknowledgement
108 BF2
111 BF4
22
112 References
113 2 0 00 18 0 0 1 60 0 1 4 00 12 0 0 1 00 0 8 00 6 0 0 40 0
116 )
117 -1
120 329–38.
121
129 [3] Bledzki AK, Gassan J. Composite reinforced with cellulose based
23
1359-835X/$ - see front matter _ 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023
136 1163–73.
137 [5] Clemons C. Wood-plastic composites in the United State. Forest
138 [14] Rana AK, Mandal A, Bandyopadhyay S. Short jute fiber reinforced
141 [6] Nabi Saheb D, Jog JP. Natural fiber polymer composites: a review.
145 [7] Shukla SR, Rao GVG, Athalye AR. Improving graft level during
146 chloride) and wood fibers. Part II: e ect of chemical treatment. Polym
151 [8] Liao B, Huang YH, Cong GM. In uence of modified wood fibers on
24
154 wood fiber/polypropylene fiber and polypropylene/veneer compos-
157 [9] Pickering KL, Abdalla A, Ji C, et al. The e ect of silane coupling
158 [17] Zafeiropoulos NE, Williams DR, Baillie CA, et al. Engineering and
163 [10] Raj RG, Kokta BV. Reinforcing high density polyethylene with
166 [18] Matuana LM, Kamdem DP, Zhang J. Photoaging and stabilization
171 1943–50.
25
1359-835X/$ - see front matter _ 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023
26