Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Let's suppose to have a simple 3-dof system with the following characteristics:
where ki = 1.0 10 3 [ N m]
i = 1 6 and m1 = 0.5[ kg] , m2 = 1.0 [ kg] and
m3 = 1.5[ kg] . The [ M ] and [ K ] are, respectively:
m1
[M ] = 0
0
0
m2
0
k1 + k4 + k6
0
0 and [ K ] =
k4
m3
k6
k4
k2 + k4 + k5
k5
k5
k3 + k5 + k6
k6
ak(1,3)=-k(6);
ak(2,1)=ak(1,2);
ak(3,1)=ak(1,3);
ak(2,3)=-k(5);
ak(3,2)=ak(2,3);
% ----------- Eigensolution -------ad=inv(am)*ak;
[ave,ava]=eig(ad);
ava(1,1)
ava(2,2)
ava(3,3)
ave
which gives the following solutions for the eigenvalues
ID ANALISI,MODALE
TIME 5 $ CPU TIME IN MINUTES
SOL 103 $ REAL MODAL ANALYSIS
CEND
TITLE = MODAL ANALYSIS OF DISCRETE
SYSTEM
SUBTI = THREE DEGREES OF FREEDOM - NO
DAMPING
ECHO = BOTH
SPC = 2 $ BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
DISP = ALL $ PRINT ALL DISPLACEMENTS
METHOD=10
BEGIN BULK
$
EIGRL,10,,,3,,,,MAX
$
GRID,1,,0.,0.,0.,
GRID,2,,0.,0.,0.,
GRID,3,,0.,0.,0.,
GRID,4,,0.,0.,0.,
GRID,5,,0.,0.,0.,
CONM2,11,2,,0.5
CONM2,12,3,,1.0
CONM2,13,4,,1.5
CELAS2,21,1.0E3,1,1,2,1
CELAS2,22,1.0E3,3,1,5,1
CELAS2,23,1.0E3,4,1,5,1
CELAS2,24,1.0E3,2,1,3,1
CELAS2,25,1.0E3,3,1,4,1
CELAS2,26,1.0E3,2,1,4,1
SPC1,2,23456,1,THRU,5
SPC1,2,1,1,5
$
ENDDATA
Bulk Data
EIGRL card for the Lanczos method
GRID card do not need a definition of
the coordinates
CONM2 for the concentrated mass
CELAS2 for the concentrated stiffness
SPC1 for the boundary conditions
EIGENVALUE
1
2
9.502505E+02 3
4
5
1
2
3.351810E+03 3
4
5
1
2
6.697939E+03 3
4
5
EIGENVECTOR
0.0
7.304158E-01
8.442084E-01
1.000000E+00
0.0
0.0
2.789000E-01
1.000000E+00
-6.307099E-01
0.0
0.0
1.000000E+00
-2.413065E-01
-1.076633E-01
0.0
Bulk Data
EIGRL card for the Lanczos method
EIGC card for the complex Lanczos
GRID card do not need a definition of
the coordinates
CONM2 for the concentrated mass
GRID,5,,0.,0.,0.,
CONM2,11,2,,0.5
CONM2,12,3,,1.0
CONM2,13,4,,1.5
CELAS2,21,1.0E3,1,1,2,1,0.05
CELAS2,22,1.0E3,3,1,5,1,0.05
CELAS2,23,1.0E3,4,1,5,1,0.05
CELAS2,24,1.0E3,2,1,3,1,0.05
CELAS2,25,1.0E3,3,1,4,1,0.05
CELAS2,26,1.0E3,2,1,4,1,0.05
SPC1,2,23456,1,THRU,5
SPC1,2,1,1,5
$
ENDDATA
1
2
3
Eigenvalues
Real
Imaginary
-7.704128E-01 3.083576E+01
-1.446919E+00 5.791290E+01
-2.045385E+00 8.186649E+01
Frequency
Damping
4.907663E+00
9.217123E+00
1.302946E+01
4.996879E-02
4.996879E-02
4.996879E-02
C O M P L E X E I G E N V E C T O R NO.
1
Grid
Magnitude
1
0.0
2
7.304158E-01
3
8.442084E-01
4
1.000000E+00
5
0.0
Phase
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
C O M P L E X E I G E N V E C T O R NO.
2
Grid
Magnitude
1
0.0
2
2.789000E-01
3
1.000000E+00
4
6.307099E-01
5
0.0
Phase
0.0
0.0
0.0
180.0
0.0
C O M P L E X E I G E N V E C T O R NO.
3
Grid
Magnitude
1
0.0
2
1.000000E+00
3
2.413065E-01
Phase
0.0
0.0
180.0
4
5
1.076633E-01
0.0
180.0
0.0
Again modification and sensitivity analysis of these files becomes easy to accomplish.
Same results are obtained for the DIRECT complex eigenvalue solution.
Here the modification of the input file:
ID ANALISI,MODALE
TIME 5 $ CPU TIME IN MINUTES
SOL 107 $ COMPLEX MODAL ANALYSIS
CEND
TITLE = MODAL ANALYSIS OF DISCRETE
SYSTEM
SUBTI = THREE DEGREES OF FREEDOM PROPORTIONAL DAMPING
ECHO = BOTH
SPC = 2 $ BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
DISP(PHASE)
= ALL $ PRINT ALL
DISPLACEMENTS
$METHOD=10
CMETHOD=15
BEGIN BULK
$
EIGRL,10,,,3,,,,MAX
EIGC,15,CLAN,MAX,,,,3
$
.
.
.
ENDDATA