Engine & fuel engineering - crankshaft deflection

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=132866

Smart questions Smart answers Smart people

Join Directory Search Tell A Friend Whitepapers Jobs Home > Forums > Automotive Engineers > Activities > Engine & fuel engineering Forum

crankshaft deflection
thread71-132866
Share This

malbeare (Automotive)

27 Aug 05 23:17

I would like to get a handle on how much crankshaft rotational deflection occurs in engine operation . I have heard that deflection could be in the order of 1 degree, say if number 1 cylinder has just fired and the resulting torque twists or winds up the crank to the flywheel end . I imagine there would be both positive and negative deflections. Could anyone enlighten me to the actual measurments experienced in engines. Thankyou A tidy mind not intelligent as it ignors the random opportunities of total chaos. Thats my excuse anyway Malbeare

ivymike (Mechanical)

28 Aug 05 0:49

it varies significantly between engines. 1deg nose-to-tail is not unreasonable. Some large engines are designed to have less than 0.4 degree max deflection. google "torsional vibration" and you might find out more.

GregLocock (Automotive)

28 Aug 05 4:15

Yup, 1 degree pk to pk would be quite typical on a 4 litre I6. If you take the TV damper off you'll get a lot more. Cheers Greg Locock Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

gio1 (Automotive)

29 Aug 05 4:05

Shorter cranks are stiffer and tend to twist less. For a I6 engine for cars I have experience of twist angles (end to end) of up to 1.5/2 deg, when rotating at high speed (7500/8000 rpm) with no engine load (driven by the dyno). Twist is worse in this case because the 3rd order inertia torque (critical for a 6 cylinder) is not counteracted by firing torque.

1 of 4

26/03/2012 3:27 PM

Engine & fuel engineering - crankshaft deflection

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=132866

R1100S (Mechanical)

29 Aug 05 12:01

As with everything on this forum, it depends on the application. Top fuel engines see 15-20 degrees under power, enough that it has to be accounted for when you grind camshafts. 1 degree seems right for a long production crank.

ivymike (Mechanical)

29 Aug 05 15:20

20 degrees of crank deflection? On a crank that stays in one piece?

R1100S (Mechanical)

29 Aug 05 17:40

Yep, 20 degrees, keep in mind the engine is only at full power for a few seconds and rebuild every run, its lifespan is measured in hundreds of revolutions.

GregLocock (Automotive)

29 Aug 05 19:11

Isaac, we have halfshafts that do not fail if they are twisted up by 180 degrees! Now, admittedly they are made from nicer materal than your average crankshaft. Cheers Greg Locock Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

malbeare (Automotive)

30 Aug 05 9:28

R1100S (Mechanical) 29 Aug 05 12:01 As with everything on this forum, it depends on the application. Top fuel engines see 15-20 degrees under power, enough that it has to be accounted for when you grind camshafts. R1100S Presumably the cam stays in time with the front cylinders as the drive for the cam is at the front of the engine .So do you have to retard the cam grind progressivly as you head towards the back cylinders? Malbeare A tidy mind not intelligent as it ignors the random opportunities of total chaos. Thats my excuse anyway Malbeare

ivymike (Mechanical)

30 Aug 05 9:44

and what happens at no- or part-load? or are the engines switched on and run immediately to full power?

evelrod (Automotive)

30 Aug 05 12:25

2 of 4

26/03/2012 3:27 PM

Engine & fuel engineering - crankshaft deflection

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=132866

Heck, I can come to grips with a 20 degree twist quicker than I can visualize a 5000+ bhp at 10,000 rpm from an 8 litre V-8 engine pushing a car from 0 to 325+mph in 4+ seconds! If ya wanna see some BIG numbers, do the fuel flow calcs for ONE second. Rod

NormPeterson (Structural)

30 Aug 05 12:35

Quote:

and what happens at no- or part-load?

I don't think its life cycle includes very many revolutions or much distance driven under those conditions either, so its "driveability" rating only needs to be a little better than "keeps running". Norm

ivymike (Mechanical)

30 Aug 05 13:21

yeah, but if the valve lift events are set for full load, and the deflections there are as large as mentioned, and valve-to-piston clearances are remotely close to "normal," then I can't see it making a single successful rev at idle.

GregLocock (Automotive)

30 Aug 05 15:33

Mal, I've seen timing problems introduced by camshaft twist (the grinder wasn't keying properly). You'd definitely have to do something funny if you were expecting 20 twist degrees on the crank. Cheers Greg Locock Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

patprimmer (Publican)

30 Aug 05 22:06

ivymike Top Fuel dragsters run reasonably low static compression as they run high boost and high nitromethane levels. This leaves plenty of room for a lot of piston to valve clearance. Another concern is that at the valve spring pressures they run, the camshafts also "wind up" a bit, so I guess they would need to correct for both. The crank would be torque and load dependant, while the cam will be rpm dependant, so the relationship will keep changing according to several independent factors. Maybe someone will come up with individual cylinder crank position sensors to control spark and to control individual lobe "V tech". Just kidding, this is reasonably big budget, but is not F1 we are talking about. Regards eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

3 of 4

26/03/2012 3:27 PM

Engine & fuel engineering - crankshaft deflection

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=132866

kenre (Mechanical)

2 Sep 05 0:30

i read an article many years ago that the formula one engines had the camshaft ground with a 16 degree twist.. no wonder they idle rather strange... Ken

evelrod (Automotive)

2 Sep 05 15:15

F1 engines really don't idle, unless you call 3 grand an idle. Rod

patprimmer (Publican)

2 Sep 05 18:58

Also, I would think that F1 had very tight piston to valve, being NA, high compression and big bore short stroke. Maybe in the turbo era there was room to move the cam around. Regards eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

Join | Jobs | Advertise | About Us | Contact Us | Site Policies

Copyright 1998-2012 Tecumseh Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or linking forbidden without express written permission.

4 of 4

26/03/2012 3:27 PM