Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I have argued that the next decade's need for reliable base-load electrical generation in the United States will
be solved by building either nuclear power plants or coal-fired power plants; the unreliability of natural gas
supplies and prices, and the intermittent nature of current renewable resources, make them unsuitable for
base-load needs. The extent to which a significant share of this new generation will be nuclear depends on a
wide range of factors, only one of which - ecological impact - is discussed in this article. Insofar as that factor is
concerned, however, the evidence overwhelmingly favors nuclear power over coal, and I hope that this will
be recognized and taken into consideration. But I am making no prediction as to how important nuclear power
will become, because any student of the history of energy knows that all forecasts always seem to be wrong.
–noun
energy,as solar, wind, or nuclear energy, that can replace or supplement traditional
fossil-fuel sources, as coal, oil, and natural gas.
3. we allow for one more case, the nuclear AFF, the NEG will find
time to cut a NEG
5. Nuclear is good for the topic, it allows us to learn about the most
viable alternative to fossil fuels.
7. the NEG can also run nuclear specific CP and DA, which are way
better than the crappy renewables DA
8. Nuclear is the most predictable case, everyone is running it and it
has a huge literature bases with equal amount of args on both
sides.
Geocities ‘04
www.geocities.com/Area51/Labyrinth/2985/diction.html