You are on page 1of 10

Interpolation

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

Example
To illustrate how we interpolate, we shall use Question 4-1 in the Study Guide In that question, the IRR was estimated using interpolation We had two points: In part (a), we obtained an NPV of -2,844.21 at a rate of 13% To estimate IRR, we tried a rate of 10% and got an NPV of 1,098.76 This is graphed on the next slide
Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall 2

2 Points Graphed
1,500 1,000 500 0 9 -500 NPV ($) -1,000 -1,500 -2,000 -2,500 -3,000 -3,500 Rate (%) 10 11 12 13 14

(10%, $1,098.76)

(13%, -$2,844.21)

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

The NPV Profile


The NPV profile shows what the NPV would be a various discount rates For normal projects, the NPV profile is slightly convex (slight curvature toward the origin), but over small intervals, the assumption that it is a straight line is not too bad

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

NPV Profile
1,500 1,000 500 0 9 -500 NPV ($) -1,000 -1,500 -2,000 -2,500 -3,000 -3,500 Rate (%) 10 11 12 13 14

(10%, $1,098.76)

(13%, -$2,844.21)

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

The IRR
Since the IRR is the rate that results in an NPV of zero, the IRR is the point on the NPV profile where it crosses the horizontal axis

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

NPV Profile
1,500 1,000 500 0 9 -500 NPV ($) -1,000 -1,500 -2,000 -2,500 -3,000 -3,500 Rate (%) 10 11 12 13 14

(10%, $1,098.76)

IRR

(13%, -$2,844.21)

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

IRR Estimate
We can see that the IRR is a little below 11% Interpolation allows us to estimate the IRR within an acceptable error factor

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

Interpolation
We know that the IRR is between 10% and 13%, a range of 3% The range between the NPVs corresponding to these rates is 2,844.21 + 1,098.76 = 3,942.97

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

Where is the IRR?


1,098.76 = 0.27866 = 27.866% 3,942.97
The IRR is 27.866% above the minimum of the range 10% to 13%, or 3% x 0.27866 = 0.836 above 10% 10% + 0.836% = 10.836%
Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall 10

Alternative
We could also determine this point by starting at the upper limit of the 10%-13% range We interpolated down from the upper value in the solution of 4-1, whereas we went up from the lower value in 4-2

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

11

Where is the IRR?


2,844.21 = 0.72134 = 72.134% 3,942.97
The IRR is 72.134% below the maximum of the range 10% to 13%, or 3% x 0.72134 = 2.164 below 13% 13% - 2.164% = 10.836%
Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall 12

A Visual Explanation

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

13

Visual Explanation
Lets recall the NPV profile graph, but add the lines indicating the rise (vertical change) and run (horizontal change) We will only concern ourselves with the absolute values of these changes, ignoring the signs The values of the rise and run are shown

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

14

NPV Profile
1,500 1,000 500 0 9 -500 NPV ($) -1,000 -1,500 -2,000 -2,500 -3,000 -3,500 Rate (%) 10 11 12 13 14

(10%, $1,098.76)

$3,942.97

3%

(13%, -$2,844.21)

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

15

Triangles
This triangle will help us find the IRR, where the profile crosses the horizontal axis In fact, the axis creates a second, smaller congruent triangle, shown in red on the next slide

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

16

Congruent Triangles
1,500 1,000 500 0 9 -500 NPV ($) -1,000 -1,500 -2,000 -2,500 -3,000 -3,500 Rate (%) 10 11 12 13 14

(10%, $1,098.76)

(13%, -$2,844.21)

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

17

Congruent Triangles
One property of congruent triangles is that the ratios of their sides is always equal
This is a fundamental relationship that allows us to use trigonometry

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

18

Congruent Triangles
1,500 1,000 500 0 9 -500 NPV ($) -1,000 -1,500 -2,000 -2,500 -3,000 -3,500 Rate (%) 10

(10%, $1,098.76) $1,098.76

x%

11

12

13

14

$3,942.97

3%

(13%, -$2,844.21)

Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall

19

Using the Congruent Triangles


This allows us to set up the following relationship:

3% x% = 3,942.97 1,098.76 1,098.76 x% = 3% = 0.84% 3,942.97 IRR = 10% + 0.84% = 10.84%


Copyright 2003, Alan Marshall 20

10

You might also like