LTP 2012-2022 Submission

Summary - submission for the Auckland Council 2012-2022 LTP
General: Establishment of a community planning framework that can act as a reference for Local Boards and community groups to see how partnerships between organisations can improve outcomes and support initiatives when they occur, That development contributions collected are allocated within communities, and spending prioritised with substantive community involvement in determining projects, That the rural village designation allows for development of separate reserve allocation for village greens, and acknowledgement of different requirements for parks and reserves allocations to offset the lack of other amenities for all rural residents and surrounding areas, Auckland Transport planning be closely coordinated with the area and community spatial plans to prevent disjointed projects, and improve outcomes, Creation of outcome driven legislation and plans rather than specific rules which apply to all, and are relevant to few. Patumahoe specific: Planning resources be provided by Auckland Council to design and implement a Patumahoe Village Spatial Plan that utilises the consultation and community designs we have compiled. This plan, or reference to it, is to be included in the LTCCP for 2012-2022 as a reference document for all Auckland Transport, Auckland Council and private development until it is updated or replaced Allocation to Patumahoe village of Parks & Reserves and community levies received in the form of development contributions from residential and commercial development in and around the village, Support for a locally designed network of walking and cycling routes within and around the village when considering such spending in the locality, and also when processing development applications when they occur, Identification of ecological and historical sites within the village and its close environs that may be accessed and enhanced in the future, Change of landuse designations as specified by the Whakaupoko Landcare project (, Further designation of commercial zoning into Categories 1, 2 and 3 and appropriate allocation of this zoning in the Patumahoe Village Spatial Plan; Acquisition of land such as defined by Options 1 and 2, or any alternative that will achieve the same long-term objectives of reconfiguration of central council reserve that have been mentioned Allow for future consolidation of existing sports facilities into one centre which also will cater to a wider remit, Allow for upgrading of tennis courts when suitable (and addition of netball court) to be included alongside this centre, Maintain as minimum existing active sports green fields (ie. two rugby fields, which accommodate a cricket pitch) Retention of existing facilities in current locations: Patumahoe Rugby Clubrooms (Patumahoe War Memorial Hall) and Patumahoe Volunteer Fire Station, When all upgrades and consolidation are achieved, then reconfiguration of remaining council reserve can be undertaken to include Category 1 commercial zoning & residential AND a formal village green appropriate to Patumahoes rural village designation, Support for a sustainably designed village sized multi-use community centre, to reflect the diversity of our community and catchment population and improve the liveability of our village for existing and future residents, Coordinated management with Auckland Council, a created Patumahoe Village Planning Committee and Auckland Transport with projects that impact on Patumahoe village, Auckland Council and representatives work with Patumahoe Village Inc to determine method of achieving and funding defined outcomes, Indirect financial support of our consultation methods by purchasing space on our website and community newsletters.
Our 60 page consultation document is available both online and for printable download. Also online can be found any submissions made to Auckland Council, minutes of committee meetings, online versions of community newsletters and associated news articles. To view please visit: www.patumahoe.org.nz Submission to LTP 2012-2022 Patumahoe Village Inc www.patumahoe.org.nz email: patumahoevillage2050@gmail.com Page 1 of 21
Background Patumahoe Village has been repeatedly identified as a growth node, initially by Franklin District Council and the Auckland Regional Council, and subsequently by Auckland Council; Previously, residential growth within the village has been incremental and easily assimilated; Vastly increased growth both in density and area, is now being focused within Village boundaries with little long term planning for central village areas to cope with these significant population and density increases; Village planning to date has been driven by private developers with specific projects. They have interacted with council with limited input from community and little consideration of overall long term Village planning; Patumahoe population is likely to expand well beyond previous expectations and given the extent of land indicated for development, with an average occupancy of 2.5 people per household will easily meet the population figure of 2,500 under current DGS boundaries. (For reference: this is almost the size of Tuakau as at the last (2005) census); Our central village area is surrounding by residential zoning. If this land is developed without a Village Structure Plan and Spatial Plan review an significant opportunity will be lost to maintain and enhance current amenity, and future financial, environmental and social costs will increase as a result; Our community has spoken strongly and in the central area we would at least like to retain the current equivalent sports areas; Equally community indicates that certain businesses should be located in the existing hub which at present includes the council reserve; In addition many support the inclusion of appropriate Village Green space and some form of multi purpose Community Centre. To Date We have engaged with the community and with this submission delivered what we believe is excellent long term planning solutions that fit well with the much publicised future direction of Auckland Council. We believe that the quality of this input is a marked improvement on what has happened in the past reinforcing Auckland Councils stated intention that engagement with the Community is highly desirable. We have found that the Village shares many of Auckland Councils aspirations for a more sustainable environment and liveable communities. In addition in the short space of 18 months we have managed some considerable achievements. Extensive website; Wide range of community meetings/street parties/open days/forums etc; Establishment of a quarterly newsletter; Extension of Whakaupoko Landcare boundaries to include this area has happened. A walkway on our boundary is underway linking nearby bush. Landowner consent and AC approval has already been achieved and initial working bees. Pest Control and bird monitoring is in progress. In order to upskill, the committee has also sought advice from Low Impact Design planners, spatial planners, and transport advisor. We have also referenced and researched the work of the Porirua Village Planning initiative, and become members of the North Auckland based council attended Flaxroots Village Planning network. The process has not been without its frustration as while Auckland Council has been a strong advocate for Community voice there has been little technical planning support available from within Auckland Council.
Submission to LTP 2012-2022 Patumahoe Village Inc www.patumahoe.org.nz email: patumahoevillage2050@gmail.com Page 2 of 21
Our role in working with Auckland Council In accordance with our submission our committee believes that partnership between Auckland Council, Auckland Transport and well-informed community groups and clubs will produce the best outcomes. So that the momentum is not lost our plans are: To form a specific Patumahoe Village Planning committee that is easily accessible to Auckland Council and Auckland Transport and which retains excellent networks for community consultation and information sharing. Ideally this would include representatives from all our local sports clubs, schools, playcentre, volunteer organisations, residents and business owners; To remain actively involved with projects to enhance the local village; Increase the knowledge of Village planning within our local community. For instance it is planned to organise a 3 day trip around other villages to identify opportunities and experience first hand success stories that may have application to Patumahoe; Advocate to Auckland Council and its representatives on the need for support and resources for local planning initiatives, To provide opportunities for other community groups to apply for funding for community projects under our organisation, Make submissions on planning documents as consultation opportunities arise. We look forward to ongoing communication with the Local Board and the support for a spatial plan development for Patumahoe with particular emphasis on the Village central area.
INTRODUCTION
Consultation processes
To determine genuine village priorities we collated the information received during consultation and divided it into categories: 1. Village Character 2. Village Aesthetic 3. Multi-Use community centre 4. Planning Zoning issues 5. Transport Traffic, Walkways, Cycleways, Public Transport 6. Natural environment Ecological corridors, regeneration and pest control 7. History/Heritage 8. Parks & Recreational Land Each category was considered in the following manner: Suggestions received from the community; Planning advice received from council low impact design and spatial planners, Additional information relating to existing council plans or proposed changes. As many of these categories overlap, proposals or solutions for one often impacts positively on others. Alternatively, when viewed from multiple aspects detrimental impacts on other categories can be identified and alternate or modified proposals can be designed. Conclusions drawn in each category are accurate as of October 2011. All these categories and connections have been considered when developing our submissions to Auckland Council. We acknowledge that these conclusions will change over time and our proposal to Auckland Council reflects and allows for these adjustments. For the full consultation document please visit the website: www.patumahoe.org.nz and view the Patumahoe Village Inc pages. Information can be viewed online, or downloaded and printed. In addition, each sporting club with facilities existing in Patumahoe, were approached with the request of their facility needs for at least 30 years into the future. This is critical to planning Patumahoes future requirements because the contour of the land around the village centre where sports is traditionally located - limits the options that will be available when residential development is taken up. Patumahoe Rugby indicated they would like an additional one or two fields to their existing fields. Patumahoe Cricket and Tennis clubs determined that existing facility capacity would be sufficient. Patumahoe Bowling Club requires an immediate upgrade to their green, and last year underwent a review process for the club. However, they are still in a situation at present where they require funding for a new green and continuing maintenance. Planning advice and approaches were also given by planners from the Low Impact Design team within Auckland Council, and further advice was obtained from planners within the spatial planning team. Existing legislation was referenced, and submissions towards the Auckland Plan, and Local Board plans were made. All this information was the basis for the submission to Auckland Councils LTCCP (Long Term Plan) which specifies funding and priorities for the next ten years (2012 -2022).
PRIORITY CONSIDERATIONS
Community consultation has indicated overwhelmingly that existing residents are concerned that large scale residential growth is underway and planned without a considered review of the impact taking place. Almost all respondents valued the existing green spaces in the middle of the village, and would like to see this retained in some form. This council owned reserve space includes a war memorial reserve and is the home to Patumahoes rugby, touch rugby, tennis, bowling and cricket clubs. Equally, strongly, respondents believed that certain types of commercial growth should be accommodated within this central area. It is apparent, when the centre of Patumahoe village is viewed as a pivotal area for long-term spatial planning, that an opportunity exists for Auckland Council to make a significant improvement for current and future residents, businesses and visitors by taking a long-term strategic view. Unusually, there are many significant ecological sites within the existing village and the DGS boundaries that can be accommodated and linked with little more than foresight when consenting development. Other linkages have been identified that can retrospectively be applied, when funding is allocated or fundraising has taken place. What is required from Auckland Council for this to be achieved is acceptance of a long-term walking/cycle network project, consultation on this when development applications are received, and consents for work to be done when required. The enhancements of identified sites can take place as a collaboration between private property owners, the community and council. This approach would go a long way in defining how a rural village can independently identify features of significance, and how each village while using the same planning techniques can identify and enhance their own community characteristics. Under current planning and consultation practices this is not happening.
PLANNING/ZONING ISSUES Current priorities of community as reflected by consultation Requirement for considered review of the central area currently council reserve with an acknowledgement of the rural village aspect and the need to accommodate commercial space. In addition, spatial planning that can be implemented is required for the village as a whole in order to create a sustainable liveable community, Identification and linkages of ecological sites that will bring access to the surrounding environment to the built form of the village, its residents and its visitors, Creation of a suitably sized facility and reserve that serves the diverse and long-term needs of the whole community, and endeavours to strengthen the community values that currently exist, recognition of existing use and long time accommodation of particular structures such as the Patumahoe Rugby clubrooms and existing Volunteer Fire Station. These facilities are considered to be a vital part of the community, and their current locations are suitable for their current and continued use. Aside from the current social and community value placed on these facilities, it is considered that the extra traffic resulting from development in Patumahoe, and Kingseat will make these locations unsuitable for a substantially large increase in patronage, and any facilities that require this should be located elsewhere. However, continued thought is being given to how the Patumahoe Rugby clubrooms can be developed by its membership. Also, in the case of the Patumahoe Volunteer Fire Station, the land is owned by NZ Fire Service, it is strategically located for a number of different destination routes and the existing noise from callouts is accepted by current residents, acknowledgement that such large increases in population without accompanying Village wide spatial planning adds to the stress on social and cultural networks that occurs, Auckland Transport also needs to create a coordinated village plan that ties in with the resultant spatial plan, and identifies and creates a staged project proposal that deals with traffic, walkways, cycleways and public transport access.
Patumahoe Village Draft Spatial Plan How we determined a basic preliminary Village Plan for discussion: On advice from the Low Impact Design planners, we identified the ecological corridors and sites within and around Patumahoe that or of significance, or provide access corridors between community areas. These include features such as streambeds, the summit of Patumahoe Hill as the highest point in the village, native bush areas, natural water features etc. At this stage, no consideration is given to ownership as this exercise is used to provide the basic framework by identifying locations which will never be built environments.
Once this framework has been established, it becomes possible to see likely routes for off-road walking and cycling. Priority would be given to routes that link natural environments and amenities, such as access to waterfalls and bush, or links between residential development and the local school and playcentre.
Then possible locations for commercial zoning are identified, along with suitable locations for additions to existing community facilities and reserves
When the previous considerations are overlaid the existing village map, it becomes apparent that a sound base for a Village Spatial Plan has been created.
SUBMISSION TOPICS
1. FRANKLIN VILLAGE PLANNING NETWORK We believe that many of the other communities within Franklin face similar challenges to Patumahoe, although Patumahoe may be unique in that it has been targeted for growth without any specific review of spatial planning. Two other Franklin communities that were identified in similar ways by Franklin District Council underwent significant review with councillors and planners Kingseat and Pokeno, and produced detailed spatial plans for community spaces and walkways within the villages. We ask that Auckland Council create a framework that can be referred to by the local board and interested community groups that facilitates communication of timely and local information in both directions between the Local Board and the local communities. Information from Auckland Council and Auckland Transport would include: local projects involving community parks, facilities and transport requirments, as well as consent applications and considerations. Also, this communication must include timely notice of any legislative changes that would impact on the local residents or businesses. Identified community network groups can also act as ONE of the conduits for community consultation, as well as disseminating information received from council, utilising whatever resources they have to hand. We believe that quality information provided at local level can aid in better decision making processes, which not only reduce the likelihood of inappropriate projects, but also allow for community characteristics to be defined and enhanced by locals rather than clumsily imposed by central planning procedures. Also, if Auckland Council assists this programme by providing planning resources, local communities can upskill in terms of planning directions and requirements and consequently community priorities and values will reflect this. To help facilitate this without directly funding unelected organisations we ask that Auckland Council purchase advertising on suitable community websites or publications to aid with the cost of producing those items, until a formal model is introduced that can deal with those ongoing costs. Important note: It appears that one of the reasons community groups resist coordination efforts is the belief that local government does not truly listen to consultation, and by joining together they will dilute the voice of their particular organisation. An Auckland Council defined framework such as this will go a long way to convincing communities otherwise and would encourage them to coordinate efforts in order to achieve the best outcome for all.
1a. FRANKLIN VILLAGE PLANNING NETWORK - Patumahoe specific As mentioned previously, we have determined a process that will allow for a continued long-term vision to be implemented, in a manner determined by the local community and initially funded for by development as it happens in the village. We propose that a specific Patumahoe Village Planning committee is created. Representatives from each existing club will be on the committee, in order to act as a conduit of information to and from each club. Also, invitations to the local schools, playcentre, fire service, businesspeople and residents will also be issued so that a full and reflective view of the community can be held when setting priorities and projects. When development takes place, the board will already have a list of projects prioritised in order of importance. These priorities will obviously change depending on which development takes place and the scale of impact. To allow for this, each time a development is in consent or implementation a review of this list will then be undertaken, with consultation and communication to the local community about changes via meetings, newsletters and website postings. When this process is completed, the committee will confirm with the Local Board where Patumahoe would like the Parks & Reserves, and Community levies to be spent in accordance with the result. Advantages of this proposal: Village Planning Committee will reflect the views and priorities of the Patumahoe community as it naturally changes due to growth and over time, Local community members are continually upskilling in terms of planning and growth considerations and this results in a wider view of how different needs interact and are accommodated, Local projects to offset this growth are determined and funded by development contributions as growth occurs and so acts as a restorative balance for village life; Projects are determined by local stakeholders and those with the best insight into their community with support from the Local Board, Local Board members are elected every three years, and it is likely that during that time, many do not have direct knowledge of small communities such as Patumahoe, this structure will allow good decision making to occur despite this, A long term vision of Patumahoe can ensure a coordinated transition that strengthens and enhances current village networks sporting, social, business and schooling as the population increases. We ask that our Local Board assist with the continuation of this community service by purchasing space on our local website and within our quarterly newsletters.
2. DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS It is our submission that parks and reserves and community development contributions received by Auckland Council should be spent within that community in order to identify and enhance those values and amenities that currently exist. At least 80% of these funds should go towards this objective, with extra consideration given to those communities undergoing significant change. Both existing and new residents pay a price for accelerated growth. Existing residents are affected by the loss of current quality of amenities and changes in social and physical environment. New residents pay not only the form of financial levies, but in possible resentment from long-term residents about growth that delay assimilation and participation in the community. For this reason, in communities that have been identified as high-growth, such as Patumahoe, considered consultation and review should take place to ensure no loss of amenity for current residents, and enhancement of community spaces to offset the impact a greater population will have on social, cultural and economic networks. We believe that the solution that we have determined for our village, can be utilised by Auckland Council to work with other communities as a method of best practice.
2a. DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS - Patumahoe specific: Patumahoe is a well established, utilised and valued community hub. Not just for Patumahoe residents, but from many surrounding areas. Within the last decade or so, a private Structure Plan for a central property was implemented and consented that resulted in the upgrading of infrastructure and the planned increase of residential properties at a rate not yet experienced by the village. In addition, both Franklin District Council and the Auckland Regional council identified Patumahoe as a growth node. This was shown in the District Growth Strategy produced by FDC, and reinforced by its identification as a growth Rural Village by Auckland Council draft plans. To date, one stage of a three stage development has taken place along with another smaller subdivision. An application for resource consent for another residential development, extending the DGS has been lodged. In both of the earlier cases, development levies for Parks & Reserves and community have not been spent in Patumahoe to offset the impact of large scale development.
DEVELOPMENTS IN LINE FOR PATUMAHOE
Our proposal submits that a community-led initiative will be able to define a long-term vision for Patumahoe that will assign priorities, responses and appropriate projects for each development that takes place. As there is no way to determine how or when developments occur any attempt to predefine community requirements would be inappropriate. planning board/committee would redress this.
Our proposal for a village
As development takes place and local contributions are assessed the community itself will review and prioritise needs alongside the long-term values of Patumahoe. The result is then given to the Local Board to determine how those contributions are to be spent. We envisage that such a partnership between the local community and Auckland Council would benefit both groups.
3. ALLOCATION OF PARKS & RESERVES Rural communities Allocations of Parks & Reserves in rural villages are currently calculated using prescribed population figures and density allocations based on urban policies. Rural villages and communities have an opportunity to purchase land at a far lower cost per hectare than urban communities, and often grounds and facilities are strongly supported in maintenance and repairs by local community members. Despite this, the same urban density formula is currently applied, and excess funds diverted elsewhere. We submit that rural villages forego access to other amenities such as public transport, waste management services, libraries, and other community services. This reduction in the cost of providing rural parks and reserves, can be utilised by providing either greater areas of reserve space within the built area, or developing other community facilities or ideally - a combination of both. 3a. ALLOCATIONS OF PARKS & RESERVES Rural communities - Patumahoe specific Population figures for Patumahoe inherited by FDC are demonstrably flawed, and in do not take into account in any way the actual catchment population of the village. This would be apparent to any statistician that was engaged to determine village use, but has not been undertaken either by the previous FDC or by Auckland Council. Given the cancellation of the 2011 census, these flawed figures are likely to be continually applied until the results of the next census or a specific calculation is determined. Given the higher density and number of newer residents, it is foreseeable that the level of access to surrounding farmlands and environments that have been enjoyed by existing residents for many years due to personal relationships, will diminish and be eliminated in the future. For that reason, specific attention needs to be given to providing access to natural environments within the village and its environs where possible. We are fortunate that in Patumahoe village, several such sites exist within the DGS boundaries or close to it, and islands of green can be linked within the built areas. In Patumahoe, several sites and linkages are obvious and this approach only needs to be acknowledged by Auckland Council and included in any Patumahoe Village spatial plan before implementation of development takes place. We understand that current District Plan restricts options at present, but would like changes to be made to those plans that would allow different models to be adopted for use. Some of these models include: purchase of facilities by community trust, partnership of ownership with community trust and Auckland Council, creation of income streams to offset costs.
4. SPECIFIC CHANGE OF ZONING REQUEST Whakaupoko Landcare & Patumahoe Village Inc In line with comments received during consultation, we support the current request for change of Landuse for the properties identified below. Benefits to community: Owner has opportunity to develop land instead of upgrading chicken farm facilities which will avoid adverse effects of combining existing residential, school and rural use of closely located properties, Creates an access from residential village to existing bush reserve that is undergoing a regeneration project with Whakaupoko Landcare, Begins the creation of a network of walking/cycling routes that identify and connect ecological sites or corridors within the village.
A: CT number: NA39A/275 Legal Description: Lot 1 DP 82415 Area: 0.8094 Change from RURAL to RESIDENTIAL. Already within DGS and connects adjoining property noted in B to existing residential area. B: CT number: NA139D/495 Legal Description: Lot 2 DP211908 Area: 3.1125 Change from RURAL to RESIDENTIAL. Adjoining DGS on boundary line, and change of landuse will allow compensatory development of residential as existing chicken farm is removed. Consultation has indicated this extra residential area is considered preferable to existing land use. C: CT number: NZ139D/496 Legal Description: Lot 3 DP211908 Area: 5614 Change from RURAL to RURAL-RESIDENTIAL or appropriate lifestyle blocks. Project with Whakaupoko Landcare and Auckland Council allows for public access across land to link existing native bush reserves Clive Howe and Henrys Bush. These reserves currently have no walking track access, and this would be the first such off road access in the village. Land contour makes it unsuitable for alternative primary production use.
This project is currently coordinated by the Whakaupoko Landcare group, Auckland Council and private landowners and provides the community with immediate and ongoing benefits. Patumahoe Village Inc is in support of such community and council partnerships.
5. CATEGORIES OF COMMERCIAL ZONING

Patumahoe is identified as requiring 0.3 ha of commercial zones by the DGS. We believe that identification of the location of this landuse is critical to enhancing the liveable areas of Patumahoe while still allowing economic activity and growth. We ask that commercial zoning within Patumahoe be divided by category and these categories will cater to different types of business while not prohibiting them. Category 1: Retail, hospitality and professional office spaces. Category 2: Trades and light industry Category 3: Heavy industry Category 1 will be encouraged and supported within the central village area, with the other categories being located and supported at greater distances from the hub. Both community consultation and planning advice identify the currently owned council reserves as the most ideal place for Category 1, with the added requirement that existing green spatial areas are retained and enhanced alongside development. This gives council a unique opportunity to strategically design a village centre that will accommodate planned growth, while maintaining and enhancing existing community social, cultural and historical values. 5a. MODERATE TO HIGH DENSITY BUILT FORM We also support the need for higher density development within Patumahoe, but consider that any change in density must be accompanied with superlative design outcomes ie. Higher density improved design quality positive outcome. For example, if commercial development of Category one was to take place in the central area, it would be both reasonable and desirable to accompany this development with upper story residential development. This will diminish the impact of the commercial development, and help retain the village feel by keeping residents within the heart of the village alongside businesses. Also, many older residents who have farmed or worked on large blocks of land, will require smaller residences and landholdings as time goes on. If the opportunity exists for them to continue their connection with Patumahoe, this may be provided by small scale moderate to high-density developments suitable for this use. As long as higher density is accompanied with improved standard of living and connectivity, we consider this to be an acceptable small part of the future development for Patumahoe.
6. Patumahoe Village MULTI-USE FACILITY

At present, we understand that the current sports park at Karaka is drawing a significant amount of funding for sports activities. We submit that this facility appears to be a badly located resource not only for Patumahoe and surrounding residents, but also the wider community and that we would prefer to see funding distributed more evenly around the Franklin Local Board area. We also submit that we would rather have development contributions go towards a community centres with a wider remit; one that caters for existing sports clubs but accommodates other community uses, such as casual sports groups or activities and classes and activities for old, young and those in the middle. We believe that Patumahoe village with its current supporting infrastructure, catchment population and centrally local sports fields is an ideal situation for a small multi-use community centre. We also conclude that a greater number of smaller sized community located centres is preferable to a large complex for the following reasons: Allows for community to develop sense of ownership of centre which is not possible with large complexes, As the perceived local ownership of the centre increases, so will the utilisation, as well as a local commitment to support and celebrate the facility, A greater diversity of the community is provided for in a multi-use facility, which can be seen as a microcosm of that that exists within the village, Human scale centres are more likely to be sustainable, as they become valued in the community and attract local volunteers and donations, A local centre defined, designed and built for and by locals will go a long way to creating a liveable village as intended in the Auckland Plan.
How will such a Multi-Use centre in Patumahoe be funded? We believe that Patumahoe collected development levies should be used to provide a significant funding base, which can be then increased and completed by fundraising activities and successful grant applications. We would be aiming for a sustainable community facility, one that requires a minimum of future funding needs. This is more likely to occur with a village sized facility that is collectively used not only by the sports clubs, but by residents, businesses and other groups.
7. LAND ACQUISITION Patumahoe specific:

Given the conflicting advice received by different departments and personnel within Auckland Council we have identified in our consultation process those values that are most important to the community and defined what is needed to preserve them. A reconfigured village centre that accommodates: Category 1 zoned commercial growth, A designed community village green, The existing Patumahoe Rugby clubrooms and Patumahoe Volunteer Fire Station, Location and construction of a community centre that caters for the local and surrounding residents. This includes consideration of existing sports clubs and facilities, tennis courts, netball courts, bowling green, two rugby fields and cricket pitch. However this is not restricted to sports only use, and should accommodate other uses and stakeholders The rugby club identified the requirement for additional sports fields within the next 30 years. To accommodate this criteria two possible land acquisitions have been identified but are not intended to be the only possible options. Their suitability has been determined by contour as suitability for active sports fields (given that existing use will be reconfigured to accommodate commercial growth and village green at some time in the future and more fields have been requested, and may be required). We acknowledge that with more detailed consideration during a Village Spatial Plan design process and input from Auckland Council and other community organisations and members other solutions to the objectives given above may be found but we do believe that the best time for identification and acquisition is before development takes place that restricts options.
Option 1: Adjoining existing council War Memorial reserve Part acquisition of property located on Carter Road, unable to access references on GIS viewer.
Adjoining the current reserve is land currently zoned residential but as yet undeveloped. Between this residential zone and the railway is land zoned rural but contained within the District Growth Strategy. Extending the reserve to allow for reconfiguration and commercial development within the centre, would require the acquisition of land on the currently residential zoned property.
Advantages of Option 1 Existing location of sports clubs and activities is preserved, and enhanced by addition of other uses within a multi-use hub. Development and design of commercial area in this pivotal central location is determined by local community, Allow for staged replacement of existing clubs by commercial zoning and village green in line with private development, and without interfering with continued use, Cultivates a green heart to the village, which includes a formally designated village green and which is often not possible in established communities Disadvantages of Option 1 Land adjoining current reserve and most appropriate for extension is already zoned residential and therefore is expensive to purchase. Patumahoe Village Inc supports the rezoning of alternate land as a negotiation tool, if Auckland Council is willing to undertake it with the owners of this property Under Franklin District Council guidelines, using their population figures and their commitment to Karaka Sportspark it is unlikely that Patumahoe will be in line with the purchase of extra sports fields. However, as mentioned previously population figures are inaccurate, and our submission defines our perspective in terms of allocation methods for rural villages. Our plan also identifies that current reserve space is ideally placed for future commercial development, and timely purchase of extra reserve space will not only guarantee continued village aesthetics and values, but make sure the heart of the village is not fragmented in the future by lack of available undeveloped land. Results in surfeit of active sports fields for a period, while development and redesign of central area takes place. This can be accommodated by a change of ownership to a trust, community-council partnership or a lease purchase by the community of the land that needs to be redesigned.
Option 2: Part purchase of land on border of village outside of DGS but geographically and geologically suited for active sports fields. CT: 90080 Legal Description: DP191961 Lot 2 Lot 4 Advantages of Option 2 Creates a natural barrier between future higher density residential development and existing lifestyle blocks, in a location geographically and ecologically suited for its purpose, Can be purchased and developed without impacting on existing use areas. Becomes first stage in redevelopment of existing council reserve, Rural zoning reduces cost of acquisition, although Patumahoe Village Inc supports rezoning of suitable land as a negotiation tool as a method of compensating landowners for purchase, remaining development levies can be utilised for development of land and other priorities, Allows for considered development of community reserves which may or may not include other community uses, such as skateparks or exercise circuits, Creates islands of green that can be linked in a spatial plan within the built form of the village while maintaining the central green heart, Will allow parking spaces to be utilised as commuter spaces during the week, and sports parking on the weekends without interfering with the commercial functioning of the village, Will link to proposed railway corridor route and highlights existing boundary native bush plantings. Disadvantages of Option 2 Under Franklin District Council guidelines, using their population figures and their commitment to Karaka Sportspark it is unlikely that Patumahoe will be able to justify purchase of extra sports fields. However, as mentioned previously population figures are inaccurate, and our submission defines our perspective in terms of allocation methods for rural villages. Our plan also identifies that current reserve space is ideally placed for future commercial development, and timely purchase of extra reserve space will not only guarantee continued village aesthetics and values, but make sure the heart of the village is not fragmented in the future by lack of available undeveloped land. Results in surfeit of active sports fields for a period, while development and redesign of central area takes place. This can be accommodated by a change of ownership to a trust, community-council partnership or a lease purchase by the community of the land that needs to be redesigned. Requires relocation of changing facilities for new sports fields while club functions and meetings can be accommodated in a new multi-use facility.
8. HOW CAN WE MAKE THIS HAPPEN? 8a. Funding sources: Development levies Given our submission on Development contributions we believe funding for these proposals to develop Patumahoe as a long-term sustainable village should come from the development contributions received as residential and other development takes place. This could then be further supplemented by community fundraising activities and successful grant applications. This acknowledges not only the impact of residential growth on a long established community, but also the higher valuations (and consequently rates) paid by residents and businesses. This higher premium is due to the existing attractiveness of a small rural village with many amenities, which is already impacted by development and will only be negatively so if the centre of Patumahoe village is not reviewed to accommodate the community concerns. We have identified in the map shown on Page 12, areas within the District Growth Strategy that are already zoned residential, already consented residential, under consent application, or within the DGS boundaries. It is apparent when looking at this map, comparison of the increase in households planned to existing households - indicates the large scale impact on existing social, community networks and values. Especially, when further consideration is given to the higher density of households that will be accommodated on the new residential sites. 8b. Funding sources: Fundraising and Donations In addition to development levies, local fundraising and donations will play in part in providing community facilities. 8c. Funding sources: Passive income streams Models can be found that allow Community Trusts to own land or facilities that generate income. With Local Board support, Patumahoe would be ready to develop such a model for their village. This could include community purchase of currently zoned reserve land for future high-density commercial development within the village, or partnership with the community multi-use centre. 8d. Alternative models: Community trust ownership of land and/or facilities This approach has two benefits: 1. Auckland Council is not required to be a developer to meet identified future needs for commercial space. 2. This reduces the current reserve allocation and allows land to be purchased for the resulting addition to future requirements for active sports fields. 8e. Alternative model: Community long-term lease of land and/or facilities This approach can be used to hold current reserve land until development reaches a point where it can be released from lease, and rezoned for commercial or otherwise. 8f. Alternative model: Community trust partnership with Auckland Council of land or facilities A combination of both alternative models may produce the best outcome.
Without outcome defined legislation and guidelines, it is almost impossible to meet the criteria AND achieve the best long-term outcomes for communities and Auckland Council. This includes financial costs and impacts on social, cultural and environmental connections. We believe that intent must be followed by commitment to allow innovative and local solutions to be adopted and implemented. Especially, in this case where funding will be provided by development and spatial planning has not been undertaken in line with development growth. We ask that however it is achieved, commitment is given by Auckland Council and our Local Board, to make this future-proofing of our village a part of the Long-Term Plan, and we will play our part as partners in that process. We also ask that we be given a hearing on this submission in order to present these ideas to Auckland Council Patumahoe Village Inc, PO Box 172, Patumahoe 2440 Email:patumahoevillage2050@gmail.com

LTP 2012-2022 Submission

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

LTP 2012-2022 Submission

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Summary - submission for the Auckland Council 2012-2022 LTP

Our proposal for a village

5. CATEGORIES OF COMMERCIAL ZONING

6. Patumahoe Village MULTI-USE FACILITY

7. LAND ACQUISITION Patumahoe specific:

You might also like