Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Most common reasons for differences, if any: 1. CUs not identified in the TCL 2. Follow up schedules not recorded 3. CUs not able to return on scheduled follow up date
GP Vit A Supplementation as of 1st GP before DQC after DQC 2nd GP before DQC after DQC Remarks:
6-11 months
12-59 months
6-11 months
12-59 months
Were M1 reports available? STs? MCTs? Q1 reports? Was the baseline data set established? Were the FHSIS records (TCLs) updated? Were secondary (non-FHSIS) source documents used? LCR data available? Were all midwives present? Were all the BHSs/baranggays represented in the data sets? * specific results per indicator attached as annexes Certified true and correct:
ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FP CU Province LA UNION Date M/C LGU SUDIPEN Month Year
Accomplish the worksheet 'Q - FP CU' 0 Get updated figures based on the TCLs
RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FP CU Province LA UNION M/C LGU SUDIPEN Family Planning Current Users
Date
(CU Beginning of month - CU not in TCL + NA of previous month + OA of present month - Dropouts = Updated CU End of month) (example: CU Beginning of November - CU not in TCL + NA of October + OA of November - Dropouts of November = CU End of November)
Year Current Users (End of the Previous Month as Recorded/ Reported in Latest ST or M1) Acceptors New (Previous Month) Dropouts Clients UPDATED Others (Present Month) Reported in the Current Users (Present Month) M1 but not (Present Month) identified in the TCL
RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FP CU Province LA UNION M/C LGU SUDIPEN
Date
Year Current Users UPDATED (Reported in the Current Users Most Recent (Based on TCL Q1) Review Workshop)
Difference
% Difference
Forecasting of health sector commodity and service requirements for family planning
Province M/C LGU
MWRA as a proportion of population: Poverty rate 2006 population ALL Current users Pills IUD Injectables Condoms Subtotal BTL Vasectomy NFP (SDM) NFP (LAM) Total MWRA CPR
LA UNION SUDIPEN
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Projected population
2014 #DIV/0!
2015 #DIV/0!
2016 -
Percent growth in number of users among poor MWRA (multiplier for increase per year) 2011 2012 2013 2014 Pills 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 IUD 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Injectables 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Condoms 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 BTL 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Vasectomy 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 NFP (SDM) 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 NFP (LAM) 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Percent growth in number of users among non-poor MWRA (multiplier for increase per year) 2011 2012 2013 2014 Pills 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 IUD 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Injectables 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Condoms 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 BTL 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Vasectomy 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 NFP (SDM) 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 NFP (LAM) 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Percent growth in number of users, all users (multiplier for increase per year) 2011 2012 2013 Pills 1.05 1.05 1.05 IUD 1.05 1.05 1.05 Injectables 1.05 1.05 1.05 Condoms 1.05 1.05 1.05 BTL 1.05 1.05 1.05 Vasectomy 1.05 1.05 1.05 NFP (SDM) 1.05 1.05 1.05 NFP (LAM) 1.05 1.05 1.05
POOR Current users Pills IUD Injectables Condoms Subtotal BTL Vasectomy NFP (SDM) NFP (LAM) Total MWRA CPR
2014 #DIV/0!
2015 #DIV/0!
2016 -
NON-POOR Current users Baseline 2010 Pills IUD Injectables Condoms Subtotal BTL Vasectomy NFP (SDM) NFP (LAM) Total MWRA CPR Prices Baseline 2010 Pills (per pack/cycle) IUD (per piece) Injectables (per vial) Condoms (per piece) BTL Vasectomy 25 150 115 6.33 3000 3000 2011 26 155 119 7 3,099 3,099 2012 27 160 123 7 3,201 3,201 Projected 2013 28 165 127 7 3,307 3,307 2014 28 171 131 7 3,416 3,416 2015 29 176 135 7 3,529 3,529 2016 30 182 140 8 3,645 3,645 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 2011 #DIV/0! 2012 #DIV/0! Projected 2013 #DIV/0!
2014 #DIV/0!
2015 #DIV/0!
2016 -
External Donations (Commodities) 2011 Pills (per pack/cycle) 0 IUD (per piece) 0 Injectables (per vial) 0 Condoms (per piece) 0 SDM beads 0
2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2013 0 0 0 0 0
2014 0 0 0 0 0
2015 0 0 0 0 0
2016
60 0.033
62 0.033
64 0.033
66 0.033
68 0.033
71 0.033
73 0.033
Methods (C1) Pill IUD Injectables Condom Sub-total Ligation Vasectomy NFP (SDM) NFP (LAM) Total
Current Users (C2) CPR (C3) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Estimated number of commodities or services required (C5) Price per unit (C6) 25 150 115 6.33
Memo: Percent of users by method (C12) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
1 1 0.100
3000 3000 60
Estimated non-poor MWRA Non-poor Total value Estimated number commodity or of commodities or service services required Price per unit requirements 25 150 115 6.33 Total Value of FP Estimated value of Commodity commodity less Total requirements Requirements for donated supplies less donations Poor Current Users Current user -
Methods (C1) Pill IUD Injectables Condom Sub-total Ligation Vasectomy NFP (SDM) NFP (LAM) Total
Current user -
1 1 0.100
3000 3000 60 0
Total value of Estimated number commodity or of commodities or service services required Price per unit requirements 25 150 115 6.33
1 1 0.100
3000 3000 60
Summary : Commodity and Service Requirements Net of External Donations (using uncorrected data)
For both poor and non-poor current users
2010 Number of users Pill IUD Injectibles Condom Ligation Vasectomy NFP (SDM) NFP (LAM) Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 -
Number of commodities and services Pill (cycles) IUD Injectibles Condom Ligation Vasectomy NFP (SDM beads)
2010 -
2011 -
2012 -
2013 -
2014 -
2015 -
2016 -
Total Value of commodities and services Pill (cycles) IUD Injectibles Condom Ligation Vasectomy NFP (SDM) Total Total Value of FP commodities (only) required for all current users Pill (cycles) IUD Injectibles Condom NFP (SDM) Total
2010 -
2011 -
2012 -
2013 -
2014 -
2015 -
2016 -
2010 -
2011 -
2012 -
2013 -
2014 -
2015 -
2016 -
Number of commodities and services Pill (cycles) IUD Injectibles Condom Ligation
2010 -
2011 -
2012 -
2013 -
2014 -
2015 -
2016 -
Vasectomy NFP (SDM beads) Value of commodities and services for the poor Pill (cycles) IUD Injectibles Condom Ligation Vasectomy NFP (SDM beads) Total
2010 -
2011 -
2012 -
2013 -
2014 -
2015 -
2016 -
Total Value of FP commodities (only) required for poor current users Pill (cycles) IUD Injectibles Condom NFP (SDM) Total
2010 -
2011 -
2012 -
2013 -
2014 -
2015 -
2016 -
Assumptions: 1. Poverty rate based on 2006 provincial poverty rate (Source: NSCB) 2. Assumes poverty rate of MWRA is the same as the rate for the entire population 3. Prices change based on assumed fixed annual rate of inflation 4. Method mix assumed fixed throughout forecast period 5. MWRA is 14.5% of total projected population 6. Base year is 2010. 7. Source of cuurent user data: FHSIS
cted data)
Total -
Total -
Financing option User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges/private sector PhilHealth/NGO PhilHealth/RHU User charges
Total -
Financing option User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges
Total -
Total -
Financing option LGU budtet LGU budget/donation LGU budget LGU budget PhilHealth/NGO PhilHealth/RHU User charges
Total -
Financing option User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges
Forecasting of health sector commodity and service requirements for family planning
Province M/C LGU
MWRA as a proportion of population: Poverty rate 2006 population ALL Current users Pills IUD Injectables Condoms Subtotal BTL Vasectomy NFP (SDM) NFP (LAM) Total MWRA CPR
LA UNION SUDIPEN
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 -
Projected population
0.00%
Baseline 2010 2011 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 2012 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! -
Projected 2013 2014 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! -
2015 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
2016 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Percent growth in number of users among poor MWRA (multiplier for increase per year) 2011 2012 2013 2014 Pills 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 IUD 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Injectables 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Condoms 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 BTL 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Vasectomy 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 NFP (SDM) 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 NFP (LAM) 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Percent growth in number of users among non-poor MWRA (multiplier for increase per year) 2011 2012 2013 2014 Pills 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 IUD 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Injectables 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Condoms 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 BTL 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Vasectomy 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 NFP (SDM) 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 NFP (LAM) 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Percent growth in number of users, all users (multiplier for increase per year) 2011 2012 2013 Pills 1.05 1.05 1.05 IUD 1.05 1.05 1.05 Injectables 1.05 1.05 1.05 Condoms 1.05 1.05 1.05 BTL 1.05 1.05 1.05 Vasectomy 1.05 1.05 1.05 NFP (SDM) 1.05 1.05 1.05 NFP (LAM) 1.05 1.05 1.05
#DIV/0!
POOR Current users Pills IUD Injectables Condoms Subtotal BTL Vasectomy NFP (SDM) NFP (LAM) Total MWRA CPR
Baseline 2010 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 2011 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 2012 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! -
Projected 2013 2014 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! -
2015 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
2016 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
NON-POOR Current users Baseline 2010 Pills IUD Injectables Condoms Subtotal BTL Vasectomy NFP (SDM) NFP (LAM) Total MWRA CPR Prices Baseline 2010 Pills (per pack/cycle) IUD (per piece) Injectables (per vial) Condoms (per piece) BTL Vasectomy NFP (SDM) 25 150 115 6.33 3000 3000 60 2011 26 155 119 7 3,099 3,099 62 2012 27 160 123 7 3,201 3,201 64 Projected 2013 28 165 127 7 3,307 3,307 66 2014 28 171 131 7 3,416 3,416 68 2015 29 176 135 7 3,529 3,529 71 2016 30 182 140 8 3,645 3,645 73 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 2011 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 2012 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! Projected 2013 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
2014 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! -
2015 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
2016 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
External Donations (Commodities) 2011 Pills (per pack/cycle) 0 IUD (per piece) 0 Injectables (per vial) 0 Condoms (per piece) 0 SDM beads 0
2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2013 0 0 0 0 0
2014 0 0 0 0 0
2015 0 0 0 0 0
2016
0 0.033
0.033
0.033
0.033
0.033
0.033
0.033
Total value of commodity or service requirements less value of donations (C11) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Methods (C1) Pill IUD Injectables Condom Sub-total Ligation Vasectomy NFP (SDM) NFP (LAM) Total
Current Users (C2) CPR (C3) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Estimated number of commodities or services required (C5) Price per unit (C6) #VALUE! 25 #VALUE! 150 #VALUE! 115 #VALUE! 6.33
Total value commodity or service requirements (C7) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Estimated value of commodity less value of donated supplies (C10) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Total Value of FP Commodity Requirements for All Current Users #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Memo: Percent of users by method (C12) #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
1 1 0.100
3000 3000 60
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Estimated non-poor MWRA Non-poor Total value Estimated number commodity or of commodities or service services required Price per unit requirements #VALUE! 25 #VALUE! #VALUE! 150 #VALUE! #VALUE! 115 #VALUE! #VALUE! 6.33 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 3000 3000 60 0 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! Total Value of FP Estimated value of Commodity commodity less Total requirements Requirements for donated supplies less donations Poor Current Users Current user #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Methods (C1) Pill IUD Injectables Condom Sub-total Ligation Vasectomy NFP (SDM) NFP (LAM) Total
Current user #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
1 1 0.100
#VALUE!
Total Value of FP Commodity Requirements for Non-Poor Current Users #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Total value of Estimated number commodity or of commodities or service services required Price per unit requirements #VALUE! 25 #VALUE! #VALUE! 150 #VALUE! #VALUE! 115 #VALUE! #VALUE! 6.33 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 3000 3000 60 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Total Poor and Non-Poor Requirements #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Total Poor and Non-Poor Requirements less donations #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
1 1 0.100
#VALUE! #VALUE!
Summary : Commodity and Service Requirements Net of External Donations (using corrected data)
For both poor and non-poor current users
2010 Number of users Pill IUD Injectibles Condom Ligation Vasectomy NFP (SDM) NFP (LAM) Total #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 2011 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 2012 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 2013 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 2014 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 2015 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 2016
Number of commodities and services Pill (cycles) IUD Injectibles Condom Ligation Vasectomy NFP (SDM beads)
2010 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
2016
Total Value of commodities and services Pill (cycles) IUD Injectibles Condom Ligation Vasectomy NFP (SDM) Total Total Value of FP commodities (only) required for all current users Pill (cycles) IUD Injectibles Condom NFP (SDM) Total
2010 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
2016
2010 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
2016
Number of commodities and services Pill (cycles) IUD Injectibles Condom Ligation
2010 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
2016
Vasectomy NFP (SDM beads) Value of commodities and services for the poor Pill (cycles) IUD Injectibles Condom Ligation Vasectomy NFP (SDM beads) Total
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
2010 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
2016
Total Value of FP commodities (only) required for poor current users Pill (cycles) IUD Injectibles Condom NFP (SDM) Total
2010 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
2016
Assumptions: 1. Poverty rate based on 2006 provincial poverty rate (Source: NSCB) 2. Assumes poverty rate of MWRA is the same as the rate for the entire population 3. Prices change based on assumed fixed annual rate of inflation 4. Method mix assumed fixed throughout forecast period 5. MWRA is 14.5% of total projected population 6. Base year is 2010. 7. Source of cuurent user data: FHSIS
ed data)
Financing option User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges/private sector PhilHealth/NGO PhilHealth/RHU User charges
Financing option User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges
#VALUE! #VALUE!
Financing option LGU budtet LGU budget/donation LGU budget LGU budget PhilHealth/NGO PhilHealth/RHU User charges
Financing option User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges/private sector User charges
ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR 4ANC/4PNV Do not enter figures in cells with a black background. Province LA UNION 1 Date Encode Q1 reported (R) figures in the cells for the last months of the qu M/C LGU SUDIPEN 0 Encode updated (U) figures in the appropriate cells, as usual. ARE M1 REPORTS OR ST RECORDS AVAILABLE FOR ALL MIDWIVES?
RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR 4ANC/4PNV Province LA UNION Date M/C LGU SUDIPEN 0 2010 Pregnant Women with 4 or More Prenatal Visits (1 each during the 1st and 2nd trimesters, 2 during the 3rd trimester) JAN
Number Reported in M1: Maternal Care
Total Population (Please attach population data used) Year of Population Data Used Demographic Factor/Multiplier Eligible Population *M1s/STs not available, Q1s used as the sources of baseline data. Only comparisons between quarterly totals can be made.
3.50%
FEB
MAR
1st Q
APR
MAY
JUNE
2nd Q
JULY
AUG
SEPT
3rd Q
OCT
NOV
DEC
4th Q
TOTAL
55
55
57
57
20
18
18
56
14
18
19
51
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
37
-1
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
38
% Difference
#VALUE! #VALUE! 67.27% -1.82% #VALUE! #VALUE! 66.67% 10.53%
% 4ANC/4PNV as Reported % 4ANC/4PNV Based on Updated Data Difference Between Reported and Updated % 4ANC/4PNV % Difference Between Reported and Updated % 4ANC/4PNV Remarks:
ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR SBA Province LA UNION 0 Date M/C LGU SUDIPEN
Do not enter figures in cells with a black background. Encode Q1 reported (R) figures in the cells for the last months of the quarter (March, June, Septem Encode updated (U) figures in the appropriate cells, as usual.
RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR SBA Province LA UNION 0 Date M/C LGU SUDIPEN 2010
Total Number of Livebirths as per LCR LCR Data as of (Date) (Please attach LCR Data)
*M1s/STs not available, Q1s used as the sources of baseline data. Only comparisons between quarterly totals can be made.
Births Attended by Skilled Health Personnel (Total number of births attended by skilled health personnel, i.e. Doctors, Nurses, Midwives, divided by Total Number of Livebirths) This definition excludes traditional birth attendants, whether trained or not, from the category of skilled health workers. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT 1st Q 2nd Q 3rd Q
R* U* R* U* R* U* R* U*
7 3 0 0 10 11 15 14 54 16 37 8 0 0 16 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 45 37 29 0 0 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 8 4 0 0 10 17 18 17 49 23 52 15 0 0 22 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 58 52 42 0 0 22 20 0 0 0 0 0 30
NOV
DEC
4th Q
TOTAL
Livebirths (Total) Attended by: Doctors Attended by: Nurses Attended by: Midwives
Attended by: R* Trained Hilot U* / TBA Attended by: R* Others U* Attended by: Unknown R* U*
100.00%
106.90%
Difference Between -1.85% 44.12% Recorded and Updated % SBA % Difference -1.89% 29.22% Between Recorded and Updated % SBA R* - As recorded in the Field Health Service Information System (FHSIS) Target Client List (TCL) and/or Summary Table (ST) and reported in the Monthly Form - M1 U* - Updated figures after data quality check Remarks:
ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FBD Province LA UNION 0 Date M/C LGU SUDIPEN
Do not enter figures in cells with a black background. Encode Q1 reported (R) figures in the cells for the last months of the quarter (March, June, Septem Encode updated (U) figures in the appropriate cells, as usual.
RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FBD Province LA UNION 0 Date M/C LGU SUDIPEN 2010
Total Number of Deliveries as per LCR LCR Data as of (Date) (Please attach LCR Data)
*M1s/STs not available, Q1s used as the sources of baseline data. Only comparisons between quarterly totals can be made.
Deliveries by Type and Place (Number of Normal Deliveries at home/hospital/others, Number of Other Types of Deliveries at home/hospital/others, divided by Total Number of Deliveries) FBD = (Normal Deliveries at Hospital (includes RHU, BHS, lying-in) + Other Types of Deliveries at Hospital) divided by Total Number of Deliveries JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC 1st Q 2nd Q 3rd Q 4th Q
R* U* R* U* R* U* R* U* R* U* R* U* R* U*
19 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 6 10 3 22 7 29 5 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 54 13 22 20 29 20 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 54 42 19 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 12 8 4 21 9 51 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 26 21 21 51 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 61
Total
Normal Delivery: Home Normal Delivery: Hospital Normal Delivery: Others Other Type Delivery: Home Other Type Delivery: Hospital Other Type Delivery: Others Total Number of Deliveries
52.38%
65.57%
Difference Between 6.88% 5.26% Recorded and Updated % FBD % Difference 11.61% 7.43% Between Recorded and Updated % FBD R* - As recorded in the Field Health Service Information System (FHSIS) Target Client List (TCL) and/or Summary Table (ST) and reported in the Monthly Form - M1 U* - Updated figures after data quality check Remarks:
ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FIC Province LA UNION 0 Date M/C LGU SUDIPEN
Do not enter figures in cells with a black background. Encode Q1 reported (R) figures in the cells for the last months of the quarter (March, June, Se Encode updated (U) figures in the appropriate cells, as usual.
RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR FIC Province LA UNION 0 Date M/C LGU SUDIPEN
Total Population (Please attach population data used) Year of Population Data Used Demographic Factor/Multiplier Eligible Population
2.70%
*M1s/STs not available, Q1s used as the sources of baseline data. Only comparisons between quarterly totals can be made.
2010
Fully Immunized Child (0-11 mos) An infant who received 1 dose of BCG, 3 doses each of OPV, DPT, Hepatitis B vaccine and 1 dose of anti-Measles vaccine before reaching one year old (Number of Fully Immunized Children divided by Total population x 2.7%) JAN FEB MAR
61
1st Q
61
APR
MAY
JUNE
63
2nd Q
63
JULY
AUG
SEPT
3rd Q
OCT
NOV
DEC
4th Q
TOTAL
Number Reported in M1: Child Care Updated Number Based on TCL/ST Difference
#VALUE! #VALUE!
10
22
21
53
24
35
63
40
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
28
% Difference
#VALUE! #VALUE! 66% 13% #VALUE! #VALUE! 44% 0%
Difference Between Reported and Updated % FIC % Difference Between Reported and Updated % FIC Remarks:
ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR EBF Province LA UNION 0 Date M/C LGU SUDIPEN
MALICLICO PORPORIKET BIGBIGA SENGNGAT CASTRO SF NORTE BULALAAN SAN JOSE UPUPLAS DUPLAS SF SUR
Do not enter figures in cells with a black background. Encode Q1 reported (R) figures in the cells for the last months of the quarter (March, June, Se Encode updated (U) figures in the appropriate cells, as usual.
NAMALTUGAN ILOCANO IPET
BHS or Brgy
BHS or Brgy
BHS or Brgy
BHS or Brgy
BHS or Brgy
BHS or Brgy
BHS or Brgy
BHS or Brgy
BHS or Brgy
BHS or Brgy
BHS or Brgy
BHS or Brgy
BHS or Brgy
OLD CENTRAL
BHS or Brgy
PONLACION
TUROD
Total
RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR EBF Province LA UNION 0 Date M/C LGU SUDIPEN 2010 Infants Exclusively Breastfed Until 6th Mo (Total Number of of Infants Exclusively Breastfed Until 6th Month divided by Total Number of Infants 6 Months of Age Seen) JAN
Infants Exclusively Breastfed Until 6th Month Reported in M1: Child Care Updated Number Based on TCL/ST
*M1s/STs not available, Q1s used as the sources of baseline data. Only comparisons between quarterly totals can be made.
FEB
MAR
1st Q
APR
MAY
JUNE
2nd Q
JULY
AUG
SEPT
3rd Q
OCT
NOV
DEC
4th Q
TOTAL
Difference
% Difference
Infants Age 6 Months Seen Reported in M1: Child Care Updated Number Based on TCL/ST
Difference
% Difference
Difference Between Reported and Updated % EBF % Difference Between Reported and Updated % EBF Remarks:
1st GP
2nd GP
6-11 Yes No 12-59 Yes No 6-11 Yes No 12-59 Yes No 6-11 R* U* 12-59 R* U* 6-11 R* U* 12-59 R* U* Total BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy BHS or Brgy
Masterlist
ENTRY SHEET FOR DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR VITAMIN A SUPPLEMENTATION Province LA UNION 1 Date M/C LGU SUDIPEN 0
RESULTS OF DATA QUALITY CHECK FOR VITAMIN A SUPPLEMENTATION Province LA UNION Date M/C LGU SUDIPEN 2010 Infant/Children Given Vitamin A (6-11 months and 12-59 months) (Infants/Children given Vitamin A divided by Number of Infants/Children 6-11 and 12-59 months) 1 0 Total Number of Infants/Children 6-11 and 12-59 months old Used for the 1st GP Used for the 2nd GP Activity in 2010 Activity in 2010 Yes Is there a masterlist (RHU/CHO level) of infants 6-11 months old? Is there a masterlist (RHU/CHO level) of children 12-59 months old? 1st GP Conducted in 2010 - 2nd GP Conducted in 2010 usually April usually October
(Year) Infants 6-11 months given Vit A R*
No
Yes
No
Total Population (Please attach population data used) Demographic Factor/Multiplier 1.35%
R*
U*
R*-U*
%
Difference
U*
6-11 Months
Eligible Population
Difference between recorded/reported data and updated data % Difference between recorded/reported data and updated data Children 12-59 R* months given Vit A U*
Remarks:
Difference between recorded/reported data and updated data % Difference between recorded/reported data and updated data R* - As recorded and reported in the Garantisadong Pambata (GP) activity documentation U* - Updated figures after data quality check
Compatibility Report for Encoding Tool for DQC.xls Run on 1/7/2012 10:49 The following features in this workbook are not supported by earlier versions of Excel. These features may be lost or degraded when opening this workbook in an earlier version of Excel or if you save this workbook in an earlier file format.
Significant loss of functionality One or more cells in this workbook contain data validation rules which refer to values on other worksheets. These data validation rules will not be saved.
# of occurrences 7
E - FP CU'!Q5 E - Vit A'!E10:CZ10 E - Vit A'!E12:CZ12 E - Vit A'!E8:CZ8 E - Vit A'!E6:CZ6 C - Vit A'!O10:Q11 C - Vit A'!U10:W11
Version
Excel 97-2003