Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
:INTHECOURTOFSH.KANWALJEETARORA:
SPECIALJUDGE:C.B.I.(P.C.ACT)
DWARKACOURTCOMPLEX,NEWDELHI.
FIRNo.:RC/ACII/2004/A20007
dtd06thDecember,2004
Undersec.:9ofPreventionof
CorruptionAct,1988.
Inthematterof:
CBIVS.BANGARULAXMAN
C.C.NO.:01/2011.
Present:
Dr.PadminiSingh,Ld.SpecialP.P.forCBI.
Sh.Sunil Kumar, Ld.Senior Advocate along with
Sh.Rajesh Khanna,Sh.ManishMohan and Sh.Atul
Kumar,Advocates,forconvictBangaruLaxman.
ORDERONSENTENCE:
1.
ratheritisexhibited.Itistheerosionofthemoralcharacter
ofindividualsinparticularandsocietyingeneralandlackof
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.1of14
ORDERONSENTENCE:
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
nationalinterest,whichhasledtothelargescalecorruption
adverselyaffectingthesocial,spiritual,political,economical,
educationalandmoralvaluesofournation.
2.
ThewisdominthesayCrimeneverpays
isbeliedbythefactualrealitiesoftoday.Thecrimescenario
inourcountryisdistressinglydisturbing,asithasshattered
hopesofboththeplebeianandintellectualsocietyaboutthe
possiblerejuvenationofavaluebasedsociety.
3.
4.
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.2of14
ORDERONSENTENCE:
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
wasthelargestconstituentofthethenNDAGovernment.He
wasconvictedvidemyjudgementdated27thApril2012.
5.
IhaveheardDr.PadminiSingh,Ld.Special
Public Prosecutor for CBI and Sh.Sunil Kumar, Ld. Senior
Advocate for the convict on point of sentence. I have also
heardtheconvictonthequantumofsentence.
6.
7.
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.3of14
ORDERONSENTENCE:
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
SCC190,thatthecourthasnotonlytoseetheoffence,but
also the age, family, sobriety and emotional and mental
conditionoftheoffender. Hecontendedthattheconvicthad
clean and unblemished record of public life of almost four
decades.Hefurthercontendedthatthepresentconvictionis
the only aberration in his otherwise clean and clear
antecedents. He contended that the convict had undergone
bypasssurgerytwoyearsbackandisalso suffering from
diabetes.Ld.DefenceCounselhasprayedforalenientview.
8.
9.
Sentencingisanimportantpartofcriminal
administration of justice. Judicial discretion plays a pivotal
roleinsentencing.Theobjectforwhich,sentenceis
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.4of14
ORDERONSENTENCE:
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
imposedisnotonlytopunishtheconvictforanunlawfulact
committedbyhim.Butalso, itisimposedtomakeitclear
that the society as such, denounces the sort of conduct in
whichtheoffenderwasinvolved.Itisalsotodetertheother
personsfromcommittingthesimilaroffence.
10.
balancingofinterestsofcommunityononehandandthatof
the accused and his family on the other, within the
frameworkoflaw.
11.
Ld.SpecialPPforCBIinDr.SubramaniamSwami'sCase
(supra),thequestionofsentencingwasnotthepointinissue
before Hon'ble Supreme Court. However, I would like to
mention an observation of Hon'ble Supreme Court, which
epitomizesthepresentscenarioofcorruptioninourcountry,
thesameisasunder:
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.5of14
ORDERONSENTENCE:
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
45.Today,corruptioninourcountry
not only poses a grave danger to the
concept of constitutional governance,
it also threatens the very foundation
ofIndiandemocracyandtheRuleof
Law.Themagnitudeofcorruptionin
our public life is incompatible with
the concept of a socialist, secular
democratic republic. It cannot be
disputed that where corruption
begins, all rights end. Corruption
devalues human rights, chokes
development and undermines justice,
liberty,equality,fraternitywhichare
the core values in our preambular
vision. Therefore, the duty of the
Courtisthatanyanticorruptionlaw
hastointerpretedandworkedoutin
such a fashion as to strengthen the
fight against corruption. That is to
say in a situation where two
constructions
are
eminently
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.6of14
ORDERONSENTENCE:
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
12.
13.
Tomakeourcountryandsocietycorruption
14.
wantstobeanationofbeautifulminds,thenIstronglyfeel
thatitcanbeachievedbyprovidingvalueeducationtoall,so
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.7of14
ORDERONSENTENCE:
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
15.
Herecomestheimportanceand roleofthe
16.
Hon'bleApexCourtin Dr.Subramaniam
Swami'sCase(supra),whileremindingtheothercourtsof
the country of their duty, has given a mandate that anti
corruptionlawshastobeinterpretedinsuchafashionsoasto
strengthenthefightagainstcorruption.
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.8of14
ORDERONSENTENCE:
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
17.
Inthepresentcase,theConvicthadkepthis
individualinterestsoverandabovethenationalinterestand
hasevenagreedtocompromisewiththesecurityandsafetyof
thenation.Hehadagreedtohelpacompanyie.M/sWestend
International,cominguptohimforgettingasupplyorderof
defence related equipments to Indian Army. The convict
agreedtocompromisewiththelivesoflakhsofthesoldiers
whowithoutfearingfortheirlives,fightforthenation. He
evenintheveryfirstmeetingwiththerepresentativesofa
company, had agreed to extend his influence for getting a
supplyorderintheirfavorwithrespecttoadefencerelated
equipmentforhispersonalgains,withoutgivingitathought
thattheequipmentsofthiscompany, mayormaynotbeof
substandardquality.
18.
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.9of14
ORDERONSENTENCE:
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
19.
20.
Corruptioninitselfisbadandinthewords
ofHon'bleSupremeCourtislikecancerforthesociety.Its
gravity and magnitude assumes dangerous and perilous
proportions, if the same is done by someone in position of
authority,tocompromisewiththedefencemechanismofour
countryandlivesofitsbravesoldiers.
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.10of14
ORDERONSENTENCE:
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
21.
whichhisinfluencewouldhavehadonthelivesofthesoldiers
ofIndianArmy,hadthedesignofconvictmaterialized,Iamof
theopinionthattherearenomitigatingcircumstancesandhe
does not deserve the leniency sought for him. As the
aggravatingcircumstancesoutscoresthemitigatingfactorsof
ageandthepreviousmedicalrecordoftheconvict.Hebeing
President of a political party was supposed to have shown
exemplarycharactertoleadbyexample.Butthatwasnotto
be.Thereforetheresultofthepathchosenbyhim,shouldbe
such,soastodeterothersnotthetreadthesame.
22.
Section9oftheP.C.Act1988correspondsto
Section163ofIndianPenalCode.Thepunishmentprescribed
undersection9isforatermnotlessthansixmonths but
whichmayextendtoaperiodof5yearswithfine.Whereas
undersection163IPC,punishmentwassimpleimprisonment
foratermwhichmayextendtooneyearorwithfineorboth.
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.11of14
ORDERONSENTENCE:
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
23.
Parliamentmusthavehadgoodreasonsto
enhancethepunishmenttoaminimumimprisonmentof six
monthsandamaximumextendingto5years,withliability
topayfineaswell.Obviously,cognizancehasbeentakenofa
widespread prevalence of practice of exertion of personal
influence on public servants by people acting to favor third
party,fromwhomtheyhaveobtainedillegalgratification.
24.
Itisoftensaidthat:theaccompliceofcrime
ofcorruptionisgenerallyourownindifference.SabChalta
hai syndromehasledustothepresentsituation,wherewe
are,wherenothingmoveswithoutanillegalconsideration.
Peopleareforcedtopayforgettingeventherightthingsdone
atrighttime. Itishightimetoshunthisattitude. When
Parliamenttakingnoteofthegrimsituationhastakenfirst
step to sternly deal with such persons by increasing the
quantumofpunishmentwhichcanbeimposed,itistheturn
ofthecourtstofollowsuit, soastoimplementthewilland
intentionoftheLegislaturebyinterpretingtheprovisionsof
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.12of14
ORDERONSENTENCE:
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
25.
thatoftheconvict,Iamoftheopinionthatinterestofjustice
wouldbemet,iftheconvictissentencedtoundergo rigorous
imprisonmentforatermoffouryearsandtopayafineof
Rs.1lakhforoffenceundersection9ofPreventionof
Corruption. He is sentenced accordingly. In default of
payment of fine, the convict is directed to undergo simple
imprisonmentforafurtherperiodofthreemonths.
26.
BenefitofSection428Cr.P.Cisgiventothe
convictandtheperiodofdetentionalreadyundergonebyhim
during inquiry, investigations and trial, be setoff against
substantivesentenceofimprisonmentimposedonhim.
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.13of14
ORDERONSENTENCE:
(C.B.I.Vs.BangaruLaxman)
th
Dated:28 April2012.
27.
Necessarycustodywarrantsbepreparedand
copyoforderonsentence,beannexedalongwiththewarrants
forrequisitecompliancebythejailauthorities.
28.
Copyofthejudgementandorderonsentence
begiventotheconvicttodayitself.
AnnouncedintheOpenCourt
Onthe28thDayofApril,2012.
(KANWALJEETARORA)
SPECIALJUDGE:C.B.I.(P.C.ACT)
DWARKACOURTS,NEWDELHI.
C.C.No:01/2011PageNo.14of14