Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 19716
CO2
..9
Research on the Quantification of GHG from Ships and Chinas Policy Response
Haifeng Wang1
1 University of Delaware, College of Earth, Marine, and Environment, Newark, DE, 19716
Abstract:
Greenhouse Gases from ships have attracted increasing attention. China, together with other developing
countries requires that the Common But Differentiated Responsibility should be the basis of international
negotiations on GHG reduction from ships; while developed countries insist that the Equal Treatment to All
Ships should be applied. This study uses sample of containerships from China to the United States and
analyzes the differences of these two scenarios in terms of economic cost. If all ships are required to reduce
emissions, Chinese containerships and exports have to pay between $0.18 billion and $0.19 billion more,
which may impose more cost to Chinas export industry. This study then discusses the strategies and policies
in international shipping GHG emission reduction regime.
Key Words: GHG, Emission Reduction from Ships, Chinas Response
H08YB06
1
[1] CO2
[2] 2007 CO2 3.3%
10.46 t [3]
CO2 CO2
1978 1973
Marpol73/78 CO2
IMOIMO
IMO
CO2 IMO
IMO
[4]
1 [5]
CO2
CO2
UNCTAD 2007
tkt
7199
1908
1394
1459
963
1159
2080
1287
3700
966
614
22729
232148
105227
55238
55145
54644
54341
51043
40201
34926
29627
20285
732825
Fijk = MFk
s
1k
sok
3
d
+ AFk ij
24 s1k
(1)
i j k ij F MF
AF s1k s0k
[6] d ij
CO2 IPCC
1t 3.15t CO2 CO2 E(2)
E = 3.15 Fijk
i , j ,k
(2)
C=
P (1 ) E
Export
(3)
[7-9]
[11] STEEM
[12] 2005 Waterborne Databank
2
1
2
3
2
/nautical miles
5225
7784
8390
2354
/knots
23.1
23.3
23.3
21.7
38000
37700
37300
26900
10
10
10
313
1862
469
18215
34
262
80
1038
/d
9.1
7.1
5.9
17.5
/kwh
/ 2005
4 CO2
4.1
(1)(2) 2005 38 t 120 t CO2
3.4%
3 CO2 5
32005 CO2
Table 3: The Origin and Destination Ports and CO2 Emissions in 2005
CO2 t
565000
427000
265000
150000
95200
4 CO2 CO2
1.3 1.4
4 CO2
CO2 /10^6 t
CO2 /10^6
1.74
6.5
41.3 - 43.5
154 - 168
0.08%
0.10%
5.5
/
t /*t
-1
CO2
1.8 1.9
1.4 1.5
1.8 ~1.9
CO2
CO2
:
1982 7
[1] IPCC. Climate Change 2007: A Synthesis Report [R]. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, 2007.
[2] Corbett, J.J. and P.S. Fischbeck. Emissions From Ships [J]. Science, 1997, 278(5339): 823-824.
[3] IMO, Updated Study on GHG Emissions From Ships [R]. London: MPEC, 2009
[4] IMO, An International Fund for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships Submitted by Denmark. [R].
Longdon: MPEC, 2009
[5]
.[M].1999 .68-75
[6] Stopford, M., Maritime Economics. Second ed., [M]. London, UK: Routledge, Taylor and Francis
Group. 1997. 562.
[7] IMO, Updated Study on GHG Emissions From Ships [R]. Longdon: MPEC, 2009.
[8] Corbett, J.J., H. Wang, and J.J. Winebrake. The Impacts of Speed Reductions on Vessel-Based
Emissions from International Shipping [J], Transport Research Part D. 2009: Washington DC.
7
[9] Wijnolst, N., Design Innovation in Shipping [M]. The Netherlands: Delft University Press. 1995, 570.
[10]
Navigational Data center
[11] Lolyds Maritime Information System (LMIS). The Lloyds Maritime Database [M]. London: Lloyd's
Register - Fairplay Ltd, 2007.
[12] Wang, C., J.J. Corbett, and J. Firestone. Modeling Energy Use and Emissions from North American
Shipping: Application of the Ship Traffic, Energy, and Environment Model [J]. Environ. Sci. Technol.
2007, 41(9): p. 3226-3232.
[13] Gallagher, K.P., International trade and air pollution: Estimating the economic costs of air emissions
from waterborne commerce vessels in the United States [J] Journal of Environmental Management, 2005.
77(2): p. 99-103.