Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
In this unit, we are going to discuss The inadequacy of classical mechanics Birth of quantum mechanics Basic formalism of quantum mechanics Introduction to quantum mechanical operators
The concepts and formulation of quantum mechanics are not elementary in the sense that they are easily understood. They are based on the outcome of considerable theoretical research supported by experimental evidence. The quantum mechanical approach to physical problems cannot be explained in simple non- mathematical terms. Simple and elegant mathematical techniques have been used to elucidate the physical concepts.
Quantum Mechanics can be regarded as the fundamental theory of atomic phenomena. The experimental data on which it is based are derived from physical events that lie almost entirely beyond the range of human perception. It is not surprising, that the theory embodies physical concepts that are foreign to common daily experience.
3 associated with the physical entity, the quantum state, is known as the State Vector. The different kinds of wave functions for a given state (in the configuration space, momentum space) are simply the sets of components of the state vector as referred to different coordinate systems or bases in the state vector space. This notation was introduced by Dirac. It is used to relate different representations. The notation is very general and suitable for handling of systems which have no classical counterpart, e.g. spin angular momentum.
from its representation, the wave functions. The state vectors constitute a complex
correspond to the same physical state. The set of all such vectors constitute a space
4 called a ray in the space. Therefore, we can say that any physical state is represented by a ray (rather than a single vector) in the vector space. Corresponding to every vector y there is a conjugate vector y Dirac used to notation y . for which
i.e. y y , y
(1)
The relation between any vector and its conjugate may be visualized readily if we consider examples of their representations. In the Schrdinger picture
y 0y
,y =
0 if and only if y = 0 .
(2a)
In general if the vector y and its conjugate f of some vector f are juxtaposed in such a was as to form a closed bracket f y , this symbol represents a single (real or complex) number which is defined to be the scalar product of f and y , taken in that order. Vectors of type y which forms the first half of the closed brackets are called Bra Vectors and those of the type y which forms the second half are called Ket Vectors. The conjugate of a bra vector is a ket vector, and vice versa. In the Schrdinger picture, f
y f ( x )yx( d . It is to be noted that * ) t
*
f y y f but f y = y f
(2b)
(2c)
Any vector space (in general infinite dimensional) such that between any two vectors of the space a scalar product which satisfies equation (2) is called a Hibert space. The space of ket vectors (or bra vectors) representing quantum mechanical states is thus a Hilbert space.
A ( 1yc + c 2y) =2 c 1
y ( A + )1 c 2y A 2 ) ( 1
dynamic variables in quantum mechanics do not commute with each other that is AB BA.
, i2 , j . . N , ) , = . .
(1)
Then a new basis can be constructed by forming N linear combinations of these vectors,
N j ei = u j =1 *j i j
(2)
in which ui j are suitably chosen complex numbers. This new basis are also orthonormal, provided that
(e , e ) = d
i' j'
i j
(3)
u
k, l
* k u ( e , lle )i d j = k j
(4)
u
k
* i k j k i j
u =d
(5)
must satisfy
(6)
It is also apparent that this conditions is sufficient to insure that the vectors ei ' formed according to equation (2) are orthonormal. Hence the necessary and sufficient conditions for the vectors ei ' to form an orthonormal basis is that the matrix U is
unitary. Since U -1U =U 1 U= 1
U U= U U 1 =
Such a unitary transformation has the effect of substituting the basis {e' } for the basis
(8)
(9)
Then, since these expression representatives of one and the same vector,
x
j
j i
' e= xi juj * e i j,
(10)
7 hence by orthogonality of e j ,
x j = i j * xi ' u
i
(11)
This equation provides the connection between the components xi ' x the i of vector with respect to the bases {e} {e' } . Since U is the unitary matrix, equation (11) can be solved for xi' in terms of xi . 1.10. LET US SUM UP In this unit, we have studied The inadequacy of classical mechanics Birth of quantum mechanics Basic formalism of quantum mechanics Introduction to quantum mechanical operators Hilberts space and Dirac notation
1.11. LESSON END ACTIVITIES 1. List the inadequacy of classical mechanics 2. Briefly discuss about Hilberts space 3. Give an account on Dirac notation 4. What are conditions under which an operator can be represented by a diagonal matrix.? 5. What are bra and ket vectors? 6. Define a linear operator in Hilbert space.
1.12. References
1.A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 2.Quantum Mechanics Leonard I. Schiff, McGraw Hill International edition. 3.Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Narosa Publishing house. 4.Quantum Mechanics S.L. Gupta, V. Kumar, H.V. Sharma, R.C. Sharma. Jai Prakash Nath & Co Ltd. 5.Quantum Mechanics Satya Prakash Sultan Chand Publishers .
8 6.Angular Momentum Techniques in Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Kluwer Academic Publishers. 7.Quantum Mechanics John L. Powell and Bernd Crasemann Narosa Publishing house.
In this lesson we are going to study Schrodinger picture Heinsenbergs picture Interaction picture
Ha =s
t(
(1)
The subscripts refers to the ket as viewed is Schrdinger picture. T h e t o t a l time derivative in used here, since the dependence of ket on co-ordinate or other variable does not appear explicitly. The Hermitian adjoint wave equation will be
10
d as= t ( d t
-i h
ts a
(H )
= a s (t ) H
(2)
Since H = H because H is hermitian. Assuming H to be independent of time the solution for the above equations will be of the form
a s ( t ) = ea s a s ( t ) =s a
-i
H e h
( 0)
-i H e h
and
(3) (4)
e ( 0)
This can be easily verified by differentiating equation (3) and getting the equation (1)
d i a s (t ) = H a s d t h
ih d as ( t d t
-i H t h
(t )
Ha =s
t(
)
-i H t h
The operator e
dynamical variable, that can be expressed as an operator or square matrix. It is essential to remember that the operator e
-i H t h
ordinary sense of rotation of axes in Hilberts space as U, V, W. But it represents the change of in to some other ket a s ( 0 ) . Thus the series as a whole is also a dynamical variable. The time rate of change of matrix element of a dynamical variable W s in the Schrdinger picture can be found out as
d a s (t W) s b (t d t = d = a s( ) { t d W ) } bt (t
s
) + ts a ( t
dW ) bss t( + d
) a t( s W t
) b s t{ (
-1 a s (t W) s b ( H ih t = a s (t
W 1 s )t a ( t ) + t + b ( s s h i 1 )s t a W ( i h
) a W( s H b t )
( t )
W ) s+bt ( s t
) H b s ](t [ ,
The first term on the right hand side arises due to any explicit time dependence
W s may have. The second term on the right hand side arises due to the change in the
11 A special case of interest will b when W s is time independent, and when W s commutes with H. In such a case right hand side will be zero and all the matrix elements of W s are constant in time. Such a dynamical variable is said to be a constant of the motion.
)= a ( t t
W ) s t+b( s i
1 ) ts a W ( h
i H t h
H[ )
b ,
t ](
with
a s (t = ea( ) sh
) and
a s (t )=s ( e ) a 0
d as ( d
i h
-t
e0 W s b (e = s ) 0 t
i h
)a ( e t i H 1 + a sW e h s- H ( 0 ) ih
-i H t h
i - H h s
i WH 0 eh )bs s (
0
t i
)
H - t
( b h ) e (s W H s
aH (
0= as )
(= 0a h ) e s
( t
since a H (t ) does not depend on time, the explicit mention of t may be omitted. The dynamical variable W H and its derivative to be
WH = e
i H T i -H T h h s
We
and
i H T i - T W H W H h =e esh t t W d H aH W +H a H b = H d t t i
i H t -i H t i H t i H 1 h h h h W - Hs H s e b e H a W H b e H e h
12
d a H W Hb d t W = a H H+ b H t i 1 a HW h
[H
,b H] H d can be d t
since the state vectors in Heisenbergs picture are independent of time brought inside the ket a H in the above equations and we will have
aH d WH b H d H W 1 =Ha W a H+ b H t t i h
,bH ] H
This equation is true for arbitrary bra and ket vectors and hence we can write
d W H HW = + d t t 1 W [ ih ,H]
This equation is called equation of motion in Heisenbergs picture. This is similar to the classical equation of motion for the dynamical variable F given by
d F F = + {F , H } d t t
where { F , H is poisson bracket. } So the transition from classical to quantum mechanical picture can be made by replacing the poisson bracket with commutator bracket divided by ih
The quantities that are not altered are the matrix element of the dynamical variable and this provides the physical content of the system since eigenvalues, expectation values, and transition probabilities can be obtained from the matrix element. In the interaction picture, the Hamiltonian is split up into two parts as H = H0 + H' where H0 is usually chosen to be independent of time. H0 may be simple
13 structure as the coloumb interaction and H' may be the external electromagnetic field varying with time. In the interaction picture we define the state vectors and the dynamical variables as
-i o s t H h s
a I (t =) a ( e
i
oH
t )
i - Hs o t
(1)
st
W I (t = es h W eh )
) i= h o
o s s i do H a h + h (t ) sh a e i s t h d t
t s
t ()
= H o -a ts( )+ Ie a H = H o -a ts( )+ IH a e
= H o -a s t( )+ H a I s = H ' aI ( t
I
i o st H h s
(t ) (t )
i o st H h s s
t (
t
)
i H t i H
s
)
H t- i H t
d WI i = Ho d h W I = + t W I = + t W I = + t
o s o s o i W s ho h h h W e s +e s e+ s s e W t t h 1 W I Ho- s H Ws I ) ( o ih 1 W I , H s] [ o ih 1 W I , H I] [ o ih
e o
o s h - s H
o h e
H s
In interaction picture, part of the time dependence is assigned to the state vectors and another part to the dynamical variables instead of having one constant and the other time dependent.
2.4. LET US SUM UP In this lesson we have discussed Schrodinger picture Heinsenbergs picture Interaction picture in detail.
14
3. Compare the equation of motion in Schrodingers picture with that of Heinsenbergs picture
4. Obtain the equation of motion in Diracs picture
2.7. Problems: Show that If the Hamiltonain H of a system does not contain time explicitly
a (t ) = e
i H t h
Solution
a ( t ) = a( 0 ) t + d d a '' t ( )t ' d
0 t
= a ( 0) + = a ( 0)
1 a 'H ih 0
t( )d '
t t 1 + ' a ' + H t ( ih 0 d 0
) t'a
't
= a ( 0)
1 1 + 0 H a t'+ )d ' t ( th ih
1 t. + 2h ! i H 2 2 2 . +t . ( )
1 = 1 +H . ih
=e
-i H t h
a0 (
a (0)
-i H t h
15
Obtain the equation of motion for <A> in the Schrodingers picture and also in the Heisenbergs picture.
2.9. References
1. A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 2. Quantum Mechanics Leonard I. Schiff, McGraw Hill International edition. 3. Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Narosa Publishing house.
(1)
where =
k m
[ x,
p 2 H , x +x = ] 2m
=
1 , k 2
x2
since [x,x] = 0
1 , p { p [ x ]p+ [ x, p] +}0 2m
16
1 {ihp} + {ihp} 2m 2ihp 2m
=
= =
(2)
=0+ =
1 k { x[ p ]x [ p x }x , + , ] 2
since [p,p] = 0
(3)
, x
]H = l
ih p k l m ih = k p l m
(4)
k But k [x , H] l = x H -H x l= k x H l k H x l
Introducing a dummy operators, l
l and k
(5)
(6)
(7)
= ( El - E k
k | p >l < |
(8)
(9)
h2k 1 = m ( El - E k k h 2w 2 p= l k ( El - E k
k p l l
( El - E = k )
w h
Thus we see that the energy difference between successive levels will be hw . Therefore the energy change can takes place in units of hw
hw - k i m x l w ( El - E k)
(11)
(10) + (11)
k p iw m = x hw l k wp ( El - E k) i m x l
( El - E k
kh- p w )
i - m 0x = l w
m x Thus ( p - i) w 0=
( p +i
m )( -p w m )x0 w x i =
{p
+ m 2( x - p 2 p + 2m x =0 i w w x )
Dividing throughout by 2m
p 2 i 2wm 2 m w + ih + 2m 2m 2m p2 1 1 - hw m +w 2 2m 2
=0
x 2= 0
p2 1 1 + m w 2 x 2 wh = 0 2m 2 2
1 0 H - hw = 2 H 0 = 1 h0 w 2 0
Thus
1 En = n + hw 2
n=0,1,2,..
( p + imwx ) is called the raising operator or creating operator and ( p - imwx ) is called
the lowering operator or annihilation operator for the above mentioned reasons.
It is a customary practice to represent the raising and lowering operators as dimensionless quantity. Therefore we multiply the raising operator ( p + imwx ) by the factor
-i 2mhw
i 2mhw
19
1 a = m x{ w - i 2mhw 1 a = m x{ w + i 2mhw
a
p p
} }
i p}
1 a m x +i p = { w 2 mh w
m{ x w }-
1 m 2wx i+2w p( 2 x x +2 p p m ) 2 mh w
- i ( 1 1 2 2 i wm h ) p 2 = mw x + + hw 2 2 m 2 m
= =
1 1 H + hw hw 2 H 1 + hw 2
hw a
1 - a =H hw 2
m{ x w }i p}
(12)
1 a a m x +i p = { w 2 mh w
2 1 1 2 2 i wm p = + mw x + hw 2 2 2 m m 1 1 = (H hw ) hw 2
H 1 hw 2
1 H = hw + hw a a 2 Post multiply by a in (12) 1 H =ahw a - ahw a a 2 Premultiply by a in(13) 1 a = hw a + ahw a a H 2 Since aH - Ha = [a, H ] we have [a, H ] = hwa Similarly
(13)
(14)
(15)
20
1 a H hwa -a hwa a = 2 1 H = hwa +ahwa a a 2 Since a H- H =a a , H we have
a , a, H hw = -a a a = a- a a
H + hw H a a = hw a, = a 1 a a=
1 2 1 2
This is called the number operator Eigen values of raising and lowering operator a, a Let
a yn =n a a y n = n b
y n y n
+1
( n + / hw ) 1 1 2 - y n hw 2 = n yn y n =n y n a yn a =y a an y n = yn
+ = a n an y 1 y1 n n-
(16)
(17)
1 2
21
= ( n +1) y n y n
= n+1 (18)
y n a yn a =y a n
an y
= b n bn y a y1 +1 n + n
= bn
2
(19) =
+1
bn a y n = n y1 + n
n +1
y n
-1
= nd n' , 0 0 a = 0 0
-1 n
2 0 0 0
0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0
+1
0 0 0 5
' y n a yn = y +' 1 y n n n
= n + 1d n ,
+1 n
0 2 0 0
0 0 3 0
0 0 0 4
0 0 0 0
p) p)
2mw x h
22
x=
h a + a 2mw
}
0 0 0 0
0 h 0 2mw 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 + 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0
h = 2mw
Similarly
(a
)a
1 = i -( p 2 2hw m
Or p =
mhw i - a 2 mhw =i 2
(-a)
0 2 0 0 -2 0 3 0 0 -3 0 4 0 0 -4 0
as N - m - N N + and as .
When >1 the situation is reversed. In either case, the wave function in the Nth well will diverge in one or both of the limits N + N - Hence we must have and .
m = eiq
( real)
(1)
Also we have
1 c o = m o m s-1+h ' . c =o s w. s ai nw h 'b=f s i n - w s j ( ) q s c a w b s + . w b c o 2
(2)
where
23
1 2
(3)
The above equation (3) determines the allowed energy levels since and (and hence f and also) depend on the parameter E. From the structure of this equation it is immediately evident that the allowed energies form continuous bands with gaps in between. For, since the value of the left hand side of equation (2) is restricted to -1 c oq s 1 the equation can be satisfied only when the right hand side , also is within this range. As the parameter E is varied , the right hand side,
f c ob s w( j as oscillates between the bounds + f (E) and - f (E) which lie outside - ) ,
s h the limits +1 and -1 admissible for cos, since f c o a> w ' . 1 The intervals of E ) for which f c ob sw ( j 1constitute the allowed energy bands, and those for
which
between allowed bands. The variation of f c ob sw ( j ) with E, and the identification of energy bands and gaps are illustrated in Figure 3.1
V =0 (n-1)'
n' =
(n+1)'
V = -V0
-.25 E V0
'
b
-.25
E V0
-.75
-.75
-2
-1
-2
-1
Fig.1 fcos(-)
b) fcos(-)
Fig.3.1 Energy bands and gaps or V0w 2 = 2 a w0 = ) 'w0 . 1 and 0 ( ; (b )w ' = w 2 Bands of allowed energies are shown as thickened 0 . sections on the energy axis. Note the narrowing of the bands as ' increases. In the limit w ' they reduce to points at the positions of the energy levels of a single potential well, shown by arrows in the
24
The nature of the energy eigenfunctions u(x) corresponding to any energy E within an allowed band can now be easily seen. We recall that we have already imposed the necessary continuity conditions on the wave function, which resulted in the transfer equation
( )
+ An An
n =M A n
+ A
( )
-1 -1
(4)
and also the condition of finiteness at infinity which gave us the restriction equation (2) on the eigenvalues of the transfer matrix M. There are no further conditions on the wave function, and in particular, there is nothing to prevent us from choosing the two coefficients (A+, A- or B+, B-) in any one of the regions in Figure.1.2. Suppose then that we choose some energy E within an allowed band, and after finding ,,c,s for this E using
2m 2m 2m 2 = a 2 a-2 n ( d 2 E)= b 0 (-V + V 0 2 h h h
E= )
(5)
determine from equation (2) and the matrix M itself from equation (4). Now let us
avail ourselves of the freedom of choosing the coefficients, and take Ae+ , A to be such e
that the column made up of these is the eigenvector belonging to the eigenvalue eiq of M, i.e.
( ) e= ( )
+ A0 A0
+ Aiq 0 A 0
(6)
( )
A+ N
AN
=MN A
+ A
( )
0 0
(7)
we have
25
( )
+ An An
= eAi- qn
+ A
( )
0 0
(8)
i.e. the coefficients depend on n only through the simple factor ein . It is obvious that
+ a similar result holds good for Bn a n n d B , - also. If we think of a well and the adjacent
barrier together, as forming a unit cell of the repeating pattern, the result just obtained may be stated in the following instructive form: The wave functions at corresponding points x and x + nb of wells (or barriers) separated by n unit cells differ only by the constant factor ei qn :
i uq ( x + n) = ( qn u ) x b e q
(9)
( b x and vq ( x =v x + n ) ) q)
(10)
in equation (9), the periodicity of vq ( x ) follows. Besides uq ( x ) there is another independent solution u-q ( x ) obtained by using the eigenvalue e - iq of M instead of
eiq in equation (6). The most general eigenfunction for a given energy E is a linear
The above results are of considerable physical importance in the study of crystalline solids where in the array of atoms produces a potential forming a regular repeating pattern. In the usual situation, the number of atoms is so large that the idealization to infinite number may be made to simplify matters. The Kronig-Penny model makes the further idealization of treating the potential due to each atom as a square well. But the fundamental specifically, the occurrence of allowed energy bands and forbidden gaps follows just from the periodicity property, V(x) = V(x + nb), of the potential. The general form equation (10) of the eigenfunctions, are called Bloch wave functions. But the explicit structure of the function vq ( x ) equation (10) in depends on the actual shape of the potential function. 3.7. LET US SUM UP
26 From this lesson one can get an clear idea on linear harmonic oscillator in detail. We can calculate the energy eigenvalues. The Kronig Penny model, is discussed in detail which find application field of nuclear physics and material science.
3.9. References
1. A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 2. Quantum Mechanics Leonard I. Schiff, McGraw Hill International edition. 3. Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Narosa Publishing house. 4. Quantum Mechanics S.L. Gupta, V. Kumar, H.V. Sharma, R.C. Sharma. Jai Prakash Nath & Co Ltd. 5. Quantum Mechanics Satya Prakash Sultan Chand Publishers . 6. Angular Momentum Techniques in Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Kluwer Academic Publishers. 7. Quantum Mechanics John L. Powell and Bernd Crasemann Narosa Publishing house. .
27
4.2. INTRODUCTION In quantum mechanics, there are many physical systems for which, the equation of motion cannot be solved exactly. So, one has to resort to approximation methods. There are three most important approximation methods in quantum mechanics. They are
28
where H o is unperturbed Hamiltonian & is of sufficiently simple structure, that its Schrdinger equation can be solved. & H ' is perturbed Hamiltonian & is small enough so that it can be regarded as a perturbation on H o . Let U k & E k be the orthonormal eigenfunctions & eigenvalues of the
unperturbed Hamiltonian H o . Let y &W be the wave function and energy level of perturbed Hamiltonian Therefore we can write.
H0 U = E U k k k Hy Wy =
29
The assumption that H ' is small suggests that, we expand the perturbed eigenfunction & eigenvalues as power series in H ' . This is easily accomplished interms of a parameter l, such that, the zero, first, second.. powers of l correspond to zero, first, second .. orders of perturbations. We replace H ' by l H ' and express Y and W as power series in l. We assume that, these two series are continuous analytic function of l for l between zero and one. The different orders of perturbation approximation are then given by the coefficients of corresponding powers of l. In the final result, l is set equal to one. The perturbed wave function & energy level are written as
y = y 0 l y + 2 2y +3l3 y . . . . . . . + 1 l + W = W + W + 2W +3 W + . . . . . . . . l 1 l 2 l3 0
(3a) (3b)
2 ( H o +)l ( . y 0 . l. 1 . W + . 2 . l = W y( + . 1l W l2 . +. . . . ) ' + . H + y . . ) 2 . . . + 0
(y 0. + . y + l 2 y . . . ) l 1 . 2 + . . .
(4)
The above equation is valid for a continuous range of l . We now, equate the coefficients of equal powers of l on both sides to obtain a series of equations that represent successively higher orders of perturbation.
l 0 Ho =Wy y 0 0
0
( H o )W y0=0 - 0
l 1 H o +1H y
0
(5a)
0
' W 0 W + yW = y 1 1
( H 0- ) W y( W - 1 y ) 0 ' H 0 = 1
(5b)
2 s i m i l al r l f o r (0yH W ) 1- W 1 H ' 2 ) Wy y o( y + 0 2=
(5c) (5d)
l3
( o- W )3= ( 1 W yH 2' ) y W 2 W y H 0 y - 2 + 1 + 0
The first of the above set of equations means that y 0 is any one of the unperturbed eigenfunctions. Therefore, we can write,
30
y 0 um & o W m E = =
(6)
This state u m is discrete, since we are dealing with the perturbation of a bound state. It is assumed to be non degenerate as well, although, others of the unperturbed eigenfunctions may be degenerate or continuous.
( ) Expressing y1 = a n1 u n y & = m u n 0
( 1 ) ( n an H 0 u- n a n n ) ( a(n E 1 n u- n a ( 1 ) n
1 n 1 n
W )n u
W n u 1 -Hm ' =
m
E n) u
W n u 1- m ' = H
a [ En - m] un W1 u mH 'm u E = -
n ( a n1 ) Em E n] u+ W1 u mH 'm u [ = k
n ( a [ E m 1- ] u) tu d * 1 u * k u d * u = H 'm t d E n W + t u n k n m k
W . K y.* T dl t1 m f dm = 0 = i f m i = l ; l l y
m
) n( 1 [m E dk E n + ]1 d m = k a - n W H k
'
= H
'
(7)
(8)
31
Hkm ' ( m- k ) E E
(9)
N o t i c e t h a t w e h a v e n o t b e e n a b l e t o d e t e r m(ni n e a1e n c )e w e( a s s 1u m e) t h = t a 0 H. a m
weget
n n n ( a H 20 u n a n( n2 -) W n 0
u) = na(
1 W
) n
m m
( ) a E 2 u n a n( n2 u) = a( E m n n n ( 2 ) n n
1 ( W n )u 1 a n ( 1 )
a [ E -m ] n - 2 W m= n a n - 1 u a E u u W n
) n
'
Rearranging we get
a (n[
2 m
) a
* a ( nu 1 H ) ' n u* n dm 1 -m ) ' k u t u d k t ( H a n n
n a
( n
[m 2 n ) d E n( - E k
' ] 1 k W)m d + a n n
( Hn = n
1 n
-m)H m dk '
(10)
For m = k, we get,
( 1 W2 = n a n S H m ) ' ( n m
-a
1 ) ' m m
n n m
' ( 1 ) ' n m n
where prime over the summation indicates that, we have omitted the term n = m. Substituting the value of a (n 1 )from first order perturbation equation we have,
' W2 = n S
| H m'2 | n ( m- n ) E E
where we used the relation H m ' n= ( H n m)*. The above equation gives ' the second order perturbation to the energy eigenvalue. For k m, equation (10) gives
32
a (k [
2 m ) 1 E - E (n = 1n a )k H(n '-k a ] S k ) m
'
( u s i n g t h e v a l u e o 1f )a w e g e t n ) a (k 2 = n'
a (k 2 =
) n
< k | H ' | n < | H '> | m k< | H ' > m m<| H ' > m > n | | S 2 ( m - Ek ) m E n E ) E ( ( m- k ) E E
(12)
(13 a) (13 b)
um =
'
|< k | H > | m | <m | H> | m | <k | H > | n | < | H ' >| m ' ' ' ' n u k + 1 k - -E + ) n ( E Ek ) - E n E ) ( k m m E m - E n( E m
The primes in the above equation denote the omission of k = m or n = m. It is to be noted that, the wave function y is not normalised since
(y , y ) = 1 + '
k
(14)
tothesecondorderinH'.Thisoccuredbecauseoh e c o n d i t0 i o n ( = ) 0>, s 0 ft y y , s
Applications of Stationary Perturbation Theory The Normal Helium Atom Or Ground State Of Helium Atom
-e r12 -e
r1
r2
+Ze NUCLEUS Consider the normal state of helium atom which contains a nucleus of charge Ze and two electrons each having a charge e. The potential energy of such a system is given by
V=
2 Z 2 e Z e2 e - - + r1 2 r 1 r2
(1)
in which r1 and r2 are the distances of electrons 1 and 2, respectively from nucleus
33 and r12 is the separation of the two electrons as shown in Figure 1. Considering the nucleus at rest, the wave equation for the two electrons becomes
2 2 2y 2 y y y 2 y 2 y + 2 + 2 + + 2 + 2 2 2 z 2 x 2y z 1 1 2 x1 y 2 2 2m Z e Z e 2 e + 2 E + + y = h r1 2 r 1 r2
(2)
0
The variables x1 , y1 , z1 are Cartesian coordinates of one electron and x2 , y2 , e2 z2 those of the other. If the term is omitted, the wave equation can be solved r1 2 exactly; hence this term may be regarded as perturbation term 2 (1 ) e H = (3) r1 2 The unperturbed wave equation can be separated into two equations by substituting
0 (0 ) (0 ) y ( ) ( x1 y1 z1 , x 2 y 2 z 2 ) = u1 ( x1 y1 z1 )u 2 ( x 2 y 2 z 2 )
(4)
Considering the wave functions in polar coordinates r1 , 1 , f 1 , and r2 , 2 f 2 and in normal state,
0 ( y 1( 0)0 y= 1 (0 ) 0( r1 , j 0 0 1,)yr1 )1(q q , 0 0 , 0 1 0 2 2 2
,j
) )
(5)
= y 1(s0) (q , r 1
js0 1) y( , r1 ,
, (2 q
,j2
The first order perturbed energy E(1) is the average value of the perturbation
2 ()=e function H over the unperturbed state of the system. Hence
1
r1
2 0 ( E (1) = y n (H ) *y 1 ) n =
( 0 )
dt
e 2 ( 0 )2 y d 0 0 , 1t 0 1 0 r1 2
(6)
we know that
Z3 0 u1(s0) 1= y ( )0= e 0 3 p a0
-r / 2
(7)
34
Z 3 ( - r1/ 2 ) ( - r/ 2 ) e e . p a03
y 1( 0)0 , 1 0= 0 0
(8)
(9)
E (1) =
Z 2e 25 p 2a0
0 0 0
p 2 1 2 2
d 0r
p 2 0
0 2
) e( - r1 - r2
r12 r 1
(10)
s q1id q1n d- s r d i r nq j d2 1 2
in which 12 = 2Zr12 / a0.
qd 2 j 2
The value of the integral can be calculated by considering the electrostatic interaction energy of two spherically symmetrical distributions of electricity, with density functions e(-1) and e(-2) respectively, Solving the integral, we have
) E( 1 = Z
5 EH 4
(11)
(
)
2 -2Z5/4Z -
E.
(12)
Thus we can calculate the energy of He, Li+, B e ++, etc. with Z = 2,3,4 etc. respectively.
The ground state of hydrogen atom is non degenerate, but the n = 2 energy levels of hydrogen atom is four fold degenerate. On the application of an external electric field, the degeneracy is partly removed. The splitting of atomic energy levels due to the application of external electric field is known as Stark effect and it has been discovered as early as 1913. It is found that the splitting of energy levels of the hydrogen atom for weak electric field is proportional to the field strength, and hence it is known as Linear Stark Effect or First order Stark Effect. The splitting of energy level for all other atom is proportional to second power of the field strength and that is known as Quadratic Stark Effect.
35
with n = 2 is
four fold degenerate. We shall write down explicitly the degenerate eigenfunctions,
(1)
where, Yl
m l
radial part of the wave functions. The radial functions are given by ,
R2 ( 0
- r / 20 a
(2)
R2 ( = r ) 1 2
r e 6 0 a0 a
3
(3) (4)
a0 = h 2 / m e
The Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom is taken as the unperturbed Hamiltonian H0 and the applied electric field as the perturbation H'. If the electric field E is along the z axis, the perturbation is given by H' = - eEz = - e- Er cos
H 'e =
4p 3
Er
1 0
q jY(,)
(5)
where, - e- is a positive quantity. Since, H' is of odd parity, the matrix elements between the states of same parity (same l value) vanish. The same result can be arrived at by considering the angular integration involving the spherical harmonics. The only surviving matrix elements are,
y2 y2
0 1
1 0
0
0
It can be easily seen that this two matrix elements are equal. Let us evaluate one of them
36
y2 H0'y 2 1 =y 2 d0 H 0* y2r W ' 1 d
4p e 3 1 4p
where, Y00 (q , f = )
1 0 1 0
Y W = d 1
( R ( r) R ) rr
0 0
r =d r - 1r e 4 3 2a 0 1
-r a0
Letting x =
a0 x 4 - x 1 - x e d x 4 3 2 0
a0 5 ! 4 -!2 4 3
9a = - 0 4 3
y 2 0 Hy2 0 '
1 0
(7)
a 4p 91 e= . E - . 0 3 3
4p
= e E
4p 3
(8)
1 0
y 2 Hy 0 e 2 = 1E3 0 '
a0
0 0
a s H1'
and
' H 2 because of the definition equation (1) and denoting the quantity 3|e|E a0 by P1 we 1
have,
(9)
' Substituting the values of H1' 2and H 2 1in the secular equation,
37
-W1 C 1 P 2 C 0 = - P 1 - 1 2C 0 C W = - W1 C 0 = 3 - W1 C 0 = 4
If W1 = P, then C1 = - C2 and C3 = C4 = 0 If W1 = -P, then C1 = C2 and C3 = C4 = 0 If W1 = 0, then C1 = C2 = 0 and C3 and C4 are indeterminate Then it follows that,
1 U1 = u ( - 2 ) u 1 2 1 U 2 = u ( + 2 ) u 1 2 U 3 = 3 u+ C 4u C 3 4 ' U 4 = 3 ' u+ C 4u C 3 4
(10)
(11)
give respectively the first order correction to the energy and the corresponding zeroth order eigenfunctions. It is seem that out of the four degenerate states only the
n two states y 2 0a 0y2 d1 0 are split but the other two states y 2 1 and y 2 - continue to be 1 1 1
W0 +3_e|Ea0 W0
U2
W0 -3_e|Ea0
38
4.7. References
1. Quantum Mechanics Leonard I. Schiff, McGraw Hill International edition. 2. Quantum Mechanics A.K. Ghatak and S. Lokanathan McMillan Publishers. 3. Quantum Mechanics Satya Prakash Sultan Chand Publishers 4. Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Narosa Publishing house. 5. Quantum Mechanics S.L. Gupta, V. Kumar, H.V. Sharma, R.C. Sharma. Jai Prakash Nath & Co Ltd.
39
(1)
is an upper limit to the lowest energy state of the system. In the above equation, H is the complete Hamiltonian operator for the system and the function f is any normalised function of the co-ordinates of the system. The choice of the function
f is quite arbitrary but the more wisely H is chosen, the more closely W will
approach the energy Eo . If we use the true wave function y o of the lowest state instead of f , then W will be equal to E o . It f is not equal to y o , we may expand f is terms of the complete set of normalised orthogonal functions y o , y1. . y . y . , . .n 2
f y a= w it
n n n n n
h *n= a 1 a
(2)
Substitutinginequation(1)weget W= a
n
y a H y
m n
* n
dm
z z
=
n
ay a
* n
* n
* m
E n d y m
m
=
n m n
d m n a E m
= a * an E n n
W= a
n 2 n
En
(3)
Subtractingthegroundstateenergyfromthebo i d e s ths
40
W- E 0 = a
n n 2 n
E-
E Q a n =1
n
= a n ( n E 0E ) n
(4)
As a n
is positive and E n E , the R.H.S is positive or Zero. Thus the have proved 0
(5)
Note :If the function f is not normalised, then W is given by the expression
W=
f Hf dt f fd t
*
The variation of f is performed by first choosing a suitable functional form for f . Depending on a number of parameters l1 , . .l. . . .l. . . . . 2 n
W ( 1, . l .2 .l. . n= . ) f* ( l 2. .l. .n l . . 1 ) H l , .l.2 . l . )td l . . , . y ( . 1 2
As the parameters are varied, the value of W also varies. Minimization of W is then accomplished by finding the values of l1 , .l. . l . for which . 2 n
W = 1 l W W . .=. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 = 2 l l n
5.3. Application of Varitional Method : 5.3.1. Ground state energy of the Hydrogen atom.
In this case wave function is of the general form
y = e- a
r
(1)
For the ground state of hydrogen atom, the potential energy term will be e2 / r and hence the form of the Hamiltonian operator H will be
h2 e2 2 H =- 2 r 8p m
(2)
as the energy occurs in the radial equation, we need only to consider the radial part of the Laplacian operator 2 . Hence
2 = 1 2 r r 2 r r
(3)
41
1 2y = 2 2 r e r r r
-a r
2 1 2 - ar = 2 2r + r e r r r 2
1 r2
- ar 2 2r e + r 2 2 e - ar r r
( )
( )
1 2r (- a )e - ar + r 2 a 2 e - ar 2 r
]
(4)
= e - a ra 2
2 a r
y y * H dt E= y * yd t
-a
rh 2 - a 2 a 2 2 - e r a e - r - ap 2 m e r r 8
2 r
d 4p r
r e -2 a r4p2 d
where 4pr 2 dr is the volume of a spherical shell at a distance r and r+dr from the nucleus. The limit of integration varies from 0 to as r goes form zero to infinity.
h2 a 2 h r2 2 a r r 2 - a d2 2 r r - 2ae - d r 2r - ea r2 e d r e + 0 8p m 0 8p 2 m 2 -2a r r e d r
0
(5)
x n e - ax dx =
n! a n +1
h2a2 2 h2a 1 2 1 + -e 2 8p 2 m 8a 3 4p 2 m 4a 2 4a 2 3 8a
(6)
h2a2 - e2a 2 8p m
42
4p 2 me 2 h2
Or
a=
(7)
2p 2 m 4 e Em i n - 2 = h
(8)
1 2 m ( where K(x) = p x = E2 V ( x ) h h
1 / 2
to mention that the motion of a particle in a varying potential is analogous to the behaviour of light in a medium of varying refractive index. If the refractive index changes rapidly, one has reflections. If the change is gradual, the trajectory is not straight, but there are practically no reflections. The behaviour of particle in a varying potential is quite similar. This is the approximate method of solution of wave function based on the expansion, of which, the first term leads to classical results, the second term to the old
43 quantum theory results and the higher terms, to the characteristics of the new mechanics. One dimensional Schrdinger equation is written as
-h2 2 y + ( - y )= 0 V E 2 mx 2
(1)
The WKB approximation takes advantage of the fact that the wavelength is changing slowly, by assuming that the wave function is not changed much from the form it would take of V were constant, namely
( i 2p x )
h e w =h e r e2 p 2 m ( E V ) = -
This suggests that, when E > V, it will be convenient to write, the wave function in the form
y = e
( i S ) h
(2)
where S is a function of x (S may be complex). It V is nearly constant, we may expect that s is roughly equal to p 2 x Now, S can be . expanded as
h2 S = (o x ) Sh( x ) S ( x ) . + . . . . . . . . . . S + 1 +2 . 2
(3)
i /
-1 ( e h2
ih S / ) 2 h i S / ) ( 2
S i (+ ) e x h
S2 x
equation(1)becomes
1 2
2 S 2 S - ih 2 + V ( m x x
E -
( i S / ) h
= e
2 1 S S 2 - ih (+ V - E 2 m d x x 2
) 0 =
1 S + (2 m d
i hS 2 V - E )2 = x x m
(4)
SubstitutingthevalueofSfromequation(3),( uptosecondorderin)inequation(4)weget, h
44
S h 2 S 1 So + h 1 2 + 2 x x 2 x m +(
2
2 1 So + 2 m
2 2 ih 2 S h 2S S - V 2oE h 2 1 ) + 2 2 + 2 x m x 2 x 2 S S S S S 2o 12 h 2 1 + o2 h h + x x x x x
= 0 x
i +( V E ) 2
2So +h h m x 2
2S1 2 =0 x
2 S i h 1 So 0 + ( V E + ) 2 m x m x
S1 2 0 x 2 x 2
2 S2 S 2 -1 i = 2 0 x x x
h2 + 2
So S2 + m x
(5)
Since this equation must be satisfied, independently to the value of h , it is necessary that, the coefficient of each power of h be separately equal to zero. This requirement leads to the following series of equations.
1 2 So + E x -( V = ) 0 m
0
2
(6)
1 So S1 S 2 i o = m x x x 2 2
S S S 2 i o o r1 - o ) 2 0 = x x 2 x
(7)
( o r )
1 2
So S2 S 2 1 2 S 1 0 + -x i = 2 x m x x
So S2 1S 2 S1 -i 2 =0 x x x x Fromequation(6)wehave,
So = x
(8)
[ 2m
x
(-E v ) ]
1 2
S0 [= 2 ( E- V ) 1 ] 2 d x m
x0
(9)
i So x l og 2 x
i S S1 = l o g o x 2
(10)
45
S o -1 l o = g l 2 x 1 S o r i 1e= = S o / x S oo g x 1
-1 / 2
i 1S =
[ 2m
( - V] E )
1 4
similarlyfromequation(8)wecanshowthat
S2 = 1 m ( v / x ) 1 m 2( v /2 x ) - 3 d x 2 5 2 2 [ 2 m - E2 v ) ] [ - m ( E v ) ] ( 2
(11)
NeglectingS,thesolnofequation(1)isgivenb y 2
i
y e h=
( oS h S ) + 1
i 0S
h e=
i 1S
Asshaspositiveaswellasnegativevalues, 0
y =
( S i A = i0eh / ) +1 e
( -ii 1S o / S) h
A - ( [ 2 m ( E V )1 ]2 d x ) e ( ] [( 2 m ) - E V1 )4 x0 +
i B - ( [ 2 m ( E V )1 ]2 d x ) e h 1 4 ( ] [( 2 m ) - E V ) x0
x x
i + h
A p2
i ( p2 h x0
d B xi h + e p 2
)
x0
2(
p d -
(12)
where A & B are two arbitrary constants and P2 = m (- E V . )The positive exponential 2 represents a wave moving in the positive X direction while the negative exponential, a wave moving is the negative X direction. When V is a constant, the exponential reduces respectively to plane waves,
i
eh
i ( 2 x ) 2( p x ) p h
When V > E, the W.K.B approx possesses real exponential solution. The solution is
y A h x0 1 B hx0 1 =e + e p1 p 2
p d i
x
i x
(13)
w h e r1 e p 2 m ( V E ) = -
By reading this lesson one can get an understanding on the two approximation methods namely variational method and WKB approximation and its applications. Variational method is applicable to study the ground state of system. WKB method find its application in alpha decay paradox.
46 5.6. LESSON END ACTIVITIES Check your progress 1. Explain how ground state energy could be evaluated using the variation method. 2. Briefly discuss an application of WKB method. 3. Briefly outline the variation method. 4. Explain how the ground state energy could be evaluated using the variation method and hence find the ground state energy of helium atom. 5. Explain the main stages involved in the WKB approximation. Use the technique to obtain the asymptotic solution of the one dimensional Schrdinger equation. Also arrive at the solution near a turning point.
5.7. References
1. Quantum Mechanics S.L. Gupta, V. Kumar, H.V. Sharma, R.C. Sharma. Jai Prakash Nath & Co Ltd. 2. A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 3. Angular Momentum Techniques in Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Kluwer Academic Publishers. 4. Quantum Mechanics John L. Powell and Bernd Crasemann Narosa Publishing house.
47
ih
y H = t
(1)
In many physical problems, the time dependence of the Hamiltonian arises due to an external agency. For example, an atom irradiated by light, by applying electric field to atomic system etc. In such cases, Hamiltonian is written as,
H =H 0 V ( t ) +
(2)
where, H 0 is the sum of Hamiltonian of the two systems in isolation and V(t) is their interaction. At a particular instant of time t = 0, the system may be regarded as being approximately in an eigenstate of H 0 as i. We have to calculate the probability of finding the system at a later time t in an eigenstate f. If y n denotes the complete set of eigen functions, then, we have
48
H0 y n E n y = n = h wn y n
The wave function corresponding to the actual state can be expanded in terms of y n
w y n ( t ) ( y ) ( r )- i en t =n C tn n
(3)
where, w s - n w = s
E -E n h
perturbation V(t) is absent, all the co-efficients C n will be constant in time. On the other hand, the perturbation V(t) makes them vary with time and for this reason, this method is called the method of variation of constants. Suppose the perturbation begins to act at time t. Initially at t = 0, the system is in the unperturbed state say, i before the perturbation is turned on. In such a case,
Cn ( 0=) 0 o r n i f Cn ( 0=) 1 o r n i f = 1 i Cf = f ( i t ) +e wf V t ih
ti
This gives the probability amplitude for states of later time other than the initial state.
6.3. Fermi Golden Rule (or) Closely Spaced Levels (or) Transition to continuum
If transitions are taking place to a set of closely spaced levels f then, Pf ( t ) will be obtained by summing over, all final state levels f Therefore,
49
Pf ( t = f | C ( t2 ) | ) = f | fV (i 2 o f 2) w | s i n i w h2 f t2 / 2 i
If the level spacing is very close, then, the summation can be replaced by integration.
=
f
r E)dE ( f f
where r ( fE ) the density of the final states around E f (i.e) the number of energy is levels per unit energy interval. Therefore, Pf ( = t ) f rf E ) f s 2 fi n d E ( i i h2 wf / 2 i
= |
f
2 ( 0
| t / 2 w
V 2 i 0 f) | 2 tw / 2 ( i r ( fE ) i f n d E s h2 wf / 2 i
A s s u m i n g e ( fE ) d o e s n o t vfa r y a r o u n d E , w e h a v e , Pf
| V 2( 0 f) | t w / 2 ( = t f )2 r( f i E ) s 2 if n d i h wf / 2 i -
Pf
(=
tf
V 2( i 0 f) | 2 it w / 2 r( E f )w s ii =n f) wf /i 2 h h2 -
dQ [w h E
Pf
| V 2( 0 ) | 2 t w / 2 (= t f 2) (i rE hff) s i w i n d i f h wf / 2 i -
(1)
Since the integral is practically zero outside w f ,i the limits are chosen from - to + , consider, the integral,
+
s
-
w f ti 2 / i w n 2 dw f /
f i
p u = xwti / 2 t f d = x
dw f it 2
2 + w f ti 2 / w i f i w /n = d 2 f i
s
-
s i2 n x 2 . d x ( x /t 2t )
2 2 2s i n x t d 2 x t - x +
= 2
s i2 n x t 2d x x -
s i2 n x d = p x x2
w t 2 / i f ni d w f 2 = t p w / 2 f i
s
-
50
substitutingtheintegralvalueonequation(1 e g e t , )w V ( 0 ) Pf ( =t f) i f ( E )p 2 t r h 2p t 2 = Vf r 0 ) f( E ) ( i h
2
ThisiscalledtheFermiGoldenrule. -
If the perturbation last from time t = 0 to t = t, and during this time, it is constant, then, we have,
1 i Cf ( tf ) V ( 0 )wf eit d t = i ih 0
1 e iwf( i t ) = Vf ( 0 ) i ih i wf 0 i Cf (= Vf ( 0 )iwf ti i t -) e- 1 hwf i
t
Thus, the probability of finding the system, in the state f at time t is given by,
Pf ( t=) C ( t ) f Pf = ( V 2f ( i 0 ) t -) h 2 w 2f i
2
iwf
t e i - 1
) ( e
i w f
it
h e
iwf
r - tei - f e - 1 wif = , i w ti e
) (
it -
f 1 - 1i w ei t e+ 1 -
t -i f = 2 - i f w+i e wi t e = 2 2-c o w f (i t ) s
= 2 [ - c owsf (i t ) ] 1 w t = 2 2 s i2 n f i 2 w t = 4 s i2 n f i 2 Vf ( 0 ) w t \ Pf (= t )2 i 4 s i 2n f i 2 hwf i 2 = Vf ( 0 ) 2 wf ti i s i n h2 wf ti
2 2
/ 2 / 2
51
-V Cf ( t= ) 0 h
i ( + ei wf( - ) i wte f w i )w 1t + w f - i w f wi + w
Thereforethetransitionprobability,
i i w V 2 ei wf ( - )1-t f w 2 Pf ( t=f) c ( t ) =02 + h (wf - ) w f i
i )w e(+ - t 1 w i + )w (
We find that the terms inside the box, while squaring will not contribute anything because when w f i approximately equal to w only one term (IInd term) will contribute while the other (Ist term) vanishes. Similarly, when w f i approximately equals - w , the contribution by the two terms will exchange. Thus, the above discussion treating the terms independently is valid.
We know that the probability amplitude for transition from initial state i to the final state f will be,
1 i i Cf ( =f ) Vi ( t )wf( et )d t t ih 0
t
1 Cf ( = t 0 ) ih 0 =
( V - i w t ) ewf( i td) t e i
Vo t i w e -(f ih o
w t )
t
V = o ih
=
ei w(f i- w t ) ) i wf ( i- w o
]
Vo - i ( we- wt1 [ f )i ih wf i- w) i (
) t i V ei ( wf - w1= -o h wf i- w
This expression differs in having w f - wfor harmonic perturbation instead of i just w f i for constant perturbation. The entire discussion of constant perturbation can be carried for harmonic perturbation, with (w f - ) w replacing w f .i We conclude that for i large t, only those transitions in which w f - w 0 can take place with appreciable = i
52 probability In other words, only when E f - E = h w , the transitions will be appreciable. i Thus, the harmonic perturbation V0 - i wt can induce transitions to a level E f whose e energy is higher than Ei by hw . Such a transition can be described as absorption of energy hw by the system from the external agency. On the otherhand, if the Hermitian adjoint V0 - i wt is used for harmonic e perturbation, then we will have, (w f + ) w instead of (w f - ) w . In such a case, the i i probability amplitude is given by,
i - V ei (wf +t) w - 1 Cf ( t= ) o h wf + w i
In this case we find that E f is lower than Ei by hw and this describes the emission of energy, Here, the energy is given by the system to the external agency.
f i n a l
i n i t i a l
whereV(0)isindependentoftime f i \e q u a t i o n ( 4 ) b e c o m e s
53
t C f 1 f d = V f( i o ) iwe ti d t t t i h 0 0 t
1 Cf ( t= ) V ( o )iwfeti d t f i ih 0
This equation shows that Vf ( tis non- zero only when Vf ( o is non-zero, Thus, ) ) i i transitions in the first order, can take place between pair state(f,i) for which Vf ( o ) .0 i Transition between any other state are forbidden in the first order. This is the first order selection rule. Even if Vf ( 0= ) then, transition between the state i and f may still 0 i be possible in the higher order via an intermediate ( l ) state. If both Vfl ( 0 and )
Vli ( 0 ) ,0then
the intermediate state l will connect the initial state i and final state f.
However, probability for transitions in the higher order will be smaller and will proceed at a slower rate. If we plot the probability Pf ( t as a function of the energy difference w f )
i
between the initial and final state of fixed t, the graph will be of the form as shown in the figure below,
P(t) f
p t p t 5
3 /
/ p t 3
5p/ t /
6p/ t
4p/ t
2p/ t
2p/ t
4p/ t
6p/ t
w t 2 /
The main peak of the curve occurs at w f = 0 and has a high proportional to t 2 . The i subsequent peaks are much smaller and occurs at 3 p t , 5 etc. Thus, we see that / p t the transition from the initial state i to the final state f occurs such that w f i falls within the main peak.
| w f i| = 2p t
which resemble uncertainty principle. The magnitude of the energy difference between initial and final is very unlikely to be significantly to be higher than h/t. This is the energy time uncertainty relation.
Here we have studied in detail the followings: Time dependent perturbation theory and its applications Fermi Golden rule Harmonic perturbation Constant perturbation Selections rules
6.9. Problems
Calculate the second order energy correction for the ground state of the charge between linear harmonic oscillator subject to a constant electric field. Compare the result with the exact solution
55
Solution
The schrodinegers equation for the perturbed system is
-h 2 d 2y 1 2 + k y x a x=y E y + 2m d 2 x 2
where is the product of the charge and the magnitude of the electric field in the xdirection. Writing X = x + / k, the above Equation becomes
( ) En 2 =
2 m
'a
2 ( 0 )
n x m
( 02 )
(E
( 0 ) ( 0 ) n m
-E
n0
1 0h )( ( 0 ) 0 x) = ( m n a -( m i 2mw
- m1
0)
)(
1 h - md n , i 2m w
+ dn ,+1 m 1 m
( ) = En 2 =
2 a2 a - = 2mw 2 2 k
Do it yourself 1. A hydrogen atom the energy state with n = 2 is subject to an electric field E parallel to the z axis. Calculate the energy correction. 2. Calculate the splitting of hydrogen energy levels due to spin-orbit interaction.
56
6.10. References
1. Quantum Mechanics Leonard I. Schiff, McGraw Hill International edition. 2. Quantum Mechanics A.K. Ghatak and S. Lokanathan McMillan Publishers. 3. Quantum Mechanics Satya Prakash Sultan Chand Publishers 4. Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Narosa Publishing house. 5. Quantum Mechanics John L. Powell and Bernd Crasemann Narosa Publishing house.
57
7.2. Introduction
Knowledge in angular momentum techniques is essential for quantitative study of problems in atomic physics, molecular physics, nuclear physics and solid state physics. The application of angular momentum techniques to solve physical problems has become so common. Angular momentum techniques are widely used in the study of both non relativistic and relativistic problems in physics. In this chapter, we will discuss the Quantum Mechanical definition of Angular m omentum first. Then we will have a discussion on physical interpretation of Angular m omentum. It is then followed by, discussion on ladder operators and coupling of two angular momenta.
u r L= x
i px
j y
k z p z p y
r L
(y pz z py ) (z px x pz) + (x py y px ) k j i
58 i.e. Lx Ly Lz [Lx , Ly ] = = = = = = = = = i.e. [Lx , Ly ] Similarly [Ly , Lz ] [Lz , Lx ] i.e. ( L x L ) (LxL) = i h Lx i h Ly L x Ly Ly L x i h Lz = y pz z py z px x pz x py y px [y pz z py , z px x pz] [y pz , z px ] [y pz , x pz] [z py , z px ] + [z py , x pz] y px [pz, z] + py x[z, pz] i h y px + i h p yx i h [x py y px ] i h Lz i h Lz (2)
r r r r
= = =
r r
i L
(3)
This Quantum mechanical definition must be generalized to include angular momentum of half integral values. Therefore, generalizing, we can write the
(J xJ ) = i J
Now, [Jx , Jy ] = i h Jz [Jy , Jz] = i h Jx [Jz , Jx ] = i h Jy
(4)
(5)
59 [J2 , Jy ] = 0 [J2 , Jz] = 0 Equations (5) & (6) gives simple physical interpretation. It is possible to find the simultaneous eigenvalues of J 2 and one of the components, say Jz alone, but, it is impossible to find precisely the eigenvalues of Jx and Jy at the same time. Representing the operators by matrices. One can say that, J
2
(6)
and Jz can be
diagonolised in the same representation, but not the other components Jx and Jy . Physically this means that, one can find the magnitude of angular momentum vector and its projection on one of the axes. The projection on the other two axes cannot be determined. This is illustrated in the figure(Fig 7.1) , in which the angular momentum vector is depicted to be anywhere on the cone. If y jm is the eigenfunction of the r operators J 2 and Jz, then r2 J y jm = hj y jm & Jz y jm = m y jm
Here j & m are Quantum Numbers used to define eigenfunctions and the corresponding eigenvalues of the operators are hj & m.
Z axis
r J
Jz
r J
Fig: 7.1 The angular momentum vector, for which its projection on the z-axis alone is well defined, but not its projection on the x axis & y axis.
r r J x J
= Jx 2 + Jy 2 + Jz2 \ [J2 , Jx ] = [Jx 2 + Jy 2 + Jz2 , Jz] = [Jx 2 + Jx ] + [Jy 2 + Jx ] + [Jz2 + Jx ] = Jx [Jx , Jx ] + [Jx , Jx ] Jx + Jy [Jy , Jx ] + [Jy , Jx ]Jy + Jz [Jz , Jx ] + [Jz , Jx ] Jz = i h Jy Jz i h Jz Jy + i h Jz Jy + i h Jy Jz i.e. [J2 , Jx ] = 0 Similarly & [J2 , Jy ] = 0 [J2 , Jz] = 0
61 = 0 Similarly Also and Problem 7.3 Find the value of [Jz , J+] and [Jz , J ] Solution Now, [Jz, J+] = [Jz , Jx + i Jy ] = [Jz , Jx ] + i [Jz , Jy ] = i h Jy + i ( i h Jx ) = i h Jy + h Jxs = =
h (Jx + i Jy ) h J+
[J2 , J ] = 0 [J+ , J2 ] = 0 [J , J2 ] = 0
= h J Hence we conclude that [Jz , J] = h J Also J2 Jz = Jz J2 and J2 J+ = J+ J2 Problem 7.4 Find the values of Jz J+ and Jz J Solution We Know that, [Jz , J+] or Jz J+ i.e. Jz J+ Similarly [Jz , J ] i.e. Jz J J Jz = = = = = = J+ in units of h J+ J + Jz + J + J+ (Jz + 1) J in units of h J
i.e. Jz J+ J+ Jz
62 Jz J i.e. Jz J = = J Jz J J (Jz 1)
The raising and lowering operators can be defined as J+ and J Let and J+ y jm J y jm = = = = Jz + iJy Jx iJy j+ j
Similarly J2 j
Operating JZ on j+ and j we have, Jz j + = = = = = i.e. Jz j + = Jz J+ yjm J+ Jz yjm J+ (Jz+1) y jm J+ (m+1) y jm (m+1) J+ y jm (m+1) j+
Thus we find that j+ and j are eigenfunctions of J2 operator, with the same eigenvalue hj. However, even though we find that, j+ and j are also eigenfunctions of Jz operator, the eigenvalues are either stepped up or stepped down by unity. It is precisely for this reason, J+ and J operators are called as raising and lowering operators, respectively. Now let us find the value of (J2 x + J2 y ) y jm (Jx 2 + Jy2 ) y jm = = (J2 Jx 2 ) y jm (hj m2 ) y jm
Since the eigenvalues of square of the Hermitian matrix is always positive, we have (hj m2 ) 0. Therefore the m values are bounded. ie.. m has a spectrum of eigenvalues, the lowest being h jand the highest value being + h j. Now, let us denote the lowest value of m by m1 , and the highest value of m by m2 . Obviously J+ and J =
2
jm
0 0
(A) (B)
jm
Operating J on the left of equation (A) and J+ on the left of equation (B), we have J J+ jm 2 (Jx iJy ) (Jx + iJy ) jm 2 = 0 = 0 = 0 = 0 = 0
[J
2 x
+ J 2 - i (J y J x - J x J y ) jm 2 y
(J (J
2 x 2
+ J2 y - J2 z
] - J ) - J )
z z
jm 2
jm 2
64
[J
[
- J z (J z + 1) jm 2
jm 2
- m 2 (m 2
] + 1)]
]
= 0 = 0 = 0 = 0 (D) (C)
Similarly
J+ J jm1
- m 1 ( m 1 + 1) jm1
[ - m (m [ - m (m
j 2 j 1
+ 1)
] - 1)]
= 0 = 0
(E) (F)
Since R.H.S of (E) and (F) are equal to zero, we can write,
j - m 2 ( m 2 - 1)
= =
j - m 1 ( m 1 - 1)
i.e.
m 2 (m 2 - 1)
m1 (m1 - 1)
2 m 2 - m1 + m 2 - m1 = 0 2
(m1 + m 2 ) (m 2 - m1 + 1)
= 0
(G)
Since (m 2 - m1 ) is always > 0, (i.e positive), the second term cannot be zero, we have
(m1 + m 2 )
m1
= =
- m2
Taking the highest value of m2 to be equal to j. i.e. m2 = j, we have m1 = j. Thus we find that Jz has a spectrum of eigenvalues ranging from j to + j, in steps of unity. i.e. j, ( j + 1) ..( j 1), j
We also find the value of hj Substituting m = j in equation (E), hj j (j + 1) = 0 hj = j (j +1) Thus the eigenvalue of J2 operator is j (j +1). Note 1. J2 y jm 2. Jz y jm = = j (j + 1) y jm m y jm
65
Using equations (1), (2) and (3) we can write, |+ |2 or + = = = = In a similar fashion, we can show that, = j(j+1) m(m+1)
j(j1) +
-+
m(m1)
j2 + j - m 2 - m
(j - m) (j + m + 1)
(j + m) (j - m + 1) (j - m) (j + m + 1) and
(j + m) (j - m + 1) respectively.
(j - m) (j + m + 1) d jj'dm'm+1 (j + m) (j - m + 1) d jj'dm'm1
The above matrix elements are sufficient to construct all the angular momentum matrices.
66 Note 1. 2. 3.
1 (J + + J - ) 2 1 (J + - J - ) 2
Jx Jy
= =
Since all the matrix elements defined above connect states with the same j but different m values, it is usual to construct angular momentum matrices for a given j value.
4.
It is customary to label the rows by m' values (i.e. m' = j..j) and the columns by m values (i.e. m = j..j)
5.
For a given j, the dimension of the angular momentum matrices are given by (2j+1) X (2j+1)
Problem 7.5 Find the angular momentum matrices of J2 , J z , J + , J , Jx and Jy when j = . Solution Dimension of the matrix The dimension of the matrix is (2j+1) X (2j+1) i.e. (2 X +1) X (2 X +1) = 2 X 2. Then, the possible values of ma are and . The angular momentum matrix for J2 is given by.
m'\m
1 2 2 -1 1
2 3 4
-1
0 4
3 1 0 4 0 1
12 0
0 -1 2
67
1 1 0 1 = sz 2 0 - 1 2
For J+
m'\m
1 2 2 -1 1 2 -1 2
0 1 0 0
For J
m'\m
1 2 2 -1 1 2 -1 2
0 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 0 + 2 0 0 1 0
1 0 1 2 1 0 = 1 sx 2
= Similarly for Jy Jy =
1 (J+ + J ) 2i
1 0 1 0 0 2i 0 0 1 0
1 0 1 2i - 1 0 1 0 1 2 - 1 0 1 0 - i 2 i 0 1 = sy 2
68 Note Jx =
1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 - i 2 i 0 1 1 0 2 0 - 1 1 = sx 2 1 = sy 2 1 = sz 2
Jy
Jz
Problem 7.6 Obtain the angular momentum matrices J2 , Jz , J+ , J , Jx and Jy for j=1. Solution Dimension of the matrix (2j + 1) x (2j + 1) = (2 x 1 + 1) x (2 x 1 + 1) = 3 x 3 matrix j = 1 possible values of m are 1, 0, 1. Angular momentum matrix for J2
m'\m 1 0 -1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 -1 0 0 2 1 0 0 = 2 0 1 0 0 0 1
The angular momentum matrix for Jz m'\m 1 0 - 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 - 1 0 0 - 1 Angular momentum matrix for J+
m'\m 1 0 -1 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 2 - 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
69
m'
1 0 -1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 -1 0 2 0
m
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
0 1 0 2 0
0 1 2 2 0
2 0 0
2 0 2
0 0 2 + 2 0 0
0 2 0
0 0 0 2 0 0
0 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 0
0 1 - 2 2i 0
0 1 - 2 2i 0
2 0 0
2 0 - 2
0 0 2 - 2 0 0
0 2 0
0 0 2
0 0 0
0 - 1 0 i 1 0 - 1 2 0 1 0
70 Problem 7.7
3 1 -1 3 , , , . 2 2 2 2
J2
15 4 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 4 0 0 15 0 4 15 0 0 0 4
0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0
Jz =
3 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 2 - 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
J+
J =
Jx
1 2
0 3 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 0 3 0
Jy =
0 - 3i 0 0 0 - 2i 0 1 - 3i 2 0 2i 0 - 3i 0 3i 0 0
LET US SUM UP
By going through this chapter, one can easily understand the algebra of angular momentum. We can calculate the spectrum of eigenvalues for J2 and J z operators. One can easily construct the angular momentum matrices for a given j by studying this lesson.
71
7.12. References
1. Angular Momentum Techniques in Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2. Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Narosa Publishing house. 3. A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 4. A text book of Quantum Mechanics S.L. Kakani Kedarnath Publishers. Quantum Mechanics Leonard I. Schiff, McGraw Hill International edition.
72
2 Set II : J1 , 22 , zJ2 , zJ J 1
The state vectors or wave functions corresponding to the two sets will be
j1 j 2 j mand j1 j 2 m m 1 2
The state vector corresponding to the first set
representation. And the state vector corresponding do the second set j1 j 2 m m is 1 2 called uncoupled representation. In order to move from coupled representation to uncoupled representation, or vice versa, we need a unitary transformation coefficient. The transition from one representation to another representation is accomplished by the following two equations.
j1 j 2 m m 1 2
jm
j1 m 1
j2 m2
j m
j1 j 2 j m
(1)
j1 j 2 j m =
j1 The symbol m1
m1 m2
j1 m 1
j2 m2
j m
j1 j 2 m m 1 2
(2)
j2 m2
73
' Now, taking scalar product with j1 j2 j m' on both the sides of equation (1) j1 j 2j' m ' j2 j 1m 2m 1 j1 j 2j' m ' j2 j 1m 2m 1
=
j m
j1 m 1 j1 m 1
j j m m 2
2 2
j1 j 2j' m ' j2 j 1m 2m 1
j m
j j d d m m j 'j m 'm 2
Now, doing the summation over j and m on R.H.S, because of the presence of Kronocker delta, of all the possible values of j and m, only those terms corresponding to j = j' and m = m' will remain.
j1 j 2j m j2 j 1 2m m 1
j1 m 1
j2 m2
j m
(3)
Thus we find the C.G. coefficient is the scalar product of the two state vectors in the coupled and the uncoupled representation.
' In a similar manner, taking the scalar product with | j1 j2 m1 m '2 > on both the
j1 j 2 m1 m j j2 j m = 2 1
j1 m 1
j2 m2
j m
(4)
j1 j 2j m j2 j 1 2m m 1
j1 m 1
j2 m2
j m
(5)
We know that the wave functions in the coupled representation as well as in the uncoupled representation are orthogonal.
j1 j 2' m1 ' j 2j j m j
' ' j1 j 2 m1 m j j2 m m 2 1 1 2
= =
d j 'j d 'm m
(1) (2)
j1 j2 j m' = '
' ' j1 j 2 m m 1 2
j1 j 2 j m =
j1 2j j j j m m m m 2 m 1 2 1 2 2 1 m
j1 m 1
j j m m 2
2
m 2
= d jj' dmm'
= d j 'j d 'm m
(3)
In a similar way, starting from equation (2), the orthogonal property for the C.G. coefficient can be written as
j1 2j j ' j mm '1 m 2 m j1 ' m1 j j m m 2
2
= d m m' d
1 1
m 2 m '2
(4)
j1 m 1 j1 m 1
j2 m2 j2 m2
j m j m
j1 m1
j m j m
2.
j2 - m2
3. = 4. = where [ j ] =
[ j] j1 [ j 2 ] m1 [ j] [ j1 ]
j j2 - m - m2 j2 1j m m 2 1
( - 1 j2 + m2 )
(2j+1)1/2
j -m
75
2. m sum rule must be satisfied m 1 + m2 = m 3. Projection rule must be satisfied i.e. m should be valid projection of j. i.e. m = j, j +1 .(j1), j is steps of unity.
j1 m1 m 2 m1 j1 j, m m1
2
j2 m2
j m
2
= 1
(5)
j j m m 2
= 1
(6)
76
8.9. References
1. Angular Momentum Techniques in Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2. Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Narosa Publishing house. 3. A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 4. A text book of Quantum Mechanics S.L. Kakani Kedarnath Publishers. Quantum Mechanics Leonard I. Schiff, McGraw Hill International edition.
77
9.2. Introduction
The Quantum Mechanics developed so far, does not satisfy the requirements of special theory of relativity as it is based on a non relativistic Hamiltonian. The wave equation we used to discuss physical problems is of the first order in time and of second order in space co-ordinates. This contradicts the space-time symmetry requirement of relativity. The difficulties suggest two ways of obtaining relativistic wave equations. i) to use a relativistic Hamiltonian for a free particle is place of nonrelativistic one ii) to try for a first order equation in both space and time co-ordinates. Though Schrdinger himself suggested the first possibility its implications were studied in detail by Klein and Gordon in 1926. Hence it is popularly known as Klein Gordon (K.G.) equation. It does not say anything about the spin of the particle. Hence it is used to describe spin zero particles such as in pions, kaons etc. Based on the second idea, Dirac developed his relativistic wave equation. The concept of spin has evolved automatically from Diracs theory which is applicable to spin systems.
p = -ih
78
y t
c 2 p 2 + m2c 4 y = i h
But it is very difficult to give a physical meaning for the square root of an operator. Further if the square root is expanded in terms of binomial services we will have even powers of on the L.H.S. In order to avoid the difficulties Klein-Gordon proposed that the wave equation will be H2 y = E2y
{c
p +
m =c i y y h t
4
{
{
u 2 r c - ih 2 m + 4c h= y
2
2 - y2 t
u 2r - h 2 c 2m + 2 ch =4 y
2 -2 y 2 t
Dividing throughout by - h 2 c2
2 2
{2 -
2 m c 2 - = y 2 h2
1 2 y c 2 t
2
2 1 m c =2 2 2 c t h
m 2c 2 } y =0 h2
(1)
2. The product y * y in KG equation does not represent the probability current density. 3. The wave function y in the KG equation is not orthogonal.
79 4. There is no way of introducing spin in to the KG equation and hence it is applicable only to spin zero particles like pions and kaons.
corresponding to particles of definite momentum p = hk substituting y ( x, t ) = f (t ) e ik . x . This leads to we obtain, the plane wave solutions
y ( x , =t )
i ( k m.w t ) ih ( x p
e=
x. - )t E
(2)
2
E = h = ( 2 m2 + 2) c 4 cw p
(3)
In contrast to the nonrelativistic case where the coefficient ( E h ) of ( it) in the exponent is the positive quantity ( p 2 / m h , here we have solutions with -w as 2 ) well as with +w. The appearance of the negative energy solutions is typical of relativistic wave equations. Another difference from the nonrelativistic case is that y * y cannot be interpreted as the probability density P(x,t). We expect P(x,t) to satisfy a continuity equation so that
P ( x, t ) d
multiply equation (1) on the left by y*, its complex conjugate equation by y, and subtract. The resulting equation can be written as
1 2 y y* 2 2 t c t
- (y * y - yy *) = 0
(4a) (4b)
A convenient choice of a common constant factor in P and S has been made here. With this choice, S coincides exactly with the corresponding nonrelativistic expression. However, P is quite different. It vanishes identically if y is real, and in the
80
y t
appropriately. Clearly, P cannot be a probability density. One could multiply P by a charge e and then interpret it as a charge density. However, P can still have different signs at different points, and this is hardly satisfactory in the description of a single particle of given charge. It is known that equation (1) can be used to describe a system of arbitrary numbers of particles and their antiparticles by treating y itself as an operator function instead of a numerical valued function. At this level, the above mentioned properties of P are no longer objectionable.
Ey =
{ a( c.+ )pb
u r r
u r r
y2 mc
2 - y mc =
{E -(ac .) bp
(1)
will give rise to space and time dependent energies and momenta. Further we want this equation to be linear in space and time derivatives which already occur in b and E, a and b must be independent of space and the time u r derivatives. This means that a and b commute with P and E. But this does not necessarily mean that a and b commute among themselves. u r r 2 a b mc get Premultiplying equation (1) by E + c .+ p we
{E + (ca .+) pb
u r r
mc E
}{
r u r r - c a . b p - 2 mc y =
Comparing the above equation with the relativistic relation between energy and momentum is E2 c2 p2 m2 c4 = 0 we get ax 2 = ay 2 = az2 = b2 =1 ax a y = -ay ax ay a z = -a z ay a z ax = -a x az ax b = - b ax ay b = - b ay a z b = - b az
Thus we find that a and b anticommute among themselves in pairs. Further we find that eigenvalues for all the four matrices are +1 and -1
82 Tr (b 2ax ) = - Tr(ax ) Tr(a x ) = - Tr(ax ) 2 Tr(a x ) =0 Tr(a x ) = 0 In a similar manner we can prove that Tr(a y ) = 0 Tr(a z) = 0 Tr(b) = 0 6. Since the traces of all these four matrices are zero, and their eigenvalues are +1 and -1, there should be same number of +1 along the diagonals as the
number of -1 in b matrix. Therefore the dimension of b matrix must be even. 7. The ith element of the equation axb + bax =0 i.e.
(a )
x k ik
b kl + (b )
m im
(a x )ml = 0
Since b matrix is orthogonal (a x )il + (b)ll + (b)ii (a x )il = 0 (a x )il { b ll + b ii } = 0 If b ll = b il then (a x )il 0 for i l otherwise (a)il =0 for i=l. Since b matrix which is a diagonal matrix must be of even dimensions we choose b matrix to be
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 0 - 1 0 - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 - - - - 0 0 - - - 0 1 -1 - -
From the knowledge of Paulis spin matrices we find that there can be only three 2 X 2 matrices anticommuting among themselves in pairs. It is impossible to find a 4th 2 X 2 matrix that is anticommute with the Paulis spin matrices. But in the case we need 3 a matrices and one b matrix to anticommute among themselves in
83 pairs. Therefore the minimum dimension of b matrix must be 6 X 6, 8 X 8, may be possible for b matrix, but this will not give anything new and hence we choose the minimum dimension the b matrix 4 X 4. Therefore b matrix will be
1 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 - 1
In short we write
1 0 b= where each element is a sub matrix of order 2 X 2. 0 -1
0 a x1 ax = 0 a x 2
Further since a x 2 = 1
a x1a x 2 i.e. 0
0 =1 a x 2a x1
0 ax = s x
0 s x 0 = 0 0 1
0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 ay = s y
0 0 0 - i s y 0 0 i 0 = 0 0 - i 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 s z 0 0 = 0 1 0 0 - 1 1 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 0
0 az = s z
84 It is to be mentioned that the above form for a and b is not unique. Any other set can also be chosen to satisfy the above commutation relations. However these two sets will be related by the singular transformation
a = s -1 a s b = s -1 b s
2 y
mc
Since a and b are 4 X 4 matrices y must be a 4 X 1 matrix (or) It is a column vector we choose
y 1 y yj = 2 y 3 y 4
or
yj =
1 u u 2 = 3 u 4 u
j
r r i(k. r w -
t)
r r i(k. r w -
t)
where j = 1,2,3,4
uj
r r i k ( -w t ) r.
}
)t
= = =
{ - ih {
u r u r a b ) c( . +
2i(k.r
mc
r r - w
t)
-r . (-i) i ( k e w ju w
r r
u r -i a c( i )k b u h +
2 j
r r 2 i ( k . r- wt )
}jmc
hw uj
{ c (a . hk ) + b mc }u
2 mc
Since hw = E h
E uj
r r and k we have = p
{ c (a. p ) +b
c a x p x+ ay
urur
u
u1 u 2 mc u3 u 4
u1 u E 2 u 3 u 4
p az +
+b p
85
u1 u E 2 u 3 u 4
0 0 c 0 1
0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 x + p 0 0 0 i 0
0 i i 0
0 + y 0 0
i 0 0 0
0 0 p 1 -
0 0 z 0 1 0 0
1 + 0 0
0 1 0 0 u1 u 2 u3 u 4
2 mc 0 1
m 2 c ( c 0 p c z p x) i - p u y 2 0 m ( c c p +) i y p - cz p u x 2 c p c ( p - iy p)- m c 0 u x c( x +p y i )z p c 0 - m cu2 p
1 2 3 4
E u1 = mc2 u1 + 0.u2 + cpz.u3 + cp u4 E u2 = 0.u1 + mc2 u2 + cp+ u3 - cpz u4 E u3 = cpzu1 + cp-u2 mc2 u3 + 0.u4 E u4 = cp+u1 cpzu2 + 0.u3 mc2 u4 [E- mc2 ] u1 0.u2 cpzu3 cp-u4 0.u1 + [E-mc2 ] u2 cp+ u3 + cpzu4 -cpzu1 cp-u2 + [E+mc ] u3 0.u4 -cp+u1 + cpzu2 - 0.u3 + [E+mc2 ] u4
2
= = = =
0 0 0 0
Since the equation are homogeneous in uj the solution will exists only if the determinant of the coefficient is zero.
2 E- m c0 c p - c pz 0 E- m 2 c c +p c p z 2 -c z p - p- E m c c + 0
=0
-c
cz
p +
0 E
c2
cp 2 +
mc
86 Thus we find that both positive and negative energy values are possible for the Dirac particle corresponding to E+ and E- we will have two solutions for both Taking first E+ = +
2
cp 2 +
Case (i)
u2 = 1
0 1 E + 2c (m ) + m 2c E( )
u2 = 0
cp 2 +
u4 = 1
87
-c zp E - m 2c
E - 2c (m ) - m 2c E( ) 0 1
u4 = 0
N2
01
c + p E + m 2c
0 1 c - pz = / + + 2m c c -P E m 2 c E 2 / E -c zP + m c
c 2 + pz 2p c 2 p N 1 + + 2 z 2 = 2 ( E m c ) ( E m 2 c ) + +
2
c 2 x 2+ y 2p p 1 + + ( E m2 c +
c2 z2 p = 2 2 ) ( E m 2 c ) +
2 c 2 p N 2 1+ = ( E 2 c2 ) + m
88
c -p/ / -c z p 0 1 E + 2c (m ) + m 2c E( )
y1
=
1+
1 c p ( E + m ) 2c 2
2 2
r r i(k. r w -
t)
In a similar manner for the other three cases also the normalization constant can be shown to equal to
y2
1 0 1 2 2 cp z /( E + mc 2 ) c p 1+ 2 ( E + mc 2 ) 2 cp + /( E + mc )
y3
=
1+
1
2 c2 p ( E - m ) 2c 2
c -p/ / -c z p
E - 2c (m ) - m 2c E( ) 0 1
y4
=
1+
1
2 c2 p ( E - m ) 2c 2
c z p E - 2c / (m ) (m 2) c +p/ E - c 1 0
c2p 2 + m 2c4
The energy correspond to positive as well as negative states We find that y 1 and y 2 will correspond to positive energy solutions for spin down and spin up particles y1 = y + y2 = y + In a similar manner the negative energy solutions y 3 and y4 will correspond to spin down and spin up particles respectively. y3 = y - y4 = y - -
89
mc
The meaning of positive energy state is clear but that of negative energy is not clear. It was at one time, suggested by Schrdinger himself as having no meaning and hence to be excluded. However there were two fundamental objections for excluding the negative energy states, i) ii) Mathematical and another Physical.
The exclusion of negative energy states will give rises to an incomplete set of solutions and this is mathematically not valid. On the otherhand the Dirac equation starts with positive energy states and there is a possibility of induced transition in to the negative energy states. Therefore if the negative energy states are excluded there will be contradiction, from Physicsts point of view. This has led Schrdinger into insurmountable difficulties. In order to overcome the above difficulties, Dirac postulated that 1. The positive energy levels form a continuum from +mc2 to + where as the negative energy states form another continuum from mc2 to -. 2. In between mc2 and +mc2 there are no available energy levels. 3. Dirac proposed that all the negative energy states are completely filled up normally. 4. The electrons in the negative energy states will not be affected by electric and magnetic fields.
90 itself, as a hole in the negative energy states. This hole is regarded as positions and it behaves like an electron with the positive charge. 3. The fact that the negative energy states are completely filled up implies that Paulis exclusion principle is obeyed. If the Paulis exclusion principle is not valid, the negative energy states cannot be completely filled up. Since otherwise many electrons rather than one electron will occupy level. 4. Feymann interpreted that negative energy states are electrons moving forward in time (or) positions moving backward in time.
In this lesson we had a discussion on the two prominent relativistic wave equations namely K.G. equation and Dirac equation. Then we presented the free particle solution of Diracs relativistic equation. Also we had a discussion on interpretation of negative energy states.
1. If you were a Dirac How would you have predicted the existence of positron? Explain 2. The K.G. equation has nothing to say about the spin of the particle Illustrate. 3. Explain how Dirac has interpreted the negative energy states. 4. Develop Diracs relativistic wave equation for a free particle and obtain its plain wave solution. 5. Deduce relativistic Klein Gordon equation. Can we use this equation for pions and kaons. Show that its probability expression is indefinite. 6. Establish the Diracs relativistic wave equation for an electron and calculate its magnetic moment. 7. Obtain the eigenvectors for Diracs relativistic wave equation of a free particle. 8. Develop the relativistic wave equation for the particle of spin zero. Discuss the difficulties involved in interpreting the probability density. Derive the expression charge and current densities from the continuity equation.
91 9. Prove the following properties of Dirac matrices on the basis of Diracs theory a. Square of matrices are unity b. Eigenvlues of the matrices are 1. c. Trace of the matrices are zero. d. Dimension of the matrices are of even order. e. The matrices anticommuting among themselves.
9.9. References
1. A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 2. Quantum Mechanics Leonard I. Schiff, McGraw Hill International edition. 3. Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Narosa Publishing house. 4. Quantum Mechanics S.L. Gupta, V. Kumar, H.V. Sharma, R.C. Sharma. Jai Prakash Nath & Co Ltd. 5. Quantum Mechanics Satya Prakash Sultan Chand Publishers . 6. Angular Momentum Techniques in Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Kluwer Academic Publishers. 7. Quantum Mechanics John L. Powell and Bernd Crasemann Narosa Publishing house.
92
[ Lz , H= x ]y x
,p x
y + yp ayp a +
a z+p b m p
= x y , a p x , y p .y p a y p x x
Here we have used the fact that x does not commute with px and y cannot commute with py but they commute will all other quantities. Also
[ x, x p = ,yy ]
= . i p h - a , yy x p
x
[ Lz , Hx= [x ,y p] ]
= ih pa x-
pa py x
px a
(1)
Here h is taken to be unity. But from Heisenbergs picture of time evolution, we know that
ih
dL z = [L z , H ]. dt
d zL = p ya-x p x a d t
y
(2)
.
(3)
This implies that Lz in not a constant of motion hence it is not conserved. In other words, Lz is not the complete angular momentum and there must be another part say Sz, such that (Lz + Sz) is conserved. We shall now verify that if Sz is taken to be
1 where 2 z
= 0
z
s z
0 sz
(4)
0 s 0 sy -ia x = y i - a , s s x 0 y 0 s xs y = -i 0 is = -i z 0 0 s = z 0 sz
= z
0 , s xs y 0 , is z
(5)
Now
[S z , H ] = 1 [ z ,H ],
2 === = = =i a xa y , H , 2
i a xa y , a x p x + a y p y + a z p z + b m , 2
i a x a xa - y p , + 2
a ,x ap a , y y y
}
y
},
i 2 - a x -y a 2
{(
a2- yap x a +2 x
a y ax a + 2p y
) },
y
i {- 2a y p x + 2a x p y }, 2
= -i{- a y p x + a x p y },
= i {a x p y- y p a
},
(6)
[(Lz + S z ), H ] = 0 = i d (Lz + S z ).
dt
Therefore we find that the angular momentum is conserved only if we include the spin angular momentum operator
Sz =
1 1 s z = 2 0z 2
0 sz
(7)
94 We see that J z = Lz + S z is a constant of motion and should be interpreted as the total angular momentum of the system. Since ,
= 0
z
s z
0 s z s z 0
0 , sz
(8)
1 ( 1) are 2
1 0 = 0 1
1 1 and - .From these facts it is evident that the Dirac equation describes particles 2 2 1 such as electrons. 2
of Spin
10.3. Spin Magnetic Moment of Electron (or) Dirac Equation in the presence of Electromagnetic Field
A familiar way of introducing electromagnetic field in the Dirac equation is to replace.
u r u r r e A p p - and c
E E - ej
where A and j are vector and scalar potentials respectively. Therefore, the Dirac equation becomes, (E - ej) y =
u r u r r e A ca - p b + c u r u r r e A ca - p b + c y
2
mc
ih - ej y t
mc
Assuming the vector function to be independent of time the wave function can be written as
y r, t
( )
- i N ,ER+ m 2c ) t (
y (r )
95 where E = = = wherey ' r, t EN.R + mc2 = Non relativistic energy + Relativistic energy
y r, t
( )
( )
y () r y' r
- iN .ER t h
2 - i m c t h
( rt ) ,
2 - i m c t h
y (r ) e
-iE N.R t h
y ih t
2 ih + mc e t
- imc 2 t h
y'
u r u u re A r 2 b ca . p - + mc y c
'
- i m2 c t h
Replacing the wave function y as a two component wave function y A and y B (large & small components)
y A 2 ih + mc - ej t y B
2 ih + mc - ej y A t y A ih t
u r u r 0 s u 1r e A 0 2 c u r p. - + 1 mc c 0 - s 0 u r u r u re A 2 cs . p - y B +y A mc c
u r u r u re A cs . p - f B + y eA y c u r u r u re A cs . p - y c u r u r u re A cs . p -y c
y A y B
(1)
Similarly
2 ih + mc - ej y B t 2 ih + 2mc - ej y B t
y -
2 B
mc
(2)
Since
ih y A y B = ih t t
ih
{y '
(r, } t)
96
-iE N.R t y (r) e h
ih
E ih -i N .R h
E N .R y e
-iE N.R t h
- iN .ER t h
{E
N.R
+ 2mc 2 - ej y B
u r u r u re A cs . p -y c
yB
{
y A ih t
u r u r u re A cs . p y A c 2 EN . R + 2mc f -
u r u r u re A 1 cs . p c EN . R2mc +
- f e yA
u r u r u re A -cs . y + f A -p e c
Since EN.R <<< 2mc2 & assuming the magnetic field to be constant, ie j = 0, EN.R + 2mc2 2mc2
y A ih t
u r u r u r e r A u 1 u e r A u r cs . p- s c 2 p y - A . c 2mc c u r u r r 1 ue r u r u e u r A A s . p - s p . 2m c c
(3)
R.H.S can be reduced by the following relation urururur u r u r u r u r u r a .B a .C = B . C a Bi . C + u r where B & C commutes with a but not necessarily with each other. Here u r u r u r u re A B= C = p - necessarily with each other. Now, c
( ) ( )
eA s . p - eA s . p c c
p - eA . p - eA + is c c
eA p - eA p c c
97
p2
=
2 r e u r u r u 2e u r - p .+ pA + A.A 2 c c u r - r u r u r u r u e + si . + p . A A. p c
p2 +
e2 2 - e - e A 2 A. p - ih . A + is . (-ih A) 2 c c c
\ ih
2 p2 e + 2m 2 m
urur e A2 A - p . c m c i h u r u er u r u r u r e h + A . - A . s 2 m c 2 m c
\ ih
urur e A2 A - p . 2 c m c i h u r u er u r u r e h + A. B s . 2 m c 2 m c
This is nothing but, Schrdinger equation in N. R approximation. The last term in the above expression gives the interaction of electron spin, with the external applied Magnetic field B . Thus we find that the electrons behaves as a particle having a spin magnetic moment
S= 1 hs 2 eh s where the spin of the e is 2mc
()
A
Then
e A. p mc
= = =
1 B r 2
( )
1 e B r p 2 mc 1 e B.r p 2 mc
u r r r e B . L (where L = r ispthe orbital angular mc
( )
momentum)
98
y A t
2 u i r u r e u r u eh u r u r r p2 e e h + A2 + - B . L A . Bs . 2m 2 m 2 2 m c 2 m c 2 m c c 2 p2 e i + A2+ 2 2m 2 m c 2
\ ih
= =
u he u r e r u r u r u r A. - B . + L hs m c 2 m c
1 Q S hs 2 ih y A t
2 p2 e i + A2+ 2 2m 2 m c 2
he u r eu r u r u r u r h A . B .+ L S 2 m c 2 m c
The last term gives the interaction of the orbital and spin angular momenta with the external applied magnetic field B .
10.6. References
1. Angular Momentum Techniques in Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2. Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Narosa Publishing house. 3. A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 4. A text book of Quantum Mechanics S.L. Kakani Kedarnath Publishers. Quantum Mechanics Leonard I. Schiff, McGraw Hill International edition. 5. Quantum Mechanics A.K. Ghatak and S. Lokanathan McMillan Publishers. 6. Quantum Mechanics Chatwal Anand Himlayan Publishing house. 7. Quantum Mechanics John L. Powell and Bernd Crasemann Narosa Publishing house.
99
11.2. INTRODUCTION
A beam of particles having a definite momentum when directed towards a target (scattering centre) will undergo scattering in all possible directions. At very large distance the scattered beam will be deflected normally outwards in the radial direction. It is usual and convenient in practice to choose a co-ordinate system, in such a way that the scattering centre as the origin and the direction of the incident beam as Z-axis. The polar angles q and f of the scattered beam which describe the scattering centre or scattering potential is chosen to be spherically symmetric. In other words the spherically symmetric potential will only have q dependence and independent of f.
100
Scattering Plane
Reference Plane
f
Target
Incident beam
Co
ne o
fS
cat t
eri
ng
of
an gle
and f indicates the direction of scattered particle with z-axis as the polar axis. Here q is the angle between the incident and scattered direction and is called as the angle of scattering. The azimuthal angle f specifies the orientation of this scattering plane with respect to some reference plane.
101
ds DN = d W t D I dW
(1)
ds is called the differential scattering cross dW
section. Therefore the differential scattering CROSS SECTION. is defined as the Number. of particles scattered per unit solid angle, per unit time, per unit incident flux. It has the dimension of area.
\ ds N D = dW dW t D I
The total scattering cross section is obtained by integrating the differential cross section over all the polar angles q and f
ds s = q s qi n fd d dW 0 0
p 2p
For spherically symmetric potential which is independent of f, the total scattering cross section becomes.
ds s = q s i n q d dW 0
p
11.7. RELATION BETWEEN DIFFERENTIAL SCATTERING CROSS SECTION AND SCATTERING AMPLITUDE
For a spherically symmetric potential, which falls of rapidly than 1/r asymptotic behaviour, the total wave function will consist of incident plane wave and out going spherical wave.
r )i z f (q e u ( q = ei k + , ) r r
k r
(1)
102 Where f(q) is called the scattering amplitude. The incident flux is given by
I i n =Ui c
2 n c 2
z = el k J
= 1 J = 1 J
=U
J
2
f (q ) r
2 2
i e
k 2 r
f (q ) r2 =
J f (q ) r2
2
Ii
n. c
f (q ) = Wn c d Ii r2
2 Dt r
= f (qW)I
in time Dt is given by,
i n c
Dt
(A)
ds DN = d W t D I dW
Comparing equations A & B.
(B)
ds 2 = f (q ) dW
Thus we find that the differential cross section is equal to the square of scattering amplitude. Thus the scattering amplitude is related to the experimentally observable differential scattering cross section. Since the dimension of length (m).
ds has the dimension of area (m2 ), f() has dW
103
11.9. References
1.Quantum Mechanics A.K. Ghatak and S. Lokanathan McMillan Publishers. 2.Introduction to Quantum Mechanics David J. Griffiths, Prentice Hall. 3.A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 4.Basic Quantum Mechanics Ajoy. Ghatak Tata McGraw Hill Publishers 5.Introductory Quantum Mechanics Richard L. Liboff Addition - Willey. 6.Quantum Mechanics John L. Powell and Bernd Crasemann Narosa Publishing house. 7.Modern Quantum Mechanics J.J. Sakurai. 8.http://thequantumexchange.org/
104
The method of partial wave is elegant procedure for the analysis of elastic scattering and low energy scattering. It is done in two steps. First wave function u(r, ) which represents the sum of incident and scattered wave is obtained in terms of partial waves. Secondly the asymptotic value of this wave function is equated to the wave function u(r, ) given by
f (q e i ) r u( q = e + , ) r r
i k z
r r . r k
(1)
A plane wave ei k zcan be expanded as a linear combination of spherical waves using Rayleighs scattering formula.
k z ei =i l l ( j 2 1 )l ( )l P c o s ) + K r ( q l =0
(2)
Here jl ( K )r is a spherical Bessel function of order l. Pl (cos ) are the legendre polynomials. Each term on the R.H.S. represents a spherical wave. The plane wave is thus equivalent to a superposition of an infinite Number. of spherical waves & the individual waves are called the partial waves. The waves with l =0, 1, 2,3 are respectively called the s.wave, p-wave, d-wave and so on. Substituting the value of jl ( K )r
105
s i k nr p(l ) - 2 k r p ) i ( K - rp 2 l -i (K 2- r e e= 2i k r
jl ( K )r =
)l
1 l i z i (l 0 2i k l =r
s q)
This form shows that each partial wave can be represented as the sum of incoming and outgoing spherical wave. Partial wave methods can be applied when the potential is central and of finite range. This method is really useful whenever the energy of the incident particle is low. Here the incident beam of particles a r e represented by a plane wave with definite linear momentum with no definite angular momentum. Hence a plane wave can be decomposed into infinite number. o f components each of which corresponds to definite angular momentum (i.e) into partial waves. The process by which a plane wave is decomposed into a partial wave is called the partial wave analysis. For a spherically symmetric potential having asymptotic behaviour, the total wave function will consist of the incident plane wave and the outgoing spherical wave.
z u ( q = ei k + ,r )
f (q ei ) r
k r
(3)
(4)
Where jl ( K )ris spherical Bessel function and Pl ( c q s is the legendre polynomial. o ) But
jl ( K )r = s i K -( p/l 2 ) n r K r
e2i k r
2 l
(3)
i
u ( q =,
il (
l= o
)k q e r
(4)
106 The Schrdinger equation can be separated into radial part and angular part. The angular part of the solution will be spherical harmonics., Ylm (, ) which will crumble to the legendre polynomial Pl ( c o s for spherically symmetric potential q ) which is independent of . The radial part of the solution Rl (r) will involve spherical Bessel function and spherical Neumann function in the field free case. Therefore the total wave function can be written as
u ( q ) R( )r ( qP o s ) ,r = l l c
l =0
(5)
)= r
Where K 2 = U , =r ( 2
2m E h
2 mV ) 2 h
The solution of the above equation (i.e) the radial wave function will be a linear combination of jl ( K )rand hl ( K ) r Where hl ( K )= r
- c o Ks r p/ 2 ) - ( l K r
However it should be noted that jl ( K )r is a well behaved function at r=0 where hl ( K ) is not so, since it becomes infinite at r=0. Therefore we choose the r radial wave function as R l ( r proportional to )
Rl ( )r c jod l K ( d l)r ls hK n r( ) a s i l
In this expression if we choose d l =0 for the field free case, then at origin, only
jl ( K ) will remain. At all other points both jl ( K ) and hl ( k rwill be present. This is r r )
the reason why we associate c od ls with jl ( K )r and s i dn with hl ( k r Rewriting the ) l above equation as
Rl ( )= [ lA o j sll ( d ) s l i K ( r ) ] r c d - K r h n l
U ( r, = r ) P o s ) q ) ( l q c R l(
l =0
=
l =0
Al [ do Ks - rd slKi nlr ( )l ] q o s ) c l j ( ) h P ( c l
107
[ c o s iK n- lp r/ 2 ]K - lp r s ( / 2 ) Al c d o s l+ s d i l n l c q o P ( s ) l =0 K r K r 1 = Al [ c d lKs s - np ( / l2+ ) s i lr - ol psP( / 2 )q] ( o s ) o i rl K d n c c l =0 K r 1 = l . s K- n lpl + Pdl ) ( q s ) A i r / 2 ( c o K lr 0
1 Al 2i K l =r0
i(
- l/ Kp
cs
q)
(6)
se 2l
- id l
The above equation is valid for all values of . Using orthogonal property of lengendre polynomial, we can easily show that Al = l ( l 1 i) Comparing the coi + e d 2
l
) f q i / 1 1ql+ - i )p / e= 2 l-e p sq A2 c e c o l l r 2 l = 0i k r
id l
Po
i
l =0
1 l l i (+ 2 2i k= 0 l
) =
)e c P lo
s q
f( q ) =
1 l 2 i ( l +e 2i k= 0 l =
id l p 1- i e /) 2 2cP lo -
s q
1 l s i ( 2l+ 1i ) Pc olqe l 2i k= 0 l
p/ 2
i eld-
= eid l . 2 s idn i l
f( q ) =
1 i p / l 2 ip / - 2 q e + ( l 2 1e l ) cP lo se 2idl si di nl 2i k= 0 l
1 )l q i (+l2 1 P c oe sldll s d n k l =0
f( q ) =
(7)
+(
l l
'
- ld
d ( + l2
l'l
s=
2p k2
( +
l 'l
2l + 1
'
l l
s=
2p k2 4p k2
( l + 2 d1 ) s i n
l =0
2l + 1
s=
( l + 2d1 ) s i n
l l =0
(8)
(1)
( l + 2d1 ) s i n
l=0
4p 1 . ( 1 ) s i 2n l + l 2 d k kl= 0
(2)
scattering amplitude for q = 0. In other words the imaginary part of forward scattering amplitude measures the intensity which the incident beam suffers because of scattering.
The effect of introducing the potential into the picture is just to change the phase angle of the normally outgoing scattered wave by an angle d l . We have just seen that the radial wave function in the absence of potential is proportional to
jl (K )= r s i K -(lp/ 2 ) n r k r
Now in the expression for local wave number the radial Schrdingers wave equation
d2 u l ( +1 ) + [k 2 ( u- 2 ) r ]+ (u =r l ) d 2 r r 0
We find that for an attracting potential u(r) is negative and have k 2 + u(r) increases or the wavelength decreases. For an attractive potential the waves are pulled in and for a repulsive potential u(r) is positive and the wavelength of the scattered wave increases and a repulsive potential the waves are pushed out.
110
It is to be noted that a phase shift will be introduced only with in the potential of will be maintained through out.
d l= 0
d l= +ve
d l= ve
RESULTS : -
is given by
(ii) ( 2
2 z k+ e k = ) i 0
0 -1 ei ( k - k) 4p r
(iii) G ( r -' r )=
111
2m E 2m = k 22, V ( =r ) U( r) h2 h
2 2 u ( r +k (u = U ) u r) ) )r ( r ( 2 ( 2 ) k+ u ) r= (U )r ( r ( u )
letting
(1)
2 Noting that ( 2 +k) e lk 2 is zero, we can write the solution for Schrdinger equation as
(2)
Thus we find that the expression for u(r) given by equation (2) is valid. Now denoting uo ( r = e k ,z we have ) i
(3)
Here we find that right hand side contains u ( r (i.e.) a function of u which we are ' ) seeking to determine. Now by replacing r by r ' , r ' by r ' , we get. '
u ( r = u( r +G 'r '- r ) U( 'r ' u (r ' d ) r ' ' ' ) o ' ) ( ' ) '
(4)
r U ) ( ' U ' ' u ( r ) uo r )+ G r - ro U ' r )u ( r ' d ) r + G( r' - ( ' r) G ' r ' r ) ( r' u )r ( d' r )d ' r' ' = ( ' ( ' ) (
The above series can be extended further by replacing r by r by r ' b' y' r& so on. ' ' Equation (4) becomes
u ( 'r ' =)u ( 'r ' +G( ' r' -r ' U ( 'r ' 'u) (r ' 'd' ) r' ' ' ) ' ' ) o
u ( r = uo( r )+ G r - ro U 'r )u ( r ' d ) r + G( r' -r ( U )r (- ' ' r' )r ( U ' r) u ' r ' d) r d r' ) ' ) ' G ' ( ' ' ( ' ) (
r ' r' u)( r ' G ( r' -r ' U' )r ( u ' r' )d( r ' d )r' 'd' 'r ' ' ' ' ) ' ' ' ' '
Such a series is called Born series or Neumanns series. This expression is evidently a perturbation expansion of U(r) with the potential treated as perturbation. If the incident energy is very large, then the series will be converging rapidly. In such a case, only the first few terms will contribute and it will be sufficient to terminate the series after two or three terms. Thus for first Born approximation, we will have two terms.
112 Therefore in the first Born approximation the wave function will be.
u(
= r )
i k z
k -1 ei k rei o r ( ) ( ' u) e U r 4p r
( r
'd ) r '
=e
i k z
f B (q e)i
k r
r -1 - l ok r f B (q e ,f=U r ' u ) r( ) ( 4p
d )r ' '
-1 f B (q , f= e ) 4p
-i ( K K - )i o
(7)
Ko
K = ko -ki
ki
From equation (7), it is clear that for the first amplitude depends only on the momentum transfer and not on the initial and final momenta and the angle of scattering. For a spherically symmetric potential, the potential will be independent of angle f and therefore.
-1 f B (q e , = U)f r - i k ( ) r q 4p 0 0 0
p 2p r
s d
qr i
nd f d
113
-1 r e - i kU ( r ) 2 s di r dq r q n 2 0 0 -1 2 ( c o i k - q) r U r) - ( rsr c e o ( d d 2 0 0
p
p p
s q)
i -1 ( c- eo k r s q ) = r 2 U( r )d r 2 0 i k r
-1 2 - ei k r ei- k r U( r )d r 2 0 i k r
-1 f B (q = U ( r ) ds ri kn r r ) k 0
since s i kn = r
ei k -r ei- k 2i
12.5.1 Validity Condition For Born Approximation Born approximation is valid only when the total wave function is greatly different from the incident wave function.
< ) Let g ( r <e i k z g ( r)2 <| <1
)d
i k z
r
2
m ei k r V 0 r2 ) < ( d = e r 2p h
i k z
)<r
m V 0 r2 = 2p h
1 2 p
) r
0 -1
ei k .r ei kwr d (r r ) 0
2
2 2 d
w f d
1 k 2 2 rw
g(
m e= r2) 4 V( 0 p 4p h = m2 h4
r 2
0
d)
r 1
rw (
e )
d .
i k r i ( k r i k r w d e e V r )r . d r e w 0 0 1 1 2
m2 = 4 h
e
0
i k r
V (r )r . d
e r i k r
i k w r
-1
ei m i k r = 4 e V (r )r . d r h 0
2
k r i- k r
-e
i k r
m2 (-2i ker 0 V e ) . 2 4 k h 0
( r
d )
2
g(
115 6. Obtain an expression for the Born approximation amplitude and hence derive the Rutherford formula for Coulomb scattering. 7. What do you meant by partial wave analysis? Employ this method to derive an expression for the scattering amplitude in terms of phase shift. 8. What are called Green function? How they are used in scattering theory? 9. Define phase shift and hence describe partial wave analysis in scattering theory.
12.8 References
1. Quantum mechanics K. Sankar Narosa publishing house 2. Quantum Mechanics A.K. Ghatak and S. Lokanathan McMillan Publishers. 3. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics David J. Griffiths, Prentice Hall. 4. A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 5. Basic Quantum Mechanics Ajoy. Ghatak Tata McGraw Hill Publishers 6. Introductory Quantum Mechanics Richard L. Liboff Addition - Willey. 7. Quantum Mechanics John L. Powell and Bernd Crasemann Narosa Publishing house. 8. Modern Quantum Mechanics J.J. Sakurai. 9. http://thequantumexchange.org/
116
(1)
f (q ) = -
1 r U (r ) sin kr dr k 0
2 m 2 sin kr ze dr r h2k 0
(2)
q 2
\ f (q ) =
mze 2 q 2h k sin 2
2 2 2
(3)
117
ds 2 = f k (W) = dW m 2 z 2e4 4h 4 k 4 sin 4 m 2 z 2e4
4 4
q 2
, where p = hk q 4 p sin 2 This coincides with the classical Rutherford formula for coulomb scattering. =
(4)
where Vo and a are constants is called yukawa potential. It is an example of a central potential. Here the potential depends only r and not on q , f It was orginally . introduced to represent the interaction between fundamental particles. The Born amplitude is defined as
-1 f B (q e f,= U ) -ri k( r d ) r 4p -1 m - i k r 2 = e V r d r ( ) 4p h 2 -1 mVo - i k re -a .r = e d r 2p h 2 r
-1 mVo 2p h 2 -1 mVo 2p h 2
a p2 p
e
0 0 0 a
- i k cr q o
e -as.r d r
i-
r s id n qd f q
2p e -(a rr
0 0
c d
k q-r ( c o s )
r qe -o
ds
)
p
m vo -a r e -i k(-rc oq s e r d r -i k r h2 0
-i k r
ei k -r e mV r = 2 o e -a d r h 0 i k r
-2mVo = h 2 k
e
0
-a r
ks i n d r r
118
Here q is the angle between the incident wave vector k and the unit vector r in the scattered direction. From the above expression, it is clear that, the scattering amplitude is independent of angle f . This independence is a general result for elastic scattering by a central potential. The differential scattering cross section can be written as
ds 2 = f (q ,f dW = 4m 2V 2 o 1 2 2 2 h 4 (a 4+ s k i q n / 22 )
Thus , we can see that, the differential scattering cross section varies with k and so it also varies with energy E. In the limit of zero energy (k 0), the differential cross section is
s= 4m 2V 2 o h 4a 4
Thus the differential cross section is independent of q as well as of f . Except at zero energy, s peaks in the forward direction ( q =0) and decreases monotonically as q varies from 0 to p , which is shown is fig. below. It is to be noted that, with in the Born Approx, the differential cross section is independent of sign of Vo and gives the same result if the yukawa potential is attractive (V0 < 0
1.0
) or
0.9
(s /
42 v 2 a 4 h m o 4
0.1 0.8
0.2 0.7
The starting point of calculations on all except the lightest atoms is the central field approximation. This assumes that each of the atomic electrons moves in a spherically, symmetric potential energy V(r) that is produced by the nuclear and all the other electrons. The approximation is a good one if the deviation from the V(r) for one election produced by close passage of other electrons is relatively small. This is actually the case, since the constant nuclear potential is of the order of Z times as large as the fluctuating potential due to each nearby electron, and the latter varies quite slowly (inversely) with the separation distance. The two principal problems are the correction of the approximate results obtained from it. Before considering these problems, we discuss some general properties of the central field. The potential energy V(r) for a neutral atom has the coulomb form c2 /r at a great distance r from the nuclear, since the removal of the electron whose potential is being measured leaves a singly charged positive ion. The electron in the hydrogen atom, for which the potential energy is c2 /r at all r has an infinite number of bound energy levels characterized by the quantum numbers n, l and m. An infinite number of energy levels is also expected for V(r), since for large n the electron wave function is small near the nucleus and only the form of V(r) of large r is significant .An important difference between the two situations is the degeneracy between states of the same n and different L that occurs in hydrogen is removed in a noncoulomb central field. This is because the electrons that have smaller angular momentum penetrate closer to the nucleus, and V(r) is stronger (more negative) than c2 /r there, since the nucleus is less completely screened by the other electrons. Thus for given n, the states of lowest l have the lowest energy. The degeneracy with respect to m is not affected, since this occurs whenever the potential is symmetric. Because of the spin, four quantum numbers n, l , me and ms are required to specify the state of an electron in a central field. The orbital quantum numbers l and
ml are the same as l and m in the hydrogen atom, ms =
1 specifies the spin 2
orientation and n is a natural generalization of the total quantum number that appears in hydrogen.
120 The equation l = n = n+ l +1 shows that n - l -1 is the number of nodes of the radial part of the hydrogen wave function; this definition of n is carried over to the general central field, so that l does not exceed n-1.
Two methods have been used for the determination of the potential energy V(r). The first of these Thomas. Fermi statistical model assumes that V(r) varies slowly enough in an electron wavelength so that many electrons can be localized within a volume over which the potential charges by a small fraction of itself. The electrons can then be treated by statistical mechanics and obey the Femi Dirac statistics. At normal temperatures the thermal energy kT is very small in comparison with V(r) every where except at the edge of atom where the chance of finding an electron is small. In this case, the Fermi Dirac statistics requires that the electron states fill in order of increasing energy, as assumed.
The number of electron states in a cube if edge length L at the walls of which the wave functions obey periodic boundary conditions was computed to be
L dk x dk y dk 2 . This must be multiplied by 2 to take account of the two 2p
3
possible spin states; then the number of states for which the momentum P = hk is less than or equal to P0 .
L 2 d 2p
p0
h p
2p
0 0
P L3 k dk sin q dq df = o 2 3 3p h 0
2
If all these states are occupied, the number of electrons per unit volume whose kinetic energy does not exceed
Po Po is 2m 3p 2 h 3
2 3
Now the maximum kinetic energy at any distance r form the nucleus is V(r), since otherwise the electrons would escape the atom. We thus obtain a relation between the volume density of electrons, n(r) and the pontentialenergy : n(r) =
[- 2m v(r )]3 2
3p 2 h 3
(1)
121 The electrostatic potential V(r)/e is also determined by poissons equation. in terms of the charge density en(r) :
1 2 - 1 d 2 dv v= r = 4p en (r ) e e r 2 dr dr
(2)
Equations (1) and (2) and two simultaneous equations for n and r, the boundary condition of the solutions can be expressed in terms of v along for a neutral atom of atomic number z. as r0, the leading term in the potential energy must be due to the nucleus, so that V(r) - Ze2 /r. As r there must be no net charge inside the
1 and rv (r) 0. The r
boundary condition at is different from that assumed earlier in this section, where v was taken to have the asymptotic form c2 /r. The v discussed earlier is the potential experienced by one of the atomic electrons, where as the Thomas Fermi potential is that experienced by an infinitesimal test charge. The diff. between the two potentials emphasizes the statistical nature of the approximation made Thomas and Fermi. The soln. for v is exact in the limit in which m becomes infinite and c becomes zero in such a way that m3 e4 remains constant then the electron wavelength becomes zero and the density of particle becomes infinite. In this limit the potential is constant over many wavelengths and enough particles are present so that statistical mechanics can be applied
1 d ( d -) V r2 2 r d r r d
we put
= 3
4e 2 [ 2 m
V (
r] )
3p h
(3)
V(r) =
- z 2e c r
2 3
r =b x
h2
2 1 3 e
1 3 p b= 2 4
= m
0 . 8 8 o5 a z
1 3
(4)
where a0 = h 2
me 2
122
d 2c =c dx 2
c = 1 at x = 0
c = 0 at x =
(5)
The most accurate solution of Equation (5) was computed by Bush and Caldwell with the help of the original differential analyzer and is expressed form of numerical table. Equation (4) show that the radius of an atom is inversely proportional to the cube root of atomic number, if this radius is interpreted to be that of a sphere that enclose a fixed fraction of all the electrons. These equations can also be used to show that the Thomas Fermi approximate improves with increasing z. The potential at the atomic radius is proportional to z 1/3 so that a typical electron wavelength is proportional to z 2/3 . The distance over which the potential changes by a definite fraction of itself is proportional to the atomic radices or z -1/3. Thus the fraction change of the potential in an electron wavelength is proportional to z -1/3 and decreases with z. Moreover since the number of electrons is equal to z, the use of the statistical method is better justified s z increases.
e2 3 d r j u k (rk ) rj k
= k uk (rk )
(1)
where rjk = |rj-rk |. If there are z electrons in the atom, equation (1) constitutes a set of z simultaneous nonlinear integral differential equations for the z functions uk (rk ). It is therefore not feasible to solve these equations. directly, and Hartree used a method of successive approximation.
123 A potential energy that approximately represents the second and third terms in (1) is assumed, electron wave fns. Computed and new potentials for each electron found from these wave functions. This process is continued until the potentials are self consistent to a high order of accuracy. The principal approximation made is the averaging of the potential energy given as the third term in (1) over the angles of rk to make it spherically symmetric. The solutions of (1) can then be expressed as products of radial functions and spherical harmonies. A further simplification is made so that the 2 (2l +1) or fewer electrons in a shell all move in the same potential and have the same radial wave function. It is apparent that the Hartree approximation neglects correlations between the positions of the electrons, since the entire wave function for all the electrons is assumed to be a simple product of one electron functions. y (r1 , r2 , ........, r2 ) = u1 (r1 ) u2 (r2 ) ................. u2 (r2 ) (2)
It is also clear from (2) that antisymmetrized wave functions are not employed. The antisymmetry is considered only in so far as the Quantum numbers of the one electron states uk are chosen in agreement with the exclusion principle.
h H = k 2m
2e 2 - r+ k j k
2 e r > j
(3)
k
where j > k implies a double summation over all different pairs of indices j and k we wish to minimize the expectation value of H, From (2) and (3) we obtain
.. *. . . . . . . y. . Hy . . .d. . . . r. . . . d . . . .r.
1 2
* u k (
-h 2 rk ) -2 u k 2m
2 z e (kr r k
d)
>
j k
e2 * u *( r k )u k ( ku jr( 3 u) r ( dk3) r j d k r r ) j j k rj k
(4)
124 since the uk are normalized. The optimum y is obtained by varying each of the uk separately to minimize equation (4). The only dependence of equation (4) on a particular one electron function uk is through the terms.
* uk (
-h 2 2 r u k ) k 2m +
2 z e -(k r r k
d)
r e2 ) ( 3 ju) r ( dk 3 r j d k r ) k u jr k rj k
j k
* u *( r j )u k (r j
* = u k ( rk ) H k u k ( rk ) d 3 rk
(5)
r
2 -h 2 2 z 2 2 e e k - +j | u k( ) 3 | d r Hk j 2m rk k j kr j
The integral in equation (5) is the expectation value of the operation Hk for the function uk . This is a minimum when uk is an eigenfunction of Hk that corresponds to its lowest eigenvalue k . Hk uk = k uk (6)
Since equations (1) and (6) are identical, we see that the Hartree wave functions are the best from the point of view of the variation method that can be written in the form of equation (2) The energy associated with this wave function is just the integral in equation (4) which can be written with the help of equation (1)
..................... u * H y d
j k
r1 ................... d 3 r2 = k
k
- > | u j (r j ) | 2 | u k (rk ) | 2
e2 r jk
d 3 r j d 3 rk
The electrostatic interaction terms between electrons are counted twice in the summation over k and so have to be subtracted to give (7). Thus the energy of the atom is not just the sum of the k , although each k . is roughly the energy of removal of the kth electron. This last is not strictly true, since the removal of an electron alters the self consistent fields and hence the wave fr. s for the remaining electrons. However, k is found to be an especially good approximation to the energy of removal in the case of an inner electron (x ray level).
125
13.9 References
1. Quantum Mechanics A.K. Ghatak and S. Lokanathan McMillan 2. Publishers. 3. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics David J. Griffiths, Prentice Hall. 4. A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. 5. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 6. Basic Quantum Mechanics Ajoy. Ghatak Tata McGraw Hill Publishers 7. Introductory Quantum Mechanics Richard L. Liboff Addition - Willey. 8. Quantum Mechanics John L. Powell and Bernd Crasemann Narosa 9. Publishing house. 10. Modern Quantum Mechanics J.J. Sakurai. 11. http://thequantumexchange.org/
126
14.2ALKALI ATOMS
The ground state configuration of an alkali atom consists of a series of full shells followed by a single s electron and so is 2S . The inner rare gas configuration is so stable that all but quite high excited states of the atom involve only the valence electron. Thus the alkalis can be treated to quite good approximation in terms of a model in which a single electron moves in a spherically symmetric noncoulomb potential energy V(r).
The configuration of an alkali atom can be specified by a single pair of quantum numbers nl. Since there is only one electron, the perturbing electrostatic term ii does not appear. In the absence of external fields the hamiltonian, including the spin orbit energy is
H= -h 2 V 2m
2
+ r
+ ) L (r (
urur ) S.
(1)
where
(r ) = 1 1 dV 2 2 2m c r dr
The total angular momentum J = L+S of the valence electron is a constant of the motion, so that states can be designated by jm instead of ml ms, where J2 j(j+1)h2 =
still a (2j +1) fold degeneracy due to m. The removal of the m degeneracy by a magnetic field is discussed later.
127
The difference in energy between states of different j is due to the L.S term in (1) and can be found from its expectation value or diagonal matrix element. u r r 2 J 2 = LS + 2 ) L 2 + S + 2 L.S = (
(2)
since e, j and s are all good quantum number (s = ). Equation (2) can be solved for the diagonal matrix element of L.S.
u r r lL.Sl j [j + = (j1) j +l (l1) 3 - 2 J k 4
(3)
Now if L is different from o,j can be either L + or L . Thus the first order perturbation arising from (r) L.S. is
1 l nl 2 -1 (l + 1) nl 2
if j = l +
1 2 1 if j = l 2
(4)
nl = h 2
|R
0
nl
(r ) | 2 (r ) r 2 dr
l >0
where Rnl (r) is the normalized radial part of the unperturbed eigenfunction associated with the nl configuration. Since V(r) represents an attractive potential energy, (r) is positive and nl is positive. Thus equation (4) shows that the state with higher j has the higher energy. The pair of states is called a doublet the doublet structure characterizes all the moderately excited levels of the alkali atoms except those for which l = 0 in which case j can only be .
The doublet separations can be calculated from equation (4) if radial function is known using the generating function for the associated lauguerre polynomials.
lj
nl
h2 z 2 e = 2 m2 2 c
1 2 R n rl d r ( ) r
128
e2h 2 Z 4 1 2 m 2 c 2 a o 3 n 3 l l + (L + 1) 2
(5)
This is valid only for l >0 ; the singularity in (r) at r 0 makes the integral for no diverge there, so that the perturbation approximation is not valid. It follows from (4) and (5) that the doublet separation is proportional to n-3 and this in fair agreement with observation. The absolute value of the doublet separation and its dependence on l are not given at all by this simple theory, since the effective z is difficult to estimate and depends marked by on l because of penetration.
We now calculate the intensities of the two lines of the allowed doublet 2P
3 1 1 1 & 2P 2S under the assumption that the radial wave functions 2S 2 2 2 2
are the same for the two excited 2P states. Transitions of this type give rise to the principal series in the alkali spectra. From the equation.
4 e 2 k 2 wkn 4 e 2 wkn 2 | < k | r | n >| = 3h c 3h c3
2
| < k | r | n >| 2
the spontaneous transition probabilities and hence the observed intensities if the two p states are equally likely to be occupied, are proportional to the squares of the dipole matrix elements The dependence of the two excited 2p states and the ground 2S state as the angular and spin co-ordinates of the electron is obtained by finding linear combination of products of the four spherical harmonics y1 , 1(q, f), y1 , 0 (q, f), y1,-1 (q, f), y0 ,0 (q, f) and the two spin wave functions (+) and (-) that are eigenfunctions of J2 and Jz. These combinations can be obtained from the Clebsch Gordan co-efficient.
129
3 2 1 2 +
m = =
y +
-1 1 3 2 22 ( y1)-, + -1 1 2 2-, y (2 0 + ) 1 y( + ,
( ( y ), 0 1 )1
) 1 1,
1
-1 2 p3 = 3 1 2 2 = -3 2
y1 , 1
1 m = 2 -1 2 p 1 =3 1 2 2 2s1
2
1 2 - y 3 + ( ) 1 y, + 2 -1 1 2 2 ( -,y ) 0 -2 1 y( +,
-1 2
-1 ) ( , ) 1
1 = 0(m 2 = -1 2
+)y (
)y0
, 0
The wave functions equation (6) can be used to calculate the matrix elements of x = r sinq cosf y = r sinq sinf and z = r cos q. We assume that the radial functions associated with equation (6) are all the Same, so that the radial part of the matrix element integral is a common factor throughout. The angle parts of the integrals are easily evaluated by making use of the explicit expressions for the ys in terms of q and f. The products of spin fns, follows the simple rules (+) (+) = 1, (-) (+) = 0 etc., In this way we obtain the following values for the squares of the magnitudes of the indicated matrix elements, expressed in units of
1 of the common radial factor : 18
3 = t 2 3 = 2
= o t=
2 p3 1 s 2
2 2
| =
0 = y 2|
z= |2 1 =2 | z |
4 0
1 t 2
| x 2|= | y 2|
130
m =
1 1 to m = 2 2 1 -1 = to 2 2
| x |2 = | y |2 = 0 | z |2 = 2 | x |2 = | y |2 = 2 | z |2 = 0
-1 -3 and . 2 2
Similar results are obtained for the transitions that start form m =
It follows from equation (7) that the sum of the intensities of all the lines that originate on each of the four 2P3/2 states is equal to 6, in the above units. It is expected that these sums are equal since the four values of m differ only in the orientation of the angular momentum, and this should not affect the intensity. However the total intensity form each of the two 2P1/2 states is also equal to 6. The equality of total intensities from each state formed form a given L and S is a general property of LS coupling; this makes the absolved intensity, which is that from all the states that are degenerate with respect to m, proportional to 2J+1. In the example considered here, the two lines for the doublet have intensities in the ratio 2:1. This is observed for the lowest doublets of the alkalis, although for the higher doublets the intensity ratio exceeds 2. This is because the spin orbit energy actually mixes different configurations (2p states with same j but different n ) ; the amount of mixing is different for the two j values, so that the two radial functions are not the same. A small admixture of the low- intensity upper states in the high intensity lowest 2p states has little effect, whereas in the opposite case there is a large effect on the doublet intensity ratio.
It is clear that two distinct problems arise in connection with molecular structure. The first is the solution of Schrdinger equation to obtain electronic wave functions and a potential energy function of the nuclear coordinates. The second is the solution of nuclear motion. The first problem can be solved only in the simplest cases. As an example, we now consider in outline an approximate solution for the hydrogen molecule due to Hietler and London.
h 2 n 2 i V+ u j (i r= ) jU (j R ) ui( r ) R R 2m i =1
(1)
in the case of the hydrogen molecule in the magnitude R of the distance between the two hydrogen nuclei. The Hamiltonian is that given in equation
H = H0 + H '
2 h2 e2 e H 0 = -1 ( 2 2 2 - + ) 2m r 1r 2 2 e 2 e2 e 2e H'= + - R 1 2 rB1 r r 2 A
(2)
however, R is no longer large in comparison with a0 = h 2 / 2e so that the m approximations implied in equation (2) are no longer useful. Nevertheless, an approximate wave function based on a simple product of two ground state hydrogen atom functions gives remarkably good results. The reason for this is that exchange degeneracy is taken into account; the degenerate wave functions for which electron 1 is on nucleus A and electron 2 on nucleus B, and for which electron 1 is on nucleus B and electron 2 on nucleus A are both used at once. The new feature of the work of Heitler and London was the recognition that an appropriate linear combination of unperturbed degenerate wave functions gives a significantly lower energy than the separate wave functions; it is the basis of the present day theory of homopolar binding in molecules. This property of degeneracy is sometimes referred to as resonance. An analogous situation is that in which an interaction between two classical oscillators that are in resonance (same unperturbed frequency) gives rise to a normal mode that has a lower frequency (and also one that has a higher frequency). In a similar way, an interaction between two resonant (degenerate) state in quantum mechanics gives rise to a lower energy eigenvalue (as well as to a higher one). There may of course be more than two degenerate unperturbed states, and the degeneracy need not be of the exchange type.
The correction of the approximate results obtained from the central field. Two terms are omitted in the central field approximation: the difference between the actual electrostatic interaction between electrons and the average interaction that is included in the central field, and the spin orbit energy. The latte is an interaction energy between the spin and the orbital motion of each electron and has the form
u r u r )Lk .S k
x (r
k
(1)
u r u r r here, L k is the orbital angular momentum operator rk x k ofpthe kth electron and has u r u2r the properties of the J operator. The eigenvalues of L k and Lkz are given in terms of
the quantum numbers l and ml for the electron as l ( +1 h)2 and ml h , respectively. l
r 1 Sk is the spin angular momentum hs k of the kth electron. The function x ( r is given ) 2
by
x (r = ) 1 1d V 2m 2 c2 r d r
in terms of central field potential V (r). In considering the effect of these terms, we shall assume that the perturbed eigenfucntions, which are linear combinations of various configuration wave functions, have only negligibly small amounts of all but one configuration mixed in them. From perturbation theory it is apparent that this is the case if the inter configuration matrix elements of the perturbation are small in comparison with the energy intervals between unperturbed configuration energies. It can be shown that from equation (1) that includes electron in full shells is zero, since the function x ( r is the same for all electrons in the shell and contributions ) from electrons with opposite ml and ms cancel. Thus the electrons in the full shell can be ignored and the summation extended only over the remaining electrons. The case in which there is just one electron outside the full shells is of interest in connection with the ground state and low excited states of alkali atoms.
133
14.6 References
1. Quantum Mechanics A.K. Ghatak and S. Lokanathan McMillan Publishers. 2. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics David J. Griffiths, Prentice Hall. 3. A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 4. Basic Quantum Mechanics Ajoy. Ghatak Tata McGraw Hill Publishers 5. Introductory Quantum Mechanics Richard L. Liboff Addition - Willey. 6. Quantum Mechanics John L. Powell and Bernd Crasemann Narosa Publishing house. 7. Modern Quantum Mechanics J.J. Sakurai. 8. http://thequantumexchange.org/
134
15.2. Introduction
Semi classical theory is a mixture of classical & quantum picture matter i.e. atoms are assumed to exist in discrete states. But the electromagnetic radiation with which it interacts is described classically. The semi classical theory is insufficient to describe the spontaneous emission of radiation because the electromagnetic field described classically.
135 E2 E2 - E1 = h w E1
E2 - E1 = h w E1
E 2 - E1 = h w E1
15.7. Einsteins co-efficients for Induced Absorption and Spontaneous Emission, Induced Emission
N2 E2 E 2 - E1 = h w 1 N1 E1
136
The above figure represents the two energy states of an atomic system corresponding to the energy E1 and E2 . Let N1 and N2 be the number of atoms per unit volume in the energy level 1& 2. Atom in the lower energy level can absorb radiation and get excited to the energy level 1 and 2. The excitation process occurs on by in the presence of radiation. Such a process is termed as induced absorption or stimulated absorption. The rate of absorption depend upon the energy density u( w ) associated with the radiation field corresponding to the frequency.
w =
E1 - E 2 h
The energy density u( w ) is defined in such a way that u( w ) d( w ) represent the number of atoms per unit volume with in the interval w and w +d w . Thus the number of absorption per unit time per unit volume is proportional to N1 u( w ). N1 u( w ) = B12 N1 u( w ) Where B12 constant of proportionality and it is called Einsteins co-efficient for induced absorption. On the other hand when an atom, is an excited state, can make transition to the lower energy state through the emission of electromagnetic radiation. However the absorption process, emission process can occur two different ways. The 1st refers to the spontaneous emission, in which the atom in the excited state emits radiation even in the absence of any incident radiation. It is thus not stimulated by any incident signal but occurs spontaneously. The rate of spontaneous emission is proportional to the number of atoms in the excited state. If we represent the co-efficient of proportionality by A21 then N2 A21 would represents number of spontaneous per unit volume per unit time to the lower energy level. The 2 nd refers to the stimulated emission in which an incident signal of appropriate frequency triggers an atom is an excited state to emit radiation. The rate of transition to the lower energy level is directly proportional to the energy density of the incident radiation at the frequency w . Thus the number of stimulated emission per unit volume per unit time is given by N2 B21 u( w ) . The quantities A21, B12, B21 are known as Einstein co-efficients and are determined by the atomic system.
137
Or
u (w ) =
(1)
N1 2 2 N B1 - B 1 2
From Boltzmanns law we have the following expression for the ratio of the population of the 2nd level at temperature T
( N1 =e N2
E2 - E ) 1 KB T
hw N1 = e KB T N2
u (w ) = e
A2
hw
KB T
-B2 2
u (w ) = B2
A2
1
(e
hw
KB T
-1
(2)
hw 3 1 u (w =) 2 3. hw p c e KB T - 1
Using the above relation equation (2) becomes
138
A2 1 hw 3 1 . hw = hw 2 3 p c e KB T - 1 B2 1 e K B T - 1
A2 1 hw 3 = B2 1 pc2 3 hw 3 A= B 2 3 p c
(1)
(2)
e2 A 2 can be neglected because the vector potential A is very small. 2mc 2 urururur . Now we are going to prove that p. A= A p
In general
( )
)
139
urur = A. p y
( )
i.e.
-e u r u r-u r u r u r u r u r u r e p. + A = A + .A p A . p . p 2m c 2m c
The interaction of Hamiltonian becomes u -e u r-e r u r u r 2A p A . p = . 2m c m c u r Now the vector potential A can be written as u r r r A = $ 0 c o ks r . t ) e A ( w
( )
$ Where e is the unit vector along the direction of propagation which is perpendicular u r to the vector potential A .
e + 2
From time dependent perturbation theory the probability amplitude for transition from an initial state n to final state s is given by
cs n= s 1 V ih n n te i
iws n t
where ws n= Now,
En - E s h
urur s Vn t n =s A . p n i
= = urur -e s A p n . 2m c
r r r r -e $ A0 i . k e s + e . k e r- ip + nr 2m c2
- iw t
w i e
On solving the above equations the transition probability for emission become
e A cs n = s e p 4m c h
2 2 0 2 2 r r i .k r
w + ws n s i2 n 2 t 2 $ n e . 2 w + ws n 2
e$
w + w n s s i2 n 2 t 2 w + w n s 2
w + ws n s i2 n 2 t 2 $ n e . 2 w + ws n 2
If we consider the atomic dimension the atomic radius is very small. So we can expand the exponential form as r r r r i .k r ei .k r= 1 .+ . 1 !
i r ( ) (+-. k )+. . . 2 !
r2
The magnitude of the successive term decreases by the factors of order of 10-3 cm. So in this case we can approximate ei
e A cs n = s p n 4m c h
2 2 0 2 2 r r . r k
r r but is the l l
=1.
w + w n s s i2 n 2 t 2 e$ 2 w + w n s 2
Transition for which the probability can be computed using the above approximation is called electric dipole transition. Since only the matrix element of the r $ r electric dipole moment e. of the particle is involved.
141
between S and n. In that case the approximation ei expanded in the series of spherical harmonics. r r r r r r r r ei .k jr= k .r 3+ j k 1 r- pq2 j5 k. 2 rcq po i1 . c o s 0
( )
( )
( )
r r
( )
The dominant factor in the nth term of the above series is proportional to the r r r r n r k . r , if k . <<1. Thus if the dipole matrix element vanishes, but the next term of
each series does not vanish. The transition matrix element is reduced by a factor that has the magnitude of the order of Ka where the linear dimension of the particle wave function of are of order of a. The transition of this type is called forbidden transition, since a probability is reduced by a factor (Ka)2 with respect to dipole or allowed transition.
determined the Einsteins coefficients for the above three process. Also we obtained an expression for transition probability. Finally we presented short notes on selection rules and forbidden transition.
142 expression for the transition probability per unit time for spontaneous emission. 5. Discuss in detail about the forbidden transition 6. Explain the selection rules.
15.14 References
1. A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 2. Quantum Mechanics Leonard I. Schiff, McGraw Hill International edition. 3. Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Narosa Publishing house. 4. Quantum Mechanics S.L. Gupta, V. Kumar, H.V. Sharma, R.C. Sharma. Jai Prakash Nath & Co Ltd. 5. Quantum Mechanics Satya Prakash Sultan Chand Publishers . 6. Angular Momentum Techniques in Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Kluwer Academic Publishers. 7. Quantum Mechanics John L. Powell and Bernd Crasemann Narosa Publishing house.
143
In this lesson,we are going to studied about quantization of wave fields. We will be discussing the Legrangian , classical Hamiltonian equations and non relativistic Schrodingers equations. Also we will be presenting creation , destruction and number operators and anti Commutation relations.
where ak is regarded as the fields co-ordinates In classical particle theory, both total and partial time derivatives were defined in connection with a function F(qi, pi, t) of the co-ordinates, momenta and time. Also a function F(y, p, t) can depend explicitly on the time as well as on the field, so that it is important to distinguish between dF/dt and F/dt.
144
t2
L. dt
t1
= 0,
dqi(t1 ) = dqi(t2 ) = 0
(1)
we expect the field Lagrangian to be a functional of the field amplitude y(r,t). It can be expressed as the integral over all space of a Lagrangian density L : . L = L (y , Dy ,y , t )d 3 r
(2)
where y is y/t or dy/ d t The appearance of y as an argument of L is a result of the continuous dependence of y on r. The variation principle that corresponds to equation (1) is
t2
t2
t2 3
L
t1
dt = d
L dt d
t1
r =
(d
t1
L) dt d 3 r = 0
(3)
dy (r , t1 ) = dy (r , t 2 ) = 0
The variation of L can be written as, u r u r u L L y L dL = d + y y dy + d y x x y z x
r y & &
(4)
(5)
where the summation over x, y, z implies the sum of three terms with y and z substituted for x we have, dy = Then equation (3) becomes
t0
y (dy ) , d (dy ) = t x x
t1
u L d y
r u r L + y d . x y z y y x
u L y +( x
d t&
y= (0
d t 3d r
(6)
Then summation terms in equation (6) can be integrated by parts with respect to space co-ordinates; surface terms vanish either because y falls rapidly at infinite distance or because y obeys periodic boundary conditions. The last term in equation (6) can be integrated by parts with respect to time and the boundary terms vanish because of equation (4). Now equation (6) can be written as,
145
r u L - x y zx y u r L y y t x
t0
t1
u r L 3 = d yd t d r0 &
(7)
since equation (3) is valid for an arbitrary variation dy at each point in space, equation (7) is equivalent to the differential equation,
u r L - y x yz x
u r L - y y t x
u r L . = &
(8)
Equation (8) is the classical field equation derived from the Lagrangian density
L (y,y,y,t). .
L & y
and
L y
Expressions for them can be obtained by dividing up all space into small cells and replacing volume integrals by summate over these cells. The expressions for the function derivatives are as follows.
L L Ld L L t = = . d 0 d y d t y y j j y
r j
u r L z x y xy x r
(9)
Here all the dyi and dy i are zero except for particular dy j, and dti is the volume of the cell. Similarly, the functional derivative of L w.r.t y is defined by setting all the dy i and dy i zero except for dy i
L L d = L t = & y d r 0 y jd dj
u r L t& y
(10)
146 Here again at point r at which the functional derivative is evaluated is in the jth cell. Substituting equations (9) & (10) in (8) gives,
L L = 0 & t y y
(11)
The momentum canonically conjugate to y j can be defined as in particle mechanics to be the ratio of dL to the infinitesimal change dy j when all the other dyj . and all dy i are zero we thus obtain.
Pj = L dL = dt j y dy j j j
y i dt i - L . i
(1)
It follows that
L Pj = dt j y
(2)
L The Hamiltonian H = Pi y i - L = i i y
(3)
H is written as the volume integral of a Hamiltonian density H and assume that the cells are small enough so that the difference between a volume integral and the corresponding cell summation can be ignored; we than have,
H = H d 3r
H = py -L
L L = y y
(4)
The true field Hamiltonian H given in equation (4) which is a functional of y and p from which y has been eliminated. The classical Hamiltonian equations of motion . . will be derived without further recourse to the cell a approximation. The variation of L produced by variations of y and y can be written using equation (4) and
L / L / = 0 & t y / y / L / L / & d L = y dd y . p = d3 d + r y / y /& y d+ p (&&
3
r ) y
147
= & [ d (p+&y) p &d- y y d pd 3 r ]
3
= d H + d L+
(5)
(6)
(7)
Comparison of equations (5) & (6) for arbitrary variations dy and dp then gives the classical field equations is Hamiltonian form.
& y = H / = p p / H &p / /
(8)
The Hamiltonian equation for the time rate of change of a functional F of y and p can now be found. We express F as volume integral of the corresponding functional density F (y , p , t ) , which for simplicity is assumed not to depend explicitly on time or on gradients of y or p . Hence,
u r u r d F F F F 3 = + + y y& p p & d r d t t
F F H F/ H / / / + t y / p p y/ / /
F + {F, H} t
d3 r
(9)
The above equation also serves to define poisson bracket expression for two function as of the field variables. The RHS of equation (9) is not changed if F also depends on y or p. It is clear from equation (9) that H is a constant of the motion if it does not depend explicitly on time; in this case H is the total energy of the field.
148
(1)
Schrdinger equation. For this reason, As a first example of the application of the field quantization technique, we consider here the quantization of the non relativistic Schrdinger equation. The application implies treating (1) as though it were a classical equation that describes the motion of some kind of material fluid. The resulting quantized field theory is equivalent to a many particle field quantization is often called second quantization, and the transaction from classical particles mechanics to equation (1) constitutes the first quantization. Classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian equations, The Lagrangian density may be taken to be
u r h2 & y* V y ( y -, L = h y i* . r 2m y) t y *
(2)
(3)
(4)
However y * does not appear in the Lagrangian density so that p is identically zero. It is therefore impossible to satisfy the corresponding classical poission bracket relation, so that y *, p cannot be regarded as a pair of canonically conjugate variables. p is the second momentum. The Hamiltonian density is,
149
u u r u r -i h H = p & yL p - = 2m -i yV p . h
(5)
The Hamiltonian equations of motion obtained from the classical field equations with the help of functional derivates are,
& y = i h + y 2 2m i i h 2 & p = Vp p h 2m i -y V h
We have thus shown, from the point of view of classical field theory, that the Lagrangian density and the canonical variables and hamiltonian derived from it are in agreement with the wave equation.
(1)
for the operations ak and ak + were solved in connection with the harmonic oscillator. It was found that the solution of aa+- a +a=1 in the representation in which a+a i s diagonal, consists of the matrices.
0 1 0 0 1 a = 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 a+ = 0 0 0 0 2 0
1 2
0 0 0 3
1 2
0 0 0 0
(2)
N
k
where
N k = ak ak
(3)
The states of the quantized field, in the representation in which each Nk is diagonal, are the kets
n1 , . .2. . . .n . . . . . . .n . . .k. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Where each nk is an eigen value of Nk and must be a +ve integer or zero. We also have the relations.
(4)
ak
ak
150 These ak + and ak are called creation and destruction operators for the state k of the field. The number operation Nk need not be a constant of the motion, that N = Nk is a constant The rate of change of Nk is given by,
ih & k = a N k
a , H k
where H =
j l
h2 a la u *j . * j u V l j 2m a j
l
+ u l
3
u3 d
j l
aj
-h 2 2 u Vl 2m
+ u
(6)
diagonal, Nk is constant only if all the volume integrals in equation(6) are zero for which either j or l is equal to k. These integrals are just matrix elements of the one particle Hamiltonian. The integrals in equation (6) are than E l d jl , and the field Hamiltonian becomes, H=
a
k
+ k
ak Ek = N k Ek
k
n
k
[y (r
(1)
It is necessary to modify the above equations if we are obtain a theory of particles that obey the exclusion principle. It is reasonable to require that this modification be made in such a way that The quantum equation of motion of y is the wave equation,
h2 2 & ih y = V - y r 2m - (t , ) y
151
h2 + y + . y +y V H = 2m
y d
It was found by Jordon and Wigner that the descried modification consists in the replacement of the commutator brackets,
[A,B] AB BA By anticommutator brackets [A,B]+ AB + BA This means that equations (1) are replaced by,
[y (r
+ + + y + (r ) y+ r( y+=) r ( y) r( + y ) r ( y' =) ( ) 0 ' ' r , + + y (r ) y r ( 'y=)+ ( y) ++ 'y ) (=y' ) r - )3 ( ' ) , r r ( r r ( d r + ) y r( ]+ 'y= r ( y r( +'y ) r ( y =r ( ) 0 , ) ) ' )
(2)
It then follows that [ak , aL]+ = ak al + al ak = 0 [ak +, aL+]+ = ak +al+ + al+ ak + = 0 [ak , aL+]+ = ak al+ + al+ ak = d kl (3) We define Nk = ak + ak as before and notice first that each Nk commutes with all the others, so that they can be diagonalized simultaneously. The eigen values of Nk can be obtained from the matrix equation, Nk2 = ak + ak ak + ak = ak + (1-ak + ak ) ak = ak + ak = Nk
1 11 2
(4)
If Nk is in diagonal form and has eigen values nk , nk .........., it is clear that Nk is also in diagonal form and has eigen values nk 12 , nk 112, ... Thus the matrix equation is equivalent to the algebraic equations.
1
nk = nk
11 2
nk = nk ...........
11
For the eigen values. These are quadratic equations that have two roots 0 and 1. Thus the eigen values of each Nk are 0 and 1, and the particles obey the exclusion principle. The eigen values of N = N k are the +ve integers and zero as before. The earlier expressions for the Hamiltonian in creation, destruction and number operators are unchanged, and the energy eigen values are
n E
k
152
In this lesson, we have discussed about quantization of wave fields. We studied the Legrangian , classical Hamiltonian equations and non relativistic Schrodingers equations, in detail. Also we presented creation , destruction and number operators and anti Commutation relations.
Check your progress 1. Define density operator and density matrix. 2. Obtain the Legrangian equations of motion. 3. Obtain the classical Hamiltonian equation. 4. Arrive at the non relativistic Schrodingers equation. 5. Explain the creations, destruction and number operators.
16.11 References
1. A text book of Quantum Mechanics P.M. Mathews and K. Venkatesan. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers. 2. Quantum Mechanics Leonard I. Schiff, McGraw Hill International edition. 3. Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Narosa Publishing house. 4. Quantum Mechanics S.L. Gupta, V. Kumar, H.V. Sharma, R.C. Sharma. Jai Prakash Nath & Co Ltd. 5. Quantum Mechanics Satya Prakash Sultan Chand Publishers . 6. Angular Momentum Techniques in Quantum Mechanics V. Devanathan Kluwer Academic Publishers. 7. Quantum Mechanics John L. Powell and Bernd Crasemann Narosa Publishing house.
153 M.Sc. DEGREE EXAMINATION, APRIL 2008 Model Question Physics QUANTUM MECHANICS Time : Three hours Answer any five questions Each question carries 20 marks. (5 x 20 = 100) 1. Give the matrix theory of harmonic oscillator and obtain the energy eigenvalue spectrum. Write down the physical meaning of matrix elements. 2. Explain the main stages involved in the WKB approximation. Use the technique to obtain the asymptotic solution of the one dimensional Schrdinger equation. Also arrive at the solution near a turning point. 3. Develop the relativistic wave equation for the particle of spin zero. Discuss the difficulties involved in interpreting the probability density. Derive the expression charge and current densities from the continuity equation. 4. Prove the following properties of Dirac matrices on the basis of Diracs theory : a) Square of matrices are unity b) Eigenvalues of the matrices are 1. c) Trace of the matrices is zero. d) Dimension of the matrices are of even order. e) The matrices anticommuting among themselves. 5. Obtain an expression for the Born approximation amplitude and hence derive the Rutherford formula for Coulomb scattering. Enumerate the two conditions for the validity of born approximation. 6. Discuss the Thomas Fermi Model and Hartrees Self Consistent Model in detail. Briefly explain Heitler and London method. 7. Distinguish induced and spontaneous emission. Define Einsteins A and B coefficients and obtain the relation between them. Write down the expression for the transition probability per unit time for spontaneous emission. 8. Obtain classical Lagrangian equation. Write notes on Creation, Destruction and Number Operators. Also discuss their anti commutation relations. Maximum : 100 marks
154 M.Sc. DEGREE EXAMINATION, APRIL 2008 Model Question Physics QUANTUM MECHANICS Time : Three hours Answer any five questions Each question carries 20 marks. (5 x 20 = 100) 1. What do you understand by equation of motion? Obtain the equation of motion in the Heisenberg picture and state the distinction between Schrdinger picture and Heisenberg picture. 2. Give the matrix theory of harmonic oscillator and obtain the energy eigenvalue spectrum. Discuss the significance of zero point energy. 3. Obtain Perturbation theory for non degenerate states. Show that the first order perturbation energy for a non degenerate state of a system is just the perturbation for average over the corresponding unperturbed state of the system. Distinguish stationary and time dependent perturbation theory. 4. Explain how the ground state energy could be evaluated using the variation method and hence find the ground state energy of hydrogen atom. 5. Obtain the spectrum of eigenvalues for J2 and Jz. Hence calculate the angular momentum matrices for j = . What are C.G. Coeffifiient? Briefly explain their significance. 6. Develop Diracs relativistic wave equation for a free particle and obtain its plain wave solution. Give the significance of negative energy states. What are the consequences of Diracs interpretation? 7. What do you meant by partial wave analysis? Employ this method to derive an expression for the scattering amplitude in terms of phase shift. Obtain an expression for scattering cross section for Coulomb potential. 8. Discuss the interaction of atom with electromagnetic field and hence show that probability per unit time for induced emission and absorption are equal. Obtain classical Hamiltonian equation. Maximum : 100 marks
155 M.Sc. DEGREE EXAMINATION, APRIL 2008 Model Question Physics QUANTUM MECHANICS Time : Three hours Answer any five questions Each question carries 20 marks. (5 x 20 = 100) Maximum : 100 marks
1. What are the conditions under which an operator can be represented by a diagonal matrix. Write down the physical meaning of matrix elements. Explain Kronig penny model. 2. There is no first order stark effect in the ground state of an atom Illustrate. Define the degeneracy of an energy eigenvalue and illustrate its removal by considering the stark effect in the n = 2 level of the hydrogen atom. 3. Obtain the expressions for the first order corrections to the energy and wavefunction making the use of the non-degenerate stationary perturbation theory. Obtain an expression for harmonic perturbation. 4. Give the quantum mechanical definition of angular momentum. Find the angular momentum matrices for j = 1. List the symmetry properties of C. G. coefficient. 5. Show that the angular momentum of electron is a constant of motion only if we include the spin. Establish the Diracs relativistic wave equation for an electron and calculate its magnetic moment. 6. Define the terms scattering amplitude and phase shift. Obtain an expression for scattering amplitude in terms of phase shift. State and explain optical theorem. Discuss in detail the problem of Yukawa potential. 7. Explain the terms doublet separation and doublet intensity. Explain how the spin orbit interaction can be accounted as correction to central field approximation. 8. Distinguish induced and spontaneous emission. Define Einsteins A and B coefficients and obtain the relation between them. Write down the expression for the transition probability per unit time for spontaneous emission.