Today's Date: Wednesday, April 25,2Q12Monday, May 07,2012 1. Your Contact Information: a. Your name: Aaron J. Walker b.

Your address: [redacted] c. Your telephone number: [redacted] d. Your preferred email address: [redacted] 2. Perpetrator Contact Information: a. Name of person who committed the alleged perjury: Brett Kimberlin. b. Address of that person: [redacted] c. Telephone number of that person: [redacted] d. Email address of that person: [redacted] Please note there are examples multiple false statements, so I will repeat that part over and over: 3. When and Where the False Statement to an Officer of the Law Occurred: False statement to the police on January 9,2012. a. Date on which the alleged false statement occurred: January 9, 2012. b. Location where the alleged false statement occurred: Circuit Court building, 9 Floor, just outside Courtroom 5. c. Matter in which alleged false statement occurred: State v. Walker, Criminal case 0D00276493 (nolle pros'ed) d. Name, address, and telephone number of every person who was present when the perjury occurred: i. There were around 9 sheriffs deputies there that day, but I have only been able to identify James Johnson. ii. [redacted]

iii. Mr. Kimberlin had an old woman as a guest. She has never been identified. 4. Was the person under oath? n/a 5. Describe the alleged specific false statements to an officer of the law: Mr. Kimberlin unlawfully took a photograph of me in the courthouse using his iPad. When asked about it he lied and stated that he hadn't done so. The sheriffs deputies also stated that they inspected his iPad and claimed they could not find the photo. This was done in a pattern of stalking and harassment (not in the sense of the criminal law, but in the ordinary sense). 6. Impact: Because of his dishonesty, he was able to get away with a picture he might have otherwise been forced to erase. 7. How do you know that the person made the false statement willfully and knowingly? We know he did in fact take the photo because he has admitted it multiple times under oath and even submitted the photo as evidence. He did this in a peace order hearing on February 8,2012, stating under oath that: "But so as we were exiting the courtroom on the 9th floor, Courtroom 5,1 believe, we walked out of the courtroom and he's screaming at me and telling me that he's going to continue harassing me. And as we got outside the door, right outside the courtroom, he began lunging at me. I picked up my iPad and took a picture of him lunging at me. He decked me in the eye and wrestled with me." Likewise on April 11, 2012 in a second peace order hearing, he had the following exchange with my attorney: Q (Reginald Bours III, Esq.): And... But you still had your iPad with you and tried to take a photograph of him, outside the courtroom, didn't you? A (Kimberlin): That's not the series of events, I would not have taken Q: You did try to take a photograph [crosstalk] with your iPad. A: [Crosstalk] I did take a photograph, [cross talk ends] I did take a photograph. Q: It's the one you put in evidence... A: Exactly.

Q: And you claim you took that only because he was attacking you? A: No, he was uh, he was uh, being an aggressor, he was verbally aggressive and physically aggressive toward me, and he was coming at me. And I felt that urn in order to memorialize that uh... that aggressive behavior I took a picture. And I am very well aware of the um... the rule requiring... I mean uh prohibiting photos in the courthouse and so... Q: You are now, or you were then? A: No, of course I was then. And I talked to the deputies when they came up and I told them that I had taken a picture. Please note that he is lying, however, when he claimed that he told the deputies about taking the photograph. Also please note that in the April 11, 2012 hearing he introduced this photo into evidence, as he did when he filed a motion attempting to prevent my criminal case from being dismissed. Have you brought the alleged false statement to the attention of the judge, lawyer, or government official who received the alleged perjury? N/a.

3. When and Where the False Statements in an Application for Statement of Charges Occurred: False statement in an Application for Statement of Charges on January 9, 2012. a. Date on which the alleged false statement occurred: January 9, 2012. b. Location where the alleged false statement occurred: Commissioner's office, District Court building. c. Matter in which alleged false statement occurred: State v. Walker, Criminal case 0D00276493 (nolle pros'ed) d. Name, address, and telephone number of every person who was present when the perjury occurred: i. Unknown. 4. Was the person under oath? Yes. 5. Describe the alleged specific false statements: Mr. Kimberlin wrote the following: [Aaron Walker] attacked me physically while exiting the courtroom. He hit me on the shoulder and chest and pushed me, and grabbed my iPad away from me and refused to return it. Mr. Walker has been [page break] harassing me and stalking me online for months, and as we were exiting said he was going to continue harassing me, and as we left the courtroom, he grabbed my iPad, hit me in the face, shoulder and chest and wrestled the iPad away from me. Several people witness [sic] this event and the police were immediately called. They got my iPad back and safely escorted me from the building. Mr. Walker tried to come at me several more times but was restrained. There are multiple false statements in that paragraph, but I am focusing on the ones most easily proven false. 6. Impact: He convinced your office to charge me with a crime for 2 months. 7. How do you know that the person made the false statement willfully and knowingly? The best proof of the falsity is the video evidence. It absolutely proves that his claim that I "tried to come at me several more times but was restrained" is absolutely indisputably false.

The same video evidence demonstrates that it not reasonably possible for me to have struck him multiple times ("in the face, shoulder and chest") or to have "wrestled" him. As you may or may not know, there is a camera constantly pointing in that direction providing a constant feed, but the digital recordings are not constant. Instead the software extracts a "snapshot" from the camera at intervals of roughly 1.75 seconds, most likely to save space on the hard drive. To believe that I struck him three times ("in the face, shoulder and chest"), you would have to believe that I timed each action precisely between "snapshots" so that you not only don't see the blow, but you don't see any movement from me indicating that I was about to strike, or had just struck, and you don't see any reaction from Brett Kimberlin in terms of being knocked by the blow or recovering from it. The same can be said of his allegations that I wrestled with him or pushed him (as he alleges later); one would have to believe that both my actions and Mr. Kimberlin's actions were timed perfectly so that the complete motion was missed by the "snapshots."

8. Have you brought the alleged false statement to the attention of the judge, lawyer, or government official who received the alleged perjury? Yes. I have filed this charge before them and it led me to your office.

3. When and Where the False Statements in a Petition for a Peace Order Occurred: False statement in an Petition for a Peace Order on January 9, 2012. a. Date on which the alleged false statement occurred: January 9, 2012. b. Location where the alleged false statement occurred: Commissioner's office, District Court building. c. Matter in which alleged false statement occurred: Kimberline [sic] v. Walker, (case no. 0601SP005392012)
1

d. Name, address, and telephone number of every person who was present when the perjury occurred: i. Unknown. 4. Was the person under oath? Yes. 5. Describe the alleged specific false statements: Mr. Kimberlin wrote the following: Mr. Walker assaulted me while leaving the courtroom. He hit me in the face, chest, & shoulder and took my iPad, and threatened to harass me more. 6. Impact: He convinced the judge to grant a temporary peace order based on this. 7. How do you know that the person made the false statement willfully and knowingly? Again, the best proof of the falsity is the video evidence. It demonstrates that it not reasonably possible for me to have struck him multiple times ("hit me in the face, chest, & shoulder"). As you may or may not know, there is a camera constantly pointing in that direction providing a constant feed, but the digital recordings are not constant. Instead the software extracts a "snapshot" from the camera at intervals of roughly 1.75 seconds, most likely to save space on the hard drive. To believe that I struck him three times ("in the face, shoulder and chest"), you would have to believe that I timed each action precisely between "snapshots" so that you not only don't see the blow, but you don't see any movement from me indicating that I was about to strike, or had just struck, and you don't see any reaction from Brett Kimberlin in terms of being knocked by the blow or recovering from it. The same can be said of his allegations that I wrestled with him or pushed him (as he alleges later); one would have to believe that both my actions and Mr.
Somehow in the beginning of the case Kimberlin's name was misspelled as "Kimberline" and this misspelling has never been corrected in the system. So you have to search for information about this case by the misspelled name.
1

Kimberlin's actions were timed perfectly so that the complete motion was missed by the "snapshots."

Have you brought the alleged false statement to the attention of the judge, lawyer, or government official who received the alleged perjury? Yes, I accused Kimberlin of lying about the incident repeatedly in the peace order hearings, but I didn't have the video evidence until very recently.

3. When and Where the Alleged Perjury Occurred: Perjury #1: Ex parte peace order hearing. a. Date on which the alleged perjury: January 9,2012. b. Location where the alleged perjury occurred: District court, unknown courtroom. c. Matter in which alleged perjury occurred: Kimberline [sic] v. Walker, (case no. 0601SP005392012) d. Name, address, and telephone number of every person who was present when the perjury occurred: i. Unknown. 4. Was the person under oath? Yes. 5. Describe the specific act of alleged perjury: Mr. Kimberlin and the judge had the following exchange: Judge: Everything that you wrote here is true and correct? [Referring to the Petition for a Peace Order] Kimberlin: Yes sir. Since the petition is false, his statement that everything he wrote is true and correct is equally false. 6. Impact: He convinced the judge to grant a temporary peace order based on this. 7. How do you know that the person committed the alleged perjury willfully and knowingly? Again, the best proof of the falsity is the video evidence. It demonstrates that it not reasonably possible for me to have struck him multiple times ("hit me in the face, chest, & shoulder"). As you may or may not know, there is a camera constantly pointing in that direction providing a constant feed, but the digital recordings are not constant. Instead the software extracts a "snapshot" from the camera at intervals of roughly 1.75 seconds, most likely to save space on the hard drive. To believe that I struck him three times ("in the face, shoulder and chest"), you would have to believe that I timed each action precisely between "snapshots" so that you not only don't see the blow, but you don't see any movement from me indicating that I was about to strike, or had just struck, and you don't see any reaction from Brett Kimberlin in terms of being knocked by the blow or

recovering from it. The same can be said of his allegations that I wrestled with him or pushed him (as he alleges later); one would have to believe that both my actions and Mr. Kimberlin's actions were timed perfectly so that the complete motion was missed by the "snapshots."

8. Have you brought the alleged perjury to the attention of the judge, lawyer, or government official who received the alleged perjury? Yes, I accused Kimberlin of lying about the incident repeatedly in the peace order hearings, but I didn't have the video evidence until very recently.

3. When and Where the Alleged Perjury Occurred: Perjury #2: peace order hearing, February 8, 2012. a. Date on which the alleged perjury: February 8,2012. b. Location where the alleged perjury occurred: District court, unknown courtroom. c. Matter in which alleged perjury occurred: Kimberline [sic] v. Walker, (case no. 0601SP005392012) d. Name, address, and telephone number of every person who was present when the perjury occurred: i. Unknown. 4. Was the person under oath? Yes. 5. Describe the specific act of alleged perjury: Kimberlin's statements contain multiple falsehoods. But I am focusing on the ones that I believe are the easiest to prove. Mr. Kimberlin made the following false statements: But so as we were exiting the courtroom on the 9th floor, Courtroom 5,1 believe, we walked out of the courtroom and he's screaming at me and telling me that he's going to continue harassing me. And as we got outside the door, right outside the courtroom, he began lunging at me. I picked up my iPad and took a picture of him lunging at me. He decked me in the eye and wrestled with me. (emphasis added). He also made this statement: A man that followed us out of the courtroom raced back into the courtroom and told two people that were working for Judge Rupp that he was attacking me and attacking me. They came out and told him to get off of me and they called the police. Nine police came up to the or, sheriffs came up there and separated him. He had my iPad in his hand at the time and refused to give it back.

6. Materiality: I do not believe by the end of the hearing that the judge actually believed his account. But it is material because he was alleging assault as a basis for the peace order and thus his false testimony went directly toward that claim. His testimony was also calculated to suggest I was out of control, which obviously was not the truth (since I never actually struck or otherwise contacted his person even once). 7. How do you know that the person committed the alleged perjury willfully and knowingly? Again, the best proof of the falsity is the video evidence. It clearly establishes that his claim that I "decked" him is false. To "deck" a person is to knock them down and plainly he was never knocked down. It equally clearly establishes that the sheriffs did not separate me from him. In fact when they arrived Kimberlin was so far away as to be off camerawell over 20 feet away from me. It is also worth noting that the claim I "decked" his is contradicted by testimony he delivered on April 11, 2012. This is the exchange (by my transcription): Q (Reginald Bours I I I , Esq.): Did he [Walker] knock you down? A (Kimberlin): No, he hit me. This is important because in Md. Criminal Law Code 9-101 (c)(1) prohibiting perjury, it states that " [ i ] f a person makes an oath or affirmation to two contradictory statements, each of which, i f false, is prohibited by subsection (a) of this section, it is sufficient to allege, and for conviction to prove, that one of the statements is willfully false without specifying which one." In other words you don't technically have to prove that he was, or was not knocked down; it will suffice to show that one of those statements have to be false. As for the claim that courtroom staff told me to get off of him, this is harder to prove but I believe the courtroom staff can be located and they will remember that they said no such thing. And the video shows it is implausible that they would tell me to get off of Kimberlin, given that I was not "on" him when they came out. 8. Have you brought the alleged perjury to the attention of the judge, lawyer, or government official who received the alleged perjury? Yes, I accused Kimberlin of lying about the incident repeatedly in the peace order hearings, but I didn't have the video evidence until very recently.

3. When and Where the Alleged Perjury Occurred: Perjury #3: peace order hearing, April 11,2012. a. Date on which the alleged perjury: April 11,2012. b. Location where the alleged perjury occurred: Circuit Court, - Floor, Judge Johnson's courtroom.
0

c. Matter in which alleged perjury occurred: Kimberline [sic] v. Walker, (Case No. 8444D) (this was a de novo appeal of the District Court case). d. Name, address, and telephone number of every person who was present when the perjury occurred: i. Judge Eric Johnson ii. Reginald Bours, Esq. iii. [redacted]

4. Was the person under oath? Yes. 5. Describe the specific act of alleged perjury: Kimberlin's statements contain multiple falsehoods. But I am focusing on the ones that I believe are the easiest to prove. Mr. Kimberlin wrote an email to my then-attorney Beth Kingsley on January 9, 2012, claiming: I just finished pressing charges against him for assault and battery and got a peace order against him. Nine deputies had to back him off. He decked me in the face, hit me in the shoulder and chest, pushed me, grabbed my iPad away from me and wrestled me. In the April 11, 2012 peace order hearing, Kimberlin falsely claimed that this email was accurate: Q (Reginald Bours III, Esq.): Later in the afternoon, did you send an email to Beth Kingsley? A (Kimberlin): Probably. Q: Did you use justice through music as the return on your email?

A: Yes. Q: You want to look at this. The top is irrelevant, but is that your email to Beth Kingsley? A: Yeah. Q: And in that email, did you say, " I just finished pressing charges against him for assault and battery and got a peace order against him. Nine deputies had to back him off. He decked me in the face, hit me in the shoulder and chest, pushed me, grabbed my iPad away from me and wrestled me?" A: That's true. Q: And you say that is true and that's what you put in the email to her? A: Uh-huh. (emphasis added). He also claimed to be ignorant of the facts of a civil suit against him and lied about having his parole revoked: Q (Bours): And you were subsequently involved in this case where bombs were set off and people were hurt, correct? A (Kimberlin): Um... Q: Known as the speedway bomber? A: Um, yeah. Q: And you were convicted of number of counts on that, correct? A: Yeah Q: And a man who was injured in those bombings actually killed himself because of his severe injuries, correct? A: I-I have no evidence of that, I have no information about that. Q: Well, you were sued for it, and there was a million dollar judgment in favor of his widow, against you, right? A: Yes Q: And it was a condition of federal parole that you pay that judgment, correct? A: Um, you're getting into nuances. Q: Well, its not a nuance that your parole was revoked because you didn't, correct? A: Not exactly. He also lied about attempting to take a photograph of me:

Q (Reginald Bours III, Esq.): And... But you still had your iPad with you and tried to take a photograph of him, outside the courtroom, didn't you? A (Kimberlin): That's not the series of events, I would not have taken Q: You did try to take a photograph [crosstalk] with your iPad. A: [Crosstalk] I did take a photograph, [cross talk ends] I did take a photograph. Q: It's the one you put in evidence... A: Exactly. Q: And you claim you took that only because he was attacking you? A: No, he was uh, he was uh, being an aggressor, he was verbally aggressive and physically aggressive toward me, and he was coming at me. And I felt that um in order to memorialize that uh... that aggressive behavior I took a picture. And I am very well aware of the um... the rule requiring... I mean uh prohibiting photos in the courthouse and so... Q: You are now, or you were then? A: No, of course I was then. And I talked to the deputies when they came up and I told them that I had taken a picture. 6. Materiality: I do not believe by the end of the hearing that the judge actually believed his account. But his lies about the alleged assault is material because it was a basis of seeking the peace order. His lies about his past is material because he was attempting to minimize his deplorable conduct in the past, which bore on the hearing. His lie about taking the photograph is material, because he said that to make his actions seem less nefarious. My lawyer was insinuating that he took this picture in an attempt to stalk me, and he wanted to make it sound like his conduct was above board. 7. How do you know that the person committed the alleged perjury willfully and knowingly? Again, the best proof of the falsity is the video evidence. It clearly establishes that his claim that I "decked" him is false. To "deck" a person is to knock them down and plainly he was never knocked down. It is also worth noting that the claim I "decked" his is contradicted by testimony he delivered in the same hearing. This is the exchange (by my transcription): Q (Reginald Bours III, Esq.): Did he [Walker] knock you down? A (Kimberlin): No, he hit me. This is important because in Md. Criminal Law Code 9-101 (c)(1) prohibiting perjury, it states that " [ i ] f a person makes an oath or affirmation to two contradictory statements, each of which, i f false, is prohibited by subsection (a) of this section, it is sufficient to allege, and for conviction to prove, that one of the statements is willfully false without specifying which one." In other words you don't technically have to prove that he was,

or was not knocked down; it will suffice to show that one of those statements have to be false. The same video evidence demonstrates that it not reasonably possible for me to have struck him multiple times ("He decked me in the face, hit me in the shoulder and chest, pushed me") or to have "wrestled" him. As you may or may not know, there is a camera constantly pointing in that direction providing a constant feed, but the digital recordings are not constant. Instead the software extracts a "snapshot" from the camera at intervals of roughly 1.75 seconds, most likely to save space on the hard drive. To believe that I struck him three times ("in the face, shoulder and chest"), you would have to believe that I timed each action precisely between "snapshots" so that you not only don't see the blow, but you don't see any movement from me indicating that I was about to strike, or had just struck, and you don't see any reaction from Brett Kimberlin in terms of being knocked by the blow or recovering from it. The same can be said of his allegations that I wrestled with him or pushed him (as he alleges later); one would have to believe that both my actions and Mr. Kimberlin's actions were timed perfectly so that the complete motion was missed by the "snapshots." As for his lies related to his civil suit and parole revocation, Mr. Kimberlin has a long and deplorable criminal record. In the late 1970's, he set a series of bombs in Speedway, Indiana. The last one severely injured a man named Carl Delong and after four years of suffering he killed himself. The Indiana courts found that Kimberlin was liable for his death. See e.g., Kimberlin v. DeLong, 637 N.E.2d 121 (1994). Further, when he failed to pay the widow DeLong for this judgment, his parole was revoked because of that failure. See Kimberlin v. DeWalt, 12 F.Supp. 2d 487 (D. Maryland 1998). This is not the first time he has lied to the Montgomery County Circuit Courts about his parole revocation. On November 14, 2011, in the case of Kimberlin v. Allen (Case No. 339254V) the defendant cross examined Kimberlin on this point. Again, I do not have an official transcript but this is my transcription of the exchange occurring at 10:40:12: Q (Seth Allen): More recently than 32 years ago from your original trial i f that's the date you're getting to, were you released.. A (Kimberlin): I'm not on parole. Q: Were you released and then sent back to prison for parole violation, for failure to pay compensation to Ms. DeLong, the wife of Carl DeLong who took his own life after those bombs tore off half his body? A: No, I wasn't. Please note that there are two encounters when they discuss this on that day (November 14, 2011). In the first exchange, there is a genuine ambiguity as to whether Kimberlin understood the question and he could reasonably claim he was confused and thought he

was being asked i f he was currently on parole. But in this exchange, it is clear that Mr. Allen did make his question clear, and thus his dishonestly is also clear. I have previously asked this office to prosecute him for perjury for making this false statement on November 14,2011. This office chose to nolle prosequi the charges related to the November 14,2011 perjury. Apparently this failure to prosecute emboldened him to tell the same lie again. As for the claim that he told the sheriffs deputies that he took the photo, obviously this will be harder to prove, but there were around 9 deputies present, and I am confident that enough will remember to remove any reasonable doubt on this point. 8. Have you brought the alleged perjury to the attention of the judge, lawyer, or government official who received the alleged perjury? Yes, my attorney accused Kimberlin of lying about the incident repeatedly in the peace order hearing.