Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contribution
The value that the customer generates in terms of revenue
Commitment
The longer term value of a customer & wallet share
Championing
The customers belief in the brand & communication to others
Profile
Production elements
Data Hygiene
Loyalty Programme
Hotel Guest
People
Hotel
Guest
Internet
People
Hotel
Guest
Internet
customer data
vs.
Mailing (2x10,000 traditional) Mailing (1,000 Data Mining) selection of top-targets
Situation
A hotel management company with 40 properties had no affinity program and felt they were leaving money on the table with ineffective cross marketing and targeted segmentation of guests. Developed a series of collections and implemented affinity branding and marketing on the individual collections. The brand was divided into several collections golf, beach, city, conference, etc. The collections each created their own SOPs around tracking affinity for the program to develop a starting point of what the guests actually valued. Each collection implemented their own affinity program to meet the needs of the guests. For example the golf group did a program around golf stays and spend. The beach collection did a program around summer stays and then cross marketed to off season. Then promotions were run in conjunction with cross collections based on need periods.
Response
Action Step 1
Desired outcomes were determined at the corporate level and the collections were developed based on review of high level and micro-segmentation of guests. Data collection was completed through CRM data management system and then scrubbed for desired collection identification. The hotelier implemented a process of evaluation of the market demands and review of the guest needs, requests and value of the product. In addition, the collections were evaluating A-List guests based on total spend and room night and comparing with other collections for opportunities to offer affinity programme. Each collection implemented their own affinity programme based of the micro-segmentation of guests. In addition, corporate was tracking all newly collected and scrubbed data to implement cross marketing strategy for collections and identification and targeting of A-List guests.
Action Step 2
Action Step 3
First year returns for the beach collection (consisting of 6 properties) saw an increase in room nights of nearly 5% over the market set and guest spend of 45% over the market set. In addition, they discovered that the member guest spent an average of 1.3 nights more than the non-member guest at the property per stay. They also noticed that the conversion of their member guest in off season increased by in excess of 45% when targeted marketing was applied. All actions for the beach collection recognized an improvement of $2.35 in GOPPAR from year to year (year 12) based on member tracking over non-member spend. This equated to approximately $617,000USD in GOP from the member spend.
Results
The other collections saw similar results with the Spa collection (4 properties) seeing improvement of ancillary spend in excess of $350,000USD over the prior year and the resort collection (14 properties) seeing an improvement of nearly $2,000,000 top line spend.
Thank you!
Juston Parker
President/CEO Parker Hospitality Group, Inc. juston@parkerhospitality.com