Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An Industry view
Bernard Fourest
Content
Part I: The needs for International standardization of nuclear reactor designs Part II: Harmonization initiatives in the international safety framework Part III: The WNA/CORDEL Initiative
Standardized advanced plants will bring additional safety layers in all stages: design, construction, operation and decommissioning
facilitate establishment of nuclear power programmes in emerging countries in safest and efficient manner
www.world-nuclear.org/reference/reports.html
Paper Benefits Gained through International Harmonization of Nuclear Safety Standards for Reactor Designs available on
To the extent possible, facilitate the construction of standardised designs for nuclear power plants worldwide by harmonising regulatory design requirements. In particular, countries introducing new nuclear programmes should avoid imposing unique requirements.
Milestones: Common requirements should be established from 2020.
12
16
Global
Convention on Nuclear Safety IAEA - Safety Standards
European
EU Council Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Establishing a Community Framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations
17
Global
Intergovtal Institutions IAEA
European
EC (DG ENER) European Council - EURATOM ENSREG WENRA ENEF
OECD/NEA
Regulatory
MDEP
Industry
WNA-CORDEL WANO
FORATOM-ENISS EUR
18
Safety Fundamentals
Safety Requirements Global Reference Point for a High Level of Nuclear Safety
19 19 Slide from the IAEA presentation at the WNU Harmonization Forum, Manchester, September 2009
Safety Guides
20
21
CNRAs Working Group on the Regulation of New Reactors (WGRNR) examines the regulatory issues of the siting, licensing and regulatory oversight of generation III+ and generation IV nuclear reactors. WGRNR is developing:
23
Construction Experience Database Regulation of Nuclear sites Selection and Preparation Licensing Structure of Regulatory staff and Regulatory Licensing Process
Main objective is to find a common approach to nuclear safety and radiation protection within EU (Nations recognize IAEA Safety Standards, the
Convention on Nuclear Safety, etc. but, different organizations & different regulatory regimes)
And to give EU an independent means of examining applicant countries nuclear safety & regulation (Nuclear safety in EU enlargement
criteria)
WENRAs Reactor Harmonisation Working Group (RHWG) was established to harmonize safety approaches & continuously improve nuclear safety for NPPs
Reference Levels FOR EXISTING NPPs were established. All 17 countries have been benchmarked against 18 safety issues and National Action Plans being implemented. Definition of safety objectives for new reactors
25
ENSREG has key role in future development of harmonised safety requirements for new NPPs in the EU
26
WG Risk aims to further improve nuclear safety aspects on the basis of the Safety Directive, which provides for Transparency high level harmonisation of nuclear safety in the EU
27
a common bridge with the external stakeholders: vendors, partners outside Europe:
EPRI, Asian utilities..., the regulators, international organisations: IAEA, OECD, EU, WENRA...
28
FORATOMs ENISS-Initiative
European Nuclear Installations Safety Standards Initiative represents nuclear licensees across Europe
ENISS is acting as a stakeholder in the regulatory issue process in Europe and has fruitful interactions with WENRA to improve its Reference Levels ENISS is strengthening its activities in the IAEA revision work ENISS is developing a constructive interaction with the EU institutions and initiatives dealing with regulatory issues
FORATOMs ENISS-Initiative
ENISS Membership
Belgium (Tractebel, Electrabel) Finland (Fortum, TVO) Germany (EON, RWE) Italy (SOGIN/ENEL) Spain (UNESA) The Netherlands (EPZ) France (EdF, AREVA NC) Sweden (EON-Se, Vattenfall AB) Switzerland (Swiss Nuclear) Czech Republic (CEZ) Hungary ( Paks NPP) Slovakia (Slovenske Elektrarne, JAVYS*) Romania (Nuclearelectra) Bulgaria (Kozloduy NPP) United Kingdom (BE) Slovenia (Krko NPP) Lithuania (Ignalina NPP*)
33
35
Energoatom, E.ON,, Exelon, KHNP, NOK/Resun, OPG, Rosenergoatom, RWE, FEPC (TEPCo), TVO, Vattenfall, Visagino AE,...
http://www.worldnuclear.org/uploadedFiles/org/referenc e/pdf/CORDELreport2010.pdf
January 2010
37
38
Urgent need for international harmonization of national licensing processes and safety requirements Standardized designs will help deliver nuclear new build on a large scale enhance nuclear safety
Regulator A
Regulator B
design review
design review
41
Regulators may join efforts in reviewing the same design by creating a collaborative network This would reduce the strain on regulators resources This would in no way infringe the right and the duty of regulators to take the final decision to issue a licence CORDEL encourages MDEP progress towards shared assessment work
Regulator A
Regulator B
design review
validation
43
Network of vendors, operators and regulators is required to address post-certification design changes and to maintain the lifetime validity of Multinational Design Certification
Country A
46
Country B
Country C
Country A
47
Country B
Country C
Design Change Management develop institutional mechanisms in the industry which would enable compliance with standardization throughout standard fleets lifetime
Develop model licensing regime and focus on support to emerging markets
52
Main safety standards: Safety requirements on NPP Design NS-R-1; Safety Classification Guide; Guides on licensing processes; regulatory infrastructure; Construction and Commissioning guides, Guides related to safety assessments of NPP designs...
WNA through CORDEL members can identify industry experts on specific issues and send them to technical meetings enriching standards with industry experience from a very early stage
53
54
DCM TF Objective: to develop and promote institutional mechanisms in the industry which would enable compliance with standardization throughout standard fleets lifetime
Many existing mechanisms are being examined and could be further improved: Owners Groups Responsibility of vendors and utilities Design Authority / Entity concept WANO role Regulators role
55
With this aim, the Task Force set up a WNA Membership Survey, which will seek to identify
The current licensing, permitting processes and nuclear laws in various countries and how they impact scheduling, procurement, financing, risk assessment...
In order to propose to emerging countries the process fitting the best their needs.
56
Conclusions
Industry has learnt from past experience that standardization is a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition for new nuclear plant competitiveness and for nuclear to take its share in world energy needs. Regulators have to agreed to further rapid progress in safety requirements harmonisation. This last point being all the more important after Fukushima. Various International organisations have to better coordinate their efforts towards harmonized safety regimes Aerospace industry needed 30 years to get internationaly recognized aircraft certification. Nuclear industry cannot wait for such a long time.