Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In the U.S. and Canada, the Residential School System’s main education policies were replacing
Native traditional languages with English, destroying Native traditional customs, and instilling
Euro-centric values and morals so that Natives could enter into the expanding European
civilization. They were designed to remove children at a very young age from their families
which then isolated them from their traditional languages and tribal influences. With the
residential schools of North America came the intergenerational impacts on Native peoples and
the Residential School Syndrome. They implemented non-traditional lifestyles with all kinds of
abuses normalized in Native communities. While the schools impacted Native peoples as a
The residential schools developed from an experiment of Native prisoners done by Lt.
Richard Pratt and modeled after the Hampton Institute. Lt. Richard Pratt, an Indian wars veteran,
began teaching Native prisoners the English language with heavy doses of Christianity. Prat took
17 adult native prisoners of war to the Hampton Institute. The primary goal of the Hampton
Institute was to educate freed slaves to be teachers so they could become the teachers of other
freed slaves. With the experiment’s success, the first off-reservation residential school, the
Carlisle Indian School, was established in 1879, it began in unused military quarters located in
Carlisle, Pennsylvania. Joel Spring states the Carlisle Indian School slogan was, “To civilize the
Indian, get him into civilization. To keep him civilized, let him stay” (144). Within three decades
of the Carlisle Indian School, 500 more schools opened and were run by various churches and
missionary societies which had the authority to act on behalf of the government, appointing all
Indian agents and hiring personnel. Many of these off-reservation residential schools were
located hundreds of miles from any of the reservations. While some colonizers advocated
outright physical extermination, the schools were to solve the “Indian problem” and Prat thought
it was wiser to “Kill the Indian and save the man” (Smith). Education became mandatory for
Native Children in 1893 and reservations were childless except for babies and toddlers. If
families refused to send their children to school the Indian agents could withhold their food
While slower in pursuit, the Canadian government adopted Pratt’s model of the
residential school system. The Canadian government’s policies also included the destruction of
Native culture, values and religion. Like the U.S., the Canadian government funded religious
institutions such as the Roman Catholic Church, Anglican Church of Canada and the United
Church of Canada so that they could establish the residential schools. The Roman Catholic
Church ran about 60% of the schools in Canada (The Economist par. 5). With the help of
churches, the assimilation process began. Sometimes children were kidnapped and taken long
Many children spent their entire childhood in the residential schools that ran on minimum
budgets. The children were given Anglo names and in some schools children were given a
number in place of their Anglo names. Andrea Smith of Amnesty Magazine said that “school
staff sheared children’s hair, banned traditional clothing and customs, and forced children to
worship as Christian” (par. 11). The children were segregated into gender and age groups in
compliance with the grade levels. Minimal contact between siblings of either sex was preferred
and tightly regulated. The schools adopted a “half and half” system, where half the day was
academic studies and the other half were school chores. Family visits were held at bay with the
children only returning home during the summer months and maybe a time at Christmas.
Sometimes the students would not return home but were recommended to stay with “good white”
families in order to earn money and experience the great civilized society and the Christianity
benefits. At all costs, eliminating the traditional languages and customs were top priority for
residential schools, and there were extensive punishments for uncooperative children.
In residential schools, physical and sexual abuses were normal and applied to the
“heathen” children while instilling good morals and civilized behavior. At the First National
sticking needles through tongues of children, often leaving them in place for extended periods of
time, inserting needles into other regions of children’s anatomy, burning or scalding children,
beating children into unconsciousness, beating children to the point of inflicting serious
permanent or semi-permanent injuries, including broken arms, broken legs, broken ribs,
fractured skulls, shattered eardrums, using electrical shock devices on physically restrained
children and forcing sick children to ear their own vomit (qtd. in Dark Night Field Notes, par.
10). In the BC Medical Journal it also states children being forced to kneel on broken glass in
front of a cross with a needle propped under their tongues as punishment for speaking their own
language (78-81). In Social Justice, Lisa Poupart reports “Boarding school teachers, staff, priests
and administrators often physically and sexually abused students, justifying these violations as
disciplinary measures. In several boarding schools in the U.S. and Canada, 60 to 70% of all
students were beaten or raped. The staff and administrators also forced Indian children to
administer assaults upon each other (par. 51). “A 2001 report by the Truth Commission into
Genocide in Canada documents the responsibility of the Roman Catholic Church, the United
Church of Canada, the Anglican Church of Canada, and the federal government in the deaths of
more than 50,000 Native children in the Canadian residential school system. The report says
church officials killed children by beating, poisoning, electric shock, starvation, prolonged
exposure to sub-zero cold while naked, and medical experimentation, including the removal of
organs and radiation exposure and…grounds of several schools contain unmarked graveyards of
murdered school children, including babies born to native girls raped by priests and other church
officials in the school” (Smith, par. 20). Generations of Native children attended residential
schools away from families for most of their life while experiencing such abuses.
Abuses of past generations of Native children and the separation from families have
many suffer from the Residential School Syndrome which is very similar to the post-traumatic
stress syndrome. The residential school was a war on the children and left many scars that have
the native communities as the unresolved trauma of native peoples who experienced or witnessed
physical or sexual abuse n the residential school system is passed on from generation to
generation”(par. 1). Embedded in generations of Native people are the normalization of sexual
and physical abuse and what is considered normal in our lives, we pass on to our children.
Charles R. Brasfield, MD, PhD, wrote in the BC Medical Journal that “Both residential school
syndrome and post-traumatic stress disorder share criteria that the person has undergone or
witnessed some degree of trauma and that his or her response was fearful or helpless. The two
residential school syndrome diagnosis is different from that of post-traumatic stress disorder in
that there is a significant cultural impact and a persistent tendency to abuse alcohol or other
drugs that is particularly associated with violent outbursts of anger. The residential school
syndrome diagnosis also highlights possible deficient parenting skills” (78-71). With generations
of Native peoples spending most of their young lives away from family and growing up in a
segregated, destructive environment; the children grew up with no experience of human love or
the family unit. These generations of residential schooled people did not learn the ability of
parenting skills and abuses into native communities have brought on the struggles that we
Throughout the U.S. and Canada contemporary Native communities, whether they are
reservations or urban communities, many people face similar struggles that were not part of the
traditional lifestyle. Some of the struggles within communities are high rates of divorce and
poverty, low rates of education and employment, alcoholism, family violence, sexual and
physical abuse, incest, fetal alcohol syndrome, homicide and suicide. Smith states, “By the end
of the 1990s, the sexual assault rate among Native Americans was three-and-a-half times higher
than any other ethnic group in the U.S...and…alcoholism in Native communities is currently six
times higher that the national average” (par. 18) The Indian Report of 2000, states “One in 99
American Indians is born with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, while nationally the average is one in
500”(par. 1). Schoolnet.ca reports, “the cross-Canada average of the percentage of aboriginal
children that complete grade 12 is about 20% and even lower in northern regions” (par. 14).
These struggles of individuals and family units remain today in Native communities but the
women have suffered the most with the loss of traditional lifestyles.
In traditional lifestyles, women had high statuses and most native communities were
matriarchal and matrilineal but in contemporary communities today many face grave dangers.
Mabel Nipshank said that, “Women shaped the social structure and held decision-making
power….The Residential School Syndrome nd the destruction of the matriarchal system have led
to the normalization of violence” (par. 1-5). News from Indian Country states, “1 out of 3 Native
American women are raped in their lifetime” (par. 9) The Native Women’s Association of
Canada, “estimates over the past twenty years more than 500 Indigenous women may have been
between the ages of 25 and 44 were five times more likely than all other women of the same age
to die as the result of violence” (qtd in Stolen Sisters Report, p. 2-4). In the
firstnationsddrum.com winter issue, it states that Indigenous women are considered luck to
survive past the age of 30” (par. 13). With inadequate education, employment opportunities and
housing resources for Native women; many face homelessness and sometimes turn to
prostitution. The Stolen Sisters Report says that “more than 30% of sex workers surveyed were
Indigenous women, although Indigenous people make up less than 2% of cities’ population” (par.
9). With the traditional lifestyles in the past; many Native women face all the struggles of Native
The U.S. and Canadian Governments and their residential school systems failed at the
attempt to tear culture away from Native American peoples. It did however introduce non-
traditional lifestyles and the normalization of abuses into Native American communities. Native
American peoples and especially the women are at risk for cycles of abuse and poverty but are
very resilient and continue to struggle and survive today through the hardships of the past
government mistakes. With the knowledge of the residential school legacies, Native people have
taken the steps to the path of healing with the acknowledgment of the Canadian Government and
affiliated churches.
“A nation is not defeated until the hearts of its women are on the ground” Cheyenne proverb.
Works Cited
Spring, Joel. The American School 1642-1993. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994
Proyect, Louis. “THE CIRCLE GAME: Shadows and Substances in the Indian
Residential School Experience in Canada; by Roland Chrisjohn and Sherri Young, with
Michael Maraun” Dark Field Notes Nov. 2001: 65
“Native Education: For the Next Generation” Indian Report. Oct 2000:p1
Oleman, Michelle. “Amnesty Demands Action to stop Violence Against Native Women.”
First Nations Drum. 3 Mar 2006
<http://www.firstnationsdrum.com/Winter%202005/WomAmnesty.htm>
Norrel, Brenda. “Native Women are prey; Communities and courts fail Native women”
News From Indian Country Dec 2003: p 9