Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AN NHON Proposal for performing Consultancy on Developing DISTRICT SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENTfour Solid Waste Management Detailed Plans for the PLAN Districts of Hoai Nhon, Phu My, An Nhon andUP TO 2025 Tay Son (VIE 07 035 11)
EP&T
DECEMBER 2011 SEPTEMBER 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. PURPOSE OF THE DISTRICT SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN ..................................................................... 4 1.2. THE CONTENTS OF THIS DISTRICT SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN............................................................. 4 1.3. TARGETS FOR DISTRICT SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT .................................................................................. 4 1.3.1. Legal Documents of the Central Government ......................................................................... 4 1.3.2. The Province Solid Waste Management Plan ........................................................................ 10 1.3.3. Targets for the District Solid Waste Management ................................................................ 10 1.4. CURRENT SITUATION OF DOMESTIC SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN AN NHON DISTRICT ..................... 12 1.4.1. Waste Composition ............................................................................................................... 12 1.4.2. Existing Equipment, Staffing and Waste Collection Service .................................................. 13 1.4.3. Current Waste Disposal Site .................................................................................................. 14 1.4.4. Current Fees and Cost Recovery ............................................................................................ 15 CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................................................................ 16 PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT OF WASTE TILL 2025 ........................................................................................ 16 2.1. PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT OF DOMESTIC WASTE TILL 2025 ........................................................................ 16 2.1.1. Definition of Domestic Solid Waste ....................................................................................... 16 2.1.2. Domestic Waste Generation Rate till 2025 ........................................................................... 16 2.1.3. Plan for Waste Management at Source 2011-2025 .............................................................. 18 2.1.4. Plan for Waste Collection 2011 - 2025 .................................................................................. 20 2.1.5. Plan for Waste Transfer and Transportation ......................................................................... 22 2.1.6. Requirements to the Waste Disposal System ........................................................................ 24 2.1.7. District Sanitary Landfill ........................................................................................................ 26 2.2. PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE TILL 2025 ....................................................................... 26 2.2.1. Definitions of Industrial/Hazardous Waste ........................................................................... 26 2.2.2. Current Situation and Plans ................................................................................................... 27 2.2.3. Possibilities for waste prevention and waste minimisation; ................................................. 28 2.2.4. Present and future quantities of Industrial Waste ................................................................ 29 2.2.5. The Management System for Industrial Waste ..................................................................... 29 2.2.6. Requirements for Capacity Development and Awareness Raising ........................................ 30 2.3. PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT OF HEALTHCARE RISK WASTE ............................................................................. 31 2.3.1. Definition of Healthcare Risk Waste ...................................................................................... 31 2.3.2. Current Situation ................................................................................................................... 32 2.3.3. Future Management of HCW ................................................................................................ 32 CHAPTER 3 ................................................................................................................................................ 33 TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS ............................................................................................................................. 33 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 REQUIREMENTS TO STREET SWEEPING EQUIPMENT ................................................................................... 33 ORGANIC WASTE TREATMENT AT SOURCE ............................................................................................... 33 DEMAND FOR WASTE COLLECTION FACILITIES .......................................................................................... 39 REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES ........................................................................... 45
3.5.1 Requirements to Waste Management Worker .......................................................................... 47 3.5.2 Cost of Waste Collection System ................................................................................................ 48 3.5.3 Fees and Cost Recovery for Waste Collection ............................................................................ 54 3.6 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS FOR THE SANITARY LANDFILL ..................................................................... 56 3.6.1 Benefits of a Shared Sanitary Landfill ........................................................................................ 58 3.6.2 Summary of the Capital and Operating Costs for the Sanitary Landfill ..................................... 58 3.6.3 Procedure for Sharing a Sanitary Landfill .................................................................................. 59 3.7 COST SAVING BY TREATING ORGANIC WASTE AT SOURCE ........................................................................... 59 3.8 CLOSURE OF DUMPSITES ...................................................................................................................... 60 3.9 REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT AND AWARENESS RAISING ..................................................... 60 3.9.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 61 3.9.2 Capacity Development and Training within the district............................................................. 61 3.9.3 Basic for a Awareness Raising Programme from 2012 to 2014 ................................................. 62 3.9.4 Strategy and Objectives ............................................................................................................. 62 3.9.5 Organisation and Implementation Structure ............................................................................. 63 3.9.6 Awareness Raising through the Public Media ........................................................................... 67 3.9.7 Requirements to Improve the Waste Collection ........................................................................ 68 3.9.8 Strengthening the Recycling at Source ...................................................................................... 69 3.9.9 Capacity Development and Training within the District ............................................................ 70 3.9.10 Cost of Capacity Development and Awareness Raising Programmes 2012 2025 .............. 70 CHAPTER 4 ................................................................................................................................................ 74 IMPLEMENTATION PLANS ......................................................................................................................... 74 4.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 74 4.2 MAIN ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................................ 74 4.2.1 Establish a District Solid Waste Management Board ................................................................ 74 4.2.2 Setting-up a Waste Resource Centre ......................................................................................... 75 4.2.3 Overall Integrated Awareness Raising Strategy ........................................................................ 76 4.2.4 Establishing organic composting at households and markets ................................................... 77 4.2.5 Establishing a Domestic Solid Waste Collection and Transportation System ............................ 77 4.2.6 Building a waste disposal site .................................................................................................... 78 4.2.7 Ensuring that all healthcare waste is collected and treated ...................................................... 78 4.2.8 Improvement of industrial waste management ........................................................................ 78 4.3 IMPLEMENTATION AND SCHEDULE .......................................................................................................... 78 ANNEX A ANNEX B ANNEX C ANNEX D TABLES OF WASTE QUANTITIES 2010 - 2025......................................................................... 82 MAP OF DISTRICT ................................................................................................................. 99 INVESTMENT COSTS AND OPERATING COSTS FOR AN NHON SANITARY LANDFILL ............ 101 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ............................................................................................ 109
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Binh Dinh Province is located on the coast of Vietnam in the South Central Coast Region. The province had a population of 1.49 million in 2009 and has a land area of 6,025 square kilometres. Within the province, An Nhon District is located about 20 km North West of Quy Nhon. The District capital is Binh Dinh Town and the second town within the District is Dap Da. The District has a total area of 243 km2 and the population in 2009 was 178,700 people. Other than the two towns, there are 13 communes within the District.
1.3. Targets for District Solid Waste Management 1.3.1. Legal Documents of the Central Government The Government Decree no. 59 on Solid Waste Management
The most important national legal document regarding solid waste management is the Government Decree No. 59/2007/ND-CP issued on the 9th April 2007. The document requires four principles applied in solid waste management as follows: 1. Solid waste generators have to pay for the collection, transport and treatment of the waste 2. Solid waste has to be segregated at source, reused, and recycled. Reusable components have to be recovered into input material for production or energy. 3. Technologies which can be used for non-degradable waste treatment or for reducing the waste amount for landfill are prioritized in order to save land resource. 4. The Government encourages the socialization in the collection, segregation, transport and treatment of solid waste. The Decree also regulates the items of state management on solid waste and promulgates requirements for the planning and investment of solid waste management. In addition, it regulates in detail the activities of solid waste segregation, collection, storage, transport and
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan treatment; as well as the costs for solid waste management. Last but not least, the decree calls for the requirement of monitoring and implementation.
Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM) is a common responsibility of the whole society, in which the Government takes a leading role in order to enhance socialisation, mobilise all the possible resources, and strengthen the investment into the ISWM activities. ISWM is implemented on the base of regional and intersectional approaches in order to optimise both economic and technical aspects and ensure social and environmental safety. ISWM is one of the priorities in environmental protection, which takes part in pollution control towards sustainable development of the country. ISWM should be based on the polluter pays principle, according to which waste generators, polluters and environmental degraders are responsible to contribute finance and compensate for the losses as required by current regulations. Solid waste management should be implemented with an integrated manner in order to take the first priority for waste prevention and reduction at source and enhance reuse and recycling to reduce the quantities of waste for landfilling.
With a clear vision for the year 2050 that all the waste that is generated will be collected, reused, recycled and treated by advanced and environmentally friendly technologies and that the quantities of waste for landfilling will be minimised, the strategy has set the following target figures: By 2015: By 2020:
85% of domestic solid waste in urban areas should be collected and treated, of which 60% should be reused, recycled, recovered into energy, or composted. 50% of construction waste in urban areas should be collected and treated, of which 30% should be recovered for reuse or recycling. 30% of septic sludge in urban areas of class II and higher and 10% in urban areas of other classes should be collected and properly treated. Reduce 40% of plastic bag use in supermarkets and superstores compared to 2010. Waste separation at households should be implemented at 50% of urban areas, where solid waste recycling facilities exist. 80% of non-hazardous industrial solid waste should be collected and treated, within which 70% should be recovered for reuse or recycling. 60% of hazardous industrial solid waste from industrial parks should be properly treated. 85% of non-hazardous and 70% of hazardous healthcare waste should be collected and properly treated. 40% of solid waste in rural residential areas and 50% in craft villages should be collected and properly treated. 100% of seriously polluting dumpsites according to Decision No. 64/2003/QD-TTg of April 22, 2003 should be treated.
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan By 2025: 90% of domestic solid waste in urban areas should be collected and treated, of which 85% should be reused, recycled, recovered into energy, or composted. 80% of construction waste in urban areas should be collected and treated, of which 50% should be recovered for reuse or recycling. 50% of septic sludge in urban areas of class II and higher and 30% in the remaining urban areas should be collected and properly treated. Reduce 65% of plastic bag use in supermarkets and superstores compared to 2010. Waste separation at households should be implemented at 80% of urban areas, where solid waste recycling facilities exist. 90% of non-hazardous industrial solid waste should be collected and treated, within which 75% should be recovered for reuse or recycling. 70% of hazardous industrial solid waste from industrial parks should be properly treated. 100% of non-hazardous and hazardous healthcare waste should be collected and properly treated. 70% of solid waste in rural residential areas and 80% in craft villages should be collected and properly treated. Waste separation at households should be implemented at 100% of urban areas, where solid waste recycling facilities exist. 100% of domestic solid waste in urban areas should be collected and treated, of which 90% should be reused, recycled, recovered into energy, or composted. 90% of construction waste in urban areas should be collected and treated, of which 60% should be recovered for reuse or recycling. 100% of septic sludge in urban areas of class II and higher and 50% in the remaining urban areas should be collected and properly treated. Reduce 85% of plastic bag use in supermarkets and superstores compared to 2010. 100% of non-hazardous and hazardous industrial solid waste should be collected and properly treated. 90% of solid waste in rural residential areas and 100% in craft villages should be collected and properly treated.
Furthermore, in order to realise the above set goals, the strategy has pointed out the following tasks for implementation: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Prevent and minimise the generation of solid waste Enhance source separation Increase the collection and transport of solid waste Strengthen the reuse and recycling of solid waste Treat solid waste Recover the surroundings of the solid waste treatment facilities.
In addition, the strategy has also pointed out the following main measures for implementation: 1. Improve the system of legal documents and policies regarding solid waste management. 2. Plan and implement the solid waste management plans for all the economic zones and provinces/cities, monitor the implementation of solid waste management plans in the planning of urban and rural residential areas, and plan and implement the
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan plans on the construction of solid waste treatment sites to the level of wards/communes. Build a database and a solid waste data monitoring system in the whole country. Build resources for the implementation of the strategy Promote scientific research for effectively contributing to ISWM Raise awareness Strengthen international cooperation
3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Last but not least, in order to ensure successful implementation, the strategy has also proposed 10 implementation programs which are summarised below:
No Programme Targets Due year & leading implementer 2020 MoNRE
01
Promoting the prevention, minimisation, reuse and recycling of solid waste Promoting solid waste separation at source Investing into the construction of solid waste treatment facilities at regional level Treating domestic solid waste in the urban areas during 2009-2020 Recovering the environment for the solid waste treatment and landfilling works Strengthening solid waste management in rural areas and craft villages Building a database and a solid waste data monitoring system Raising public awareness
02
03
- Set up and implement measures for the prevention, minimisation, reuse and recycling of solid waste - Develop recycling industry - Set up regulations and guidance on solid waste separation at source - Disseminate source separation models Construct solid waste treatment facilities for the economic zones in the whole country as approved by the Prime Minister Construct solid waste treatment facilities for the urban areas in the whole country, using technologies that limit landfilling - Strictly treat the seriously polluting dumpsites as per Decision No 64/2003/QD-TTg - Improve and upgrade all the current dumpsites in the whole country to meet the required environmental standards Strengthen integrated solid waste management in the rural areas and craft villages Build a database and a solid waste data monitoring system in the whole country in order to enhance the effectiveness of the solid waste management of both the central and local governments Gradually increase public awareness on the separation, reduction, reuse and recycling of solid waste as well as to protect hygienic conditions Improve the system of standards, regulations, technical guidance, mechanisms, policies, institutions etc. on integrated solid waste management Ensure by the year 2025 100% solid waste generated by the healthcare establishments be collected and treated properly as required by the environmental standards
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Building a legal, policy and institutional system for integrated solid waste management Treating healthcare waste during 2009-2025
2025 MoH
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan for and the construction and operation of solid waste burial sites. First, the circular elaborates requirements for the selection of waste burial site locations. It requires that the burial site locations must be determined on the basis of construction planning that has already been approved by the competent state management bodies. Besides, it sets minimum distances from a burial site, depending on its size, to different works including urban areas, airports, industrial parks, residential clusters, ground water exploiting works, etc. For instance, the minimum distance from a small and medium burial site to a delta or midland residential cluster (of more than 5 households) should be 1,000 m at the end of principal wind direction or 300 m to other directions. Furthermore, the document guides the procedure for selection of a model and size for a burial site. Second, the circular regulates the operating procedure of a burial site. This includes the weighing and registration of waste, covering the layers of placed waste with soil or other equal materials, closure of a site, post-closure monitoring, and ultimate (re)use of the site after closure. Third and the last, the circular guides the organisation of implementation, in which it shares the responsibilities of the MoSTE, the MoC and the PCs of provincial level in the selection of location for and operation of waste burial sites.
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan 5. Organisation for implementation The circular requires the ministries and PCs of provincial level to prepare, appraise and approve solid waste management plans as regulated by Article 10 of Decree 59/2007/ND-CP. Furthermore it requires the PCs of provincial level to appraise and approve construction plans for solid waste treatment of provincial and inter-provincial regional scales. Finally it requires the PCs of provincial level to be responsible for closing unsanitary dumpsites as regulated by Decision 64/2003/QD-TTg of April 22, 2003.
Furthermore, Article 21 of the circular imposes the responsibilities of preparation, appraisal and approval of construction plans as follows: 1. The organisations and individuals who prepare, appraise or approve construction plans are responsible for implementing SEA for the plans as required in this Circular. 2. After the construction plan has been approved and announced, the construction planner is responsible for extracting the SEA or its summary to post on the webpage of the local government and submit a copy (formatted as a pdf or word file) to the MoCs address as bxd-vp@hn.vnn.vn
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Last but not least, Article 23 of the document states that this circular comes into affect from March 15, 2011 and that it replaces the MoCs Circular No 10/2000/TT-BXD of August 8, 2000 guiding the preparation of EIA for construction plans. It can therefore be expected that the DSWMPs that are being developed for the for districts of Hoai Nhon, Phu My, An Nhon and Tay Son under the BTC funded project Water Supply and Sanitation Project in Binh Dinh Province do not have to follow Circular No. 01/2011/TT-BXD, i.e. prepare SEA, as they all started in November 2010.
By 2020: - 100% of domestic solid waste in Quy Nhon and 80% of domestic solid waste in other urban areas should be collected and treated. - 100% of domestic solid waste generated in urban areas should be segregated at source. The plan includes projections of the quantity of solid waste generated in the whole province for the years 2015 and 2020. In addition, it suggests a model for solid waste management in urban areas which consists of not only sanitary landfills but also composting and other recycling activities. For rural areas of the province the model only foresees the use of landfills for waste disposal. Finally, the plan has proposed 10 solid waste treatment complexes for the whole province of Binh Dinh, each of which include as one of the components, a landfill.
10
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Recycle the waste, where the discards are separated into materials that may be incorporated into new products; Use of waste not suitable for re-use or recycling as source of energy; Disposal of waste not suitable for re-use or recycling nor for energy recovery, as well as the remains of waste from which energy has been recovered, without endangering human health and without using processes or methods which could harm the environment.
The above prioritisation is also in line with international practices. Ideally all waste generation should be avoided; where this is not possible, the quantity of waste should be minimised. Hereafter the hierarchy advocates recycling, energy recovery and final disposal in a landfill. For energy recovery, the most common solution is incineration of waste to generate steam and electricity; another possibility is to produce biogas from the biodegradable organic fraction of the waste. As can be seen from the above, placing the generated solid waste in a landfill is the least favoured option, however, by removing the waste from populated areas and placing it in a landfill, a number of health and environmental problems are solved. To reach the above-mentioned national and provincial policy goals, the solid waste management system in An Nhon District has to be improved. The percentage of waste currently collected has to be increased in order to prevent pollution through illegal dumping. The waste volumes to be disposed of should be minimised, since with the disposal of waste many useful materials are lost, for the same reason recycling and reuse should be encouraged. Since the existing dumpsites within the District have a negative impact on the quality of water, air and soil, measures must be taken to reduce the harmful environmental impact caused by these sites. Furthermore, both healthcare risk waste and industrial waste are generated within the District, and these also need to be collected, treated and disposed of correctly. Today, the majority of healthcare wastes are properly treated; only the waste arising from small sources still need to be included in the existing system. For industrial wastes, there is currently no plan in place for their management.
The objectives of this District Solid Waste Management Plan are as follows: Objective no. 1: Reduce the negative impact of uncollected or dumped domestic waste on the health of the population and on the environment
Targets aiming at a reduction in negative health and environmental impacts of domestic waste are: By the year 2020, 60% of all domestic solid waste produced in the District is recycled, composted or placed in a central landfill. All inhabitants in hamlets, villages and towns within the District shall have access to waste collection services by the year 2020. Efforts will be made to reduce the waste volume through the composting (or other treatment) of market waste, as well as the organic faction or household waste in rural areas. All waste shall be placed in the District landfill from 2015. All existing dumpsites shall be closed and covered with soil by the year 2016.
11
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Objective no. 2: Ensure the safe management of healthcare risk waste and minimise all forms of pollution from industrial waste
Targets aiming at the safe management of healthcare risk waste and minimising pollution from industrial waste are: By the year 2020, all waste from small, medium and large industries must be transported to landfill(s) approved by the District authorities. Hazardous waste must be separated from the non-hazardous industrial waste and treated in a dedicated hazardous waste treatment facility. By 2013 all healthcare risk waste generated within the district must be treated properly.
1.4. Current Situation of Domestic Solid Waste Management System in An Nhon District 1.4.1. Waste Composition
The results of these waste analyses are is very much in line with the Province Solid Waste Master Plan for Binh Dinh Province where the solid waste is found to contain 60.8% organic waste. A total of 650 kg of samples of waste from the main markets in each of the four districts was analysed by Somers. The average composition by weight was found to be as follows:
Result Markets Type organic recycleables non recycleables hazardous Total % % 76.5% 6.9% 16.6% 0.0% 100.0%
12
As could be expected, the waste from wet markets contains a higher percentage of organic waste. It is anticipated that the composition of the waste remains unchanged until the year 2025.
Agricultural/Farm Waste
Clubroot is a disease that attacks plants of the mustard family such as cabbage, collards, kale, mustard, brussel sprouts, radish, turnip, rutabaga, cauliflower, broccoli, rape, and kohlrabi. The clubroot disease causes the abnormal swelling of roots and occasionally on stems below ground, and it is very difficult to eradicate. Therefore, the prevention of the disease is essential, as an outbreak is very costly to farmers over a large area, as the disease is spread by the wind and water. A common cause of the clubroot disease is the burial of field waste, such as remains of cabbage after harvest and these can cause the growth of the clubroot fungus underground as the vegetables decompose. The practice of burying such field waste seems common is some districts within Binh Dinh province1, it is important that the farmers are made aware of the risks of infection caused by this practice and that they are trained to manage such field waste safely.
13
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan and provision of waste management services. The waste collection services break even and a principally seen by the Managing Director as a future opportunity and as opening for obtaining other business through the DPC. Dai Tin Ltd. Companys waste collection company is called Nhon Tho Service and Development Stock Company. This company has three 7 m3 compactor trucks that are all 15 years old. Each truck has a crew of one driver and three workers. At the dumpsite, a guard is on duty. The office staff consists of two accountants and one manager. The company collects waste from the five communes every other day. As is the case for the two towns in An Nhon District, the waste is accumulated in bags that are collected directly by the truck, there is no collection system using pushcarts or other such devices.
The Truc Son dumpsite; the two bulldozers can be seen to the left. The closed cell is at the rear of the picture.
The Truc Son dumpsite is operated by Dai Tin Ltd. Company. The company receives 38,000 VND per cubic metre of solid waste delivered to the site. Hereof the waste collection company has to pay 19,000 VND/m3 of delivered waste and a further 19,000 VND/m3 subsidy is paid through the Districts budget. The Dai Tin Ltd. Company permanently has two bulldozers stationed at the dumpsite. The current plan is to close this dumpsite on 10 March 2011 and to use the new dumpsite from that date. The closure is principally due to disagreements with Trung Ai village of Nhon Hoa commune, where the villagers are located downstream of the dumpsite and complained that during heavy rains leachate is released from the dumpsite and pollutes their local stream. The solution has been to move the waste disposal operations to Nhon Tho commune and construction of this landfill2 is currently ongoing. To ensure that there are no complaints from the inhabitants along the stream, the stream has been diverted around the inhabited area.
It has been called a landfill as the design is said to include a HDPE liner. Presumably there is no leachate treatment plant or other ancillary equipment such as a weighbridge normally associated with a sanitary landfill.
14
The new landfill that includes a HDPE liner is being built on part of the 20 hectare site destined for the future District sanitary landfill (in Dong Binh Hamlet, Nhon Tho Commune, An Nhon District) and is expected to be put into operation from 25 June 2011.3 It is planned to construct 9 cells in this landfill, of which 1 cell will receive industrial solid wastes and other 8 cells will receive domestic solid wastes. In average, area of each cell is 10,000 m2. The first cell is now constructing by Dai Tinh Ltd. Company. In addition, it is planned to install 1 incinerator for incinerating hospital wastes in this landfill area.
An earlier sanitary landfill site proposed in the District was located in a flood plain; this is not the case with the current proposed site, which is at no risk what so ever of flooding.
15
This is identical to the definition generally used for Municipal Solid Waste. The term domestic solid waste is used in the Plan, to avoid the confusion that the term municipal solid waste may cause. 5 Somers: Description and Mapping of the Biologically Treatable Waste Stream in 4 Districts: An Nhon, Tay Son, Hoai Nhon and Phu My in Binh Dinh Province
16
250.000
200.000
150.000
100.000
50.000
Fig. 2.1 Increased population in An Nhon district within the strategy period. Within Binh Dinh Province as in Vietnam as a whole, the availability of reliable data on waste production is limited. Based on the Province Solid Waste Master Plan for Binh Dinh Province the waste generation rates are taken as follows: Cities of rank III & IV: Towns of rank V: 0.9 kg/person/day 0.8 kg/person/day
For communes the figure of 0.5 kg/person/day has been used, as this seems a generally accepted quantity for rural settlements. At present the collection rates for the sub-towns, as well as every commune, are based on information from the district, as well as estimates by the consultancy. Furthermore, proposed collection rates have been set up to the year 20256. At present the figures aim for a collection of 80% in 2020, based on the resolution of the Provincial Party General Meeting Nr. 17: Up to 2020: 100% of the domestic solid waste from Quy Nhon city, 80% of the domestic solid waste from other urban areas are collected and treated7. Binh Dinh is expected to become a provincial level town in 2015 and has therefore been included as such in the estimate of waste generation rates over the next 15 years. The waste generation tables can be found in Annex A. As it can also be seen from these tables, it is estimated that currently 15% of the waste in Binh Dinh and Dap Da towns and 10% of the domestic solid waste generated in the communes is sold to scavengers and recyclers. This is the cardboard, paper, bottles, cans and metals that are sorted at source by the households. It is estimated that these quantities will increase slightly over the coming years to 18% and 12% respectively. Furthermore, it is expected that increased awareness raising and encouragement from the Water Supply and Sanitation Project will lead to increased levels of composting and other forms of treatment for organic waste, eventually leading to 15% of organic waste in Binh Dinh and Dap Da towns being treated at source and 30% in the communes.
6 7
At present EP&T have set the collection rates these should be revised by the District together with the consultant during the next phase of the planning. Province Solid Waste Master Plan for Binh Dinh Province page 6
17
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Of the remaining waste, it is expected that by the year 2015, 70% will be collected in Binh Dinh and Dap Da towns. All other communes are expected to have a collection rate of 30% in 2015. By 2020, the collection rate will be 80% in the two towns and 40% in the communes. The collection rates are expected to further increase to 50% by 2025 in the communes. Hence the waste collection rate will gradually increase as shown in the tables and as illustrated in Fig. 2.2.
90,00 80,00 70,00 DSW Collection rate (%) 60,00 50,00 40,00 30,00 20,00 10,00 -
Towns
Year Communes
An Nhon district
Fig. 2.2 Increased domestic solid waste collection rates within the strategy period. By 2015 it is expected that approximately 109 tonnes per day of waste will be generated, of which 60.4% will receive treatment: 35.4 tonnes per day (32.6%) will be recycled at source and another 30.3 tonnes (27.9%) will be placed in a landfill. By 2020, 72% of all waste generated within the District is expected to receive some form of treatment.
Markets
The solid wastes from the wet markets contain a high percentage of organic materials (approximately 76%). Therefore, reuse of market wastes for onsite composting is a potential option that would help to reduce amount of waste to be landfilled and produce a compost or soil amendment for farmers. In this case, the organic waste from the market stalls must be collected
18
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan separately, stored in the markets waste storage area until it can be taken to the composting site. One of many possible technologies, using the Toptex,8 is described in the following: This basic model, focusing on centralized collection and composting of organic waste, is seen all over the world. Materials to be composted may vary from separated organic waste from households, to wet market waste and even the solid fraction of animal manure. Sometimes organic additions such as straw may be needed to assure sufficient porosity, dry matter content and to adjust the carbon to nitrogen ratio. A Toptex fleece allows water vapour (and gases) to be released from the compost heap, yet avoiding entrance of rain water in the heap. Due to the lower gas emission, this is also the most environmentally friendly composting technique. The process of composting is fairly simple, but some experience will be needed make good quality compost. In short, organic waste is shredded, put in heaps and covered by Toptex fleece. To allow sufficient air to enter the heaps, turning is necessary. This can be done manually or by machines. After about 45 days, the compost is sieved and bagged.
Households
Households can also treat their organic waste to produce compost or other products (see below). Therefore, households should be encouraged to separate food refuse for composting, as well as separating valuable materials for selling to recycling shops. Then only non-recyclable materials will have to be collected by the waste collection company, thereby greatly reducing the waste management costs for the district, town and/or commune. Of course this option is only feasible if households are willing to do so, otherwise the waste will be a mixture of organic and other waste. Therefore, awareness raising and education will be required to make the two following technologies popular9: Mesophilic storage units are concrete or brick storage bins in which the volume and weight of organic waste is reduced by natural processes (bacteria, fungi, larvae, worms). The bins are in the first place designed to serve one households. The bins are designed to receive waste that naturally breaks down within a period of about one year (bone and shell are exceptions that will break down over a longer period). Data collected by the project from tests of the solid waste treatment model with mesophilic bins at the 4 districts resulted in the following findings: After 2 months of operation, the outcome was: The more larvae the bins had, the highly decomposed the waste was. For the bins that larvae developed a lot, the decomposition was about 80% - 90% (daily produced organic waste > 1.5kg and most of the waste was food waste, rotten fruit and vegetable ...); For the bins that larvae developed normally, the decomposition was 60% - 70% (daily produced organic waste < 1.5kg and most of the waste was food waste, rotten fruit and vegetable ...); For the bins that larvae developed just a little, the decomposition was only 40% - 50% (daily produced organic waste < 1.5kg and most of the waste was garden waste);
8 9
The description of the Toptex technology is based on Somers Phase 3 draft report. The descriptions of the Mesophilic unit and the BSF unit are based on Somers Phase 3 draft report.
19
Mesophilic bin
Waste that can be placed in the bin includes food preparation waste, table scraps, spent bouquets of flowers and small amounts of garden waste. A household bins might receive 3 kgs of waste per day. The small lid is opened and the waste is thrown in the bin. Mesophilic bacteria and fungi require oxygen. That is why the sides of the bin have aeration holes. But these holes are not enough to keep the contents of the bin fully aerated. A certain amount of stirring is required. It is recommended to stir once a week. Without sufficient stirring, foul odours are created. Once a year, the bin needs to be cleaned out. This is the only time that the large lid needs to be opened. The contents of the storage bins can be collected, shredded and then routed to composting operations using Toptex, see the previous section for a description. A second model is operated by waste collectors or scavengers. These collect organic waste and use it for a operating a small commercial black soldier fly (BSF) larvae production. In this model, the waste collectors are encouraged to separated waste that can be fed to BSF larvae, who convert the organic waste in to growth. This could be done in their house or at a local place where a few waste collectors work together. The larvae can be sold as animals feed for chicken, frog, turtle, fish and pigs. The waste collectors are already separating a number of recyclables and make an extra income from selling these. Therefore, it seems feasible that the same person would also collect specific organic waste and sells BSF larvae. BSF larvae can eat just about any type of fresh putrescent waste, even meat and dairy products; they can consume all food waste and some parts of the non-food waste.
2.1.4. Plan for Waste Collection 2011 - 2025 Methodology for Collection of Waste Street Sweeping
Street sweeping will be applied in central areas of Binh Dinh and Dap Da towns. In rural areas of communes, it is not necessary to implement street sweeping. Street sweeping will be organised every day for main streets in administrative and central zones of the town, at parks and bus station. Workers will sweep along the sidewalk; pavement and roadside and collect garbage into the pushcart for later transfer to a transportation vehicle.
Public Areas
Public areas such as parks, the bus station and the main streets in the administrative zone are equipped with garbage bins where required. Waste from these bins is collected by garbage compactor trucks and transported to the landfill.
20
Collection of Solid Waste from Households in Towns Waste collection mode for households along main roads in town/sub-town
For waste collection in towns, where the households are close to each other, door to door collection mode with stationary container system is strong recommended. Waste collectors will start with empty pushcart from the first house of a collection route to pick up waste bag/basket, empty it and return the bag/basket to the house (if necessary) and then continue doing the same at the next houses until pushcart is fully loaded. Waste collectors will push the loaded pushcart to a waste transfer point, waiting for emptying it into waste transportation vehicles. The waste collectors can either use a second pushcart to continue collecting waste from another route or they will have to wait for the transfer of waste to the transportation vehicle. This will depend on the number of pushcarts available. Waste collection mode for households located along main roads is illustrated in Fig. 2.3. In this area, waste from households will be collected every day. Time of collection will be set up depending up agreement between households and waste collectors and the time of transferring waste from the pushcarts to the transportation vehicles. House 1 Empty pushcart Pushcart location House 2 House 3 House 4 .. House n
House 1
Transfer point
Loaded pushcart
21
Village transfer point 1 Empty pushcart Pushcart location Next collection route
..
Loaded pushcart
Fig. 2.4 Waste collection mode for rural areas of a commune. For scattered settlements and isolated households, households must bring their waste to bins/containers located along the (main) roads.
22
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 2.1 A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis for transfer station option: Strengths Have sufficient place for gathering collected domestic solid wastes of the whole town or ward Prevent scatter waste transfer points which may cause nuisance and dirty Weaknesses Need a storage area inside a residential area and it is difficult as no waste in my backyard Improper operation of transfer station will cause several problems such as nuisance, leachate, attraction of flies, rats, etc. If only one transfer station in each town or communes, waste collectors again have to walk for a long distance to reach the transfer station Opportunities One transfer station in each commune is approved in Binh Dinh Province Solid Waste Master Plan10
Threats Operational cost is required for cleaning and maintaining of the transfer station. Town and Ward PC has to find budget for that Improper operation of the transfer station will cause worse environmental problem as all wastes are gathered in one location
Table 2.2 A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis for rendezvous point option Strengths This option is already applied in the District and is operating very well. The improvement would be that the new trucks will have a hydraulic lift to empty the pushcarts mechanically. Setting new rendezvous points along main roads of communes for collection of wastes from communes to landfill would be easier as: (1) wastes are stored in pushcarts; (2) no special requirements for operation and maintenance ; (3) uploading wastes from pushcarts into transportation vehicles will be less time consuming and requires less workforce. Weaknesses It needs some time for adapting with new system. Waste collectors and transportation drivers are both required on time at the rendezvous points Opportunities Using rendezvous points for transferring of waste are applied successfully in several places in Vietnam.
Threats The system is difficult to operate well: If the waste collection truck is delayed, the waste collectors must wait for the truck so that their pushcarts can be emptied.
Transportation Eight tonne garbage compactor trucks are for now proposed to collect waste11 from rendezvous points (including large waste generation sites such as markets and hospitals) and transport to
10
Province Solid Waste Master Plan (PSWMP) for the urban areas and the industrial zones in Binh Dinh area up to 2020
23
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan sanitary landfill for disposal. Compactor trucks are recommended rather than normal trucks for several reasons: The compactor truck will have a hydraulic lift, so that the waste can be transferred from bins, containers and pushcarts into the truck mechanically. When using a flatbed truck, the transfer of waste must be done manually and this is time consuming; The longer loading time when using a normal truck will increase the time requirement for completing 1 trip of collection and transportation of waste to the landfill. As a result fewer trips can be done by one truck in a day and therefore it is necessary to invest in a higher number of trucks; and A flatbed truck must be loaded manually, requiring more workers and exposing these to unhygienic working conditions. Transportation mode of domestic solid waste in the district is illustrated in Fig. 2.5.
..
24
The assumptions following described in section 2.1.2 were employed when calculating the quantity of waste that has to be landfilled every year. Based on these assumptions, the calculations result in the following flows of waste, including the annual quantity of waste going to landfill as shown in table 2.3. Table 2.3 Total amount of waste to landfill 2012 - 2025
Quantity Generated Year (Kg/day ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 102,604 103,795 104,999 106,217 107,449 108,695 109,956 111,231 112,522 113,827 115,147 116,483 117,834 119,201 120,584 121,983 (Tonnes /yr) 37,450 37,885 38,325 38,769 39,219 39,674 40,134 40,599 41,071 41,547 42,029 42,516 43,009 43,508 44,013 44,524 Percentage Recycled at source (%) 11 11 11 21 26 33 33 33 36 36 40 40 40 40 40 40 Quantity Recycled at source (Kg/day ) 11,742 11,878 12,016 22,777 28,413 35,390 35,800 36,215 40,637 41,109 46,147 46,682 47,223 47,771 48,325 48,886 (Tonnes/yr ) 4,286 4,335 4,386 8,314 10,371 12,917 13,067 13,218 14,833 15,005 16,844 17,039 17,236 17,436 17,639 17,843 Remaining after Recycled at source (Kg/day ) 90,862 91,917 92,983 83,440 79,036 73,305 74,156 75,016 71,885 72,718 69,000 69,801 70,611 71,430 72,259 73,097 (Tonnes/ yr) 33,164 33,550 33,939 30,455 28,848 26,757 27,067 27,381 26,238 26,542 25,185 25,477 25,773 26,072 26,374 26,681 Percentage Collected and Treated at Landfill (%) 20 20 32 36 41 41 41 41 42 45 52 52 52 56 56 59 Quantity Collected and Treated at Landfill (Kg/day ) 18,186 18,397 29,490 30,401 32,398 30,286 30,637 30,992 30,151 33,051 36,200 36,620 37,045 39,933 40,396 43,381 (Tonnes /yr) 6,638 6,715 10,764 11,096 11,825 11,054 11,183 11,312 11,005 12,064 13,213 13,366 13,521 14,576 14,745 15,834
25
2.2. Plan for Management of Industrial Waste till 2025 2.2.1. Definitions of Industrial/Hazardous Waste
Industrial solid waste is defined in Decree No. 59/2007/N-CP issued by Vietnamese Government as solid waste generated in industrial production, craft villages, business and service activities or other activities is collectively referred to as industrial solid waste. Furthermore, hazardous solid waste is described as solid waste containing substances or compounds that exhibit any of the characteristics of radioactivity, ignitability, explosiveness, corrosiveness, infectiousness, toxicity or other hazardous characteristics. Industrial waste represents waste generated from activities in manufacturing businesses that utilises raw material and machinery to generate marketable products in their premises. A small percentage of the industrial waste will be hazardous waste, these are also discussed below. Industrial waste is generated from manufacturing businesses that use raw material and machinery to generate products within their premises. Typical categories of manufacturing industries can be found below:
12
Food processing Beverage manufacturing Wood-based products Manufacturing of chemical and chemical products Manufacturing of non-metallic mineral products Basic metals
The CDM option through landfill gas is only an option if organic waste is placed in the landfill. As mentioned elsewhere, composting activities also reduce the emission of greenhouse gases and are also eligible for CDM credits.
26
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Manufacture of electrical machinery, apparatus, appliances and supplies Manufacture of transport equipment Textiles and garments
These categories of industries will each generate their particular industrial waste, where the waste characteristics will be dependent on the industrial production process. The wastes are often complex and heterogeneous ranging from inert inorganic waste (such as mineral, electronic and metal waste) to organic waste (such as plastics and foodstuffs). Industrial waste is the waste generated by the industrys production, as can be items such as mineral, electronic and metal waste, filter cakes, plastics, raw material wastage, off-spec products, floor sweepings, rags, packaging, etc.; so long as these do not fall under the MONREs definition of a hazardous waste In addition to the industrial waste generated, the industries will also generate a sizeable amount of general waste. This latter waste is common to all industries and includes packaging, office and canteen waste. Some of this waste (e.g. packaging) is often sold for recycling and the remained of this waste is usually handled as domestic solid waste. The term Hazardous Waste applies to toxic and hazardous waste. These are defined as wastes containing components that are toxic, radioactive, inflammable, explosive, abrasive, contagious, poisonous or harmful.13 Vietnams National Technical Regulation on Hazardous Waste Thresholds (QCVN 07:2009/BTNMT) sets the standard for hazardous waste thresholds and is used to indentify wastes that may be considered hazardous. These technical regulations clearly describe the laboratory methods that must be used for analysis of waste to determine whether it is a hazardous waste. Hazardous waste from industrial activities will include waste such as solvents, oils, PCBs, acids and plating baths. Healthcare risk waste is also defined as a hazardous waste (as it is contagious); these are discussed in section 2.3.
13
Law on Environmental Protection of 2005 that went into effect on 1 July 2006
27
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Go Oi Hon Lap Industrial Point that occupies 7 hectares; Go Son Nhon Tan Industrial Cluster that occupies 26 hectares Nhon Hoa Industrial Cluster that takes up 10 hectares Nhon Hoa Industrial Park that occupies 272 hectares The provincial livestock centre that occupies 154 hectares; The Nhon Tho commune livestock centre that occupies 12 hectares and is under construction; and Doi Hoa Son Industrial Cluster is under construction and will occupy 40 hectares.
Furthermore, there are some more wood processing enterprises and stone processing enterprises in operation in An Nhon outside the industrial clusters. The District also has about 25 craft villages. Finally, the Nhon Hoa Industrial Zone is under construction. This will be a large estate of approximately 200 hectares where there will be agro-forestry processing, manufacture of consumer goods and some transit warehouses. The Industrial Zone Management Board performs regular inspections of all the enterprises. At present the general waste is collected from about 40% of the industries; this consists of waste from canteens, offices and so forth. This general waste is included in the numbers for domestic solid waste in section 2.1.2. The remaining 60% of companies generally burn and bury their waste within their premises. The consultant found that the disposal of containers that have held pesticides was a problem throughout the province. Some Districts have built boxes in the fields, with the intention that the farmers should place their pesticide waste in these boxes. This system did not work, as the farmers did not use the boxes and continue to dump the containers on their land. Some Districts are interested in again trying to collect these empty pesticide containers. This is not recommended as long as there is no disposal system for the empty pesticide packaging. If these containers were collected today, the District would have to store these as a hazardous waste, as there is no disposal system for hazardous waste within the region. At a later date, when a hazardous waste treatment facility is built within the region, the collected waste would then have to be shipped for treatment at great cost to the District.14 For the empty pesticide containers, the Government of Vietnam should implement a programme in collaboration with the pesticide manufacturers, the importers and the distributers. The programme should ensure that when the farmers are supplied with new pesticides, the supplier will automatically take back empty pesticide packaging. There could be a deposit on the packaging, to ensure all packaging is returned. The pesticide distributers would then organise and implement an awareness programme, so that all farmers know how to store and return their empty pesticide containers.15 Given that the distributers transport full pesticide containers to sell to the farmers, it is easy for them to ensure that empty containers are transported back to their distribution centre or factory. The empty containers can then be reused or sent for treatment as hazardous waste.
14 15
The treatment fee would likely be in the region of 20,000 VND per kg or more. Such a programme would normally also take back and treat any obsolete pesticides that the farmer may have stored over time on his premises.
28
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Industries frequently have large amounts of raw materials that are wasted during the manufacturing process; likewise some industries have a significant percentage of products that do not meet the specifications. Both the wasted raw materials, as well as off-spec products are often discarded on-site, as this is an inexpensive solution. Commonly reusing these materials in the production makes good economic sense, as it reduces the companys costs for raw materials per unit product. Better utilisation of raw materials, as well as other resources such as water, should be encouraged. Some industrial hazardous waste is also recycled at the moment, this includes waste oils and waste lubricants that are currently sold to recyclers and used as a fuel, often in brick kilns. In the longer term; once there is a dedicated hazardous waste treatment facility within the region, this practice should be discontinued and the hazardous waste oils and lubricants should be treated at a specialised facility.
The figures for 2015 in the PSWMP do not add up and have therefore been ignored.
For some of the industrial waste to be placed in a sanitary landfill requires that this waste is kept separate from hazardous waste during the manufacturing process. A frequent problem for industrial waste is that large amounts of relatively inert waste that could be reused or placed in a sanitary landfill, is contaminated with a small percentage of hazardous waste, making all the waste hazardous waste that requires very costly treatment.
29
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan production or manufacturing process; this can be contaminated raw materials, wastage from the production process and/or off-spec products. Other a sizeable percentage of these materials can be reused (especially if the alternative is to pay to dispose of them). Likewise, some waste can be (and is already) reused, for example wood waste and sawdust from wood manufacturing industries is often reused as a source of energy. Naturally, most industries will have some waste that is not general waste. The industry is expected to ensure that this waste is transported by a licensed transporter to an approved site where it can be treated and disposed of. Much of the manufacturing waste from industries can meet the acceptance criteria of landfills and can therefore be transported to landfills. This requires that the manufacturing waste is not contaminated with hazardous waste (in which case the whole batch of waste will often be considered as hazardous waste). Therefore, industries must have good housekeeping to keep non-hazardous and hazardous waste separate. Finally, there are some wastes that are hazardous wastes and that require special treatment. This applies to materials such as waste solvents, waste oils and spent plating baths. Here the enterprise must follow the requirements of the Law on Environmental Protection of 2005 regarding the handling, storage, transportation and treatment of these materials. If housekeeping is good, the quantity of hazardous waste will be very small for most industries. These wastes must be transported to a hazardous waste treatment facility for final treatment and disposal (unless they are treated (or pre-treated) on-site, as is generally the case with liquid wastes). To properly manage these wastes, thorough training is needed, so that managers and workers within enterprises and industries can correctly handle all the waste that is generated within their premises. This is briefly described in the following section and will be further developed over the coming months.
Note that this activity is not part of the projects awareness raising programme
30
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan about how to manage industrial waste. The improvements can be monitored on a month by month basis measuring the workers habits relating to the handling of industrial waste.
2.3. Plan for Management of Healthcare Risk Waste 2.3.1. Definition of Healthcare Risk Waste
There exist various definitions of Healthcare Waste in general and Healthcare Risk Waste in particular. This report, however, employs Vietnamese definitions, which are defined in the Decision No. 43/2007/QD-BYT promulgated on 30 November 2007 by the Minister of Health, and which are as follows: Healthcare Waste (HCW) is the material in either solid, liquid or gaseous form, which is discharged from healthcare facilities (HCFs) and which includes both healthcare risk waste and ordinary waste. Healthcare Risk Waste (HCRW) (also known as special healthcare waste or hazardous healthcare waste) is the waste containing hazardous elements to human health and the environment, such as infectious, toxic, radioactive, flammable, explosive, corrosive or possessing other hazardous properties, if not disposed of properly Healthcare waste management (HCWM) is the management activities of the waste generation, preliminary handling, collection, transport, storage, reduction, reuse, recycling, treatment and disposal of healthcare waste and the control and supervision of implementation. Healthcare waste reduction is the activities taken in order to minimize the generation of healthcare waste, including reduction of healthcare waste at source, use of products that can be recycled and/or reused, good management and strict control of the practical processes and correct waste segregation. Reuse is the use of a product several times until the end of life of the product or use of the product for other functions and/or purposes. Recycling is the reproduction of waste materials into new products Waste collection at source is the process of segregation, gathering, packing and temporary storage of waste at the site of waste generation in the healthcare facilities. Transport of waste is the process by which the waste is transported from the place where it was generated to the sites of preliminary treatment, storage, or disposal. Preliminary treatment is the process disinfection or sterilization of potentially infectious waste at the sites of the waste generation, before transportation to a site of storage or disposal. Treatment and disposal of waste is a technological process which aims to disable the waste in causing its potential hazards to human health and the environment.
According to Vietnamese definitions (Vietnamese Regulation on Healthcare Waste Management promulgated by Decision No. 43/2007/QD-BYT of the Minister of Health on 30 November 2007), healthcare waste is classified into five groups as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Infectious waste Hazardous chemical waste Radioactive waste Pressurized containers Ordinary waste
31
19
32
Equipment required for street sweeping includes pushcarts, brooms and labour protective equipment (such as clothes, gloves, boots, comforters, hats). At least two pushcarts should be provided per town. Street in front of administrative offices and some main roads will be swept in early morning. The other areas will be cleaned in the afternoon. Each pushcart will be operated by one worker. The life time of a pushcart is approximately 4 years. Equipment demand for street sweeping is estimated and summarised in Table 3.1. Table 3.1 Estimated equipment demand for street sweeping up to 2025 Year Number of pushcarts Number of brooms* Number of labour safety clothing** Demand Investment Demand Investment Demand Investment 2011 2 0 16 16 8 8 2012 2 2 16 16 8 8 2013 2 0 16 16 8 8 2014 2 0 16 16 8 8 2015 2 0 16 16 8 8 2016 2 2 16 16 8 8 2017 2 0 16 16 8 8 2018 2 0 16 16 8 8 2019 2 0 16 16 8 8 2020 2 2 16 16 8 8 2021 2 0 16 16 8 8 2022 2 0 16 16 8 8 2023 2 0 16 16 8 8 2024 2 2 16 16 8 8 2025 2 0 16 16 8 8
* 1 workers/pushcart x 2 pushcarts/town x 2 towns x 4 brooms/worker/year = 16 brooms/year ** 1 workers/pushcart x 2 pushcarts/town x 2 towns x 2 labour safety clothing/worker/year = 8 labour safety clothing/year
3.2
Estimation of number of organic treatment units needed is based on the following assumptions: - 20% of the organic waste to be treated at source is from markets and the remainder is from households; - 90% of organic waste from markets will be composted using Toptex technology and the remainder will be treated in biopods which can receive 30-40 kg of organic waste/biopod/day (35 kg/biopod/day is used for calculation number of biopods). The size of a compost pile is 1 m (width) x 0,6 m (height) x 10 m (length), specific gravity of organic waste to be composted is 450 kg/m3. Thus, each compost pile can receive 1350 kg of organic waste and it has to be incubated for 45 days . Each compost pile has to be covered by approximately 14 m2 of Toptex. - Organic waste from households will be treated in mesophilic bins or in biopods with black soldier fly larvae production. 75% of organic waste from households will be treated by
33
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan mesophilic bins and the remains will be treated by biopods. It is planned that each bin will be shared by 2 households. Thus, amount of organic waste to be treated in each mesophilic bin or biopod at households in the town will be (0.52 kg/person/day x 5 person/household x 2 household =) 5,2 kg/bin/day. While in the communes, each mesophilic bin will receive approximately (0.325 kg/person/day x 5 persons/household x 2 households =) 3.25 kg/bin/day. Cost of Toptex material is 30,000 VND/m2; A mesophilic bin will cost 350,000 VND; A price of the biopod made of composite is 1,200,000 VND. Toptex can be used for 5 years. Mesophilic units and bipods can last for 15 years.
Total number of compost piles, mesophilic units and biopods expected to be invested for An Nhon District is estimated and summarized in Table 3.2. Distribution of these organic treatment units for towns and communes are described in Table 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6. Investment cost for organic waste treatment facilities of An Nhon is described in Table 3.7. Table 3.2 Number of units required to treat organic waste using Toptex, mesophilic units and biopods up to 202520 Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Number of market organic waste treatment units Compost piles 65 98 127 129 130 156 158 185 187 189 191 193 195 Biopods 6 9 12 12 12 15 15 17 18 18 18 18 18 Number of household organic waste treatment units Mesophilic bins 1,749 2,653 3,482 3,523 3,564 4,344 4,394 5,201 5,261 5,322 5,384 5,447 5,510 Biopods 0 583 884 1,161 1,174 1,188 1,448 1,465 1,734 1,754 1,774 1,795 1,816 1,837
20
The programme for treating organic waste at source can be started earlier if so desired.
34
Table 3.3 Demand on compost piles using Toptex for An Nhon District up to 2025 Number of compost piles No. Locality 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 1 Binh Dinh 0 10 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 2 Dap Da 0 9 13 18 18 18 18 19 19 3 Nhon My 0 4 5 7 7 8 10 10 12 4 Nhon Thanh 0 5 8 10 10 10 13 13 16 5 Nhon Hanh 0 3 5 7 7 7 9 9 11 6 Nhon Hau 0 4 6 9 9 9 11 11 14 7 Nhon Phong 0 3 4 6 6 6 7 7 9 8 Nhon An 0 3 5 7 7 7 8 9 10 9 Nhon Phuc 0 3 5 7 7 7 9 9 11 10 Nhon Hung 0 4 6 8 8 8 10 11 13 11 Nhon Khanh 0 3 4 6 6 6 7 7 9 12 Nhon Loc 0 3 4 6 6 6 7 8 9 13 Nhon Hoa 0 6 9 12 12 12 15 15 19 14 Nhon Tan 0 2 4 5 5 5 7 7 8 15 Nhon Tho 0 3 4 6 6 6 7 8 9 TOTAL 65 98 127 129 130 156 158 185
2021 16 19 12 16 11 14 9 11 11 13 9 9 19 8 9 187
2022 17 19 12 17 11 14 9 11 11 13 9 9 19 8 9 189
2023 17 20 12 17 12 14 9 11 11 13 9 10 19 8 9 191
2024 17 20 12 17 12 14 9 11 11 13 9 10 20 8 10 193
2025 17 20 12 17 12 15 9 11 12 14 9 10 20 9 10 195
35
Table 3.4 Demand on biopods to treat organic waste of markets for An Nhon District up to 2025 Number of biopods to treat market organic waste No. Locality 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 1 Binh Dinh 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 Dap Da 0 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Nhon My 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 Nhon Thanh 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 Nhon Hanh 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Nhon Hau 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 Nhon Phong 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 Nhon An 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 Nhon Phuc 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 Nhon Hung 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 Nhon Khanh 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 Nhon Loc 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 Nhon Hoa 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 14 Nhon Tan 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 15 Nhon Tho 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 6 9 12 12 12 15 15 17 18 18
2023 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 18
2024 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 18
2025 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 18
36
Table 3.5 Demand on mesophilic bins to treat organic waste of households for An Nhon District up to 2025 Number of mesophilic bins to treat household organic waste No. Locality 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 1 Binh Dinh 0 188 286 289 293 296 300 303 306 310 314 2 Dap Da 0 165 251 339 342 346 350 354 359 363 367 3 Nhon My 0 109 165 223 226 228 289 292 355 359 363 4 Nhon Thanh 0 151 228 308 312 315 399 403 490 495 501 5 Nhon Hanh 0 104 157 212 215 217 275 278 337 341 345 6 Nhon Hau 0 129 195 263 267 270 341 345 419 424 428 7 Nhon Phong 0 82 124 168 170 172 217 220 267 270 273 8 Nhon An 0 97 147 198 201 203 257 259 315 319 322 9 Nhon Phuc 0 102 155 209 212 214 271 274 332 336 340 10 Nhon Hung 0 119 181 244 247 250 316 320 388 393 398 11 Nhon Khanh 0 82 125 168 170 172 218 221 268 271 274 12 Nhon Loc 0 86 130 176 178 180 227 230 279 282 286 13 Nhon Hoa 0 174 264 356 360 364 461 466 566 572 579 14 Nhon Tan 0 75 114 153 155 157 198 201 244 247 249 15 Nhon Tho 0 85 129 174 176 178 225 228 277 280 283 TOTAL - 1,749 2,653 3,482 3,523 3,564 4,344 4,394 5,201 5,261 5,322
2023 317 371 367 507 349 433 276 326 344 402 277 289 586 252 287 5,384
2024 321 376 371 513 353 438 279 330 348 407 280 292 593 255 290 5,447
2025 325 380 376 519 357 444 283 334 352 412 284 296 599 258 293 5,510
37
Table 3.6 Demand on biopods to treat organic waste of households for An Nhon District up to 2025 Number of biopods to treat organic household waste No. Locality 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 1 Binh Dinh 0 63 95 96 98 99 100 101 102 103 105 2 Dap Da 0 55 84 113 114 115 117 118 120 121 122 3 Nhon My 0 36 55 74 75 76 96 97 118 120 121 4 Nhon Thanh 0 50 76 103 104 105 133 134 163 165 167 5 Nhon Hanh 0 35 52 71 72 72 92 93 112 114 115 6 Nhon Hau 0 43 65 88 89 90 114 115 140 141 143 7 Nhon Phong 0 27 41 56 57 57 72 73 89 90 91 8 Nhon An 0 32 49 66 67 68 86 86 105 106 107 9 Nhon Phuc 0 34 52 70 71 71 90 91 111 112 113 10 Nhon Hung 0 40 60 81 82 83 105 107 129 131 133 11 Nhon Khanh 0 27 42 56 57 57 73 74 89 90 91 12 Nhon Loc 0 29 43 59 59 60 76 77 93 94 95 13 Nhon Hoa 0 58 88 119 120 121 154 155 189 191 193 14 Nhon Tan 0 25 38 51 52 52 66 67 81 82 83 15 Nhon Tho 0 28 43 58 59 59 75 76 92 93 94 TOTAL 0 583 884 1,161 1,174 1,188 1,448 1,465 1,734 1,754 1,774
2023 106 124 122 169 116 144 92 109 115 134 92 96 195 84 96 1,795
2024 107 125 124 171 118 146 93 110 116 136 93 97 198 85 97 1,816
2025 108 127 125 173 119 148 94 111 117 137 95 99 200 86 98 1,837
38
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 3.7 Total investment cost of Toptex, mesophilic units and biopods for An Nhon District up to 2025 New investment Investment cost (x 1,000 VND) Year 2 Toptex (m ) Mesophilic bins Bipods Toptex Mesophilic bins Bipods 2012 2013 905 1,749 589 27,138 612,008 706,721 2014 468 905 305 14,041 316,653 365,657 2015 408 829 279 12,228 290,162 334,896 2016 21 40 14 620 14,138 16,324 2017 21 41 14 627 14,302 16,514 2018 1,267 780 262 37,996 273,032 314,951 2019 493 50 17 14,801 17,635 20,359 2020 782 807 271 23,459 282,437 325,800 2021 51 60 20 1,519 21,116 24,374 2022 51 61 21 1,536 21,361 24,657 2023 1,297 62 21 38,916 21,609 24,943 2024 524 62 21 15,732 21,860 25,232 2025 813 63 21 24,401 22,113 25,525 TOTAL 7,100 5,510 1,855 213,015 1,928,428 2,225,953 The cost for this equipment may seem high, but investment in the treatment of organic waste at source greatly reduces the quantity of waste that has to be collected, transported and deposited in a sanitary landfill. The savings in investments in bins, pushcarts, garbage trucks and sanitary landfill far outweigh the costs of the investment in the above equipment for the treatment of organic waste at source.
3.3
Selection of Waste Collection Equipment Equipment used for primary collection consists of 240 L bins located along street, 660 L containers located at central waste producers and 660 L pushcarts for collection wastes from households and other small waste producers. Estimated density of wastes contained in this equipment is summarized in Table 3.8. The proposed domestic solid waste primary collection equipment for An Nhon District is presented in Fig. 3.1.
Fig. 3.1 Proposed domestic solid waste primary collection equipment for An Nhon district.
39
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 3.8 Estimated Waste Densities within Different Collection Equipment Collection equipment Density Percentage of (kg/m3) volume used when emptied Waste in 240 L container 350 60% Waste in 660 L container 350 60% Waste in 660 L pushcart 350 100%
Demand of primary domestic solid waste collection equipment Estimation of equipment required for primary domestic solid wastes collection in An Nhon district is conducted based on the conditions summarized in Table 3.9. Table 3.9 Characteristics of equipment required for primary collection of domestic solid waste in An Nhon district
AREA EQUIPMENT SERVICE ESTIMATED DIVISION OF
SYSTEM COVERAGE
Towns
240 L bin
Located along main streets and central areas of the towns Central waste producers as markets, administrative offices, institutions, hotels Collection of waste from residential areas Located along main streets and central areas of the towns Collection of waste from residential areas
660 L container
660 L pushcart
660 L pushcart
20-30% of total waste amount, typical value for estimation is 25% 10-20 of total waste amount, typical value for estimation is 10% 60-70% of total waste amount, typical value for estimation is 65% 10-15% of total waste amount, typical value for estimation is 10% 80-90% of total waste amount, typical value for estimation is 90%
On the basics of the data presented above, equipment demand for primary collection of domestic solid wastes in An Nhon district is estimated and summarized in Table 3.10 and described in detailed for different towns and communes in Table 3.11, 3.12 and 3.13.
40
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 3.10 Total demand on equipment for primary domestic waste collection in An Nhon District up to 2025 Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 240 L Bins 92 81 77 74 74 76 76 77 87 88 89 90 91 92 Towns 660 L Containers 14 13 12 11 11 11 11 11 13 13 13 14 14 14 660 L Pushcarts 52 47 44 42 43 43 43 44 49 51 51 51 52 53 Communes 240 L 660 L Bins Pushcarts 48 93 63 117 77 141 67 131 67 131 69 131 67 124 78 146 83 155 84 157 84 159 96 179 97 182 106 204
41
Table 3.11 Demand for 240 L bins for An Nhon District up to 2025 No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Locality Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL Number of 240 L bins 2012 49 43 9 6 7 5 11 5 5 140 2013 43 38 8 7 6 6 7 5 5 10 4 5 144 2014 41 36 6 8 6 7 5 5 6 6 5 5 9 4 5 154 2015 40 34 5 7 5 6 4 5 5 6 4 4 8 4 4 141 2016 40 34 5 7 5 6 4 5 5 6 4 4 8 4 4 141 2017 41 35 6 7 5 6 4 5 5 6 4 4 9 4 4 145 2018 41 35 5 7 5 6 4 5 5 6 4 4 8 4 4 143 2019 42 35 6 8 6 7 5 5 6 7 5 5 9 4 5 155 2020 48 39 6 9 6 8 5 6 6 7 5 5 10 5 5 170 2021 49 39 7 9 6 8 5 6 6 7 5 5 10 5 5 172 2022 49 40 7 9 6 8 5 6 6 7 5 5 10 5 5 173 2023 50 40 7 10 7 9 6 7 7 8 6 6 12 5 6 186 2024 50 41 8 10 7 9 6 7 7 8 6 6 12 5 6 188 2025 51 41 8 11 8 10 6 7 8 9 6 7 13 6 7 198
42
Table 3.12 Demand on 660 L containers for An Nhon District up to 2025 No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Locality Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL Number of 660 L containers 2012 7 7 14 2013 7 6 13 2014 6 6 12 2015 6 5 11 2016 6 5 11 2017 6 5 11 2018 6 5 11 2019 6 5 11 2020 7 6 13 2021 7 6 13 2022 7 6 13 2023 8 6 14 2024 8 6 14 2025 8 6 14
43
Table 3.13 Demand on 660 L pushcarts for An Nhon District up to 2025 No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Locality Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL Number of 660 L pushcarts 2012 28 24 18 12 14 10 20 9 10 145 2013 25 22 16 14 10 11 13 9 9 18 8 9 164 2014 23 21 11 15 11 13 8 10 10 12 8 9 17 8 9 185 2015 23 19 10 14 10 12 8 9 10 11 8 8 16 7 8 173 2016 23 20 10 14 10 12 8 9 10 11 8 8 16 7 8 174 2017 23 20 10 14 10 12 8 9 10 11 8 8 16 7 8 174 2018 23 20 10 13 9 11 7 9 9 11 7 8 15 7 8 167 2019 24 20 11 16 11 13 9 10 11 12 9 9 18 8 9 190 2020 27 22 12 17 12 14 9 11 11 13 9 10 19 8 10 204 2021 28 23 12 17 12 14 9 11 12 13 9 10 19 9 10 208 2022 28 23 12 17 12 15 9 11 12 14 9 10 19 9 10 210 2023 28 23 14 19 13 16 11 13 13 15 11 11 22 10 11 230 2024 29 23 14 19 14 17 11 13 13 16 11 11 22 10 11 234 2025 29 24 16 22 15 19 12 14 15 17 12 13 25 11 13 257
44
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan During the following years, the waste amounts to be collected will increase. New investment needed is estimated as presented Table 3.14 with assumption that the life time of this equipment is 4 years. Table 3.14 New investment of equipment for primary domestic waste collection up to 2025 Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 240 L Bins 92 92 2 1 102 3 1 2 103 4 Towns 660 L Containers 14 14 16 1 16 660 L Pushcarts 52 53 1 58 2 1 59 3 Communes 240 L 660 L Bins Pushcarts 48 93 15 24 14 24 48 93 17 24 17 11 22 53 102 18 26 19 23 42 54 105 27 48
The An Nhon District Peoples Committee wishes to ensure that there are some spare pushcarts. At present the above calculations ensure that there will be sufficient pushcarts, as it is anticipated that each pushcarts will only complete one collection route per day.
3.4
Transportation Vehicles Secondary collection and transportation of domestic solid waste to landfill will be done by 8 tonne rearend loading compactor truck (called compactor truck). Secondary collection and transportation system data is described briefly in Table 3.15. Average time for 1 trip of compactor truck is estimated as presented in Table 3.16.
45
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 3.15 Secondary collection and transportation system data Town Average loading time per Time for emptying one container: 240 L bin 1 min Time for transport between 2 containers: 1 min Total: 2 minutes/container Average loading time per Time for emptying one container: 660 L container 2 min (more difficult access) Time for transport between 2 containers: 5 minute Total: 7 minutes/container Average loading time per Time for emptying one pushcart: 1 660 L pushcart minute Time for transport between 2 groups of 4 pushcarts: 5 minutes (It is expected that there will be an average of 4 pushcarts at a rendezvous point) Total: 2.25 minutes/pushcart Average time for transportation between communes Average distance for return trip to landfill Average transportation speed to landfill Average time at landfill n/a Commune Time for emptying one container: 1 min Time for transport between 2 containers: 1 min Total: 2 minutes/container
Time for emptying one pushcart: 1 min Time for transport between 2 groups of 4 pushcarts: 5 minutes (It is expected that there will be an average of 2 pushcarts at a rendezvous point) Total: 3.5 minutes/pushcart 20 minutes
20 km 30 km/h 20 minutes
40 km 25 km/h 20 minutes
Table 3.16 Average time per trip of compacter truck Waste collection time (minutes/trip) Average time for transportation between communes (7 communes/trip x 20 minutes/commune) Average time to transport to landfill Average time at landfill Average none-working time per trip (for maintenance, ~ 15% of working time) Total time per trip of compact truck (minutes/trip) Total time per trip of compact truck (hours/trip) Town 185 minutes 0 minutes 40 minutes 20 minutes 37 minutes 282 4.7 Commune 160 minutes 140 minutes 96 minutes 20 minutes 57 minutes 473 7.8
Based on the data presented in Table 3.15 and 3.16, number of compact truck required is estimated and summarised in Table 3.17.
46
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 3.17 Number of compactor trucks required for secondary waste collection and transportation
Year Amount of waste to be collected (tonnes/day) Towns Communes 18.04 11.45 16.10 15.20 14.51 14.68 14.85 15.03 15.20 17.20 17.40 17.60 17.81 18.01 18.22 14.30 17.20 15.77 15.95 16.14 15.13 17.85 19.00 19.22 19.44 22.13 22.38 25.16 Operating time to collect waste (minutes/trip) In towns In communes 636 677 568 536 512 518 524 530 536 606 613 620 628 635 642 845 1017 932 943 954 894 1055 1123 1136 1150 1308 1324 1488 Total operating time of truck (hours/day) 22 24 26 24 24 25 24 27 29 29 30 32 33 35 Total truck needed 2.74 2.94 3.23 3.01 3.04 3.08 2.97 3.32 3.60 3.65 3.69 4.03 4.08 4.44 Total truck invested 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
As can be seen, the number the trucks is rounded to the nearest whole number, so that in some cases the collection vehicles will have to work a little more than 8 hours each day, thereby saving the cost of purchasing and operating an extra truck that would be under utilised. New investment for compactor truck is estimated and presented in Table 3.18 where life time of the truck is 10 years. Table 3.18 New investment of compact truck required for secondary collection and transportation of the district up to 2025
Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total compact truck required 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 New investment 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1
3.5
Requirements to Waste Management Workers, Fee and Cost Recovery of Domestic Waste Collection and Transportation System
47
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan For waste collection, one worker will operate two pushcart; For the transportation vehicle, there will be 1 driver and 2 assistants.
Workforce requirement is estimated based on the conditions mentioned above and summarised in Table 3.19. Table 3.19 Workforce required for waste collection and transportation operation Compactor Workers to operate Workers to operate pushcart Year truck drivers compactor truck Town Communes 2012 26 47 6 3 2013 24 59 6 3 2014 22 71 6 3 2015 21 66 6 3 2016 22 66 6 3 2017 22 66 6 3 2018 22 62 6 3 2019 22 73 6 3 2020 25 78 8 4 2021 26 79 8 4 2022 26 80 8 4 2023 26 90 8 4 2024 26 91 8 4 2025 27 102 10 5
* Note: Prices on trucks and pushcarts have been collected from purchasers in Vietnam. Other prices are estimates based on purchases elsewhere in Vietnam.
On the basis of the unit prices and the number of facilities and equipment estimated above, the total investments to be made within the initial period can be calculated. The result is summarized in table 3.21. Detailed investment for towns and communes is presented in table 3.22.
48
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 3.21 Total investment cost for waste collection and transportation equipment of An Nhon
Total equipment Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 240l Bins 140 15 14 140 19 12 155 21 1 25 157 31 660l Containers 14 14 16 1 16 660l Pushcarts 145 24 24 146 24 17 23 160 28 19 43 164 51 Compact truck 3 1 3 1 240l Bins 67,200 7,200 6,720 67,200 9,120 5,760 74,400 10,080 480 12,000 75,360 14,880 Total investment (x 1,000 VND) 660l 660l Containers Pushcarts 29,400 580,000 96,000 96,000 29,400 584,000 96,000 68,000 92,000 33,600 640,000 112,000 76,000 2,100 172,000 33,600 656,000 204,000 Compact truck 4,800,000 1,600,000 4,800,000 1,600,000 Total cost (x 1,000) 5,476,600 103,200 102,720 680,600 105,120 68,000 97,760 2,348,000 122,080 4,876,480 186,100 764,960 1,818,880
49
Table 3.22 Investment cost for waste collection equipment for towns and communes in An Nhon district Year Number of new invested equipment Investment (x 1,000 VND) Towns Communes Towns Communes Compactor 240l 660l 660l 240l 660l 240l 660l 660l 240l 660l Compactor truck Bins Containers Pushcarts Bins Pushcarts Bins Containers Pushcarts Bins Pushcarts truck 2012 92 14 52 48 93 3 44,160 29,400 208,000 23,040 372,000 4,800,000 2013 15 24 - 7,200 96,000 2014 14 24 - 6,720 96,000 2015 2016 92 14 53 48 93 44,160 29,400 212,000 23,040 372,000 2017 2 17 24 960 - 8,160 96,000 2018 17 68,000 2019 1 1 11 22 480 4,000 5,280 88,000 2020 102 16 58 53 102 1 48,960 33,600 232,000 25,440 408,000 1,600,000 2021 3 2 18 26 1,440 8,000 8,640 104,000 2022 1 19 3 480 76,000 4,800,000 2023 2 1 1 23 42 960 2,100 4,000 11,040 168,000 2024 103 16 59 54 105 49,440 33,600 236,000 25,920 420,000 2025 4 3 27 48 1 1,920 12,000 12,960 192,000 1,600,000
50
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost of Domestic Waste Collection and Transportation System Capital, operating and maintenance costs have been estimated based on the capital investments, personnel costs, operating costs and maintenance as a percentage of the investment. For calculation of annual costs related to waste collection and transportation, the unit costs listed in Table 3.23 have been used. Table 3.23 Operation and maintenance unit cost Item
240 L bin Cost: 480,000 VND Lifespan: 4 years Annual write down 120,000 VND Annual maintenance cost =5% of investment/year = 24,000 VND/year/container 660 L container Cost: 2,100,000 VND Lifespan: 4 years Annual write down 525,000 VND Annual maintenance cost =5% of investment/year = 105,000 VND/year/container 660 L pushcart Cost: 4,000,000 VND Lifespan: 4 years Annual write down 1,000,000 VND Annual maintenance cost =5% of investment/year = 200,000 VND/year/container 8 tonne rear-loading compactor truck Cost: 1,600,000,000 VND Lifespan: 10 years Annual write down 160,000,000 VND Annual maintenance cost =5% of investment/year = 50,000,000 VND/year/truck Fuel for compactor truck: (8 ltr./hour x 8 hours/day x 300 days/year x 21,000 VND/ltr = 403,200,000 VND/year/truck) Equipment per worker: Working clothes, brooms, shovels, gloves (per employee) Average salaries per driver of compactor truck Total salary, including bonus, compensation, social costs etc. Average salaries per waste collector and assistant of compactor truck driver Total salary including social costs etc.
144
630
1,200
210,000
403,200
On the basis of the unit prices and the number of facilities and equipment estimated, the total annual costs for the collection and transportation system can be calculated. The result is shown in Table 3.24.
51
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan As can be seen in table 3.24 the costs of the system are considerable and over 50% of the costs are labour costs. The total costs in 2015 would be around 3.41 billion VND; this would serve to collect 11,054 tonnes of domestic waste, at a time when there are approximately 191,500 inhabitants in the district. Hence the cost is about 305,850 VND per tonne or around 17,700 VND per citizen per year. If it is assumed that 50% of the population is served by the waste collection service and that the population bears 67% of the costs (the remaining third being borne by shops, institutions, industries, etc.), this amounts to a cost per citizen of 2 * 17,700 * 2/3 = 23,600 VND per year. So if an average household has five people, the monthly cost is around 9,800 VND. These costs only include waste collection and transport to the disposal site; i.e. capital and operating costs for a sanitary landfill are not included. Included in the above estimate are all costs for purchasing new compactor trucks, bins and pushcarts, as well as the maintenance of these, safety equipment for workers and fuel for the vehicles. Administration costs are not included. There are naturally means to reduce these costs: The most obvious is to minimise salary costs by reducing the necessary staff to a minimum. Contracting out the operation of pushcarts to individuals could be one way to reduce costs. At present a pushcarts only completes one collection route per day. In towns a waste collection worker can normally complete two collection routes with a pushcart per day. This means that each worker in towns could be issued with two pushcarts or that the garbage truck come to empty the pushcart twice during the day. Either way, the number of collection workers in towns will be halved, furthermore, if the pushcart is emptied twice per day, only half the number of pushcarts is needed. Finally, the trucks only operate around 8 hours per day in these estimations, and significant gains could be made if the trucks operated for longer periods every day. In some countries, for example Denmark, the garbage truck are generally operated in two shifts per day (i.e. 16 hours per day) to reduce costs as much as possible.
52
Table 3.24 Total cost for operating a waste collection system within the district Total Operation and Maintenance Cots (x 1,000 VND) Towns Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 24 2,448 72 24 48 2,472 96 105 1,680 200 11,800 600 552 1,296 648 1,680 200 11,600 400 264 1,272 432 2,208 48 1,470 10,600 1,152 408 18,600 4,800 3,400 4,400 20,400 5,200 3,800 8,400 21,000 9,600 240 L Bins 2,208 660 L Containers 1,470 660 L Pushcarts 10,400 Communes 240 L Bins 1,152 360 336 660 L Pushcarts 18,600 4,800 4,800 Compactor truck Maintenance 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 Fuel 1,209,600 1,209,600 1,209,600 1,209,600 1,209,600 1,209,600 1,209,600 1,209,600 1,612,800 1,612,800 1,612,800 1,612,800 1,612,800 2,016,000 Equipment for workers 23,550 26,400 29,550 27,750 27,900 27,900 26,850 30,300 33,000 33,600 33,900 36,900 37,500 41,550 Salary drivers 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 150,000 Salary workers 1,630,800 1,836,000 2,062,800 1,933,200 1,944,000 1,944,000 1,868,400 2,116,800 2,289,600 2,332,800 2,354,400 2,570,400 2,613,600 2,883,600 Total 3,137,780 3,317,160 3,547,086 3,410,550 3,455,530 3,426,756 3,348,250 3,601,588 4,292,800 4,305,304 4,324,924 4,549,405 4,622,148 5,352,094
53
21
The remaining 1/3 of the total cost for operating a waste collection system in An Nhon District will be covered by the fee collection from shops, offices, hospitals, markets, industrial zones, etc.
54
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 3.25 Cost recovery for waste collection system
Year Total cost for operating waste collection system (x 1000 VND/year) 3,137,780 3,317,160 3,547,086 3,410,550 3,455,530 3,426,756 3,348,250 3,601,588 4,292,800 4,305,304 4,324,924 4,549,405 4,622,148 5,352,094 Total cost for Total cost for operating primary operating waste collection secondary waste system (x 1000 collection system VND/year) (x 1000 VND/year) 1,688,180 1,867,560 2,097,486 1,960,950 2,005,930 1,977,156 1,898,650 2,151,988 2,360,000 2,372,504 2,392,124 2,616,605 2,689,348 2,936,094 1,449,600 1,449,600 1,449,600 1,449,600 1,449,600 1,449,600 1,449,600 1,449,600 1,932,800 1,932,800 1,932,800 1,932,800 1,932,800 2,416,000 Number of serviced households Towns 4,992 5,050 5,108 5,167 5,227 5,288 5,349 5,411 6,256 6,329 6,402 6,476 6,551 6,627 Communes 10,081 12,199 14,279 14,445 14,612 14,782 14,953 16,746 19,360 19,585 19,812 21,737 21,989 23,980 Cost recovery from household fee (x 1000 VND/year) 1,168,958 1,324,218 1,476,807 1,493,938 1,511,268 1,528,799 1,546,533 1,679,112 1,941,245 1,963,764 1,986,543 2,129,639 2,154,343 2,302,187
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
The District has to consider one of the three following options: Option 1: Apply household fee indicated in Decision No. 23/2008/QD-UBND as mentioned above. + Advantage: because this option is based on Decision of the Province, so there is no explanation requirement. + Disadvantage: if applied this collection fee for households, cost recovery from household fee can only compensate the operational cost of secondary collection system. That mean the District has to find budget to operate primary collection system and waste treatment (landfill operation and maintenance). Option 2: Increase household fee so that it could help to recover 2/3 of the cost for operating the primary waste collection system (Table 3.26) (and the remaining will be covered by the fee collection from other waste generation sources). In this case, households have to pay in average about 6,600 VND/household/month in 2012 and reduce to 5,700 VND/household/month in 2025. + Advantage: Implementation of this option would help to save the budget of the District compared to the option 1. Slightly increase in the fee in the communes and rural areas would be accepted by households. In this case, the District has to find budget to operate secondary collection system and waste treatment (landfill operation and maintenance). + Disadvantage: new fee should be approved by the Province. Option 3: Increase household fee so that it could help to recover 2/3 of the total operational cost of waste collection system (Table 3.26) (and the remaining will be covered by the fee collection from other waste generation sources). In this case, households have to pay in average about 11,200 VND/household/month in 2012 and reduce to 9,500 VND/household/month in 2025.
55
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan + Advantage: Implementation of this option would help to save the budget of the District compared to the option 1 and 2. A little increase in the fee would be easier to convince households to pay for waste collection. In this case, the District has to find budget only for waste treatment (landfill operation and maintenance). + Disadvantage: (1) new fee should be approved by the Province; (2) it would be even more difficult to convince households to pay fee compared to the option 2. Table 3.26 Recommended household fee (VND/household/month) Year New household fee New household fee recommended option 2 recommended option 3 2012 6,600 11,214 2013 6,511 10,543 2014 6,526 10,113 2015 6,031 9,577 2016 5,996 9,501 2017 5,929 9,394 2018 5,628 9,053 2019 5,862 9,000 2020 5,446 9,066 2021 5,489 9,067 2022 5,478 9,015 2023 5,573 8,859 2024 5,604 8,853 2025 5,736 9,522 Household fee could be reduced year by year in the future if number of serviced household is increased. This is also an important point for the District to consider in setting action plan for improving solid waste management of the District in the coming years.
3.6
The technical and financial implications of establishing a sanitary landfill as proposed in section 2.1.6 are discussed in the following. It must be noted that, given a number of uncertainties at present, the cost estimates are all not accurate and must be revised/adjusted in the future prior to implementing the sanitary landfill. The site for the planned future sanitary landfill is where part of the existing Nhon Tho Dumpsite is located. It is suitable in term of minimum distance to National and Provincial main areas; to residential areas; to rivers and streams; to groundwater, exploitation works/structures; to airports, seaports and industrial areas.22 The landfill designed by CEEN in 2008 is sized to receive an average of 34.25 tonnes per day of waste. The waste cell will have a waste layer that is 11-12 metres thick. The bottom of the cell consists of a compacted clay layers and a HDPE layer. There is a gas collection system, as well as a leachate collection and treatment system that will discharge water to the surroundings meeting the requirements of the Standard TCVN 7733:2007 Effluent standards for leachate of solid waste landfill sites. A surface water drainage system is provided around the landfill. The sites water supply is from drilled wells. The power supply is mainly for lighting. Proposed ancillary facilities include buildings, a weighbridge, a fence, environmental monitoring, a car park, a guard house, etc. The original estimate was made by CEEN in 2008.
22
56
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan The cost estimate is based on the 2008 estimate by CEEN in 2008 and has been updated to 2011 costs; it can be found in Annex C, tables C1 and C2. As can be seen, the costs include a weighbridge, a truck wash station, a material stockpile area, an office, guard house, a fence around the entire site and the sanitary landfill cells with their impermeable membrane and leachate collection system. Also included in the costs are the leachate treatment system, the water supply and electric systems and the closure of cells that have been filled with waste. Finally observation wells are included for the monitoring of the environment round the sanitary landfill and a bulldozer to be used daily in the operation of the landfill. Excluded from the costs are the costs of land acquisition; as well as the costs for the closure of the existing dumpsites. As can be seen from the tables, the total investment costs for the sanitary landfill are 40.2 billion Dong, where the majority of the costs are for the construction of new landfill cells and the cost of machinery. The landfill proposed by CEEN is large enough to accommodate the waste generated by the district in the period 2013 2025. The landfill has been subdivided into 50,000 m3 cells; where a cell is closed when it is full. The design by CEEN proposes that all cells are built immediately, so in this scenario there will be empty cells that will remain unused for about 10 years (7 years in case of a shared landfill). This is not a recommended scenario, as the cells that are not used are difficult to preserve and they will be damaged by sunshine, vegetation and precipitation and deteriorate rapidly and therefore become unusable; thus, the initial investment may be lost to a large extend. In fact, the landfill may be planned in one design as was done by CEEN, but they may not be all fully built immediately. Thus, the dimensioning of the planned total area for the landfill site may be large enough to cover the entire planning period (say 15 years), but the construction of landfill cells should be phased, with a new cells built only after the previous cell has been filled up. The size of each cell should not be larger than necessary, so that it will be filled within say about two years; no new additional cells should be built before needed. Therefore, the construction of the landfill cells is split into phases, so that there is an initial investment, subsequent additional investments for the new landfill cells, as well as operating costs for the landfill. The costs are based on the CEEN estimate, where the costs of landfills that are subsequently build, is deducted from the initial cost estimate. The operating costs for the years 2013 through 2025 can be found in Annex C, table C3. Here the main expenses are maintenance costs and the cost of staff. As can be seen in table 3.28, the total operating costs per tonne for the sanitary landfill come to approximately 360,000 VND per tonne. The sanitary landfill staff is foreseen as follows:
57
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 3.27 Landfill Staffing Staff Category
Landfill Manager Waste Controllers / (weighbridge Operators) LTP Operator Chief Mechanic Assistant Mechanics Electrician Machine Operators Cleaners Security Guards Various unskilled workers Total Staff:
Number
1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2
5
17
3.6.2 Summary of the Capital and Operating Costs for the Sanitary Landfill
The capital and operating costs for the period 2013 to 2025 for the sanitary landfill can be found in table 3.28.
23
The CDM option through landfill gas is only an option if organic waste is placed in the landfill. As mentioned elsewhere, composting activities also reduce the emission of greenhouse gases and are also eligible for CDM credits.
58
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 3.28 Summary of the capital and operating costs for the period 2013 to 2025 for the sanitary landfill; the last column gives the cost if the landfill is shared with Tay Son District Sanitary Item Unit Shared Landfill Landfill Total tonnage received Tonnes 188,911 367,727 Initial investment costs MVND 26,859 28,076 Additional investment costs MVND 12,212 34,285 Operating costs MVND 23,539 26,833 Average costs per tonne VND/tonne 331,426 242,555 As can be seen in the above table, the overall landfill costs come to about 330,000 VND per tonne of waste received. Significant savings can be made by sharing the costs of building and operating a landfill with Tay Son district. The basic infrastructure required is the same, though the operating costs are a little higher in terms of fuel consumption, chemicals for the leachate treatment costs, and so forth. In practice, sharing the landfill will reduce the costs by approximately 90,000 VND per tonne. This is a significant saving, especially given that this plan calls for 30 tonnes of waste to be collected daily within the District a few years from now. Final disposal of solid waste by landfilling, if and where needed, will have to employ environmentally safe sanitary landfills. Taking into account both economic and environmental aspects, it is obvious that sharing a landfill has significant cost advantages. The only challenge for this scenario is the possible resistance of the local residents where the shared landfill is to be located. To make this realistic, the district must design and implement an appropriate IEC and awareness raising programme for both local authorities and residents.
3.7
There are considerable savings to be made by composting the organic faction of waste at source. This District Solid Waste Management Plan has used a model where eventually 30% of the total waste stream is treated through composing (or similar processes) in communes and 15% of the waste stream is treated likewise in towns. In table 3.29 below the total costs are compared to scenarios where there is absolutely no treatment of organic waste at source and one where all
59
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan organic waste is treated at source. In all three cases, it is assumed that the waste will be deposited in a District sanitary landfill. Table 3.29 Cost comparison for various composting scenarios Almost 100% of Current scenario organic waste is (30% in communes composted /15% in towns) Total Waste to landfill 2013 147,365 175,558 2025 (tonnes) Total Capital Costs (MVND) 36,161 40,165 Total Operating Costs 23,143 23,532 (MVND) Total Costs (MVND) 59,304 63,697
As can be seen there are significant savings in the current system, when compared to a system where there is no treatment of organic waste at source. The fact that about 55,000 tonnes less of waste are collected over the period 2013 2025, (176,000 tonnes versus 231,000 tonnes) means savings in the order of 21 billion VND. Hence, there are very strong financial incentives to minimise the flow of waste to landfill, as this significantly lowers the costs. Furthermore, waste minimisation benefits the environment.
3.8
Closure of Dumpsites
The existing dumpsites in An Nhon should sooner or later be closed in order to avoid polluting the environment and to be in compliance with the national strategy on sustainable development. It is foreseen that over the next 15 years all dumpsites should be eliminated. Assuming (and it seems most likely) that no industrial hazardous waste was received by the dumpsites, they can be closed following the guidelines given in the Joint circular No. 01/2001/TTLT-BKHCNMT-BXD of January 18, 2001 guiding the regulations on environmental protection for the selection of location for, the construction and operation of, solid waste burial sites" as follows: The final cover layer should have a clay content over 30%, a standard moisture content and be properly compacted, with a thickness over 60 cm. The slope from the edge to the top should gradually increase from 3 to 5%, ensuring good draining, and thereafter: + Cover the buffer layer with a 50-60 cm thick layer of sandy soil + Covering with a 20-30 cm thick agricultural soil + Plant grass and trees Carry out a monitoring program, including the monitoring of air, water, soil and ecosystems, labour environment and local residents; health.
Once the dumpsite has been closed, the District Office of Natural Resources and Environment should develop a simple monitoring programme to ensure that the final cover layer remains intact.
3.9
This section describes the requirements capacity development and awareness raising programme from 2012 through 2025. A section is included covering the costs of these recommended activities. The programme is structured around the building of Environmental Communication
60
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Teams at all levels within the District whilst funds are available through the Water Supply and Sanitation Project. From 2015, when only the more limited local budgets are available to fund these activities, the operations will be maintained due to the skills acquired during the initial years.
3.9.1 Background
The Environment Protection Agency (EPA) under the provincial Department of Natural Resources and Environment is in charge of environmental communication activity in Binh Dinh Province. Regarding the administrative management, EPA delegates most of its environment management activities to the districts. District DONRE represents the district in managing and implementing environmental management and communication activities at the commune and town level.. However, these activities are generally limited to meetings on around special events (e.g. Earth Day) and therefore do not fully meet the goals of increasing community awareness for the following reasons: The budget for this activity is usually low, although every District has 1% of their yearly budget allocated for the environmental protection activities; this is called the Environment Life-work budget. However, most of this budget is used for waste collection and treatment activities. The human resources available for implementing the environmental communication activities are limited. Most of the human resources come from the District Office of Natural Resources and Environmental, as well as from Environmental and Land officers from wards and communes These officers have limited knowledge of environmental communication and waste management; this especially applies to officers at the commune level.
61
In a second phase (2013 mid 2014) the capacity development actions are continued coaching (but less intensive) of the change process as described in the DSWMPs, and based on what has been achieved in 2011. Furthermore, technical trainings will also be provided for the specific needs that have come up in the working groups.
62
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan To establish key Environmental Communication Teams within towns, communes and schools rapidly. These teams will be trained in environmental communication principles and solid waste management in order to be able to organise and implement these activities, with the goal that they must be able to organise solid waste management activities within their own town, ward or commune. The key groups will be trained with sufficient knowledge on environmental communication and sustainable solid waste management, solutions to reduce waste at dumpsite, skills on organising and implementing the environmental communication activity at community level. The towns, communes and schools should formulate and implement their individual communication plans on waste issues with the aim of meeting the objectives of the District Solid Waste Management Plan. The improvement of the solid waste management services within the district, towns and communes will be monitored on a quarterly, semester or yearly basis as appropriate. Here precise indicators will be used to compare the actual progress with the objectives of the District Solid Waste Management Plan, such as the percentage of households receiving waste collection service, the percentage of households that are paying waste collection fees, and the percentage of households that are treating organic waste at home. During the period 2012-2014, the budget resource will rely on the Water Supply and Sanitation Projects budget. The focus will be on capacity development for core teams. For the period from 2015 the focus will be on maintaining the existing activities, hence lowering the financial requirements. Here the resource from Environment Life-work budget should be able to cover the necessary project activities.
63
Env. Communication core team at district level Env. Communication core team at Towns/communes level Waste collectors MB Waste collectors Env. Communic ation team at community level Households Env. Communication team at school level
EPA
Market MB
Pupils
HH Sellers
Note: DoCI: Department of Culture and Information (this component will implement at provincial level)
64
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan The resources and functions should as follows: Unit 1 Environmental Communication Core team at district level Responsibilities - In charge of overall management and coordinate the environmental communication activity at district level. - To approve activity plan and support budget/tools/means/documents for environmental communication activity. - To orient the precise objectives for each area, each period for the environmental communication groups at towns, communes based on the approved (or adjust during the implementation process). - To organise capacity development for key groups on SWM and communication skill. - In the period 2012 2014 PPMU and EPA will direct support budget as well as techniques. From 2015 2025 the groups will be selfmanagement and implement through the Environment Life-work budget of District and the consulting of EPA. - To participate in the capacity development organised by the district. - To cooperate with environmental communication (EC) groups at hamlets/sub-wards/cells) to formulate a yearly action plan on environmental communication and submit to the district for approval. - To provide documents / communication tools/ budget for EC activities at community - In the period from 2012 2014 will organise training on SWM, communication skills for community EC groups - To cooperate/ support with community EC groups to implement the EC activity based on the approved action plan. - To organise quarterly meeting with EC group to review the Members - Leader/Director of the Natural Resource and Environment Office - District Natural Resource and Environment Office officers. - District Womens Union officer - District Youth Association officer - District Farming Association officer. - District Educational Office staff. - (6 members)
- Leader of PC of towns/communes, in charge of group leader - Officer who is in charge of Environment activity - WU staff. - YA staff. - Veteran Association staff. - Farming Association staff - (6 7 members)
65
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Unit Responsibilities Members implementation process based on the supervisory plan and detailed indicators in order to adjust the action plan accordingly To participate into capacity - Representative of school development program will be management board. organised by the district. - Teachers who in charge of To cooperate with head the movements teachers/mistress in schools to build - Teachers at primary school: a yearly EC and submit to the teaching music and fine arts. district for approval. Teachers at secondary To provide documents/ schools: teaching civics and communication tools/ budget for EC biology activities in classes. In the period from 2012 2014 will provide training on SWM, communication skills for head teachers in schools. To cooperate with and support teachers in carrying out the EC activity based on the approved action plan. To review every quarter with the head teacher on the process of the program based on the action plan and indicators in order to adjust accordingly. To participate into capacity This is a main force to work with development program on SWM, community people in environmental communication skills hamlet/sub-ward. Therefore, organised by towns/communes. the members of the team will To present the ideas/initiatives of be flexible. It is depending to the community and to cooperate the context of each area to with the key EC group at invite the ones who has free towns/communes to build the time and interested in this environmental communication environmental activity. action plan at their hamlet/subHowever, the core members ward. should be based on the existing To implement the environmental mass organisation and local communication at their hamlet/sub- authority staff such as: ward. The main communication will - Sub-ward management be: organise meeting at cells to board member. discuss with community people on - Cell leaders. the improvement of the existing - WU branch SWM at their communities; home - YA. visits to mobilise, consulting and - Farming Association explanation on the habit/attitude to branch. improve the existing SWM such as: - Veteran Association participate the collection service, branch. payment collection fee dispose the - Volunteers who are
66
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Unit Responsibilities waste in time, sorting waste at home, treatment organic waste at home by simple techniques. To record information/data, detail figure with the core group to supervise the implementing process of the environmental communication activities To participate into capacity development program on SWM, environmental communication skills organised by schools. To cooperate with core group to formulate the EC activity for school. To carry out the EC activity in classes. The main EC program will be: teaching the pupils on having right attitude/behaviour with the disposal of waste, organise some concrete activities for pupils participate as waste separation at school; treating food wastes, leafs at school by using simple techniques (according to the condition of each school); organise competition for pupils on the knowledge on waste To record the data/information, figures in order to cooperation with the core group to supervise the environmental communication implementation process. Members ready to participate into environmental communication activity. Waste collection workers at community.
For Primary schools, the team will be included of all teachers (each teacher will in charge of one class). For secondary schools, the team will be included mistresses in order to integrate this subject into their regular meetings or organise extra-curricular activities
67
Introducing the project activities quarterly. Introducing the organic waste treatment simple technologies such as composting and the black soldier fly larvae. Practical aspects of the solid waste collection system. The importance of paying waste collection fees. Introducing more general aspects of the solid waste management system issue in Binh Dinh.
For the communication through television it is suggested to advertising good behaviour through a few video clips that are alternated as the environmental communication programme will be implemented throughout the year. The changes in clips will keep people watching. Scenes and scripts should be developed for educational purpose but with a great sense of humour. Actors practices are representative of the local peoples practices. The EPA should sign the contract with the provincial television company to broadcast the programme at a certain time during the day when it is known that most people will be watching the local TV channel. For example, the broadcasting time can be in the evening after the news programme or during the break in a film. The produced video clips should be copied into DVDs to be distributed to motivators, towns, communes, schools and other civil organisations as supporting IEC material. These video clips can then be shown in meetings, training sessions or workshops at schools and/or for organisations. This gives a chance for a number of people who do not watch television to be approached by the programme. From 2012, the District Peoples Committee will submit proposals to the Binh Dinh Peoples Committee to assign both TV and radio stations to broadcast news relating to solid waste management as part of their responsibility for raising environment awareness. This component will in practice be formulated for the whole province by public broadcasting system of Binh Dinh province.
68
A second consideration is for towns and communes to establish a small scale composting facilities at their wet market; in this case it is important to: Choose the appropriate technology with a simple operation and low cost. Separate recyclable, organic and non-organic wastes at source That the Market Management Board agrees with this idea and that they provide the land for a composting facility or a location to store the organic waste separately. They can then help organise the scavengers at market into a group; this group is then allowed to work in this area managing the waste and operating the composting facility.
Here the Environmental Communication Core Team at town/commune level can assist the District authorities in setting up the small scale facilities. Finally, there may be plans for scavengers (or others) to operate a commercial black soldier fly larvae production; these will require support from the District authorities and the Environmental Communication Core Team at town/commune level to ensure a successful implementation: Provision of information on how to operate a commercial black soldier fly larvae production. A site to place the equipment. Assistance from the Environmental Communication Team to ensure that organic waste can be collected from households, restaurants, etc. Support on the sale of the larvae.
69
3.9.10 Cost of Capacity Development and Awareness Raising Programmes 2012 2025
The costs of the above programmes that are described in this section are estimated in this section.
70
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 3.29 Annual Costs for District Awareness Raising Programme (in 1,000 VND)
Activity 2011 (9 towns/communes) Cost
Unit No price No price
2014 Cost
price
50 10 1 252,200 80,000 40,000 40,000 80,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 20,000 20,000 45,000 7,200 255,600 45,000 135,000 75,600 189,000 45,000 90,000 54,000 696,800 -
2 Capacity building for core team at Dist. level 2.1 Training/ w orkshop at Dist. level
For core team of tow ns/communes For core team of school Time Time 0 For core team of school Time Time Time Time unit Per. Time Time Time Time Time Time
30 6
45,000 5,000
2 2 2 2 1 1 9 6
2 2 2 2 1 1 9 6 20,000 20,000 5,000 1,200 40,000 20,000 20,000 45,000 7,200 255,600 45,000 135,000 75,600 189,000 45,000 90,000 54,000 2,876,800 1 1 6 6
2.4 Com m unication tools 2.5 Managem ent fee (stationary/ transportation m eans) Dist. Core team (6
per.)
1,380,000 1,350,000 30,000 237,200 80,000 40,000 40,000 80,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 20,000 20,000 30,000 7,200 291,000 75,000 90,000 126,000 225,000 75,000 60,000 90,000 2,133,200
30 45,000 6 5,000
5,100,000
678,800 160,000 80,000 80,000 160,000 80,000 80,000 180,000 90,000 90,000 150,000 28,800 6 1,200
7,200 -
9 9 9
9 9 9
15 6 15 6 15 6 15
291,000 1,093,200 75,000 240,000 90,000 450,000 126,000 403,200 225,000 828,000 75,000 240,000 60,000 300,000 90,000 288,000 1,993,200 7,700,000
15 15
5,000 8,400
9 9 9
9 9 9
15 15
5,000 6,000
71
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 3.30 Budget Capacity Development for District Solid Waste Management (Euro) (from excel file "CD actions 2011 Total Basis for calculation 2011 - SEM2" year Establishment of 6,200 DSWMGroups & subgroups in 4 districts: Define coaching process of 8,340 sub-groups: Start up coaching processes & 34,000 follow up Total 48,540 2012 increasing input (HR+budget) from province/districts is needed coaching of sub groups 48,000 5 working (consultant fees) groups*100EUR/consultant/d*8d/m*12m coaching process 10,080 30 EUR/meeting*4 districts*1 board & 5 (meetings/workshops) working groups*12m Total 58,080 2013 increasing input (HR+budget) from province/districts is needed continued coaching (less 25,200 (1 board+6 intensive) workinggroups)*100EUR/consultant/d*3d/ m*12m possible technical trainings 12,500 technical, project management, leadership, ... 5 trainings (1 training per working group area*5 working group areas) 25 participants*5 trainings*100 EUR/p/training coaching process 10,080 30 EUR/meeting*4 districts*1 board & 5 (meetings/workshops) working groups*12m Total 47,780 2014 input (HR+budget) provided by province/districts 10,080 30 EUR/meeting*4 districts*1 board & 5 workinggroups*12m Total BUDGET (2011 2014) 164,480 The above table includes costs for: experts contracted to coach the districts on the longer term (2 years) with their planning and implementation allowances to organise meetings of the working groups study trips technical trainings for members of the working groups or other people that need training.
72
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 3.31 Total cost for the Public Broadcasting Programme covering four Districts (in 1,000 VND)
2012 STT Content unit time Price 400 No 10 1 90 4 4 2 2 total cost 284,000 4,000 100,000 180,000 9,600 1,600 8,000 4,800 800 4,000 50,000 348,400 No 10 1 90 4 4 2 2 10,000 10,000 2013 total cost 284,000 4,000 100,000 180,000 9,600 1,600 8,000 4,800 800 4,000 50,000 348,400 No 10 1 90 4 4 2 2 10,000 10,000 2014 total cost 284,000 4,000 100,000 180,000 9,600 1,600 8,000 4,800 800 4,000 50,000 348,400 852,000 12,000 300,000 540,000 28,800 4,800 24,000 14,400 2,400 12,000 150,000 1,045,200 Total 2012- 2014 Yearly (2015 - 2025) No 10 1 90 4 4 2 2 10,000 10,000 total cost 284,000 4,000 100,000 180,000 9,600 1,600 8,000 4,800 800 4,000 50,000 348,400
1 Television station 1.1 Television news 1.2 Video clip production 1.3 Video clip broadcast 2 Radion station 2.1 Radio news Technical article (composting, SWM 2.2 sustainability) 3 Newspaper 3.1 News page 3.2 Technical article (composting) 4 Publishement of DVD Total
video clip 100,000 time time article article article unit 2,000 400 2,000 400 2,000
5 10,000
As can be seen from the above about 5 billion VND of technical support are foreseen over the years 2012 to 2014, whilst the plan is being implemented. The costs for the awareness raising programme come to approximately 2.6 billion VND for the awareness raising programme plus about 1 billion VND for the public broadcasting programme. Hereafter the annual costs are approximately 370 million VND for the awareness raising and 350 million for the public broadcasting covering all four Districts. The Water Supply and Sanitation project does not have sufficient funds to cover these costs, so participation of the Environment Life-work budget will be required.
73
4.2
Main Activities
To successfully implement the District Solid Waste Management Plan, a number of activities are required over the coming years. These are discussed in the following sections.
74
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan ensure a close cooperation between the different actors and offers a forum for public participation. The District Solid Waste Management Board can establish working groups covering more specific topics under the District Solid Waste Management Plan. Areas that should be covered by various Working Groups include: Funding of all activities and Fee Collection Treatment of organic waste at source Waste Collection and Transport Sanitary Landfill Industrial Waste Healthcare Waste Public information, awareness raising and capacity development.
Such working groups would in turn have contact persons appointed at the town or commune level. The District Solid Waste Management Board will monitor the implementation of the waste management system. The means that it will monitor process during the implementation phase and provide subsequent follow-up during the operation of the system. The District Solid Waste Management Board will ensure that all actors are executing their activities in a timely manner. Hence each administrative unit (towns/communes) will have a group or committee at their level that reports to the District level board. The Board will receive reports from all actors, allowing it to monitor progress and to take corrective action whenever planned activities are falling behind schedule or now operating as planned. Important areas that will require close attention from the District Solid Waste Management Board include the following: Ensuring at the waste treatment at source using Toptex, mesophilic units and biopods is implanted and functioning as intended; Making sure that the waste collection equipment is purchased in the most efficient manner possible; that it is distributed equitably between communes, towns and waste managements companies; That the sanitary landfill is tendered in a transparent manner; hereafter the Board must closely monitor the construction work of the selected contractor; and finally when the sanitary landfill is ready for operation; the Board must ensure that a trustworthy management structure is put in place that can run the landfill in an efficient manner; Ensuring that the District stakeholders receive assistance from the Waste Resource Centre when needed; and Following up on all public awareness raising and information programmes, to make sure that these are efficient and have the desired impact. For example, should the treatment of organic waste at source be less successful than anticipated, this will mean that there is an acute need for further awareness raising and capacity development amongst the population and other stakeholders.
75
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan donors, income generation and support from the Government of Vietnam. The Centre is to be staffed to support the provision of the core services; these shall cover the following areas within solid waste management: Technical support within waste management systems Operation as a demonstration and research centre Offer contacts between various players within the waste management domain Assisting with obtaining carbon credits (CDM) Social support and training for all workers within waste management Provision of training services
The WRC will serve as a knowledge centre providing expertise within the abovementioned fields. Rationally it should be based in Quy Nhon and serve the whole province. Furthermore, the centre will most likely endeavour to sell its services further afield. Ideally the centre should seek links to universities, research institutions and other similar organisations to strengthen its work and knowledge base.
Such working groups would in turn have contact persons or (if relevant) awareness raising teams appointed at the town or commune level. As the above is the overall awareness raising strategy for several areas in solid waste management (health waste, industrial waste, agricultural waste, treatment of organic waste at
76
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan source, collection and transport, landfill construction and operation), there is a need for specific awareness raising programs per area. Except for the working groups treatment of organic waste at source and collection and transport, all working groups need to develop their own awareness raising plan and implement it. The working groups treatment of organic waste at source and collection and transport deal mostly with the public in general and continue the implementation of the projects awareness raising strategy and plan for 2010-2014, which is described in detail below. To ensure the sustainability of the awareness raising program after WSSP ends, increasing input (HR + budget) from province is needed, complementary to the budget provided by WSSP. Therefore, EPA and the DPCs need to integrate the awareness raising plan and budget in the Social-Economic Development Plan of the province.
77
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Adjust waste collection and transportation routes (from transfer points to the landfill). Hire and train waste collection workers, workers and drivers operating waste transportation vehicles.
4.3
The implementation of this Action Plan will start with the establishment of a District Solid Waste Management Board. The Board (or Working Groups set up under it) will have the necessary authority to make decision, establishing the legal and financial basis for the various activities. These groups will also oversee the implementation of all aspects of the solids waste management systems for domestic waste, healthcare waste and industrial waste. The timing of the various activities is briefly described in tables 3.1 to 3.6.
78
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table 4.1 Authority Decisions No. Activity 1.1 Approve District Solid Waste Management Plan 1.2 Establish District Solid Waste Management Board 1.3 Approve budgets and establish financing for the solid waste management system 1.4 Decision to establish a Waste Resource Centre 1.5 Amend legislation (if or as required) 1.6 1.7 1.8 Approve solid waste management schemes as required Approve purchases Supervise the implementation of all systems
Dates January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 January December 2012 as required as required 2011 - 2015
Table 4.2 Establishing a domestic waste collection and transportation system No. Activity 2.1 Establish a working group under the District Solid Waste Management Board that is responsible for the collection and transportation of domestic waste. 2.2 Determine whether a new tariff system is required for the different users (residents, institutions, markets etc.). 2.3 Determine exactly what equipment should be purchased 2.4 Purchase 240 l bins, 660 l containers and 660 l pushcarts 2.5 Purchase waste collection trucks. 2.6 Purchase personnel equipment for workers 2.7 Hire new staff: Additional staff will be needed in parallel with the expansion of collection services and the purchase of new equipment. 2.8 Train all waste collection staff: All staff (waste collectors, street sweepers, drivers, mechanics, etc.) must be properly trained and know what is expected of them in their job situation. 2.9 Determine the best location for bins, containers and rendezvous points. Decide where pushcarts will be stored when not in use. 2.10 Review and revise collection routes/collection schemes. New routing plans/schedules for collection trucks must be made in accordance with the increased collection coverage and rendezvous points. 2.11 Provide training for administrative and operational staff at various levels: Train administrative and operational staff in general solid waste management and in specific issues relevant for the different working areas. 2.12 Plan and undertake public awareness campaigns. Awareness campaigns must be planned and conducted in parallel with the physical improvements of the waste collection system. Table 4.3 Actions to implement composting at households and markets No. Activity 3.1 Establish a working group under the District Solid Waste Management Board that is responsible for the treatment of organic waste at source. 3.2 Carrying out demonstration project within the District (under the PPMU at present) 3.3 Prepare guideline instructing how to operate a mesophilic storage unit
February April 2012 April 2012 May July 2012 May July 2012 May July 2012 June August 2012 June August 2012 June Sept. 2012 June Dec. 2012 June - Dec. 2012
2012 2016
79
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan No. 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 Activity Organise public information through the Environmental Communication Teams Implement the use of mesophilic storage units in selected areas. Provide technical and financial support to the households. Monitoring and evaluating the results of the mesophilic storage units Preparing plan to expand this composting model among residential areas Preparing project of market waste composting system and get approval Purchase any required equipment Dates 2012-2013 January 2012 December 2013 2012 2013 2014-2016 March June 2012 June Sept. 2012 October 2012 2013 - 2015
3.10 Operating market waste composting system 3.10 Expand system to other markets Table 4.4 Actions to be taken to establish a sanitary landfill for the District No. Activity 4.1 Establish a working group under the District Solid Waste Management Board that is responsible for the construction of the sanitary landfill 4.2 Tender the design of the new sanitary landfill 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 Get Construction and Investment report approved Complete Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Get EIA approved Tender the construction of the new sanitary landfill Construct the sanitary landfill and ancillary systems Tender and purchase of landfill moving equipment
Dates: March 2012 January March 2012 March - June 2012 June Sept. 2012 Sept. - October 2012 October Dec. 2012 January Dec. 2013 April Dec. 2013 December 2013
Training of landfill staff in proper landfill operation and maintenance: The training should cover overall landfill aspects (proper disposal techniques, environmental monitoring etc.) and specific training in operation and maintenance of new landfill equipment and facilities 4.10 The landfill starts receiving waste 4.11 Close old dumpsites
Table 4.5 Actions to be taken to ensure all healthcare waste is collected and treated No. Activity Dates: 5.1 Establish a working group under the District Solid Waste Management March 2012 Board that is responsible for healthcare waste management 5.2 Determine what institutions (private clinics, commune health stations, April 2012 etc.) generate infections waste that is not treated 5.3 Resolve who will pay for the treatment of the collected waste May - June 2012 5.4 Plan a collection system and determine what equipment is required May - June
80
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan No. 5.5 5.6 Activity (plastic bags, bins, safety equipment, etc.) Purchase any required equipment Training of health station and clinic staff in the labelling, storage, handling and transport of infectious waste. Training in the proper use of safety equipment. Start receiving and treating infectious waste from all sources. Dates: 2012 July August 2012 September 2012 October 2012
5.7
Table 4.6 Actions to be taken to improve the management of industrial waste No. Activity 6.1 Establish a working group under the District Solid Waste Management Board that is responsible for industrial waste management 6.2 Determine the types and characteristics of the industrial waste generated within the District. Establish a plan for the management of the identified industrial waste. 6.3 If necessary, resolve who will pay for the treatment of the industrial waste 6.4 If needed, draft and have the DPC approve a new decision regarding reporting requirement, as well as the storage, handling and disposal regulations for industrial waste generators. 6.5 Purchase any required equipment (protective clothing, storage containers, etc.) 6.6 Training of District staff, industrial cluster staff and waste collection staff in the proper procedures for segregating various waste streams, as well as their storage, transportation and disposal. 6.7 Implement the industrial waste management system and provision of technical assistance to resolve any issues.
Dates: March 2012 May September 2012 October December 2012 October December 2012 January 2013 February April 2013 April September 2013
81
Annex A
82
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 17,533 17,308 11,411 15,755 10,853 13,472 8,583 10,136 10,693 12,500 8,614 8,981 18,208 7,841 8,908 180,797 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 15,780 13,847 5,705 7,877 5,427 6,736 4,292 5,068 5,346 6,250 4,307 4,490 9,104 3,920 4,454 102,604 Sold to Recyclers % 15% 15% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 2,367 2,077 571 788 543 674 429 507 535 625 431 449 910 392 445 11,742
2010 Treated/ Treated/ Composted Composted at Source at Source % (kg/day) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Balance of Waste (kg/day) 13,413 11,770 5,135 7,090 4,884 6,063 3,863 4,561 4,812 5,625 3,876 4,041 8,194 3,528 4,009 90,863 Rate of collection (%) 50% 50% 0% 15% 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 15% 0% 15% 15% 0% 15% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 6,706 5,885 1,063 722 844 606 1,229 601 18,186
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
83
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 17,736 17,509 11,543 15,937 10,979 13,629 8,683 10,254 10,817 12,645 8,714 9,085 18,419 7,932 9,011 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 15,963 14,007 5,772 7,969 5,490 6,814 4,341 5,127 5,408 6,323 4,357 4,543 9,209 3,966 4,506 103,795 Sold to Recyclers % 15% 15% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 2,394 2,101 577 797 549 681 434 513 541 632 436 454 921 397 451 11,878
2011 Treated/ Treated/ Composted Composted at Source at Source % (kg/day) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Balance of Waste (kg/day) 13,568 11,906 5,194 7,172 4,941 6,133 3,907 4,614 4,867 5,690 3,921 4,088 8,289 3,569 4,055 91,917 Rate of collection (%) 50% 50% 0% 15% 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 15% 0% 15% 15% 0% 15% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 6,784 5,953 1,076 730 854 613 1,243 608 18,397
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
84
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 17,942 17,712 11,677 16,122 11,107 13,787 8,784 10,373 10,942 12,792 8,815 9,191 18,633 8,024 9,116 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 16,148 14,170 5,839 8,061 5,553 6,893 4,392 5,186 5,471 6,396 4,407 4,595 9,316 4,012 4,558 104,999 Sold to Recyclers % 15% 15% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 2,422 2,125 584 806 555 689 439 519 547 640 441 460 932 401 456 12,016
2012 Treated/ Treated/ Composted Composted at Source at Source % (kg/day) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Balance of Waste (kg/day) 13,726 12,044 5,255 7,255 4,998 6,204 3,953 4,668 4,924 5,756 3,967 4,136 8,385 3,611 4,102 92,983 Rate of collection (%) 70% 70% 0% 30% 0% 0% 0% 0% 30% 30% 0% 30% 30% 30% 30% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 9,608 8,431 2,177 1,477 1,727 1,241 2,515 1,083 1,231 29,490
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
85
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 18,150 17,918 11,813 16,309 11,236 13,947 8,886 10,493 11,069 12,940 8,917 9,297 18,849 8,117 9,222 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 16,335 14,334 5,906 8,155 5,618 6,973 4,443 5,247 5,535 6,470 4,459 4,649 9,424 4,058 4,611 106,217 Sold to Recyclers % 15% 15% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 2,450 2,150 591 815 562 697 444 525 553 647 446 465 942 406 461 12,155
2013 Treated/ Composted at Source % 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% Treated/ Composted at Source (kg/day) 1,634 1,433 591 815 562 697 444 525 553 647 446 465 942 406 461 10,622 Balance of Waste (kg/day) 12,251 10,751 4,725 6,524 4,494 5,579 3,554 4,197 4,428 5,176 3,567 3,719 7,540 3,247 3,689 83,440 Rate of collection (%) 70% 70% 0% 30% 0% 30% 0% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 8,576 7,525 1,957 1,674 1,259 1,328 1,553 1,070 1,116 2,262 974 1,107 30,401
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
86
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 18,361 18,126 11,950 16,498 11,366 14,109 8,989 10,615 11,197 13,091 9,020 9,405 19,067 8,211 9,329 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 16,525 14,501 5,975 8,249 5,683 7,054 4,494 5,307 5,599 6,545 4,510 4,703 9,534 4,106 4,664 107,449 Sold to Recyclers % 15% 15% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 2,479 2,175 597 825 568 705 449 531 560 655 451 470 953 411 466 12,296
2014 Treated/ Composted at Source % 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% Treated/ Composted at Source (kg/day) 2,479 2,175 896 1,237 852 1,058 674 796 840 982 677 705 1,430 616 700 16,117 Balance of Waste (kg/day) 11,567 10,150 4,481 6,187 4,262 5,291 3,371 3,981 4,199 4,909 3,383 3,527 7,150 3,079 3,498 79,035 Rate of collection (%) 70% 70% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 8,097 7,105 1,344 1,856 1,279 1,587 1,011 1,194 1,260 1,473 1,015 1,058 2,145 924 1,049 32,398
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
87
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 18,574 18,336 12,088 16,690 11,498 14,272 9,093 10,738 11,327 13,242 9,125 9,514 19,289 8,306 9,437 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 16,716 14,669 6,044 8,345 5,749 7,136 4,546 5,369 5,664 6,621 4,563 4,757 9,644 4,153 4,718 108,695 Sold to Recyclers % 18% 15% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 3,009 2,200 725 1,001 690 856 546 644 680 795 548 571 1,157 498 566 14,486
2015 Treated/ Composted at Source % 15% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% Treated/ Composted at Source (kg/day) 2,507 2,934 1,209 1,669 1,150 1,427 909 1,074 1,133 1,324 913 951 1,929 831 944 20,903 Balance of Waste (kg/day) 11,200 9,535 4,110 5,675 3,909 4,853 3,092 3,651 3,851 4,502 3,103 3,235 6,558 2,824 3,209 73,305 Rate of collection (%) 70% 70% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 7,840 6,674 1,233 1,702 1,173 1,456 927 1,095 1,155 1,351 931 970 1,967 847 963 30,286
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
88
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 18,789 18,549 12,228 16,883 11,631 14,438 9,198 10,862 11,459 13,396 9,231 9,624 19,512 8,403 9,546 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 16,910 14,839 6,114 8,442 5,816 7,219 4,599 5,431 5,729 6,698 4,615 4,812 9,756 4,201 4,773 109,956 Sold to Recyclers % 18% 15% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 3,044 2,226 734 1,013 698 866 552 652 688 804 554 577 1,171 504 573 14,655
2016 Treated/ Composted at Source % 15% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% Treated/ Composted at Source (kg/day) 2,537 2,968 1,223 1,688 1,163 1,444 920 1,086 1,146 1,340 923 962 1,951 840 955 21,146 Balance of Waste (kg/day) 11,330 9,645 4,158 5,740 3,955 4,909 3,127 3,693 3,896 4,555 3,139 3,272 6,634 2,857 3,246 74,156 Rate of collection (%) 70% 70% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 7,931 6,752 1,247 1,722 1,186 1,473 938 1,108 1,169 1,366 942 982 1,990 857 974 30,637
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
89
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 19,007 18,764 12,370 17,079 11,766 14,605 9,305 10,988 11,592 13,551 9,338 9,736 19,739 8,500 9,657 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 17,107 15,011 6,185 8,540 5,883 7,303 4,653 5,494 5,796 6,776 4,669 4,868 9,869 4,250 4,829 111,231 Sold to Recyclers % 18% 15% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 3,079 2,252 742 1,025 706 876 558 659 695 813 560 584 1,184 510 579 14,824
2017 Treated/ Composted at Source % 15% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% Treated/ Composted at Source (kg/day) 2,566 3,002 1,237 1,708 1,177 1,461 931 1,099 1,159 1,355 934 974 1,974 850 966 21,391 Balance of Waste (kg/day) 11,461 9,757 4,206 5,807 4,000 4,966 3,164 3,736 3,941 4,607 3,175 3,310 6,711 2,890 3,283 75,016 Rate of collection (%) 70% 70% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 8,023 6,830 1,262 1,742 1,200 1,490 949 1,121 1,182 1,382 952 993 2,013 867 985 30,992
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
90
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 19,228 18,981 12,514 17,277 11,903 14,775 9,413 11,116 11,726 13,709 9,446 9,849 19,968 8,599 9,769 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 17,305 15,185 6,257 8,639 5,951 7,387 4,707 5,558 5,863 6,854 4,723 4,925 9,984 4,299 4,885 112,522 Sold to Recyclers % 18% 15% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 3,115 2,278 751 1,037 714 886 565 667 704 823 567 591 1,198 516 586 14,996
2018 Treated/ Composted at Source % 15% 20% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% Treated/ Composted at Source (kg/day) 2,596 3,037 1,564 2,160 1,488 1,847 1,177 1,389 1,466 1,714 1,181 1,231 2,496 1,075 1,221 25,641 Balance of Waste (kg/day) 11,594 9,870 3,942 5,442 3,749 4,654 2,965 3,502 3,694 4,318 2,976 3,102 6,290 2,709 3,077 71,885 Rate of collection (%) 70% 70% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 8,116 6,909 1,183 1,633 1,125 1,396 890 1,050 1,108 1,295 893 931 1,887 813 923 30,151
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
91
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 19,451 19,202 12,659 17,478 12,041 14,946 9,522 11,245 11,862 13,868 9,556 9,963 20,199 8,699 9,883 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 17,506 15,361 6,329 8,739 6,020 7,473 4,761 5,622 5,931 6,934 4,778 4,982 10,100 4,349 4,941 113,827 Sold to Recyclers % 18% 15% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 3,151 2,304 760 1,049 722 897 571 675 712 832 573 598 1,212 522 593 15,170
2019 Treated/ Composted at Source % 15% 20% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% Treated/ Composted at Source (kg/day) 2,626 3,072 1,582 2,185 1,505 1,868 1,190 1,406 1,483 1,733 1,194 1,245 2,525 1,087 1,235 25,938 Balance of Waste (kg/day) 11,729 9,985 3,988 5,506 3,793 4,708 3,000 3,542 3,737 4,368 3,010 3,138 6,363 2,740 3,113 72,718 Rate of collection (%) 70% 70% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 8,210 6,989 1,396 1,927 1,327 1,648 1,050 1,240 1,308 1,529 1,054 1,098 2,227 959 1,090 33,051
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
92
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 19,676 19,424 12,806 17,681 12,180 15,119 9,633 11,375 12,000 14,028 9,667 10,079 20,434 8,799 9,997 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 17,709 15,539 6,403 8,840 6,090 7,560 4,816 5,688 6,000 7,014 4,833 5,039 10,217 4,400 4,999 115,147 Sold to Recyclers % 18% 18% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 3,188 2,797 768 1,061 731 907 578 683 720 842 580 605 1,226 528 600 15,813
2020 Treated/ Composted at Source % 15% 20% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Treated/ Composted at Source (kg/day) 2,656 3,108 1,921 2,652 1,827 2,268 1,445 1,706 1,800 2,104 1,450 1,512 3,065 1,320 1,500 30,334 Balance of Waste (kg/day) 11,865 9,634 3,714 5,127 3,532 4,385 2,793 3,299 3,480 4,068 2,803 2,923 5,926 2,552 2,899 69,001 Rate of collection (%) 80% 80% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 9,492 7,708 1,485 2,051 1,413 1,754 1,117 1,320 1,392 1,627 1,121 1,169 2,370 1,021 1,160 36,200
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
93
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 19,905 19,650 12,954 17,886 12,322 15,295 9,744 11,507 12,139 14,191 9,779 10,196 20,671 8,902 10,113 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 17,914 15,720 6,477 8,943 6,161 7,647 4,872 5,754 6,069 7,096 4,889 5,098 10,335 4,451 5,057 116,483 Sold to Recyclers % 18% 18% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 3,225 2,830 777 1,073 739 918 585 690 728 851 587 612 1,240 534 607 15,996
2021 Treated/ Composted at Source % 15% 20% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Treated/ Composted at Source (kg/day) 2,687 3,144 1,943 2,683 1,848 2,294 1,462 1,726 1,821 2,129 1,467 1,529 3,101 1,335 1,517 30,686 Balance of Waste (kg/day) 12,003 9,746 3,757 5,187 3,573 4,436 2,826 3,337 3,520 4,115 2,836 2,957 5,994 2,581 2,933 69,801 Rate of collection (%) 80% 80% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 9,602 7,797 1,503 2,075 1,429 1,774 1,130 1,335 1,408 1,646 1,134 1,183 2,398 1,033 1,173 36,620
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
94
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 20,136 19,878 13,105 18,093 12,464 15,472 9,857 11,641 12,280 14,356 9,892 10,314 20,910 9,005 10,230 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 18,122 15,902 6,552 9,047 6,232 7,736 4,929 5,820 6,140 7,178 4,946 5,157 10,455 4,502 5,115 117,834 Sold to Recyclers % 18% 18% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 3,262 2,862 786 1,086 748 928 591 698 737 861 594 619 1,255 540 614 16,182
2022 Treated/ Composted at Source % 15% 20% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Treated/ Composted at Source (kg/day) 2,718 3,180 1,966 2,714 1,870 2,321 1,479 1,746 1,842 2,153 1,484 1,547 3,137 1,351 1,535 31,042 Balance of Waste (kg/day) 12,142 9,859 3,800 5,247 3,615 4,487 2,859 3,376 3,561 4,163 2,869 2,991 6,064 2,611 2,967 70,611 Rate of collection (%) 80% 80% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 9,713 7,887 1,520 2,099 1,446 1,795 1,143 1,350 1,424 1,665 1,148 1,196 2,426 1,045 1,187 37,045
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
95
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 20,369 20,108 13,257 18,303 12,609 15,652 9,972 11,776 12,422 14,522 10,007 10,434 21,153 9,109 10,349 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 18,332 16,087 6,628 9,152 6,305 7,826 4,986 5,888 6,211 7,261 5,004 5,217 10,576 4,555 5,175 119,201 Sold to Recyclers % 18% 18% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 3,300 2,896 795 1,098 757 939 598 707 745 871 600 626 1,269 547 621 16,369
2023 Treated/ Composted at Source % 15% 20% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Treated/ Composted at Source (kg/day) 2,750 3,217 1,988 2,745 1,891 2,348 1,496 1,766 1,863 2,178 1,501 1,565 3,173 1,366 1,552 31,402 Balance of Waste (kg/day) 12,283 9,974 3,844 5,308 3,657 4,539 2,892 3,415 3,602 4,211 2,902 3,026 6,134 2,642 3,001 71,430 Rate of collection (%) 80% 80% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 9,826 7,979 1,730 2,389 1,645 2,043 1,301 1,537 1,621 1,895 1,306 1,362 2,760 1,189 1,351 39,933
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
96
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 20,605 20,341 13,410 18,515 12,755 15,833 10,088 11,912 12,566 14,691 10,123 10,555 21,398 9,215 10,469 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 18,545 16,273 6,705 9,258 6,378 7,917 5,044 5,956 6,283 7,345 5,062 5,277 10,699 4,607 5,235 120,584 Sold to Recyclers % 18% 18% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 3,338 2,929 805 1,111 765 950 605 715 754 881 607 633 1,284 553 628 16,559
2024 Treated/ Composted at Source % 15% 20% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Treated/ Composted at Source (kg/day) 2,782 3,255 2,012 2,777 1,913 2,375 1,513 1,787 1,885 2,204 1,518 1,583 3,210 1,382 1,570 31,766 Balance of Waste (kg/day) 12,425 10,089 3,889 5,369 3,699 4,592 2,925 3,455 3,644 4,260 2,936 3,061 6,206 2,672 3,036 72,259 Rate of collection (%) 80% 80% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 9,940 8,071 1,750 2,416 1,665 2,066 1,316 1,555 1,640 1,917 1,321 1,377 2,792 1,203 1,366 40,396
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
97
Year Waste Generated per Person (kg/person) 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Population (people) 20,844 20,577 13,566 18,730 12,903 16,017 10,205 12,051 12,712 14,861 10,241 10,677 21,647 9,322 10,591 Total Waste Generated (kg/day) 18,760 16,462 6,783 9,365 6,452 8,008 5,102 6,025 6,356 7,431 5,120 5,339 10,823 4,661 5,295 121,983 Sold to Recyclers % 18% 18% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% Sold to Recyclers (kg/day) 3,377 2,963 814 1,124 774 961 612 723 763 892 614 641 1,299 559 635 16,751
2025 Treated/ Composted at Source % 15% 20% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% Treated/ Composted at Source (kg/day) 2,814 3,292 2,035 2,810 1,935 2,403 1,531 1,808 1,907 2,229 1,536 1,602 3,247 1,398 1,589 32,135 Balance of Waste (kg/day) 12,569 10,206 3,934 5,432 3,742 4,645 2,959 3,495 3,686 4,310 2,970 3,096 6,278 2,703 3,071 73,097 Rate of collection (%) 80% 80% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% Garbage from collection (kg/day) 10,055 8,165 1,967 2,716 1,871 2,322 1,480 1,747 1,843 2,155 1,485 1,548 3,139 1,352 1,536 43,381
No.
Locality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binh Dinh Dap Da Nhon My Nhon Thanh Nhon Hanh Nhon Hau Nhon Phong Nhon An Nhon Phuc Nhon Hung Nhon Khanh Nhon Loc Nhon Hoa Nhon Tan Nhon Tho TOTAL
98
Annex B
Map of District
99
100
Annex C Investment costs and operating costs for An Nhon Sanitary Landfill
Table C1: Total investment Cost estimate Work: Sanitary Landfill In An Nhon District Location: An Nhon District, Binh Dinh Province NR 1 2 3 4 5 6 Of which: COST ITEM Construction cost inclusive of tax Equipment cost inclusive of tax Project management cost Investment consultancy cost Other cost Contingency 10% Total Construction cost without tax Equipment cost without tax Currency: VND TOTAL 33,136,313,000 10,169,079,000 680,832,000 1,825,186,000 374,316,000 4,618,572,600 50,804,299,000 29,825,664,000 9,244,617,000
101
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan Table C2 Estimation for the investment costs for An Nhon Sanitary Landfill No. A I 1 2 II 1 2 3 III 1 2 3 4 5 IV IV.1 1 2 3 4 5 IV.2 1 2 V 1 Item Construction cost before tax Access road Dirt road, width of 3.5m, sod facing on both sides of 1.5m Sign boards, stacks, transportation safety Bridge scale and car/truck washing bridge, material stockpile area Bridge scale, RC foundation Car washing bridge Material stockpile area, concrete of 4x6 crushed stone, thickness of 20cm, on compacted soil Office, guardhouse, fences Site office: Class III, bricked wall, metal sheet roof, metal roof trusses, false ceiling Guardhouse, area S = (3.6x3.6), bricked wall, RC roof Car/motorbike parking, metal roof trusses Gates, wall height of 2m built by bricks B40 net fences, RC piles Landfill cells and Bio-ponds Landfill cells Excavation, leveling and compaction of landfill cells, soil Class III Construction of cell bottom with impermeable clay, stones, sand HDPE sheet thickness of 2mm Internal roads: Compacted crushed stone, K=0.95, road width of 6m Surface drainage ditch: Wet masonry open canal, size of 600x700 Bio-ponds Excavation, leveling and compaction of Bio-ponds, soil Class II HDPE sheet thickness of 2mm Water supply and electric system Water supply networks of moisten, truck washing, pump station m3 m2 304.00 546.00 114,954 222,027 Unit Quantity Unit Price (VND) Total Amount (VND) 29,825,664,000 705,940,000 692,100,090 13,840,000 1,131,901,000 m2 m2 m2 13.20 24.20 600.00 8,108,823 34,690,904 308,908 107,036,464 839,519,877 185,344,800 1,608,528,000 m2 m2 m2 m m 98.00 12.96 120.00 100.00 520.00 4,363,319 6,564,285 4,363,319 1,505,924 810,882 427,605,262 85,073,134 523,598,280 150,592,400 421,658,640 24,579,640,000 24,423,467,344 3,008,865,340 10,062,284,445 10,228,339,836 376,095,003 747,882,720 156,172,758 34,946,016 121,226,742 271,864,000
m LS
1,445.00 1.00
478,962 13,840,000
m3 m3 m2 m m
102
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan uPVC Pipe Dia. DN50 HDPE Pipe Dia. DN50 Water supply pump station Electric system Leachate collection system Installation and back-up 4 catchpits 800x800x800 by RC and 1 leachate collecting well by RC, Dia. 1500mm, height of 6m uPVC pipes, Dia. DN160, perforating of 20% area uPVC pipes, Dia. DN250, perforating 20% area Monitoring system and gas collection system Observation wells, Dia. 150, depth of 22m Gas collection system by uPVC pipes Dia. 150, perforating of 20% area Equipment cost before tax Water supply system and pump station Pump, capacity Q = 5m3/h, H = 35m Equipment/machinery in pump station Water supply well, Q = 4m3/day, H = 25-30m Water treatment equipment Scale station Weighbridge Car/truck washing station Car/truck washing equipment Observation wells Well, uPVC pipes Dia. 150, depth of 22m Operation equipment/machinery Caterpillar bulldozer 100CV, made in USA Dump truck, 2 wheels, 5 tonnes, made in Korea Excavator 0.4 0.6m3 made in Korea Equipments in workshop Electric equipments Copper wire OVAL, PVC insulator m 1,584.00 27,000 m m m2 LS 1,119.00 1,119.00 4.00 1.00 43,440 105,876 2,061,388 96,533,604 48,609,360 118,475,244 8,245,552 96,533,604 1,292,450,000 46,325,337 34,752,097 484,992,718 726,379,848 235,341,000 Nos m 2.00 78.20 96,533,604 540,588 193,067,208 42,273,982 9,244,617,000 100,585,000 LS LS Nos LS LS LS Nos 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 10,320,000 3,807,000 45,683,000 30,455,000 761,379,000 30,455,000 45,683,000 20,640,000 3,807,000 45,683,000 30,455,000 761,379,000 761,379,000 30,455,000 30,455,000 91,366,000 91,366,000 5,821,655,000 Nos Nos Nos LS 1.00 3,150,000,000 1.00 805,800,000 3,150,000,000 805,800,000 1,713,578,580 152,276,000 363,007,000 42,768,000
2 VI
1 2 3 VII 1 2 B I 1 2 3 4 II III IV
LS m m
V 1 2 3 4 VI 1
103
An Nhon District Solid Waste Management Plan 2 3 4 Light poles Generator KDE 12STA, diesel engine driven; 9,5 KVA LS Nos 14.00 1.00 1.00 11,878,000 96,747,000 57,200,000 166,292,000 96,747,000 57,200,000 2,076,170,000 2.00 1.00 35,420,000 5,330,000 70,840,000 5,330,000 2,000,000,000 39,070,281,000
Transformer 25 KVA LS Leachate treatment system VII (Q= 50 m3/day.night) 1 Leachate pump Nos Equipment/machinery for pump 2 LS station Leachate treatment system and 3 LS pump well at the collection well Total construction and equipment cost before tax
1.00 2,000,000,000
104
Table C3 Estimation for the operating costs for the An Nhon Sanitary Landfill
Year Nr Item Investment phasing (Construction cost before tax) Daily average of waste Density of waste in dumpsite Daily average volume of waste Soil cover, (1m of waste/20cm of soil cover) Final soil cover and top soil for plantation (60cm of soil cover + 30cm of top soil) Annual volume of landfill Cumulative volume of landfill Unit 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
MVND
12,212
14,647
6,106
6,106
1 2 3 4
m3
2.07
3.32
3.42
3.64
3.41
3.45
3.49
3.39
3.72
4.07
4.12
4.17
4.49
4.54
4.88
6 7
m3 m3
17,357
19,068 36,961
17,825 54,786
18,032 72,818
18,241 91,059
17,746 108,805
19,453 128,257
21,306 149,563
21,553 171,116
21,803 192,920
23,503 216,423
23,776 240,198
25,532 265,731
Build cell # 3
Build cell # 4
9 II
1,945
105
Shifts of bulldozer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Diesel oil Closure of landfill cells Maintenance of access road Maintenance of vehicles Maintenance of equipment and facility Electricity Chemicals for leachate treatment plant Salary for landfill staff
86.00 85.00
92.00 91.00
86.00 85.00
88.00 87.00
86.00 85.00
103.00 102.00
104.00 103.00
114.00 113.00
115.00 114.00
106
Table C4 Cost estimation for the operating costs for the An Nhon Sanitary Landfill when it is shared with Tay Son District
Year No. Item Investment phasing (Construction cost before tax) Daily average of waste Density of waste in dumpsite Daily average volume of waste Soil cover, (1m of waste/20cm of soil cover) Final soil cover and top soil for plantation (60cm of soil cover + 30cm of top soil) Annual volume of landfill Cumulative volume of landfill Unit 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
MVND
11,429
16,647
11,429
11,429
11,429
1 2 3 4
m3
4.61
6.34
6.40
6.69
6.66
6.79
6.89
6.76
7.30
7.83
7.97
8.09
8.58
8.68
9.19
6 7
m3 m3
33,180
33,502
34,988
34,829
35,514
36,027
35,350
38,206
40,983
41,673
42,322
44,898
45,419
48,080
68,490
103,319
174,861
248,416
289,400
373,395
418,293
463,712
511,792
9 II
2,124
1,912
2,126
107
Shifts of bulldozer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Diesel oil Closure of landfill cells Maintenance of access road Maintenance of vehicles Maintenance of equipment and facility Electricity Chemicals for leachate treatment plant Salary for landfill staff
161.00 159.00
168.00 166.00
171.00 169.00
198.00 196.00
217.00 215.00
108
Annex D
Implementation Schedule
109
Authority Decisions
Establish District Solid Waste Management Board Approve District Solid Waste Management Plan Approve budgets and establish financing Decision to establish a provincial WRC Amend legislation Supervise implementation Establish working group Determine whether a new tariff system is required for the different users Determine equipment to be purchased Purchase bins and containers Purchase waste collection trucks *
* *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
***
110
**
***
**
**
***
**
**
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
111
OctDec
JanMar
OctDec
JanMar
OctDec
JanMar
OctDec
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
*** *
112
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
113
JanMar
OctDec.
***
JanMar
OctDec.
JanMar
OctDec.
JanMar
OctDec.
JanMar
OctDec.
Tender the construction of the new sanitary landfill Construct the sanitary landfill
***
***
***
***
Purchase of landfill *** moving equipment Training of landfill staff The landfill starts receiving waste Close old dumpsites Actions to be taken to ensure all healthcare waste is collected & treated
Establish a working group Determine what institutions generate waste that is not treated Resolve who will pay for the *
***
***
***
***
**
114
**
**
115
2011 2012 Sept Oct- Jan- Apr- July- Oct- JanDec. Mar June Sep. Dec. Mar Actions to be taken to improve the management of industrial waste Activities
Establish a working group Determine the characteristics of the industrial waste and establish a plan If necessary, resolve who will pay If needed, draft and have the DPC approve a new decision Purchase any required equipment Training of District staff, industrial cluster staff and waste collection staff Implement the industrial waste management system *
OctDec.
JanMar
OctDec.
JanMar
OctDec.
JanMar
OctDec.
**
***
** **
**
***
***
116