Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Karan Vasisht
M. Pharm., Ph.D. Professor of Pharmacognosy
enzyme activity until their deactivation, decompartation of chemicals during cutting and crushing, oxidation from air & light, radiation effect, physical loss of components
Chemical standardization
Identification of analyte (marker) Estimation of marker in the drug material
Identification of marker
Constituents of a medicinal plant material which are chemically defined and of interest for control purposes
Chemically characterized Preferably biologically active Quantitative correlation to said activity Specific to plant
ubiquitous plant constituents to be avoided
Identification of a marker
Procedure Instrument
Specificity
Should specifically measure analyte of interest It is not always possible to demonstrate specificity of analysis procedure for the analyte (complete discrimination) Two or more assay procedures are necessary to demonstrate necessary level of discrimination Deduced from positive results with mixture containing analyte and negative results from mixture containing similar compounds but no analyte Especially valuable when analyzing analyte among similar compound in the mixture
Linearity
EGCG (ng) Mean AUCSD
800
23471 19.0
600 AUC (x103)
R =1 y = 2240.7x + 1175.4
EGCG (ng)
Accuracy
How close is the measurement to actual value Should be specified across the range of analytical procedure Application of the procedure to substance of known purity Application of the procedure to test sample after spiking Inferred from 9 measurements (triplicates of three concentrations in the range)
Precision
Repeatability from 9 measurements (triplicates of three concentration in the range) or 6 measurements at 100% of test concentration (intra-lab, same analyst, same equipment) Intermediate precision using different days, analysts and equipment Reproducibility by means of inter-laboratory trials (when procedure is recommended for wider use say pharmacopoeial procedure)
Detection limit
Several approaches Based on signal to noise ratio (> 2:1 or 3:1) Standard deviation and response (Detection limit = 3.3 SD/slope) Based on standard deviation of blank measurements Standard deviation of regression lines
Quantitation limit
Established from experiments, minimum level of analyte at which it can be reliably quantified Based on signal to noise ratio (quantitation limit = 10 standard deviation / slope)
Robustness
Extraction time Stability of analytical solutions Pertaining to HPLC:
Columns, different lots or manufacturers, pH and composition of mobile phase, temperature influence, flow rate
Accessibility
10
11
12
Sample application
Usual concentration of applied samples 0.1 to 1 g / L for qualitative analysis and quantity may vary in quantitation based on UV absorption 1 to 5 L for spot and 10 L for band application Better results with band application in quantitation as narrow band is better suited to optics of the TLC scanner Manual, semi-auto or auto application Manual with calibrated capillaries Semi and auto-application through applicators Applicators use spray on or touch and deliver technique for application
Sample application
Band application
Spot application
13
Development of plates
Best achieved in special purpose TLC chambers Improvised use of all types of chambers possible Twin-trough chambers allow saturation of chamber with different mobile phase Pre-saturation decreases Rf values and corrects side distortion of solvent front
14
15
Chromatogram evaluation
Scanning of tracks in TLC scanner in transmittance, reflected or fluorescence mode Multi-wavelength scanning possible UV scanning standard on all scanners Transmittance and fluorescence modes optional Data acquisition through standard softwares provided with the instrument
16
HPTLC vs TLC
Smaller size of adsorbent particles (100 vs 250 m) Narrow range of particle size, more homogenous layers Better resolution over shorter runs More precision and accuracy Normal run 3-5 cm vs 8-10 cm Because of shorter run analysis time is reduced But fairly expensive in comparison to TLC Not necessarily essential in all analyses Used where resolution on ordinary plates is poor
17
Calibration curve: Six different concentration from 0.5 to 3.0 L of std Solvent system: Toluene: Ethyl acetate (9:1) Instrument: Camag TLC scanner Wave length: 305 nm Estimation of DPH-1: AUC of DPH in 1 L spotted test solution and estimation using calibration curve Result ( % of DPH-1): 0.26 % in sample 1 and 1.45 % in sample 2
18
Saussurea costus
Traditional uses
Anti-inflammatory Antiasthmatic
Chemical constituents
Costunolide Dehydrocostus lactone Alantolactone Isoalantolactone -Cyclocostunolide Isodehydrocostus lactone Isozaluzanin C
19
Dehydrocostus lactone
CC Silica gel
Freezer crystallization
Drug
Extract
Costunolide
M.Liquor
Costunolide
Crystallization
Dehydrocostuslactone calibration
3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 200 400 Conc ng y = 4.2224x + 92.933 R2 = 0.9988
600
800
20
Analysis steps Weigh exactly about 5 g root powder Extract in Soxhlet with 50 ml methanol for 4h Filter and make up the volume to 50 mL Take 1 ml, dilute to 50 mL and use 10 L Develop the plate and scan at 220 nm Record the AUC and calculate the concentration from the standard curves
21
22
HPLC instrumentation
Instrumentation
23
HPLC
Solvent reservoir:
glass or stainless steel
solvents must be degassed to eliminate formation of bubbles and base line noise are to be primed to remove any bubble that may be in solvent delivery line normally a linear ramp is used to change the composition but convex and concave ramping curves are also available fixed volume loop or variable volume injection normal phase or reverse phase, several sizes, packing material, support material UV, PDA, RI, EC, FL, ELSD, CD Several good softwares from manufacturers or from third parties
Detector:
24
Flow rate
Normal pump variations 0.3% same magnitude of variation in Rt
Column temperature
At 25 C variation of 3 C will transform to 1.5% variation in the Rt. Control to about 0.4 C for 1% and 0.04 C for high precision of 0.1%.
Recording errors
Variation of 0.38 s at Rt 6.283 min (RSD 0.1%), 0.2 s at 8.119 (RSD 0.04%)
Peak areas
Area of peak = Detector response x wt of solute / flow rate Flow rate variation will elicit same variation in peak area; reduction of 1% will increase the peak area by 1% and height by 0.3% Changes in temperature will introduce error in peak area as it does for retention time Same is true for composition change The performance of the integration system will contribute to variation in measured peak areas Peak start and end measurements Inversely proportional to signal to noise ration, low noise better precision
25
Extra-column effects
Injection Volume Injector Connection Tubing Endfittings and Frits Detector Volume
Injection volume
26
Connecting tubes
27
Standard curve
Stock solution: 0.0984 mg/ml methanol Injection volume: 5 L Linearity range: 10 to 280 ng
EGCG (ng) Mean AUCSD
800
23471 19.0
AUC (x103)
R =1 y = 2240.7x + 1175.4
EGCG (ng)
28
EGCG (mg/g)
50 40
48.39 53.6
30 20 10 0
57.12
Methanol
Water 60
Water 80
Ethyl acetate
60 50
EGCG (mg/g)
40 16.44 30 20 10 0
40
60
40.65
80
Temperature
42.72
98
53.6
4.32
29
60 50
EGCG (mg/g)
59.06
40 30 20 10 0
40
29.98
60
Temperature
49.55
48.68
80
49.45
48
49.15
30
Sample : solvent
56.54
58.85
52 50 48
Coarse
55.88
Moderately Coarse
Moderately Fine
Fine
56.34
31
40 30 20 10
68.35
58.52
57.82
51.47
50.18
45.44
44.18
42.31
38.12
PA SI -2
PA SI -9
PA SI -8
TV -2
TV -1
wa l
As h
ng ra
TR
R6
Ja
TR
Ka ng ra
Ka
hi n
Va ri e
I-2
I-2
TV -9
02 6
01 7
02 5
ty
33.91
32
Conclusion
HPLC is the workhorse in analytical work and most rapidly advancing with highest level of sensitivity and greatest resolutions achieved not possible with HPTLC Higher sensitivity and reproducibility with HPLC but at higher cost HPTLC is the fastest chromatographic technique which is a time machine and allows to do many things in short spans The multi-component matrix of plant drugs more suited to HPTLC analysis HPLC and HPTLC allow quantification of one or more components Monitoring of changes in multicompound systems possible Both HPTLC and HPLC are indispensable in QC of MAPs
33
34