For the answer of the present questions, it is necessary to bring the simple instructive example, to gain an understanding of it,

and than, make some analogy, in order to obtain the correct interpretation of the Rule 3. Here is that example: From one and the same initial point, simultaneously and with simultaneous velocity start moving two twins, one runs by the roadside, and another speeds by automobile. Task put by: to gain an understanding what is the difference and what is common in these simple motions? It is quite clear that if we look through the present example kinematic , the twins will have all characteristics identical. . If we look at the twins otherwise, but not as at the objects moving in space, but as at alive organisms, possessing some inward inner life, then we find out that there is a great difference between them. The one who runs itself, inner condition (circulation of the blood, metabolism and etc.) is very different, that of the one, who is driving automobile. But why everything was changed so abruptly in the running brother? Because the human is also the clever mechanism, and knows that only by reconstructing whole inner physiology, he is able to provide energetic running of one of the twin. It means that when something is moving itself, or it is made to move it is not one and the same. The twin, who is speeding by automobile, does not feel any necessity to change something in him, because his velocity is maintained at the expense of external exposure (automobile), but not at the expense of some internal changes. Making some analogy with the twins, we may conclude some general rule for every ultimate particle. As it is every ultimate particle moving by the velocity V, somehow slaves the motion, maintaining the necessary energetic balance. (Note: according to the analogy of running twin). If elementary particle is carried away by something it naturally will consequence energetic imbalance. It is clear, because the velocity will be maintained at the expense of external action, but not at the expense of increase of internal energy. It is an interesting drawing. For example, the particle has the high speed, but does not possess internal energetic support. In other words, it means the following: that in case of forced motion, the portion of progressive energy will be increased, but the portion of internal energy will practically be left without changes. There presents the violation of natural energetic balance (See Rule 2). It is quite clear that such condition is not natural for the particle; it is some forced condition and seems non-stable. That is why, clever mechanism working in the particle, will aim to store everything in its places and restore energetic balance. This, in its turn, means increase of the portion of internal energy, but at the expense of what it may increase? It is cleat, that only at the expense of the progressive energy (as whole energy should stay constant). It in its turn means diminish of the velocity of the particle motion. In this way, general conclusion, which can be obtain as a consequence of all aforesaid, is concluded in the following: violated energetic balance in the particle will always be restoring at the expense of diminish of the velocity of progressive motion. This conclusion can be discussed as some addition to the third rule, letting us deeply understand the mechanism of the restoration process in the particle. Here one should make one important remark. It is obvious, that the possibility of deferment of energy is not excluded, also because of the other reasons. Let us recall, that majority of the particles possess spin, magnetic moment and also other

characteristics, which most likely should have been changing with the beginning of motion, because of the deformation of the particle. In reality they maintain desirable constancy. It may be explained only by internal energetic transformation, but not otherwise. If all aforesaid argumentation in some degree are acceptable, then we are entitled to return to the task put by before and try to gain an understanding of in it against a background of these new ideas. As it is, the total target setting is as follows, for example there are two frames and accordingly two observers. The firs system is motionless. The second system mobile, is moving by speed V, with respect to the first. For example, in the second system (of laboratory) there is some particle of the mass m, moving with respect to the second observer with velocity U. It is required to define the velocity of movement of the particle with respect to the first observer. For the simplicity let us suppose V U (See drawing 1)

U (Drawing 1)

The originality of the present task is concluded in, that the particle participates in two real motions: 1) The particle moves itself with the velocity U. 2) The particle is carried away with the laboratory, with velocity V. Thus , there is some superposition of natural motion with forced motion. Here we must recall our discussion that while forced motion the particle should become slower for restoration of energetic balance. In result, for the first sight, quite inoffensive task transformed into the most complicated task, as a matter of fact it is not so easy to observe all of the energetic transformation in the particle, not possessing the complete and exact conception of the particle itself. What one can do? It seems that there is outlet from the present situation. We should try to find whole energy of the particle by superposition of two aforesaid motions. Possessing formula for complete energy, it will not be difficult to define the velocity, which obtains the particle in the given situation. Thus, let us start realization of our program. It is obvious that moving system reports to the particle a certain velocity V, and accordingly transmits certain energy E1 . For the first observation this energy will equal 1+ E1 = MC 2 + MCV = M 0C 2 V C V2 1 2 C

By the present energy the particle will possess, before the start of its own motion with speed U; that is why it is quite obvious that E1 should serve as the initial energy for it. Starting movement with velocity U, the particle obtains certain growth of energy, whole energy calculated by the second observer will equal
U C E2 = E1 U2 1 2 C Here is quite reasonable to put the question as follows: where I have established from that in this case also works such regularity? 1+

Certainty in correctness of the formula for E2 assigns the principle of relativities which consequences that all physical rules are the same in all inertial systems of counting out. If for the second observer one had to write any other formula that that for the first one, it would have meant their inequality, that does not correspond the basic standings of physics. Taking into consideration E1 , one can assign a certain other face to formula E2 , so: 1+ V U 1+ C C 2 V U2 1 2 1 2 C C

E2 = M 0C 2

It is obvious, that the first observer also should assign such energy to the particle, because the energy is defined only by the internal condition of the particle, but it is the same for all, i.e. E1 = E2 Consequently the energy of the particle, participating in two motions should be calculated by the formula V U 1+ 1+ C C E = M 0C 2 (13) 2 V U2 1 2 1 2 C C

It is the result, which we have been aspired to. Carrying out the simple algebraic transformation, the formula for energy may be recorded in more convenient form for us
1 U +V C 1 + UV C2 1 U +V 1 2 C 1 + UV C2 1+

E = M 0C 2

Why is interesting such record? Because its outward looks like the formula for the complete energy of the particle, after all as a matter of fact, by introducing the designation
U +V UV 1+ 2 C We will obtain: V =

E = M 0C 2

1+

V C 2 V 1 2 C

It is a formula of the complete energy for the particle, moving by the velocity V . Thus one may approve with the complete certainty, that the particle participating in two motions will possess the energy

E = M 0C 2

1 U +V C 1 + UV C2 1 U +V 1 2 C 1 + UV C2 1+

And by the velocity -

V =

U +V UV 1+ 2 C

Here I would like to make very important remark: the fact that we were successful to record energy in such form, gives some certainty on the correctness of our discussions. If we were not able, then we would have base to think about. Thus for the resultant velocity we obtained the same result as from the special theory of relativity. But obtained it in a different way; if there this result is obtained by being based on the idea of contraction of space and deceleration of time, then here we obtain it by being based on the specified formula, for the complete energy and principle of relativity. It turned out that this result is nothing else than a direct result of the rule of unanimity and struggle of antipode. In the present example there are two antipodes: the particle and moving system. The moving system violates, but the particle restores internal order. Before I have pointed out that for restoration of the internal order the particle should

diminish the velocity of motion. It is pleasant that this assumption was confirmed by the mathematical calculation. U +V As a matter of fact from formula V = follows, that resulting velocity is less than UV 1+ 2 C it was expected. It means that the particle is reduced, it is a fact! And this reduction is a result of interaction of the particle with itself but not with the system. The system only creates the base for such interaction. In its turn self-braking of the particle may follow the reduction of the velocity of motion of the system itself. If by the reduction of the velocity of the system we do ignore, then the strange way of composition of the velocities can be explained only by the reduction velocity of the particle of motioning laboratory i.e. U. In other words U cannot stay constant and equal of its datum value. By increasing of V, U must be reduced, i.e. by loosing its independence it becomes depended on V. It is easy to become sure that such independence should really exist, by looking through the simple extreme case of motion. After all as a matter of fact, by increase of V to the highest degree, i.e. C, U, cannot maintain its datum value, because then the particle should have to move by the velocity more than deliberate, that is why there is only one outlet, U must get reduced till null, by speeding of V to its highest degree. Such is a mechanism on the view, the strange way of combination of velocities. It is obvious that there is nothing strange in it, simply it takes into consideration influence of the system on the particle and those changes, which it may consequence in it. Thats it! In the conclusion I would like to point out that the general feature of the given version is concluded in its newness. I am deeply sure that today or tomorrow given version or something else should replace already existing one, because the base on which it is based is not correct basically. Later I will try to express my idea concerning it. Now let us continue and recall the formula for general energy by two motions

V U 1+ C C E = M 0C 2 2 V U2 1 2 1 2 C C

1+

It is obvious that it is available to record it otherwise and assign to it more universal aspect. Let us record it as follows
V C E1 = E2 V2 1 2 C

1+

(14)

Where E 1 - energy calculated by the immovable observer. E 2 - energy calculated by movable observer. Look at this, we obtain an interesting rule: energies calculated by two different observers (movable and immovable) will always differ by the multiplier:

 1+ V C 2 1 V C2

responsible for the changes of the energy, resulted by the system itself.

By such record, present formula becomes more important, universal and field of its utilization gets wider. One of the possible usage of given formula we will talk about later, when purely superficially will touch some aspects of pass of light. Before completion of given part it would have been interesting to gain an understanding of how is stored whole energy between its components and by superposition of two motions? It is not difficult to answer this question, because possessing the formula for complete energy, recording it in necessary form for us, we will obtain required answer: as it is

1+ E = M 0C
2

UV C2

V2 U2 1 2 C2 C

+ M 0CV 1

U +V V2 U2 1 2 C2 C

In this formula are two members. The fact that we were successful to record energy in such form, gives some certainly on the correctness of our discussions.

As it is not difficult to understand, the first member in given total indicates the energy of progressive motion, but the second so called internal energy.