Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Truth Between the Lies
Truth Between the Lies
Truth Between the Lies
Ebook586 pages9 hours

Truth Between the Lies

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

This remarkably eye opening book for anyone interested in comparative religion, history and human psychology may find many surprises that challenge what many once believed to be absolute truths. This work reflects a meticulous and painstaking effort to present the findings clearly, concisely and thoroughly as a result of the study of comparative religious ideas, history and the psychological effects which impact adverse results in our present day thinking and correcting errors that crept into history. This effort is not intended to deride people and certainly not to mock anyone's beliefs. The intent is obviously to point out false charges, misconceptions and outright lies are in themselves deriding and mocking and a most odious thing. This book should prove to be a very valuable asset to mankind. People should be aware of what in fact has been taught to mankind as a result of studying this book which efforts to dispel darkness upon us all.
May Gods Peace and Blessings Be With You All.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherXlibris US
Release dateFeb 26, 2016
ISBN9781514457177
Truth Between the Lies
Author

Aaron McDaniels

My entire life I've struggled with reading. Actually I read about as fast as a running turtle. I would guess that this is a part of a disability so knowing this I began to read a lot hoping to fix this problem and clear up many questions I have asked myself for decades attempting to kill two birds with one stone. So I decided to study a subject that I believe matters tremendously. But even after over 20 years of research I still read about as fast as a running turtle but I believe a higher power guides me.

Related to Truth Between the Lies

Related ebooks

Christianity For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Truth Between the Lies

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Truth Between the Lies - Aaron McDaniels

    Chp 1

    AUTHENTICITY

    The word Bible comes from the Greek word biblia meaning books. It is a collection of many books which form the foundation of Christian belief. Admittedly, they have been written by a large number of authors, known and unknown. But those authors are believed to have been inspired by God and they wrote the books under the supervision and guidance of God; hence the Bible is referred to as The Word of God. However, the Catholic Bible is somewhat different from the Protestant Bible, in that the former consists of 73 books, while the latter has only 66 books which makes them both suspicious of their authenticity.

    The Bible in general is divided into two parts, The OLd Testament which was probably written before the advent of Jesus Christ (PBUH) sometime after the return of the Jews from Babylonian captivity (i.e., after the 536 B.C.). The New Testament which was written long after the departure of Jesus Christ (PBUH) describes his life and teachings and activities of his supposed disciples, or apostles, in spreading the Christian religion. The New Testament also contains letters addressed to various Christian groups mostly written by St. Paul who is described as the true founder of modern Christianity. These books of the New Testament were collected and accepted (canonized) as legal in the 4th century (about 367 A.D.). However, there were at the same time hundreds of books (gospels) which were not accepted and some of them still exist today but are regarded as Apocrypha or Hidden by the church elders. The term Apocrypha has been wrongly interpreted as false or not genuine and only the officially accepted four gospels in the Bible are known as Canonical Gospels which are now regarded as The Word of God. One might think that when we refer to the Bible (The King James Version or the Authorized Version of the Bible) as The Word of God it makes it absolutely true and without flaw which consequently earns for it many of glowing tributes from well-known institutions and distinguished personalities all over the world. Yet, the preface of one of many revisions of the Bible (Revised Standard Version 1979) reveals that the so called The Word of God had suffered so much serious defects that neccessitates revision. Further, from the very words of the galaxy of Doctors of Divinity (Thirty-two scholars, assisted by an advisory committee representing 50 cooperating denominations), came the admission that the New Testament of the King James Version which was based on a Greek text is marred by mistakes containing the accumulated errors of 14 centuries of manuscript copying. What is more glaring is the fact, that the Jehovah's Witnesses in their publication Awake!, Brooklyn, N.Y., September 8, 1957, declared that the Bible (The Word of God) contains 50,000 errors.

    Now, let us read what some eminent Christian scholars who dominated Christian theology and those writers and publications of repute have written about the Old Testament and the New Testament of the Bible, The doctrine of the Holy Trinity is not taught in the (Old testament), (New Catholic Encyclopedia).

    Theologians today are in agreement that the Hebrew Bible does not contain the doctrine of Trinity. (The Encyclopedia of Religion).

    The word Trinity is not found in the Bible... it did not find a place formally in the theology of the church till the 4th century. (The Illustrated Bible Dictionary).

    Trinity is not...directly and immediately the word of God. (New Catholic Encyclopedia).

    "The Bible (Old Testament) contains many stories of pornography, whoredom, incest and other undesirable acts which are immoral and devoid of holiness.

    A copyist would sometimes put in not what was in the text, but what he thought ought to be in it. He would trust a fickle memory, or he would make the text accord with the views of the school to which he belonged. In addition to the versions and quotations from the Christian Fathers, nearly 4,000 Greek MSS of the Testament were known to exist. As a result the variety of reading is considerable." (J.R. Dummelow: Commentary on the Holy Bible, P.16).

    "Thus Gospels were produced which clearly reflected the conception of the practical needs of the community for which they were written. In them the traditional material was used, but there was no hesitation in altering it or making additions to it, or in leaving out what did not suit the writers purposes. (T.G Tuker: History of the Christians in the Light of Modern Knowledge, p. 320).

    The elder John used to say, Mark having become Peter's interpreter, wrote down accurately whatsoever he remembered. It was not, however, in exact order that he related the sayings or deeds of Christ. For he neither heard the Lord nor accompanied him, but subsequently as I said attached himself to Peter who used to frame his teaching to meet the wants of his hearers, and not as making a connected narrative of the Lord's discourses. (Roberts and Donaldson (editors), The Anti-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 1, pp. 154-155).

    But a close examination of the treatment he (Matthew) gives to his borrowings from Mark shows that he allowed himself great freedom in regarded as the rightful honoring of the great Master. The same tendencies are often visible elsewhere when he is producing 'Q' or providing matter peculiar to himself, Anything, therefore, strictly peculiar to 'Matthew' can be accepted as historical only with great caution. (C.J. Cadoux: The Life of Jesus, Penguin Books, pp. 14-15).

    The third Gospel (Luke) was written for the benefit of the most 'excellent theophilus' supposed to be a high official of the Roman Empire. By its introduction, the writer Luke admitted that he was not an eye witness and his knowledge was neither inspired by God but rather supplied by supposed eyewitnesses and members of their ministry.

    The speeches in the Fourth Gospel (even apart from the early Messianic claim) are so different from those in the Synoptics, and so like the comments of the Fourth Evangelist himself, that both can not be equally reliable as records of what Jesus said: Literary veracity in ancient times did not forbid, as it does now, the assignment of fictitious speeches to historical characters: the best ancient historians made a practice of composing and assigning such speeches in this way. (C.J. Cadoux: The Life of Jesus, p.16). The authors of the Bible were fictitious, either generally credited to, not definitely known, unknown, doubtful, probably collected, likely collected, probably written or collected, major part credited to, mainly by, nothing known of the writer or the place where it was written, etc., whereby their authenticity are of doubtful origins according to the (Revised Standard Version [RSV]) published in New York, Glasgow and Toronto by William Collins Sons & Co., Ltd.

    With all these discrepancies mentioned about the Bible, can any one still claim that it is The Word of God (Perfect Word of God)?

    About the Holy Qur'an, Western scholars who are unfriendly critics of Islam say: There is probably in the world no other book which has remained twelve centuries (now 1400 years) with so pure a text. (Sir William Muir, The Life of Muhammad, Introduction, p. 18) The Holy Qur'an is the complete revelation (Message of Allah) given to Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) through the agency of angel Gabriel. The whole revelation was sent to him in fragments, from time to time within a period of 23 years during his prophethood. Each time he received revelation, he used to communicate it to his companions and asked them to commit it to memory and to write it down. Thus, the whole revelation was written and preserved in the hearts of many persons (i.e., Muslims) during his lifetime and now by hundreds of thousands of Muslims who followed the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).

    This is confirmed in the Holy Qur'an:

    Nay this is A Glorious Qur'an, (Inscribed) in a Tablet Preserved. (The Qur'an, 85:21-22)

    Praise be to Allah, Who sent to His Servant the Book, and allowed therein no Crookedness. (The Qur'an 18:1).

    Do they not ponder over the Qur'an? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy. (The Qur'an, 4:82).

    Chp 2

    JUDAISM

    Unlike some religions and cultures, Judaism is rooted in history, not mythology. Yet, some might ask: The Jews are such a tiny minority, about 18 million in a world of over five thousand million people, why should we be interested in their religion, Judaism?

    One reason is that the roots of the Jew go back some Three to four thousand years if history is correct, and if so other major religions are indebted to its Scriptures to a greater or lesser degree depending on how well it was preserved over time from molestation or corruption.

    Christianity is alleged to have been founded by Jesus (PBUH), but seems to be more Paul's then anyone else's. But that's another story. In the first-century has its roots in the Hebrew Scriptures. And as any reading of the Qur'an will show, Islam is in purity of the old Scriptures with manifest proofs.

    The founding of Jerusalem is shrouded in the mysteries of the past. First mentioned in Genesis 14:18 as the city of Salem (i.e. salam meaning 'peace'), over which Melchizedek was the alleged name of the King.

    Jerusalem's early existence is attested by the Tell el Amarna Tables discovered in Egypt. The city named Salem, later combined with the name Jeru, has had a history of almost 4,000 years. Jerusalem through the centuries just as Mecca where Adam (PBUH) built the Ka'aba, and later Abraham and Ishmael (PBUT) rebuilt it, and later after the people began to worship Idols and pagan gods there then the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) demolished and abolished this evil and cleansed the ka'aba of this evil presents and reverted it back to its original purpose to worship God and God only (AGBH) as was taught by earlier Prophets and messengers of God.

    Abraham (PBUH) from whom had come both Israel and the Arabs, had been given great promises. Some lands would belong to the Arabs, and some lands would belong to Israel, both descendance of Abraham (PBUH). But Israel's possession of their predicted land would not be immediate according to Biblical accounts. They would go off to a distant land for hundreds of years and then return. This was fulfilled when Jacob and his family moved to Egypt and multiplied until they became a great nation of several million in number. The saga of their exodus from Egypt and their possessions of a portion of the land is contained in the early books of the Old Testament. But the prophets also predicted they would be driven out of the land again because of their failure to keep the law that God had given them. In due time the Assyrians carried off ten of the twelve tribes, and 125 years later the Babylonians carried off the two remaining tribes along with their books, leaving Jerusalem in ruins. But the prophets predicted their return, and back to Jerusalem they came in the six century B.C.E. Once again the temple and the city were built, and Jerusalem again became the center of Israel's religious and political life. They fell once again to the disciplined Roman armies in 63 B.C.E., it began centuries of distortions and influence of Roman and Greek attributes prevailed over the people of Israel. This is where the attitude of compromise with the Roman world stood in stark contrast to the teachings of Jesus (PBUH) and the apostles. Apostate Christians of the second century took on the trappings of the pagan Roman religion. They clothed themselves with pagan Roman garb and titles and became imbued with Greek philosophy. Professor Wolfson of Harvard University explains in The Crucible of Christianity that in the second century, there was a great influx into Christianity of Philosophically trained gentiles. These admired the wisdom of the Greek and thought they saw similarities between Greek philosophy and teachings of the Scriptures. Wolfson continues: Sometimes they variously express themselves to the effect that philosophy is God's special gift to the Greeks by way of human reason as Scripture is to the Jews by way of direct revelation. He continues: The Fathers of the Church...entered upon their systematic undertaking to show how behind the homely language in which Scripture likes to express itself, there are hidden the teachings of the philosophers couched in the obscure technical terms coined in their Academy, Lyceum, and Porch [centers for philosophical discussion].

    Such an attitude left the way open for Greek philosophy and terminology to infiltrate an distort the teachings of the prophets. The yoke of the Roman and Greek occupation was a heavy burden. The religious leaders were divided and Rome raised up among the Jews, Puppet Kings which also held office during the time of Jesus (PBUH). Therefore more of a cause for Bublical distortions years after the Babylonia take over. Then came the notorious Paul and the rest is history of the changes in Jesus (PBUH)'s teachings.

    SOME BIBLE PROPHECY OF BABYLONIAN CAPTIVITY AND PRESENT EVENTS

    Chp 3

    IS THE BIBLE A 100% HOLY?

    Can we be sure that the Bible is Holy?

    Read what Luke said about his recording in 1:2 and 3.

    Even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word, It seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write unto thee in order, most excellent Theophilus.

    If Luke said that he himself was not an eyewitness and the knowledge he gathered was from eyewitnesses and not as words inspired by God, can we still believe the Bible is God's word. History has shown that the Bible suffered changes through the ages. The Revised Standard Version 1952 and 1971, the New American Standard Bible and the New World Translation of the Holy Scripture have expunged certain verses compared with the King James Version. Reader's Digest has reduced the old Testament by 50% and the New Testament condensed by about 25%, Some years ago Christian theologians wanted to desex the Bible. Does holy mean that the Bible is Free from error?

    Yes. But what kind of error do we mean?

    Suppose one verse states that a certain person died at the age of 50 years and another verse states that the same person died at the age of 60 years, can both statements be right?

    No, both statements can never be right. Only one can be right or both are wrong.

    If a Holy Book contains conflicting verses, do you still consider it Holy?

    Of course not, because a Holy scripture is a revelation from God and it should be impossible to contain mistakes or conflicting verses which make it's Holiness disappear. If so what could be the cause then?

    It could be a mistake in recording; or deliberate changes by the scribes with additions and/or deletions.

    If there are conflicting verses in the Bible, can we still consider it Holy?

    Here are some conflicting verses in both the Old and the New Testaments:

    1. II Samuel 8:4

    And David took from him a thousand chariots and seven hundred horsemen and twenty thousand footmen...

    I Chronicles 18:4

    And David took from him a thousand chariots and seven thousand horsemen and twenty thousand footmen...

    Question: Seven hundred or seven thousand horsemen?

    2. II Samuel 8:9-10

    When Toi king of Hamath heard that David had smitten all the host of Hadadezer. Then Toi sent Joram his son unto king David, to salute him. and to bless him. because he had fought against Hadadezer, and had smitten him; for Hadadezer had wars with Toi. And Jaram with him vessels of gold, and vessels of brass.

    I Chronicles 18:9-10

    Now when Toi king Hamath heard how David had smitten all the host of Hadarezer king of Zobah; He sent Hadoram his son to king David, to inquirire of his welfare, and to congratulate him, because he had fought against Hadarezer, and smitten him; (for Hadarezer had wars with Tou;) and with him all manner of vessels of gold and silver and brass.

    Question: Toi or Tou, Jaram or Hadoram, Hadadezer or Hadarezer?

    II Samuel 10:18

    And the Syrian fled before Isreal; and David slew the men of seven hundred chariots of the Syians, and forty thousand horsemen, and smote Shobach the captain of their host, who died there.

    3. I Chronicles 19:18

    But the Syrian fled before Isreal; and David slew the Syrians seven thousand men which fought in chariots, and forty thousand foot men and killed Shophach the captain of the host.

    Question: Seven hundred chariots or seven thousand men? Forty thousand horse men or footmen? Shobach or Shophach?

    4. II Kings 8:26

    Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign

    II Chronicles 22:2

    Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign.

    Question: Twenty-Two or forty-two years old?

    5. II Kings 24:8

    Jehoiachim was 18 years old when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months.

    II Chronicles 36:9

    Jehoiachim was 8 years old when he began to reign, and he reigned 3 months and 10 days in Jerusalem.

    Question: 18 years or 8 years? 3 months or 3 months and 10 days?

    6. II Samuel 23:8

    These the names of the mighty men whom David had: The Tachmonite that sat in the seat, chief among the captains; the same was Adino the Eznite: he lift up his spear against 800, whom he slew at one time.

    I Chronicles 11:11

    And this is the number of the mighty men whom David had: Jashobeam, an Hachmonite, the chief of the captains; he lifted up his spear against 300 slain by him at one time.

    Question: Tachmonite or Hachmonite? 800 or 300?

    7. II Samuel 24:1

    And again the anger of the Lord was kindled against Isreal, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Isreal and Judah.

    I Chronicles 21:1

    And Satan stood up against Isreal, and provoked David to number Isreal.

    Question: Is the Lord of David then Satan? God forbid!

    8. II Samuel 6:23

    Therefore Michal the daughter of Saul had no child until the day of her death.

    II Samuel 21:8

    But the King took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bare unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul, whom she brought up for Adriel the son of Barzilai the Meholathite.

    Question: Did Michal have children or not? Note: The name Michal in II Samuel 21:8 is still present in the King James Version and the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures used by the Jehovah's Witnesses, but is changed to Merab in the New American standard Bible 1973.

    Is this not enough to deny it's Holiness? See Genesis 6:3, And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh; yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. But how old was Noah when he died? More than a 120 years. See Genesis 9:29. And all the days of Noah were 950 years when he died. Some Christian Theologians maintain not that the maximum age of man will be 120 years but that the flood come in a 120 years. Even this doesn't fit because at the time of the flood Noah should have been 620 (500+120) years old but the Bible states 600 years. Study these verses--Genesis 5:32: And Noah was 500 years old...; Genesis 7:6: And Noah was 600 years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth.

    Christianity beleives that God created man in His image: White, black or any else, male or female? This is according to Genesis 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness... But this contradicts Isaiah 40:18 and 25: To whom then will ye liken God? Or what likeness will ye campare unto him?...To whom then will ye liken me, or shall I be equal? saith the Holy One. See also Psalm 89:6 For who in the heaven can be compared unto the Lord? And Jeremiah 10:67: Forasmuch as there is none like unto thee, O Lord...there is none like unto thee.

    Now let's go to the New Testament.

    1. John 5:37

    Ye have neither heard his [God's] voice at any time, nor seen his shape.

    John 14:9

    ...he that hath seen me hath seen the father...

    2. John 5:31

    If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.

    John 8:14

    Jesus Answered and said unto them, though I bear record of myself, yet my record is true.

    These are only some of the contradictions in the New Testament. One may find more when one commits his or herself to finding the truth of the doctrines of modern Christianity like the Trinity, Divinity of Jesus Christ, Divine Sonship of Jesus, Original Sin and Atonement, not to mention the degrading of many Prophets in the Bible as worshipers of false gods and accusing them of incest, rape and adultery.

    The Bible states that Noah is shown to have been drunk to the point of becoming naked in the presence of his grown-up sons (Genesis 9:23-24): And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness. And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.

    Solomon was accused not only of having a large harem but also of worshipping thier false gods (I Kings 11:9-10): And the Lord was angry with Solomon... And had commanded him concerning this thing, that he should not go after gods: but kept not that which the Lord commanded.

    Aaron, as a Prophet who had accompanied his brother Moses to Pharoah, was accused of having fashioned the golden calf for the Israelites to worship (Exodus 32:4): And he [Aaron] received them [golden earrings] at their hand, and fashioned it with a graving tool, after he had made a golden calf: and they said, These be thy god's, O Isreal, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt. You will read of a Prophet who was married to two sisters at the same time (Genesis 29:28): And Jacob did so, and fulfiled her week: and he [Laban] gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also,

    And another Prophet accused of adultery (II Samuel 11:4-5): And David sent messengers, and took her [the wife or Uriah]; and she came in unto him, and he lay with her; for she was purified from her uncleanliness; and she returned unto her house. And the woman conceivied, and sent and told David, and said, I am with child.

    My Question is: How could David then be accepted in the genealogy of Jesus when it started with a person who committed adultery? God forbid it! Is this not in contradictiction with what is mentioned in Deuteronomy 23:2 A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth gemeration shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord.

    Another allegation of incest along with rape by Ammon the son of David on his half-sister Tamar (II Samuel 13:14) How beit he (Ammon) would not hearken unto her voice: but being stronger than she (Tamar) forced her, and lay with her.

    Still another multiple rape, by Absalom on David's concubine, was told in II Samuel 16:22: So they spead Absalom a tent upon the top of the house, and Absalom went in unto his father's concubines in the sight of all Isreal (I can't believe that anybody in the world could do this, not even the barbarian).

    Another encest by Judah and Tamar his daughter-in-law. Judah on his way to Timnath to shear his sheep saw Tamar, he thought her to be a harlot because she had her face covered (Genesis 38:18): ...And he (Judah) gave it (signet, bracelet and staff) her, and came in unto her and she concieved by him.

    Although Jews and Muslims are archenemies, no Muslim would dare to write a book and stamp any Isrealite Prophet like Judah, David, Jesus, etc. rape, adultery, incest or prostitution.

    All Prophets were sent by God for the guidance of mankind. Do you think that God had sent the wrong people for guidance?

    I don't think so.

    I believe in all Divine Scriptures, but in their original form. God sent to each nation a Prophet as a warner, and some of them with a Scripture as a guidance for that particular nation only. The Suhuf to Abraham, the Torah (part of the Old Testament) to Moses, the Zabur (Psalms) to David, and the Injeel (Gospel) to Jesus. None of these Scriptures remain in their original form now. Some part's of the Bible is stil pure. But this does not mean that I Believe in the Bible we have today becuase it is not the original scriptures that were revealed by God. They underwent alterations, additions, and omissions. This was also said by the Committe charged with revising the Holy Bible (Revised Standard Version). This Committee comsisted of thirty-two scholars who served as members of an Advisory Board of 50 representatives of the co-operating denominations. The Committee said in the Preface to The Holy Bible (Revised Standard Version), p.iv: Sometimes it is evident that the text has suffered in transmission, but none of the versions provides a satisfactory restoration. Here we can only follow the best judgment of competent scholars as to the most probable reconstruction of the original text. The Committee also said in the Preface, p.vii: Notes are added which indicate significant variations, additions, or omissions in the ancient authorities (Mt 9:34; Mk 3:16; 7:4; Lk 24:32, 51 etc.). As you can see that these are Christains who addmit that their Bible has suffered in transmission, which also maybe the reason for all the contradictions. Or maybe only one of many reasons why the Bible we have today seem to be in error in some parts of the scriptures.

    Jesus himself said that he was sent only to the people of Isreal (Matthew 15:24): I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Isreal. Also (Matthew 1:21): And he shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus; for he shall save his people from their sins, He even said that he came not to make changes but to fulfill (Matthew 5:17-18): Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fullfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one title shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

    But in Mark 16:15 Jesus said, Go ye unto all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

    This contradicts what is mentioned above Matthew 15:24 and Matthew 1:21. Secondly, Mark 16:9-20 has been expunged in many Bibles. The New American Standard Bible put this part in brackets and wrote the following commentary: Some of the oldest manuscripts omit that from, verse 9 though 20. The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures used by the Jehovah's Witnesses admits that certain ancient manuscripts add a long conclusion after Mark 16:8 but some omit. And the Revised Standard Version prints the following footnote: Some of the most ancient authorities bring the book to a close at the end of verse 8...This means also that the resurrection is not true as this is described in Mark 16:9. But Juesus said in Matthew 28:19: Go ye therfore, and teach all nations... All nations must be explained as all the twelve tribes of Isreal; otherwise it contradicts Matthew 15:24 an Matthew 1:21. In the New American Standard Bible and the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures it is not translated as all nations but as all the nations, which means the twelve tribes of Isreal.

    One may say the name Melchezidec is truely Melik Sedik, Melik meaning King or Judge in a Semitic language, and Sedik meaning Sincere. But only God fits this attribution, not any of His creation, or any one man to say the least. The Bible states that This man Melchezidec had know known father or mother, which is also Known the same for Adam who was created by God without neither father nor mather. So the words Melik Sedik fits more to be the words written in the Bible rather then Melchezedic which there is Know such word to be found in the Semitic language. Salam meaning Peace sure looks familiar to the word Salem, that is mentioned in the Bible, Also Melchezedic is alledged to be The King of Peace, and of Salem according to the Bible. And it also states that Abraham gave a tenth to Melchezedic. I believe when Abraham gave a tenth this means that he gave what was required for charity for the poor due in the place the Bible called Salem that I believe is short for Jurusalem, and or Salam meaning Peace, People of Peace, Which the Bible says that Melchezedic was the King of this place called Salem.

    When one gives charity, this is simular to giving to God when you give to God's people by giving to the people of the place called Salem, or Jurusalem, or Salam. Note: When giving charity, Bible uses God's attribute not Melchezedec. The Bible states that Emannuel means God's with us which is incorectly translated. In the Semitic language Eman means Faith. The word Nuel is known to be translated as; Giver. The word Nuel is best known during the Christmas season carole's, during the time of giving...No-o-el, O No-o-el...

    Galgatha in the Bible is translated to be; Place of Skulls can nowhere be found in Semitic's. The closest word's that I can find in Semitic's is Jal, and Jahsa, Jal-Jahsa, which is translated: Counterfeit body."

    Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani? Which is tranlated in the Bible to be: My God, My God, why have you foresaken Me?.

    This could never be true. For one, God would never forsake, or even give Jesus any idea that He would forsake His beloved Messiah for the people. Only Satan would forsake Jesus, not God. And also this would contradict the fact that the Bible states that Jesus was the fulfillment of a prohecy to suffer and die at the hands of his enemies, according to popular belief. So if Jesus Knew that this was suppose to happen, it would not make any since to say: Why have you forsaken Me? Corectly written is: Eloi, Eloi, lama Sabatini. Translated in the Semitic langusge to Englis would be: My God, My God, Why is his look's on me, or why do I look like him (Jesus), presumptively.

    When one studies and research these facts one may find what I write to be true with factual evidence to support what I write.

    As part of God's original plan, He finally sent Muhammad (SAWS) as the Seal of all Prophets with the Holy Qur'an as a guidance for all mankind, anywhere and anytime because Christianity had deviated a long way from the original teachings of Jesus. God then sent as part of His original plan His last Prophet, Muhammad (SAWS), as revivalist to restore all these changes. There is no doubt Roman paganism had it's influence in the Bible's of today with all the changes alterations, additions, and ommissions during transmission.

    I pray that God may forgive me if I have incorectly stated anything in this paper that may have offended anyone, for this was not my intention, but only with the intent to convey my research of truth with the hope of waking up the minds of one in search of the knowledge of God's Revelation to mankind.

    Chp 4

    TRINITY

    I John 5:7 and 8; For there are three that bear record in the heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in the earth, the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

    This is in the King James Version, authorized in 1611, and formed the strongest evidence for the Doctrine of the Trinity. But now this part, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these are one, has been expunged in the Revised Standard Version of 1952 and 1971 and in many other Bibles, as it was a gloss that had encroached on the Greek text.

    I John 5:7 and 8 in the New American Standard Bible reads as follows: And it is the Spirit who bear witness, because the Spirit is truth. For there are three that bear witness, the Spirit and the water and the blood, and the three are in agreement. Also, in the New World Translation of the Holy Scripture used by the Jehovah's Witnesses, you will find: For there are three witness bearers, the spirit and the water and the blood, and the three are in agreement. I can understand if some don't know that this important part has been removed, but I wonder why many ministers and preachers are not aware of this.

    The Trinity is not Biblical, The word Trinity is not even in the Bible or Bible dictionaries, was never taught by Jesus and was never mentioned by him, There is no basis or proof in the Bible whatsoever for the acceptance of the Trinty.

    But in Matthew 28:19 we still find: ...Baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. This part is not removed yet, is this not a proof of the Trinity?

    No. If you mention three persons are sitting or eating together, does it mean that they are forming one person? No. The formulation of the Trinity by Athanasius, an Egyptian deacon from Alexandria, was accepted by the Council of Nicaea in A.D. 325, more than three centuries after Jesus had left. No doubt Roman paganism had influence in this doctrine, the triune god; Sabbath was shifted to Sunday; December 25, which was the birthday of their sun-god Mithra, was introduced as Jesus's birthday, although the Bible clearly predicted and forbade the decoration of Christmas trees in Jeremiah 10:2-5: Thus saith the Lord, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the sign of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them. For the customs of the people are vain; for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold, they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. They are upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, because they cannot go. Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good. When in research one may find that Christianity had deviated a long way from the original teachings of Jesus. The Roman Julian calendar introduced as the Christian era; pork not prohibited; circumcision abolished by Paul (Galatians 5:2): Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.

    Some say that God and Jesus are one (John 14:11): Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me.

    Read then John 17:21.

    That they (the disciples) all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that thay may also be one in us...

    It is clear here that God and Jesus are one, but also that the disciples are one in Jesus and God. If Jesus is God because he is in God, why are the disciples then not God, as they all are like Jesus also in God? If God, Jesus and the Holy Ghost form one unit of Trinity, then with the disciples included they should form a God unit of fifteen. They also say that Jesus is God according to John 14:9: ...he that hath seen me hath seen the Father.

    See to the context now--what is before and after this: (John 14:8): Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. (John 14:9): Jesus saith unto him, have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hast seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?

    So finally Jesus asked Philip how to show the appearance of God to the disciples, which is not possible. You should believe in God by admiring his creation: the sun, the moon, all creation, and Jesus himself who was created by God. He said (John 5:37): ...ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape. How can you see a spirit then? What they saw was Jesus and not God. Also, Paul said (I Timothy 6:16): ...whom no man hath seen, nor can see... So what you can see is never God. Jn 4:24 God is spirit

    Some also say that the Holy Spirit is the Holy Ghost, is also God. It is taught that the Father is God, the Son is God, the Holy Spirit or Ghost is God, and it is not allowed to Three Gods, but One God.

    Read Matthew 1:18.

    Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise. When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.

    Compare now with Luke 1:26 and 27.

    And in the sixith month the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth, To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary.

    So in the miraculous birth of Jesus, Matthew mentioned the Holy Ghost and Luke mentioned the angle Gabriel. What is the Holy Ghost then? The Holy Ghost is the angle Gabriel according to the scriptures, when comparing the two.

    God is God, the Holy Ghost or the Holy Spirit is the angel Gabriel, and Jesus is a Prophet according to Mark 6:4; and many more.

    Also, Throughout the New Testament Jesus call's himself the son of man 81 time's. Now compare this to how many time's that he say's that or uses the phrase; I am God so therefore worship me. God forbid!

    Chp 5

    DIVINITY

    John 1:1; In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    It is a fact that a Holy Scripture should not contain contradictions. If there are two conflicting verses, then only one can be true; both can never be true or both are wrong.

    If Jesus is God according to John 1:1. Then how many Gods are there? Two at least, God forbid! This then is in contradiction with many passages in the Bible: Deuteronomy 4:39; ...that the Lord he is God in heaven above, and upon the earth beneath: there is none else; Deuteronomy 6:4; Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord; Isaiah 43:10-11; '...that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me. I, even I, am the Lord; and beside me there is no savior; Isaiah 44:6; Thus saith the Lord... I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God; Isaiah 45:18; For thus saith the Lord that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the Lord; and there is none else."

    From Isaiah 45:18 alone one can conclude that God alone was the Creator and no one else, not even Jesus, Participated in the creation.

    See further: Deuteronomy 4:35; Exodus 8:10; II Samuel 7:22; I Kings 8:23; I Chronicles 17:20; Psalms 86:8, 89:6 and 113:5; Hosea 13:4; Zechariah 14:9.

    Now read in Mark 12:29 what Jesus himself said: And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord.

    I Corinthians 8:4...we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one. I Timothy 2:5; For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus. Look to the expression the man Christ Jesus." Now you can either say that John 1:1 is right and all these other verses are wrong, or the reverse.

    Some say Jesus is God because he is filled with the Holy Spirit. So why not consider other people divine who are also are filled with the Holy Ghost then? (Acts 11:24): For he (Barnabas) was a good man, and full of the Holy Ghost and of faith; and much people was added unto the Lord. (Acts 5:32); And we are his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him.

    See further Acts 6:5; II Peter 1:21; II Timothy 1:14; I Corinthians 2:16; Luke 1:41.

    One may also say that Jesus was filled with the Holy Ghost while he was still in his mother's womb.

    The same was true with John the Baptist (Luke 1:13,15): But the angel said unto him, Fear not, Zacharias: For thy prayer is heard; and wife Elizabeth shall bear thee a son, and thou shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mother's womb.

    Some will also say: But Jesus could do miracles. He fed 5000 people with only 5 loaves and 2 fishs.

    The same was done by Elisha and Elijah. Elishah fed a 100 people with 20 barley loaves and a few ears of corn (II Kings 4:44): So he set it before them, and they did eat, and left thereof, according to the word of the Lord. Elisha secured the increase of a widow's oil and he said to her (II Kings 4:7): Go, sell the oil, and pay thy debt, and live thou And thy children of the rest. See also I Kings 17:16: And the barrel of meal wasted not, neither did the cruse of oil fail, according to the word of the Lord, which he speak by Elijah. Also I Kings 17:6; And the raven brought him (Elijah) bread and flesh in the morning, bread and flesh in the evening; and he drank of the brook.

    But Jesus could heal leprosy.

    Also Elisha told Naaman who was a leper to wash in the Jordan river (II -Kings 5:14): Then went he (Naaman) down, and dipped himself 7 times in Jordan, according to the saying of the man of God (Elisha): and his flesh came again like unto a flesh of little child, and he was clean. But Jesus could cause a blind man to see again.

    Also Elisha did (II Kings 6:17): "And

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1