Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3. Daelmans HE, van der Hem-Stokroos HH, Hoogenboom RJ, et al. Feasibility and reliability of an in-training assessment programme in an undergraduate clerkship. Med Educ 2004;38:12701277. 4. Van der Vleuten CPM. Validity of final examinations in undergraduate medical training. BMJ 2000;321:12171219. 5. Hodges B. Validity and the OSCE. Med Teach 2003;25:250254.
6. Shumway JM, Harden RM. AMEE Guide No. 25: The assessment of learning outcomes for the competent and reflective physician. Med Teach 2003;25:569584. 7. Dacre J, Besser M, White P. MRCP (UK) Part 2 Clinical Examination (PACES): a review of the first four examination sessions. Clin Med 2003;3:452459. 8. London D. Game, set, and MRCP. Lancet 1994;344:1159.
9. Ebel RL. Determination of the passing score. In: Frisbie DA (ed) Essentials of Educational Measurement, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Allyn & Bacon, 1979: 33373422. 10. Van der Vleuten CPM. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1996;1:4167.
244 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008. THE CLINICAL TEACHER 2008; 5: 239244