Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE \ilESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
$ $
s s
$
$
$
AT&T, INC.; INGENIO, INC.; YELLO\ryPAGES.COM LLC; ETHER' A DIVISION OF INGENIO,INC.; AND INGENIO,INC., DOING BUSINESS AS
KEEN,
Defendants.
$
$ $ $ $ $
s
$
AT&T
Interactive;
Ether, a division of Ingenio, Inc.; and Ingenio, Inc., doing business as Keen (all collectively,
THE PARTIES
1. 2. 3.
Plaintiff CTC is a Texas Limited Partnership, with its principal place of business
in Austin, Texas.
Defendant AT&T, Inc. ("AT&T") is a Delaware corporation with its principal
place of business at208 S. Akard, Dallas, Texas 75202. Defendant Ingenio, Inc. ("Ingenio") is a wholly owned subsidiary of AT&T with
its principal place of business at#331, 100 First Street, Suite 100, San Francisco, CA 94105.
2288075v11012921
4.
Defendant YELLOWPAGES.COM
Interactive
5.
subsidiary
Defendant Ether,
owned
Francisco, CA 94105.
6.
subsidiary
business
at
Francisco, CA 94105.
7.
SE|.
The Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. $$ 1331 and
133S(a) because this action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. $$
I er
because this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants, and CTC has its principal place business in this District.
of
9.
infringement
10.
Defendants are properly joined in this action because the AT&T Companies and
Services Defendants are all wholly owned subsidiaries of AT&T and AT&T owns the infringing YellowPages.com and Ingenio products and services, including Ether and Keen.
BACKGROUND
11.
CTC is the owner of United States Patent 5,818,836 (the "'836 patent").
2288075v11012921
12. The '836 patent was issued on October 6, 1998 and the PTO issued a
reexamination certificate for the '836 patent on December 30, 2008. A true and correct copy of
the '836 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
13.
AT&T has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims of the '836
patent by its manufacture, use, sale, importation, licensing andlor offer for sale of its products
call initiated on a website. AT&T also has infringed and continues to infringe one of more claims of the '836 patent by contributing to and actively inducing others to use, sell, import, and/or offer
for sale infringing products and/or services. AT&T is liable for its infringement of the '836
patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C . 5 271.
14.
Ingenio has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims of the '836
patent by its manufacture, use, sale, importation, licensing and/or offer for sale of its voicecommerce applications, including Pay Per Call, Live Advice, and Ether, as
well as any
predecessor products and any products which include a telephony call initiated on a website.
Ingenio also has infringed and continues to infringe one of more claims of the '836 patent by contributing to and actively inducing others to use, sell, import,and/or offer for sale infringing products and/or services. Ingenio is liable for its infringement of the '836 patent pursuant to 35
u.s.c.
271.
15.
the '836 patent by its manufacture, use, sale, importation, licensing and/or offer for sale of
Ingenio's voice-commerce applications, as well as any predecessor products and any products
which include a telephony call initiated on a website or other Internet Protocol interface.
YellowPages.com also has infringed and continues to infringe one of more claims of the'836
patent by contributing to and actively inducing others to use, sell, import,andlor offer for sale
228807
5vll0l292l
infringing products and/or services. YellowPages.com is liable for its infringement of the '836
patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C . 271.
16.
Ether has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims of the '836
patent by its manufacture, use, sale, importation, licensing and/or offer for sale
of Ingenio's
voice-commerce applications, as well as any predecessor products and any products which include a telephony call initiated on a website. Ether also has infringed and continues to infringe
one of more claims of the '836 patent by contributing to and actively inducing others to use, sell,
import, and/or offer for sale infringing products and/or services. Ether is liable for its
infringement of the '836 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 27L
17.
Keen has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims of the '836
patent by its manufacture, use, sale, importation, licensing and/or offer for sale
of Ingenio's
voice-commerce applications, as well as any predecessor products and any products which include a telephony call initiated on a website. Keen also has infringed and continues to infringe
one of more claims of
import, and/or offer for sale infringing products and/or services. Keen
infringement of the '836 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C . 271.
18.
Defendants' acts
entitled to recover from Defendants the damages wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial.
it
WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT
19.
Plaintiff to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. $ 2S4 and to attorneys' fees and costs incurred in
prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. $ 285.
20. 21.
The inventor of the '836 patent, Stephen DuVal, licensed the '836 patent to
license agreement. As part of the license agreement, InfoRocket had the right to sue infringers,
4
2288075v11012921
and shortly after obtaining the license to the patent, InfoRocket sued Keen. As part of the lawsuit
settlement, Keen bought InfoRocket and obtained the license agreement that DuVal executed
with InfoRocket. In 2003, the Keen/InfoRocket company changed its name to Ingenio. Ingenio
made the 2003 payment pursuant to the license agreement. Ingenio later stopped making royalty payments and canceled the exclusive license agreement with DuVal.
22. In April
a ex parte reexamination
proceeding,
challenging the validity of the '836 patent based on prior art. In June 2004, the PTO began
reexamination proceedings.
acquired Ingenio
in
of
the
reexamination proceeding.
In September 2008, the PTO issued its Notice of Intent to Issue Reexamination
Certificate, which distinguished the prior art and validated the '863 patent. As the formal
requester of the reexamination of the '836 patent, attomeys for
the United States Patent and Trademark Office of this Notice of Intent to Issue the ReExamination Certifi cate.
JURY DEMAND
25.
follows:
a) b)
Declaring that each Defendant has infringed directly, andlor indirectly, U.S.
Patent 5,818,836.
its
2288075v1/012921
c)
5,818,836, including enhanced damages, if applicable, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. $ 284 together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, in an amount according to proof;
d)
by law; and
e)
For such other costs and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
6
228807 5v | 1012921
Respectfully submitted,
Ashley McMillian State Bar No.24070252 amcmi llian@susmangodfrey. com SusvnN Goonnsv L.L.P. 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 651-9366 Facsimile: (713) 654-6666 Attorneys for Plaintiff Click-to-Call Technoloeies LP
2288075v11012921