Professional Documents
Culture Documents
30.05.2007
300
250
Mtoe Biomass
200
150
100
Integrated biorefining complexes 2nd generation: EtOH, Syn Diesel, DME from lignocellulosic biomass, SNG 1st generation: EtOH, ETBE, FAME, FAEE
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
50
2000
Source: Final report of the Biofuels Research Advisory Council; EUR 22066
30.05.2007 Dept. fr Nachhaltige Agrarsysteme l Institut fr Landtechnik l Ao.Univ.Prof. Dr. Thomas Amon 2
Biorefinery of Biomasses
(Source: modified after Kamm et al. 2006)
Biomasses Biomass of maize, sudanund meadow grass etc.; Sec. Agric. biomasses and by products: straw, sugar beet leaves, pulp; glycerin, raps seed cake, etc. Wood for energy, wood waste-products
Technology Enzymatic fermentation Biogas production Mechanical pressing Gasification Polygeneration Combustion Co-combustion
Biorefinery usage Fuels: - Bioethanol E85 - Biodiesel - Bio-CNG - Synfuel (Bio-CNG, Diesel) Energy: - Electricity - Heat Chemicals: - synthetic polymers - solvents - adhesives - Fetty acids - Drugs dyestuffs - Tenside, etc. Food and Feed
30.05.2007
Objectives/challenges :
To increase substantially the production of biofuels that are commercially viable, CO2- efficient and compatible with vehicle engines. To promote the transition towards second generation biofuels which will be produced from a wider range of feedstock (including waste biomass and bio based products from industry). To promote the transition towards fully integrated biorefinery concepts. To reduce competition for land and food. To produce biofuels in the most efficient way.
30.05.2007 Dept. fr Nachhaltige Agrarsysteme l Institut fr Landtechnik l Ao.Univ.Prof. Dr. Thomas Amon 4
European biogas initiative to improve the yield of Agricultural biogas plants (EU-Agro Biogas)
Aim
Demonstrate and optimize innovative approaches to improve biogas yield and energy output and economic efficiency at selected biogas plants in Europe.
Partners
BOKU, RTD Sevices, GE Jenbacher, Thoeni Industriebetriebe (Austria), Research Institute of agricultural engineering (Czech Republic), Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences (Denmark), Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Federal Agricultural Research Centre, KTBL, Vogelsang GmbH (Germany), Universita degli Studi di Torino (Italy), EC Baltic Renewable Energy Center (Poland), Agrotechnology & Food Innovations (The Netherlands), Institute of Grassland & Environmental Research (UK)
30.05.2007
Energiepark Bruck
Axiom
TU Wien Verfahrenst.
BOKU DNAS
Biogas Bruck
EVN
TU Wien IVK.
OMV R&M
WP Leaders
Platform Bio-CNG-Traffic
Austria
30.05.2007
Ruden maize
120 Batch-Fermenters (1000 ml) For 27 different Substrates, Standards and Inoculum with 3 replicates
30.05.2007
30.05.2007
10
30.05.2007
11
Glycerine
Effect of glycerine addition on the specific methane yield of agricultural raw materials
30.05.2007
13
Effect of glycerine on the methane yield of a mixture from maize, CCM and swine manure
500 400 300 200 100 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Spec. methane yield [Nl * kg VS-1]
15 0 60
Effect of glycerine on the methane yield of a mixture from maize, CCM and swine manure
500 400 300 200 100 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Spec. methane yield [Nl * kg VS-1]
6 % glycerine 3 % glycerine 0 % glycerine Basic mix Methane content in the biogas [%] h
15 0 60
Effect of glycerine on the methane yield of a mixture from maize, CCM and swine manure
500 400 300 200 100 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Spec. methane yield [Nl * kg VS-1]
15 % glycerine 8 % glycerine 6 % glycerine 3 % glycerine 0 % glycerine Basic mix Methane content in the biogas [%]
R&D Exampel: Biogas with raw materials from Universitt fr Bodenkultur Wien sustainable crop rotation systems
30.05.2007
17
Co-Fermentation of energy crops, Universitt fr Bodenkultur Wien organic manures and industrial based by products
Content of used mixtures (% of FM). Raw materials Sun flower silage 0 20 15 30 20 5 5 5 0 20 30 35 15 grass silage 0 0 0 0 0 30 40 30 40 10 5 7,5 0 Rye silage 0 0 0 0 0 10 20 30 20 10 5 7,5 10 Maize silage 31 30 25 20 40 10 0 5 5 20 10 35 45 CCM Pig manure 54 20 10 20 30 40 35 20 30 20 20 0 15 Sugar beet silage 0 20 30 30 10 0 0 10 5 20 20 10 15
Mix M11 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6
15 10 20 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 10 5 0
M7 M8 M9 M10
Block 3 (balanced)
30.05.2007
18
Effects of co-fermentation
Spec. Methane yield Block --Block 1 (energy rich) Mix M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 Block 2 (protein rich) M7 M8 M9 M10 Block 3 (balanced) M11 M12 M13
a,b
Additional methane yield Absolut (lN/kg VS) +125a +79ab +54abc +28bc +66abc +104ab +96ab +111ab +115a +89ab +99ab -7c +129a Relative (% of expected) +49 +28 +18 +10 +23 +39 +36 +39 +42 +32 +36 -2 +43
Measured (lN/kg VS) 383 367 349 302 347 371 363 395 386 369 378 303 427
Expected (lN/kg VS) 258 287 295 274 281 267 267 283 271 281 279 311 298
30.05.2007
19
Significance ***
0,5418
0,6003
0,5416
0,6001
***
400 375 350 325 300 275 275 Y = 0,8337 X + 60,826 R2 = 0,8337
0,5412
0,5998
***
CH4 = 3911,18 XP* + 4515,25 XL* + 4864,12 ADL* + 1665,29 Cell* + 3840,62 H-Cell* + 936,88 Sta* + 1955,44 Sug* 213356 CH4 = 7,19 XP 23,22 XL** + 1,96 XF + 527,80***
0,5307
0,6006
***
0,2385
0,2871
**
6 7 8
CH4 = 13,15 H-Cell*** + 172,82*** CH4 = 2,01 VS + 533,12*** CH4 = 1,92 XF + 327,07***
ADL = lignin (% DM); C = carbon (% DM); Cell = cellulose (% DM); CH4 = specific methane yield (LN/kg VS); CN = C/N quotient; DM = dry matter (% FM); FM = fresh matter; GE = gross energy (MJ/kg DM); H-Cell = hemicellulose (% DM); Sta = starch (% DM); Sug = sugar (% DM); VS = volatile solids (% DM); XF = 2 crude fiber (% DM); XL = crude lipids (% DM); XP = crude protein (% DM); adj. R = adjusted coefficient of 2 determination; R = coefficient of determination Level of significance for the models and the regression coefficients: * < 0,05; ** < 0,01; *** < 0,001; n.s. = not significant
300
325
350
375
400
425
450
30.05.2007
20
Sugar beet silage Vegetable litter Old food Lecithin Grease Canteen litter Soya residues
Fermenter 2 (F2) Diet composition Average values for F2: Methane concentration = 63,6 Vol.% Specific methane yield = 574 LN/kg VS
30.05.2007
21
Maize, cereals
Straw
Straw 11,6 t ha-1 a-1
Maize corn
Ethanol production
Stillage
(DDGS)
22
Maize, cereals
Straw
Straw 11,6 t ha-1 a-1
Maize corn
Biogas plant
Stillage
Ethanol production
Residue
30.05.2007
Maize, cereals
Straw
Straw 11,6 t ha-1 a-1
Maize corn
Biogas Stillage 9.080 kWh ha-1 a-1 Straw 26.510 kWh ha-1 a-1
Biogas plant
Stillage
Ethanol production
Residue
30.05.2007
Maize, cereals
Straw
Straw 11,6 t ha-1 a-1
Maize corn
Steam explosion Biogas Stillage 9.080 kWh ha-1 a-1 Straw (Steam explosion) 35.980 kWh ha-1 a-1
Biogas plant
Stillage
Ethanol production
Residue
30.05.2007
30.05.2007
26
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Days from start of anarobic digestion steam exploded straw untreted straw
-1
30.05.2007
27
Energy output [MJ/kg DM] Ethanol Ethanol and stillage Ethanol, stillage and straw Ethanol, stillage and straw (Steam explosion) 3,96 5,56 10,21 11,87
utilisation level*
30.05.2007
28
Biogas production from integrated biorefinery Concepts and sustainable crop rotations
Seeds Press 7 t/ha RME
Meadow gras
Brewers barley
70 %
Spring barley
Rape
Raps
5 t/ha Straw Rape oel meal
Maize
70% GPS, 30 % CCM
Corn
Wheat
100%
Maize straw
4,3 t/ha
5,3 t/ha
CCM
Wheat straw
30.05.2007
29
Cereals: Rapeseed: Sun flowers: Sugar beets: Fallow land: Manure: Grassland: Cropping system:
Straw and grain depending on degree of self-sufficiency (DSS) Straw and rape oil meal Straw and sun flower oil meal Leaves and sugar production residues 100% use for biogas production 100% use for biogas production Grassland depending on DSS milk Preceding or succeeding crop, 15% of arable area
Not yet included: - Residues of bioethanol production (DDGS, distilled dry grain solubles) - Residues of biodiesel production (crude glycerin and oil seed cake) - Residues of starch production
30.05.2007
30
EU25 2005
14%
(Source: Eurostat)
6%
36%
7%
Cropping system
26% 3%
6% 2%
30.05.2007
31
Kosts and shares of biogas production from biomasses. Total power: 1,5 MW 250 m3/h
Costs of electricity production: 14,0 15,0 cent/kWhel. 9% 7% 7% 42%
Cost of bio-methane production for feeding into the gas distribution system: 4,5 5,6 cent/kWhBiomethanenergie
Quelle: D. Hornbachner et a. 2005
39%
30.05.2007
32
Bioethanol
Energy
Residues
Biodiesel
Manure
Biohydrogen
Industrialbased byproducts
Biogas
30.05.2007
33
Conclusion / Outlook
Biogas is the key technology within integrated biofuels based biorefinery systems. It enables: high land productivity, whole crop utilisation and reduce competition for land and food. Further developments are required to fully maximise the potentials of already existing conversion technologies. Ways must be found that make it possible: to combined the production of food, feed, chemicals and energy witch are based on already existing conversion technologies within sustainable, regional adapted crop rotation systems In the longer term the implementation of full-scale integrated biorefineries using new energy crops, crop residues and Industrial based by-Products will be necessary.
30.05.2007 Dept. fr Nachhaltige Agrarsysteme l Institut fr Landtechnik l Ao.Univ.Prof. Dr. Thomas Amon 34
http://www.forum-biogas.net
l Institut fr Landtechnik l Ao.Univ.Prof. Dr. Thomas Amon 35