Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The increasingly divisive immigration debate in the NAFTA has accelerated migration:
United States focuses on two main strategies: on
the one hand stepped-up workplace and border Almost 500,000 undocumented Mexicans migrate
enforcement with an emphasis on the deportation to the United States every year.i During the
of undocumented workers; and on the other hand, NAFTA debate, advocates assured the U.S. and
the expansion of temporary worker visa programs Mexican people that the trade agreement would
with a path to legalization. But both strategies fail greatly alleviate unauthorized immigration by
to address the root cause of migration—the mass increasing employment opportunities in Mexico
economic displacement of Mexican workers, an and closing the gap between U.S. and Mexican
historically rooted phenomenon that has been wages. But this promise of prosperity has been a
dramatically accelerated by the trade, investment mirage for millions of Mexicans: the value of the
and labor policies associated with the North Mexican minimum wage dropped 23 percent in
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). NAFTA's first decade,ii 19 million more Mexicans
are living in poverty than 20 years ago, and today,
The contradictions of the NAFTA economy— one quarter of Mexico’s population cannot afford
opening U.S. borders to trade and investment while basic foods.iii
closing the door to displaced Mexican laborers who
are essential to the American construction, Increasing income disparity and poverty in the
agriculture and service industries—have separated post-NAFTA years has produced a sharp rise in
millions of families. According to the Pew migration to the U.S., especially from the Mexican
Hispanic Center, more than 3 million American countryside. In the first decade of NAFTA, the
children have at least one parent who is an annual number of immigrants arriving to the U.S.
undocumented immigrant. On the Mexican side of from Mexico more than doubled. Additionally,
the border ever more households live broken with a because the number of visas issued during the same
parent across the border. In fact, entire villages period was sharply cut back, more than 80 percent
depend on unstable remittance salaries sent home of post-NAFTA immigrants from Mexico are
by their exiled mothers and fathers, sons and undocumented.iv
daughters. No attempt to address immigration
flows can succeed until these brutal realities are Mexican government data documents that the
addressed and policymakers, the private sector, and elimination of food security policies under NAFTA
the media focus on the critical need for sustained led to at least 1.3 million Mexican peasant farmers
community-level economic development in losing family livelihoods as lower priced, often
Mexico. subsidized U.S. food imports entered the Mexican
market.v The influx of U.S. subsidized corn has
undercut the ability of Mexican corn farmers to
compete with U.S. corn producers. In sharp
contrast to promises by NAFTA’s backers that
i
Passel, Jeffrey. “Unauthorized Migrants: Numbers and Characteristics of the Undocumented Population.” Pew Hispanic Center.
2005.
ii
Wise, Timothy, “NAFTA’s Untold Stories: Mexico’s Response to North American Integration.” International Relations Center,
Americas Program. June 10, 2003.
iii
Jordan, Mary and Sullivan, Kevin, “Trade Brings Riches, but Not to Mexico’s Poor.” Washington Post. March 22, 2003.
iv
Passel, Jeffrey. “Unauthorized Migrants: Numbers and Characteristics of the Undocumented Population.” Pew Hispanic
Center. 2005.
v
Audley, John and Polaski, Sandra and Papademetriou, Demetrios G. and Vaughan, Scott. “NAFTA’s Promise and Reality:
Lessons from Mexico for the Hemisphere.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Report. November 19, 2003.
vi
Luis Hernández Navaro."The New Tortilla War." Center for International Policy, Americas Program. May 7, 2007.
vii
Carlos Salas, “Between Unemployment and Insecurity in Mexico: NAFTA Enters Its Second Decade,” in Robert E. Scott,
Carlos Salas, and Bruce Campbell, Revisiting NAFTA: Still Not Working for North America’s Workers, (Washington, D.C.:
Economic Policy Institute, 2006.