A. STORIES AND SUBJECT MATTER According to Kenny (1966:10), there is a difference between the subject matter and narratives.

The story is something that is told in a work of fiction. He has been an integral part with the relevant and closely related to aspects of form. subject matter, it is not something that is contained even yet (not) be part of the work, but something that in referring, or relating to, the content of the story. Thus the principal permaslahan will still exist even though he was never appointed to serve the story. While the story after being appointed to a new existence in a work. For example, issues of fear and (as a result :) impotence remains a problem that can and often experienced by humans even though it was, for instance not be the story in a novel way There's no end of famous essay Mochtar Lubis. The novel is famous not because of fear of dealing with the subject permsalahan it, but more due process and the author kemempuan transform the problem into a form of literature with the power of imagination, creativity, and express it into the narrative works correctly, so as to create and display a model of life . The selection of the principal problems are usually related to the selection of themes. At the very least, there is a correspondence between the selection keduannya to facilitate the reader in understanding it. The theme may once extracted from the subject matter (which has become the story) that express, or conversely, the subject matter of DAPT was chosen to reflect the theme. But, however, poko more problems related to the problem of "what is told", or "a story about what". Therefore, it is very possible existence of several different subject. But have a common theme. For example, novel dwarfs missed the Moon and the Ox-Frog Interlocking Thus, each work of Safe and Nur Sutan Modjoindo Datuk Iskandar second novel was picked up two points permaslahan different but have the same theme. B. STORIES AND FACTS Based on the presence of each element of the "intervention" between fact and fiction can be categorized in three sections:

A. Factual writing data, a. Factual and Actual Ie posts are made based on factual data and or information, such as news in the newspaper should be completely based on the actual and factual data. So the news in a newspaper other than to be based on the fact that the news should also contain the latest information, news is not expired. b. Factual but not necessarily the actual Another type of writing should be based on factual data but the actuality is not bound by the writings or scientific works, in the form of scholarly books or the other in certain areas may be data kelimuan kesejrahan, social, research, etc. which "kebenerannya" can be proved empirically or logically. In these writings are more bound by the clarity, accuracy, and sharpness (and others

similar) description. Authorship may be reviews, explanations, descriptions, analyzes, descriptions, ratings, and others presented in detail, deep and long enough not tied to a problem format. From the above two kinds of writing there is a difference which is the deadline to aktualan above two kinds of writing. Examples of writing in the news despite the news that day he became the actual, factual and even sensational topic of the day. In a long time who did so would be no longer actual, out of the day. While the scientific writings can still be actual even though the writing is relatively long, even the things that raised thousands of years ago to kinipun people still read and studied, such as literary theories have Aristotle neighbor. 2. Dialogue Facts and Fiction Problems of the relationship between fact and fiction or real with the imaginary in literature has been questioned by Aristotle with mimetic theory and its creatio (imitation or creation). The first suggests the imitation (or even making a real life models, the second to the creation of models of life according to the author's ability kretaifitas. Actually two things are not necessary because the literature dipermalsahkan these two things co-exist and complement. A work suggests that only those things that actually happened as it is to be rejected as a novel or a work of fiction. In contrast, an absolute work of fiction that contain imaginative events that did not reflect the reality of life, it would be difficult or even incomprehensible. So that an imaginary world can be understood by gamabaran and knowledge from the world of reality. In contrast, image and knowledge to the world of reality we can get through the ability of imagination. However, it must be realized that in a work of fiction, the resemblance to reality is not a destination, but only a means to convey to the reader something more than reality itself (Teeuw, 1984:232). Besides works of fiction that really imaginative work, we can also find works of fiction: - A novel that contains elements of historical truth, examples works that contain elements of history is the event PKI rebellion in 1965 that appears in many works such as the Dome. Early Day Kemukus latitude, Bawuk, the Priyayi, and others. However, novels such as these do not bias used as a provider of historical facts are considered less reliable. Because the authors did not indicate when the author mulain appoint-historical facts and when starting with a cover story. As for when we check and was consistent with the fact, that would not affect the levels of the novel is concerned kredebilitas (Luxemberg, et al, 1984:20). Because kredebilitas esebuah novel. ditenteukan by the coherence between the intrinsic elements. - A novel that takes the material of history or so-called novel (roman) history, as an example Novel Roro Mendut, Genduk Duku, and Lusi Lindri, are examples that can dipertanyakan.Apakah the works is a historical romance (according to naming the author) or just accidental use of historical data? Is it true what was told, the characters, events, background, truly historical fact?. - The writing of history can not be manipulated theoretically. However, In Fiction, though berdsarkan on historical fact, has an element of freedom. So there is work that combines historical fact and the fact imaginary. Thus history is an aspect of the content, while the literature

as an aspect of form, decoration (Scholes, 1981, by Jonah, 1984:41). And, with the freedom of fiction to manipulate the facts of history in the sense above. So that the fiction is not only capable of recording history in the sense dokumentatif-sociological, namaun also created sejrah for himself that is monumental. And dokumentatif-sociological nature, and this is monumental. Among others, that marks the successful work of fiction as a work sesastraan. 3. Elements of reality and imagination, Elements of reality actually is not the monopoly's nonfiction works. Instead elements of imagination is not just a monopoly-owned works of fiction. Because keduaq work both contain two elements. What distinguishes the two essays on the levels of reality and imagination contained therein. The element of imagination is more prominent in works of fiction. Whereas in reality the work of the more prominent elements of nonfiction. The novelist can not create didadasi on knowledge, experience, and perceptions of the world of reality. Instead, the author of nonfiction works, or news, will not create dpat without personal interpretation. In conclusion the entanglement between the fiction of a reality show by Jonah (1983:5) there are five possible attachment, start the most direct to the contrary. The more immediate effect of reality, like a work of fiction that is the reflection of reality, the lower the level of imagination. Conversely the author's intense appreciation of the realities of life, will only be an interpretation of the nature of attachment semaikn far from reality and fiction semaikin high levels of imagination.