Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Inclined Troughed Belt Conveyor Systems for Underground Mass Mining Operations
J C Spreadborough1 and A G L Pratt2
ABSTRACT
Inclined troughed belt conveyors are more frequently being selected from a range of alternatives, which include shafts and trucks for ore haulage in underground mass mining projects. Belt conveyor haulage systems are being operated with lifts exceeding those normally associated with truck haulage systems and approaching the limits of shaft haulage systems. A belt conveyor haulage system, in this context, incorporates subsystems for: crushing, tramp detection and removal, and haulage. This paper presents details of recent inclined troughed belt conveyor systems for underground mining operations, and explores the application of inclined troughed belt conveyors for the increasing demands of future underground mass mining projects.
the application of cable belt conveyors, though similar principals can be applied to define their limits of application.
INTRODUCTION
The selection of haulage systems for underground mines has focused on shaft haulage, trucks and belt conveyors. The application of these alternatives in the Australian mining industry is summarised in Figure 1 as a graph showing lift (m) versus annual production (kt/a) (Pratt, 2005). Troughed belt conveyors are shown to be applied in the range to 8 Mt/a and 1200 m lift. This paper further defines the current range of application of troughed belt conveyor systems, defines limits on their application and the scope for increasing these limits to the demands of future underground mass mining projects. This paper does not address
1. 2. Associate Director, Maunsell Australia, 10 Finchley Street, Milton Qld 4064. Email: John.Spreadborough@Maunsell.com MAusIMM, Group Manager Mine Engineering, Newcrest Mining Limited, Level 8, 600 St Kilda Road, Melbourne Vic 3004. Email: Adrian.Pratt@Newcrest.com.au
71
of rock bolts, straps and mesh for ground support. The block cave method generally requires ground support only at the undercut and extraction levels. Ground support generally contributes the majority of the tramp in the ore stream. Other contributors include drill consumables, Load-haul-dump (LHD) bucket hardware and chute liners. The haulage subsystem (Figure 3) includes the chutes, skirts, belt, idlers, pulleys, drives and structures that support and transport the material from the feed point to the discharge point. The haulage subsystem may incorporate more than one conveyor flight and more than one transfer point. Critical elements in the haulage subsystem include:
Idlers to support the belt. Pulleys to resist belt tensions at changes of direction and to
transfer tractive forces from the drives to the belt.
the driving and braking controls provide for minimum dynamic effects when starting and stopping, and for no material retained in the transfer chutes for all stopping scenarios, including emergency and power failure stops. for belt sag control.
received to direct the material on centre and in line with the receiving belt.
72
INCLINED TROUGHED BELT CONVEYOR SYSTEMS FOR UNDERGROUND MASS MINING OPERATIONS
belt reel handling facilities; and belt splicing/repair facilities. CURRENT APPLICATIONS
Troughed belt conveyors are applied over a wide range of length/lift combinations, but at the limits are grouped as long (overland) or high lift conveyors (Figure 4). Troughed belt conveyors for mass mining operations frequently fall into the second (high lift) group. Troughed belt conveyors are also applied over a wide range of material flow rates, belt widths and belt speeds (Figure 5 and Table 1).
belt drift, drive slip, belt rip, belt carcass and belt splice deterioration, take-up over-travel, equipment over-temperature, and emergency.
1000
800
Prosper Haniel
600 Lift (m) Chuquicamata Ridgeway Portal Nifty CV3 Kapok Mc Arthur River Ridgeway Trunk Gordonstone Drift Cadjebut Revenge Crinum 0 Channar KPC High Lift
400
Long (Overland)
200
FIG 4 - Length/lift for typical long (overland) and high lift troughed belt conveyors.
1000
800
Prosper Haniel
600 Lift (m) Ridgeway Portal 400 Nifty CV3 Kapok Mc Arthur River 200 Cadjebut Ridgeway Trunk Revenge Crinum KPC Lafarge Surma -200 0 1000 2000 3000 Feed Rate (t/h) 4000 Curragh North Dawson CV-193 Channar
Chuquicamata
Gordonstone Drift
5000
6000
FIG 5 - Productivity ranges for typical long (overland) and high lift troughed belt conveyors.
73
TABLE 1
Details for typical long (overland) and high lift troughed belt conveyors (Baigent, 2005; Kusel, 1999; McLennan, 2001).
Conveyor High lift Prosper Haniel Chuquicamata CB002 Ridgeway Portal Nifty CV3 Kapok McArthur River Ridgeway Trunk Gordonstone Drift Cadjebut Revenge Long (overland) Curragh North Crinum Dawson CV-193 Channar KPC Lafarge Surma Coal Coal Hard rock Hard rock Coal Hard rock 20 035 9955 16 300 10 400 13 100 17 000 68 52 4 0 0 -120 2500 1100 2400 2200 1350 800 7.5 4.9 5.1 4.1 5.3 3.0 1200 ST1500 900 ST1600 2 35 cable belt 1050 ST3150 1000 ST2250 750 ST1800 Coal Hard rock Hard rock Hard rock Hard rock Hard rock Hard rock Coal Hard rock Hard rock 3745 4578 2863 2324 2400 2680 1213 1555 2500 1500 783 540 503 408 400 305 226 215 200 185 2000 5500 840 500 200 470 1100 5000 300 450 5.5 6.0 3.0 3.9 2.8 1.6 3.4 5.0 2.5 1.6 1400 ST7500 1830 ST10 000 1050 ST5500 900 ST3150 630 900 1050 ST2240 1800 ST4500 850 1200 Material Length (m) Lift (m) Rate (t/h) Speed (m/s) Belt spec
1000
800
Ridgeway Portal
Lift (m)
200
0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Length (km)
FIG 6 - Limits of length and lift based on the Ridgeway Portal configuration with 840 t/h, 3 m/s, splice FoS = 6.7 for ST500 to ST7100.
LIMITS OF APPLICATION
The slope of the high lift group is limited by the slope of the drift or decline/incline in which the conveyor is mounted. This is normally in the range 1:5.3 to 1:5.4 (10.5 to 10.7) where the development is carried out using rubber-tyred equipment. Length and lift are limited by the belt carcass construction and the strength of the belt splice. These limits of length are presented in Figure 6 for the Ridgeway Portal configuration operating at 840 t/h, 3 m/s and with a splice factor of safety (FoS) of 6.7 for belt constructions in the range ST500 to ST7100. The choice of belt construction is also limited by the troughability of the belt. Troughability is the ratio of the cross belt sag to belt width and generally reduces with increases in carcass strength. Reduced troughability results in poor belt tracking and hence edge damage and/or tripping on belt drift.
FUTURE APPLICATIONS
Advances in future designs will be fundamentally linked to the load-carrying capacity of the available belt constructions and splice designs. It is useful to recognise a parameter that is used to compare wire rope constructions. This parameter is called the free length and is defined as the length at which a rope will break under its own weight. It is calculated by dividing the rope strength by its weight per unit length. The free length of a range of steel cord belt constructions is presented in Figure 7. The free length calculation recognises:
loss of strength at the splice, free length of bare cords (reduces with increases in carcass
strength), and
74
INCLINED TROUGHED BELT CONVEYOR SYSTEMS FOR UNDERGROUND MASS MINING OPERATIONS
lighter constructions. Splice factors of safety are reduced to around 5.5 (Baigent, 2005). Designers of high lift conveyors can exploit this characteristic in a similar manner. The potential range of application of a new generation of high lift troughed belt conveyors is illustrated for the Ridgeway Portal application operating at 840 t/h, with belt speed increased from 3 to 5 m/s and splice safety factor reduced from 6.7 to 5.5 (Figure 8). This shows when comparing Figure 8 with Figure 6 that the carcass could be reduced from ST5500 to ST2800, or that the lift could be increased from 503 m to around 750 m using the existing ST5500 belt. This illustrates the potential for utilising lighter belts for a given application and hence reducing the capital and operating costs of the haulage system. Alternatively, this illustrates the potential for applying a single flight conveyor to a greater lift and again reducing the capital and operating costs of the haulage system by reducing the number of transfer/drive stations. The key issues in achieving these increases in length and lift include:
ST4000
ST5000ST5500
ST6300
ST7100
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
FIG 7 - Free length for 1 m width of conveyor belt for no carcass splice (upper data points) and for spliced carcass (lower data points).
1000
800
Ridgeway Portal
ST5500
Lift (m)
200
0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Length (km)
FIG 8 - Limits of length and lift based on the Ridgeway Portal conveyor (840 t/h, with belt speed increased to 5 m/s and belt splice FoS reduced to 5.5).
75
Limit the additional strains applied to the belt by: designing chutes to minimise material impact at the
loading point;
providing facilities to limit dust generation; selecting idlers, pulleys and drives for life and noise
limitation;
REFERENCES
AS1755 2000 conveyors. Safety requirements. Baigent, D, 2005. Curragh North materials handling project, in Proceedings Bulk Materials Handling Conference, Mackay. DIN 22101 1982:02. Continuous mechanical handling equipment Belt conveyors for bulk materials Bases for calculation and design. DIN 22101 2000:08. Continuous conveyors Belt conveyors for loose bulk materials Basis for calculation and dimensioning. Kusel, B, 1999. The success story of self-extinguishing steel cord conveyor belts in underground coal mining, International Mining Quarterly Review, 44. McLennan, G, 2001. Energy efficient belt conveyor at BHP Gregory/ Crinum, in Bulk Solids Handling, 21(1):73. Nordell, L K, 1991. The Channar 20 km Overland A flagship of modern belt conveyor technology, Bulk Solids Handling, (11)4:781. Pratt, A G L, 2005. Application of conveyors for underground haulage, in Proceedings Ninth Underground Operators Conference, pp 273-283 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne). Pratt, A G L, 2008. Mine haulage Options and the process of choice, in Proceedings Tenth Underground Operators Conference, pp 179-188 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne). Troncoso, J, Francis, R and Pedersen, L, 1993. Design and construction of coal handling facilities at Gordonstone Colliery, Bulk Solids Handling, 13(4):823.
installing idlers to avoid belt resonance; and designing chutes and/or accelerating belts to minimise
abrasion at the load point.
splicing procedures and personnel training; quality of splice materials; quality of splicing equipment; and splice monitoring.
CONCLUSIONS
A number of technologies have contributed to the successful application of troughed belts in underground mass mining operations. These include:
76