Communism, Commune, Community ( audio link enclosed) Now, What is the root wor d for " Community"?

This is the one that I wanted you to listen to, also, please join us on Sat. at 6 PM EST with Howard G., Gemini Research Group and Law Study Class at Talkshoe 99043 http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=99043&cmd=tc http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-99043/TS-631301.mp3 audio link

We are honored once again to have Howard Griswold by: Special Appearance In RE: Law Study Class- Howards Law Study with open mike, question and answer time. How ard's regular show is on Thursday night at http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=95099&cmd=tc Request the Transcripts from Thursday nights from olde_silas@totalusa.net Howard Griswold Water and Health Conference calls: 218-844-3388 pin 966771# (6 mutes & un-mutes), Monday at 8 p.m., Eastern Time. Please send all All correspondence to: Gemini Investment Research Group, POB 398 , Delmar, Del. 19940 Howard's home number: 302-875-2653 (between 9:30, a.m, and 7:00, p.m.) Thursday Phone Number: (724) 444-7444 Call ID: 95099 ____________________________________ Monday Water and health call 218-844-3388 pin 966771# (6 mutes & un-mutes), Mond ay at 8 p.m., _______________________________________ Wednesday truthradio.com _______________________________________ Thursday Talkshoe 8:00 http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=95099&cmd=tc 95099 Saturday Talkshoe http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=99 043&cmd=tc 99043 6pm est Saturday, Howard joins the Jack Bauer call at 74235 Howard was on last Wednesday on the Bo and Rocko Show on http://freedomslips.com/ 347-688-2902 Cancelling the Contract(s) Howard Griswold http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlDKkI-3Rpg False Healing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6nWMQOGa-c Using The Constitution In Court http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzBpHzeVsMQ http://www.mindserpent.com/American_History/court/1909_fulton.html Fulton Light, H. & P. Co. v. State of New York 65 Misc. Rep. 263, 121 N. Y. S. 536 (1909) (No. 9103.) State of New York, Court of Claims, December, 1909. The rights which claimants thus acquired through the previous appropriations of the State are property rights. "Property" in the strict legal sense is an aggreg ate of rights which are guaranteed and protected by government. In the ordinary sense it is used to indicate the thing itself rather than the rights attached to

it. Whether or not we employ the term in one or the other of these senses, the result is the same, so far as the interference with property is concerned; for, while in the former attention is directed to the rights which make up the thing, in the latter the thing which constitutes the aggregation of these rights is em phasized. In both cases the rights attached to the thing are the subject of conc ern. A reference to the cases in the courts will show the various rights which h ave been protected under the name of property but which, in reality, are rights attached to something which in the ordinary mind constitutes property. In Forste r v. Scott, 136 N. Y. 584, Judge O'Brien said: "Whenever a law deprives the [65 Misc. Rep. 288] http://www.mindserpent.com/American_History/court/court_index.html State and Federal Court Cases 1776 Wheeler v. Hughes 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 23 1779 Respublica v. Sweers 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 41 1795 Glass v. The Sloop, Betsey 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 6 1795 Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 54 1801 Marshall v. Loveless ** 1 N.C. 412 1805 United States v. Hooe ** 7 U.S. 73 1812 Conways' Executors and Devisees v. Alexander 11 U.S. (7 Cranch.) 218 1813 Fairfax's Devisee v. Hunter's Lessee 11 U.S. (7 Cranch.) 603 1815 Terrett v. Taylor 13 U.S. (9 Cranch.) 43 1815 Delovio v. Boit ** 7 Federal Cases, 418, No. 3,776, 2 Gall. 398 1819 M'Culloch v. Maryland 17 U.S. 316 1819 Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward 17 U.S. 518 1823 Corfield v. Coryell ** 6 Fed. Cas. 546, no. 3,230 1823 The Society for Propagating the Gospel & c. v. New Haven 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 464 1823 Johnson and Graham's Lessee v. M'Intosh 21 U.S. (8 Wheat) 543 1824 Gibbons v. Ogden 9 Wheat. 1 1824 The Bank of the United States v. Planters' Bank of Georgia 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 904 1827 Harcourt v. Gaillard 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 523 1830 United States v. Buford 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 464 1831 Cathcart v. Robinson 30 U.S. (5 Peters.) 264 1833 Barron v. City of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243

1837 Moore v. Wilson's Adm'rs. ** 18 Tenn. 406 1842 Swift v. Tyson 41 U.S. (16 Pet.) 1 1842 Milnor v. Metz 41 U.S. 221 1843 State v. Beackmo ** 6 Blackf. 488 1844 The Louisville Cincinnati & Charleston Railroad Company v. Letson ** 2 Howard 497 1846 Quinby v. Duncan ** 4 Har. 383 1851 In re Charge to Grand Jury ** Fed. Cas. No. 18,267, 1022 1853 Alexander J. Marshall v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company ** 16 Howard 314 1856 The Armstrong v. United States ** Dev. Ct. Cl. 38, Section 87 1856 Piqua Bank v. Knoup ** 6 Ohio Reports 342 1856 Wynehamer v. The People ** 13 N.Y. Rep. 378 1857 Scott v. Sanford 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 1866 United States v. Rhodes ** 7 Am. Law Reg. (N.S.) 233 1867 U.S. v. De Repentigny ** 72 U.S. (5 Wall.) 211 1869 Paul v. Virginia 75 U.S. (8 Wall.) 168 1869 Texas v. White 74 U.S. (8 Wall.) 700 1870 McGoon v. Scales 76 U.S. 23 1871 United States v. Russell 80 U.S. 623 1873 United States v. Anthony ** 24 Federal Cases 829 1875 Minor v. Happersett 88 U.S. 162 1875 Walker v. Sauvinet 92 U.S. 90 1875 U.S. v. Cruikshank 92 U.S. 542 1880 Hauenstein v. Lynham 100 U.S. 483 1882 United States v. Lee 106 U.S. 196 1884 Julliard v. Greenman 110 U.S. 421 1884 The Slaughter House Cases 111 U.S. 746 1884 Burnham v. Bowen 111 U.S. 776 1885 Garfield Mining & Milling Co. v. Hammer 8 P. 153 1886 Yick Wo v. Hopkins 118 U.S. 356 1889 Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co. ** 130 U.S. 291

1889 Jantzen v. Arizona Copper Co. ** 20 P. 93 1889 The Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. U .S. 136 U.S. 1 1890 Jones v. United States 137 U.S. 202 1890 Anheuser Busch Brewing Co. v. Emma Mason (Shephard) 46 N.W. 558 1892 Boyd v. State of Nebraska ** 143 U.S. 159 1892 Barton v. Brown 145 U.S. 335 1896 Davis v. Elmira Savings Bank 161 U.S. 275 1897 The Glide 167 U.S. 606 1898 United States v. Wardwell 167 U.S. 606 1900 Maxwell v. Dow 176 U.S. 581 1901 Downes v. Bidwell 182 U.S. 244 1903 United States v. Morris ** 125 Federal Reporter 322 1905 Clyatt v. United States (Shephard) 197 U.S. 207 1906 Hale v. Henkel 201 U.S. 43 1908 Twining v. New Jersey 211 U.S. 78 1908 Merchants Bank of Valdosta v. Baird (Shephard) 160 F. 642 1909 American Fruit Co. v. United Fruit Co. 213 U.S. 347 1909 Fulton Light, H. & P. Co. v. State of New York 65 Misc. Rep. 263 1911 U.S. v. Chamberlin ** 219 U.S. 250 1911 First National Bank of Tallapoosa v. Monroe (Shephard) 69 S.E. 1123 1919 Brainerd v. Brice 250 U.S. 229 1921 United States v. Strang 254 U.S. 491 1921 Kavanaugh v. Cohoes Power & Light Corporation ** 187 New York Supplement 216 1922 Balzac v. Porto Rico 258 U.S. 298 1923 Keller v. Potomac Electric Power Company 261 U.S. 428 1924 Gorman v. Forty Second St. M. & St. N. Ave. Ry. Co. ** 203 N.Y.S. 632 1927 Stanek v. White 215 N.W. 784 1927 Howard & Foster Co. v. Citizens National Bank of Union (Shephard) 130 S.E. 758 1928 Collier v. Lindley ** 206 P. 526 1930 Federal Radio Commission v. General Electric Co.

281 U.S. 464 1930 Redfield v. Fisher 292 P. 813 1934 California Law Review Regarding Non-citizen Nationals 1934 Nebbia v. New York ** 291 U.S. 502 1934 Hallenbeck v. Leimert 295 U.S. 116 1935 Hallenbeck v. Leimert 295 U.S. 116 1935 Colgate v. Harvey ** 296 U.S. 404 1935 United States v. Butler 297 U.S. 1 1936 Ashton v. Cameron County Water Improvement District No. One 298 U.S. 513 1937 Chas. C. Steward Mach. Co. v. Davis 301 U.S. 548 1937 Helvering v. Davis 301 U.S. 619 1938 Erie Railroad v. Tompkins 304 U.S. 64 1939 Guaranty Trust Co. v. Henwood 307 U.S. 247 1939 Hague v.Committee for Industrial Organization 307 U.S. 496 1940 Petition of Karas 17 N.Y.S.2d 958 1943 Clearfield Trust Co. et. al. v. United States 318 U.S. 363 1946 In re Bolter ** 66 F.Supp. 566 1946 Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. 328 U.S. 293 1946 United States v. Lovett 328 U.S. 303 1952 Blackmar v. Guerre 342 US 512 1955 Jersey City v. Hague ** 115 A.2d 8 1955 Quinn v. Dupree ** 303 S.W.2d 769 1957 Briehl v. Dulles ** 248 F.2d 561 1957 Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners 353 U.S. 232 1962 Pearlman v. Reliance Ins. Co. 371 U.S. 132 1968 Dyett v. Turner 20 Utah 2d 403 1973 In re Great Plains Royalty Corp. 471 F.2d 1261 1973 Roe v. Wade 410 U.S. 113 1978 United States v. LaSalle National Bank 437 U.S. 298 1980 Lefkowitz v. Lebensfeld 434 N.Y.S.2d 929 1982 Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe

455 U.S. 130 1982 Lewis v. U.S. 680 F.2d 1239 1983 United States v. Drefke 707 F.2d 978 1984 Trezevant v. City of Tampa 741 F.2d 336 1992 Kimmel v. Burnet County Appraisal Dist. 835 S.W.2d 108 1993 Diversified Metal Products, Inc. v. T-Bow Trust, et al Complaint CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.Idaho Rules of the United States Supreme Court Code of Conduct for United States Judges Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees Checklist for Financial and Other Conflicts of Interest Collected Court Citations ** indicates quote only, and not entire case.

How to Incorporate a For-Profit Business - For Lawyers - Law ... rc.lsuc.on.ca Home How-To Briefs Business Law This How-To Brief outlines steps to take to set up a for-profit corporation both ...Business names must be registered in the Roman alphabet (English, French, .. . Title 13-C, 121: Requirements for documents; extrinsic facts www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/13-c/title13-csec121.html Feb 1, 2012 Maine Revised Statutes ... Title 13-C: MAINE BUSINESSCORPORATION ACT HEADING: PL ... A. A corporate name need not be in English if written using the Roman alphabet or Arabic or Roman numerals; and [2001, c. 640 ... AACR2 Abbreviations (Roman Alphabet) - Yale University Library www.library.yale.edu/cataloging/abbrev.htm AACR2 Abbreviations (Roman Alphabet) ... Use only in notes to indicate voice ran ge of vocal works. Use only in names of firms and other corporate bodies.