Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I
G Kumaraswamy Naidu Consulting Editor, Portfolio Organizer. Manoj Gautam Research Associate, Examinations Department, The ICFAI University. Sanchita Patnaik Research Associate, Examinations Department, The ICFAI University.
The application of free cash flow models is thought of as the most challenging and enriching exercise for analysts involved in equity valuation.
n our previous article, Equity Valuation: Dividend Discount Model, published in Portfolio Organizer, May 2005, we learnt the practical application of Dividend Discount Model (DDM) of valuation. There are many shortcomings in DDM. It cannot be used to value companies which do not pay dividends. Also, the earnings of the companies must exhibit a significant relationship with the dividends. Due to these reasons, analysts began focusing on alternate measures of value. The free cash flow valuation came in vogue in the 1980s but till very recently, analysts used to have a fascination for earnings. Companies were also doing their bit by focusing on short-term earnings to make up good numbers for quarterly analysts meets. Several accounting scandals followed by the collapse of some of the major firms like Enron and WorldCom changed this scenario. Analysts and academicians began to understand the importance of cash flows. Cash flows, rather than earnings, as indicators of the future market price may look absurd to staunch supporters of earnings; but earnings are affected by diverse accounting policies adopted by various firms while cash flows reduce this variability. Market experiences have established that current stock prices are more influenced by long-term cash flows than by short-term earnings numbers. Not long ago, Indian banks were making huge provisions NPAs and writing them off. Going by the earnings logic, share prices should have tumbled, but in most cases, the reverse happened as the market viewed this as an indicator of healthy cash flows in future. According to Rappaport and Mouboussim, 2001, the discounted cash flow model is the only theoretically correct valuation model that can explain the pricing of equity stock.
Free cash flows of the firm Discount rate Likely growth rate in free cash flows of the firm in next period
This model is suited to value firms, which are expected to grow at stable growth rate in perpetuity. The problem with this model lies in the denominator. If k in the above equation is less than the growth rate, then this model becomes worthless. Generally n stage model is used to value firms. As in dividends discount model, we can use H-model, 2 and 3 stage model in FCF valuation. Dividends are substituted by FCF here. The n-stage model can be represented as follows:
We have used the term FCF i.e. free cash flows, which can be either FCFF or FCFE. As FCFF indicates the total value of the operating assets of the firm including the value of debt, if we use FCFF to find the value of the firm then we need to deduct the market
50
INVESTMENT TOOLS
value of debt from the cumulated present value. After arriving at the value of operating assets, we add the value of non-operating assets like investments to find the value of equity
Interest Expense
While arriving at the net income, interest expenses are deducted from total income. Since our aim is to find out the cash flows available to all the suppliers of the capital, interest expenses are to be added back. The long-term creditors of the company are interested in the cash flows that are available for servicing their debt. Since interest has a tax-shield associated with it, tax adjustments are done prior to its inclusion.
FCFF
t = 1 (1 + WACC )t
WACC stands for weighted average cost of capital. It represents opportunity cost of capital to the investors investing in the firm. Weighted average of all the sources of capital is taken. The formula for WACC is as follows:
Portfolio Organizer June 2005
52
INVESTMENT TOOLS
WACC = kd(1- t) x D/V + ke x E/V + kp x P/V Where: kd = Pre-tax cost of debt ke= Cost of equity kp= Cost of preference capital D = Market value of debt E = Market value of equity P = Market value of preference capital t = Marginal tax rate V = Market value of the firm
We use market value weights as market value represents the true value of claims by various providers of capital.
Debt
Where debt is not traded in the secondary market, traded debt securities of a similar nature in terms of tenure and credit quality are searched. Using their yield to maturity as discount rate, present value is calculated. This present value is used as market value of debt. While estimating cost While estimating of debt, the coupon interest should never be taken as it is static and does not portray a true picture of the current cost of debt, the conditions. Another approach pertains to the use of risk free coupon interest rate. We dealt with risk-free rate in our previous article. should never be Default risk of the entity is found by assessing its rating and if no ratings are available, then analysts estimate effective taken as it is static proxies for these ratings by using their own methods. After and does not that, the rating spread is added to the risk-free rate. After portray a true calculating the cost of debt, we calculate the market value of picture of the debt using the cost to discount the cash flows associated with the debt. current conditions Coming back to the cost of debt, as it is tax-deductible, it is multiplied by the tax adjustment factor, i.e., (1-t) where t is marginal tax rate, to arrive at post tax cost of debt.
Equity
Equity is traded in the market so that the number of outstanding shares is multiplied by the current market price to obtain the market value. Cost of equity is already dealt with in detail in our previous article. (Valuation of Equity: Dividend Discount Model in Portfolio Organizer, May 2005).
Preferred Securities
Preferred stocks pay dividends perpetually to the preferred shareholders. Their cost can be found by dividing the dividends by their market price.
53
Terminal Value
The calculation of terminal value under this model more or less remains the same as DDM. The dividends are replaced by FCF. At the beginning of the stable period, the terminal value is calculated assuming that FCF would grow at a stable rate forever. Terminal value = FCF/ k-g Where FCF can be FCFE or FCFF depending upon the cash flows we are using for valuation. k = Discount rate g = Growth rate in the stable period While calculating terminal value, the assumptions regarding key parameters like capital spending, depreciation, cost of equity and cost of debt change. In the matured stage, due to lack of reinvestment opportunities, the capital spending becomes less. The cost of equity, if we use CAPM to calculate it, also changes, as beta in stable phase is different from beta in high growth period. After calculating the present value of FCFF, we deduct market value of debt outstanding to arrive at the value of operating assets of the firm.
54
INVESTMENT TOOLS
Theoretically, FCFE should be equal to the dividends as these are the actual cash flows that are available to the equity shareholders. In practice, firms do pay less than this amount due to varied reasons. One of the reasons which could be cited is the companys preference to adopt stable payout policy over a period of time. These are standard definitions of FCFE and FCFF from net income as reported by the firms. However, in practice, analysts use varied methods to derive these cash flows. Many analysts, instead of using the bottom up approach, i.e., net income approach, start with EBITDA. However, in all these approaches, the basic tenet remains the same.
55
56
INVESTMENT TOOLS
of the industry sales. These contribute nearly 38% and 2.87% to the total revenues of the company. Another significant item is nozzles, which contributes 22% to the total revenues of the company. In the spark plug and nozzle segment, the company might face some problems, as pressure is two-pronged. First, the threat is from the oversupply of cheap products from the unorganized sector. The second threat is related to the availability of cheap substitutes from China and Thailand. We expect the sales of MICO to increase by 20% in the year 2005. The Company recorded an impressive growth of 60% in earnings for 2004. This was due to fresh demand for their fuel injector system. The Operating Profit Margin (OPM) of the company is already 27% and we do not foresee any significant increase in the OPM. MICO is introducing the CRDi system in India from 2006; this product can help the company reach new high of sales in the coming year. The pricing power of the product is not known. However, considering the immense potential of the product, we believe sales of the company will show at least 70% rise in 2006. Many analysts are of the opinion that We expect the sales will double in 2006, but many foreign carmakers have sales of MICO to ambitious plans to enter the country with cars that are already equipped with the CRDi system. Hence, we are increase by 20% in taking a very conservative view. Considering the plans of the year 2005. The some players to make an aggressive entry into the segment, Company recorded the sales from this segment will eventually slow down. The an impressive sales are expected to increase by 40% for the year 2007 and 30% for the year 2008. growth of 60% in We prepared a proforma income statement for this high growth period from 2005 to 2008. We forecast the individual components of income statement taking the most recent percentage to sales as MICO achieved significant cost efficiency during 2004.
Cost of Capital: The cost of equity is calculated using CAPM. The beta value of MICO was calculated by regressing the returns of the stock of the company with the S&P 500 index. It was around 0.44. The risk free rate is taken at 6.5% while the market risk premium is taken at 7.5%. (Please refer to Valuation of Equity: Dividend Discount Model in Portfolio Organizer, May 2005). The cost of equity has been calculated as follows: 6.5% + 0.44(7.5) = 9.8%. We assumed a target debt equity ratio of 10% considering the historical ratio. The value of debt was found by adjusting the value of equity at the year-end for the net profits after the dividends. We assumed the dividend payout ratio of 8% again considering the historical record of the company. An effective interest rate of 5.13% was used to calculate the cost of capital. The cost of capital was to 9.22%. After forecasting these amounts, the projected FCFF statement of MICO was prepared. (See Table 2). Transition Period: The high growth period will last for 4 years. After the high growth period, the transition period will begin at the end of which the earnings of the company will settle to a stable growth rate. We assume this period to last for 5 years. Entry of new players in the fray coupled with the expected slowdown in the auto sector can play spoilsport. Instead of focusing on individual components for this period, we focused on the likely growth in FCFF that the company is expected to have. As explained in the previous article, the stable growth rate of the firms is more or less equal to the long-term growth rate of the economy in which it operates. Growth of the auto-ancillary sector is linked
57 Portfolio Organizer June 2005
1. Interest: For the past few years, the company has been following a policy of keeping a stable D/E ratio of 10%. We continue with this ratio to arrive at the debt amount for the company. A lot of debt of the company is in the form of short-term credit, like sales-tax deferrals. Hence, the cost of debt for the company is arrived at 5.13%. 2. Depreciation: In absence of specific information about the depreciation policy of the company, we took past average of depreciation figures as a percentage to gross fixed assets. It was around 8.23%. 3. Tax rate: The marginal tax rate of 35% is taken into account. 4. Changes in non-cash working capital: We took the average percentage of working capital to sales to arrive at this figure. Working capital investments are highly correlated with the sales in general. Then we deduct the previous years figure from the current year figure to arrive at the changes. 5. Investments in fixed assets: According to company sources, the parent company has huge plans for MICO. The parent company is going to invest Rs. 1000 cr over a period of 4 years in the company. Rs. 550 cr will be invested in the year 2005 to start the commissioning process of CRDi systems while rest, Rs. 450 cr, will be invested in three installments, in the years 2006, 2007 and 2008.
closely to the growth of the GDP of the country. We have used the sustainable growth rate method to calculate the stable growth rate of the company. The long-term ROE of the company is approximately 20%. We have assumed that MICO will pay 50% of its earnings as dividends in the stable period. Therefore, the stable growth rate is taken at 10%. This is lower than the long-term growth forecast for the economy at 12%. The growth in FCFF for the year 2008 was 32.16%. This will decline linearly to 10% at the end of 2013. As we have assumed that the beta of the company will be 1 in the stable phase, we have linearly increased this beta from 0.44 in the year 2008 to 1 in the year 2013. Hence, cost of capital also changes during the transition phase. Terminal Value: By making use of expected FCFF during 2013, we calculated the terminal value at the end of 2013 as follows:
58
INVESTMENT TOOLS
Terminal value = FCFF2012 (1+ growth rate
stable period
) / (WACC
stable phase
stable phase
In the stable phase, the cost of capital changes significantly. We adopted the custom of using beta 1 in the stable phase as in the stable phase the returns of the firms match with that on market and risk characteristics of the firms change significantly. We also consider the penchant of the parent company to keep its subsidiary debt-free in the stable phase. Hence, we assumed that in the stable phase, MICO would go debt-free. The cost of capital using the beta 1 and keeping other factors constant come to 14.0%. The total value of FCFF of the company stood at Rs. 414,065.04 mn. To arrive at the value of equity, MV of debt, i.e., Rs. 1,253.90 (calculated on our own since the final figures have not been available) is deducted. To this figure, we added the value of cash (we excluded cash from working capital calculations) and value of nonoperating assets to arrive at the total value of the firm.
Cashflows During Transition Period
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 14.00 34,383.20 12.37 13,525.18 2013 10.00 37,821.05 14.00 11,630.27
Growth (%) 27.73 FCFF (Rs. mn) 20,605.80 Discounting factor (%) 10.07 Present value (PV) (Rs. mn) 12,753.95 Present value of Free Cash Flows during high growth period (Rs. mn) Present value of Free Cash Flows during Transition period (Rs. mn) PV of Terminal value (Rs. mn) Total
28,669.73
The total value of the firms equity = 414,065.04 1,253.90 + 4,891.14 + 2,915 = Rs.420,617 mn This figure, when divided by the total number of shares outstanding, i.e., 32.05 million gives us a figure of Rs. 13,123.78 per share. Ever since the world discovered the concept of FCF, it has been gaining ground. The real importance of FCF lies in its applications. Non-dividend firms can also be valued using FCF. However, there are significant practical problems also. FCF valuation, like other valuation models, depends on significant assumptions regarding growth rate, cost of capital, reinvestment opportunities and capital structure. The capital structure can change and so can the cost of capital for the company. The depreciation policy was not clear from the annual reports so we made our own assumptions, which we found were justified. We assumed the growth rate to decline linearly during the stable phase, which may not be the case. P
Reference # 6M-2005-06-10-01
59