Howard Griswold Conference CallThursday, December 9, 2010 Partial Howard Griswold Conference calls: 218-844-3388 pin 966771# (6 mutes

& un-mutes), Thursdays at 8 p.m., Eastern Time. 6 Mutes and un-mutes

Conference Call is simulcast on:

www.TheREALPublicRadio.Net Starting in the first hour at 8 p.m.

Note: there is a hydrate water call Mondays, same time and number and pin #. Howards home number: 302-875-2653 (between 9:30, a.m, and 7:00, p.m.)
Mickeys debt collection call is 8:00 p.m., Eastern Time, Wednesday night. The number is 712 432 8773 and the pin number is 947975#.

All correspondence to: Gemini Investment Research Group, POB 398, Delmar, Del. 19940 (do not address mail to Howard Griswold since Howard has not taken up residence in that mailbox and since hes on good terms with his wife he isnt likely to in the foreseeable future.) "All" Howard's and GEMINI RESEARCH's information through the years, has been gathered, combined and collated into 3 "Home-Study Courses" and "Information packages" listed at www.peoples-rights.com "Mail Order" DONATIONS and/or Toll-Free 1-877-544-4718 (24 Hours F.A.Q. line) Dave DiReamer can be reached at: notaxman@dmv.com Peoples-rights has a new book available from The Informer: Just Who Really Owns the United States, the International Monetary Fund, Federal Reserve, World Bank, Your House, Your Car, Everythingthe Myth and the Reality. Hell take $45 for the book to help with ads, but $40 would be ok which includes shipping ($35 barebones minimum) www.peoples-rights.com c/o 1624 Savannah Road, Lewes, Delaware 19958 ********************

Christian Walters (trusts) is on Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays (8 pm) and Saturdays at nine oclock, Eastern Time. The number is 1-712-432-0075 and the pin is 917030# (9 pm). Wednesdays number is 1-724-444-7444 and the pin is 41875# (8 pm, Eastern).

Often you can find a transcript or a partial one for the weeks call at the following website:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/peoplelookingforthetruth Howard approves or disapproves all postings to this yahoo group. ******************************************************************* When you arent talking please mute your phone!! It would be best if you mute your phone when you first come on, then un-mute it when you want to talk and then re-mute it. You can use the *6 button on your phone or use the phones mute button Speaker phones and cell phones are not desirable as they can chop up the call badly occasionally. If you are recording the call and leave the phone unintended, please mute!!!!!

Note, at various times some people left the phone un-muted and coupled television audio into the phone making the conference call conversations very difficult.
When you are not muted be careful of making noise such as breathing hard into the phones microphone or rubbing the mouthpiece or not reducing extraneous noise across the room. Cell phones can pick up wind noise when used outside and also if not in a primary reception zone can couple noise into the call. Excessive echoes and noise will terminate the conference call. Cell phones and speaker phones can cause echoes. Keep the call quiet, dont make Howard climb out of his mailbox and bop you one. ******************************************************************* Note: the telephone lines are usually quite noisy and therefore it would be prudent to slow your speech down otherwise your words and meaning will be lost. Suggestion: Get a phone with a privacy or mute button. This is much more convenient than star-6 and more rapid to use. It can also be used as a cough button since it can be used rapidly. Try it, youll like it. ********************************************************************* Mickeys new call-in number: 1-712-432-8787, pin: 170555# 8 p.m, EST ****************************************

A recording of each Howard Griswold Thursday conference call is available from Dezert Owl upon request for any sized donation. Go to the following link: www.TheRealPublicRadio.Net/Archives.html .
For donations to desert, send them to Free America Radio Network, 121 Seaparc Circle, Suite B, Kingsland, Georgia 31548. Phone number: 912-882-2142. Cell: 304-629-7169. ************

. . . {00:22:39.574} [Howard] I got to give a tremendous amount of credit and thanks to this fellow that goes by the name of David Clarence and his group of people around him that have been working and researching and studying and coming at a slightly different angle than I have come at it from and exposed to me what I didnt see or understand. Now, Im really hoping that he and his group will get in touch with me because Im more than willing to share with him what weve found so that he can improve what hes doing and really bring it down to an airtight function that will work all the time for everybody. And Im going to tell you something. You better be prepared for this. As we become more and successful youre going to find these governments all over the world becoming more and more oppressive. Violence will erupt all over the place. Governments will turn on their people and it will happen here in America. Dont trust this government any further than you could pick it up and throw it and you really cant pick it up and throw it. So dont trust it at all. When they start losing control they will become violent. Be prepared for it. In no way do I want to knock what Mr. Clarence has done. I think hes on the right track but theres more to know about it and I wish I would have understand what they figured out a long time ago because it fit so many of the things that we had researched and studying but I just had not totally put that picture together and realized what could be done about it. Now, as I go through some of this stuff tonight and begin to discuss it Im going to stop on this subject and relate it to some other subjects off and on but heres what I found about the breach of duty of persons in a fiduciary relation. First of all, some of you listeners may remember maybe ten years ago or more we had come upon a case in New Jersey called Jersey City v. Hague. Mayor Hague was the mayor of Jersey City government from 1904 to somewhere around 1944. He was voted out of office and a new mayor took office and shortly after he took office the employees of Jersey City government came to the new mayor and said, are you going to do what Mayor Hagues been doing? And he said, I dont know, whats that? And they said, he was charging us 3% of our paycheck to keep our job and if we didnt pay him we got fired. The new mayor said, what? He called the attorney general. The attorney general brought charges against mayor Hague. The whole case went up to the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Thats the decision that we found a copy of and were reading. In that decision the court said that government is always in a trust position. In other words, government is a trust operation. Now, that doesnt make the Constitution a trust document. That created a situation where people would take office and be a trustee for the good of the rest of the American people. Thats what government is all about, its a public trust, it is in a trustee position and it must look out for the beneficiaries who are us and if you ask any lawyer that has any knowledge at all which are damned few or some even tax collectorsthey know this. They understand it. They realize that the American people are the beneficiary and theyll tell you that and that theyre the trustees, that theyre in a trust position. Now, this

goes a lot deeper than that and I had realized some of it but not enough of it. Weve been talking about securing an interest in your property for eleven years, at least, and weve been doing security agreement documents for people and telling them that youve got to recover the interest in your property. When you recorded any property at all by registration with the government, the government acquired an interest in that property and you lost all interest in the property and your interest is your power to control the property. If you want to live free you got to take your property back. You got to take back the controlling interest and the only way to do that is to follow the law. And the only way we found in the law is to create and properly file a security interest and Daves talked about this many times. Ive talked about it many times over the years. When you do this you put them in a position of not being able to prove that they have any interest in the property and they failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted in the courts as long as you can show and stand up for your interest and explain it to the court. Now, weve had people be very successful with doing this and this document has worked great for some people and weve had lots of people fail because they dont bother to read. Theyre too lazy to put out an effort to learn anything and they fail. Thats their problem, not ours. What we gave them came right out of the law book. We dont profess to be lawyers so we cant do it for you and youll never get one of these scum bag lawyers to do this because the lawyers are on the other side and Ill think youll see that as I go through some of this tonight. The lawyers are the thieves. Theyre a ring of people in business for the purpose of taking your wealth and your property for themselves. Shakespeare once said, if youre going to straighten out a corrupt government the first thing you have to do is kill all the lawyers. Im afraid Ive got to agree with him. If were going to straighten this out were going to have to execute all the lawyers. Im sure the lawyers wont like that. Thats tough. Theyre the ones that are the scum bags. They are part of government. They are telling the rest of government what to do because somebody said that because they have a degree in law that they know what the laws all about, so you listen to them and do what they tell you. So every agency has its own lawyer and that lawyers tells the agency what to do and the people follow what the lawyer said and proceed to break the lawsthe real law that they dont apply to. By misapplying laws, rules, codes and regulations to the private people that they dont apply tothe lawyers have told them its ok, you can do that. The lawyers have created statutory law and constitutional amendments to give the appearance that government has the right to do what its doing and it has deceived everybody and misled them into thinking that we got to listen to these peoplewe got to do what they tell us. And nobodys ever had enough ambition to find out why or how or what, and believe me, its not an easy thing to do. Ive been at this for 31 years and all this study that Ive done the pieces are really starting to fall in place, finally, after 31 years of research and the pieces all come back to this public trust and them breaching the public trust. Using your birth certificate as a monetary document would be a breach of the public trust but other things that youve acquired in life such as the ability to labor once youre finished growing up and learning something. Whether you did it through education or mom and dad taught you or Uncle Tenuce taught you, it doesnt matter where you learned it from, once youre learned it and you want to get out in the world and

apply your abilities then you have to sign another document called social security application and that gives them the power to control your labor because you gave them that property right. The birth certificate gave them your body and your name. Both your name and your body are your propertyyou gave it away. You gave away the interest in that. When you grow up and get to working a little bit and making some money you buy a car and what do you do with it? You register it with the Department of Motor Vehicles, an agency of government and that gives that agency and the rest of government the interest in the automobile as theyve already acquired an interest in your body through the birth certificate and your labor through the social security. And then you work a little harder and you make a little more money and you get rich enough to buy some goodies that you like, like a house and you register the land deed and there went the interest in your house. You dont have anything left. You have nothing to call your ownyouve given it all way. What you get back from this crooked little system is the right to use that property as long as you pay the taxes and follow all the rules and regulations related to that kind of a property that they set up. Am I right? You cant argue with me, can you? Thats exactly the way were living. You got to follow all the rules. Youre not the one thats supposed to follow the rulesyoure the beneficiary. Theyre supposed to follow the rules and protect you and your interest and thats not what theyve done. Now, heres what happens. The first case I want to bring up is Iroquois Iron Company v. Kruse. Its at 241 Federal Reporter. Now, thats the very first series of books on the Federal Reporterthat makes this an old case. But believe it or not, this is still ruling case law. Iroquois Iron Company v. Kruse. 241 F. Rptr., 433. Not F2nd, now, thats a newer book. This is the old real original book (page 433). Now, this case said a whole lot of different things and there are different quotes about it here but the most important thing that it said is very directly related to what weve said about security interest in your property. And remember that the government is a public trust. Every government is a public trust whether were talking about the county government, the city government, the little rinky dink town government or unincorporated governments of small towns or boroughs or parishes down in the New Orleans area. These little governments they too are public trusts. The state is a public trust and the fed is a public trustall governments are a public trust. You ought to see that Jersey City v. Hague case, youll see that. As such I got to quote this out of Jersey City v. Hague and every time I quote it I have to chuckle. The court said that all government officials are at all times in a trust position and as such they have a fiduciary duty to act in good faith with the highest level of honesty and integrity. Have you ever seen government act in good faith much less with a high level of honesty and integrity? I havent. But the court said that thats what theyre supposed to do. And heres what this case said. Its Iroquois Iron Company v. Kruseit said, property acquired by a fiduciary by means of interest or information obtained through his fiduciary relation is held to charge that relation with a constructive trust. Now, thats in addition to the public trust so that narrows it down to every individual in a department of government that youre dealing with where your property is registered. Theyre holding it in a constructive trust. As such they have a duty as fiduciaries to act with the highest level of honesty and integrity and

everything should be done with good faith looking out for you and I as beneficiaries, not looking out for themselves and stripping us of our property and our wealth as they have been doing. Theyve reversed everything. Now, all this information thats in here goes back quite far in the history of this country. These are old cases. They are precedent setting ruling case law because they havent been changed and Ill tell you why they havent been changed because the lawyers make sure that nobody knows anything about this and they wont bring any new cases because they know theyll lose. So these kinds of cases are not being brought in the courts anymore. There is no question about your registration of property being a constructive trust but lets get into some of the details of the importance of that constructive trust. [Neil] Do you have the cite for Jersey City v. Hague, Howard?

[Howard] Yeah, somewhere, not right in front of me. I didnt dig that out tonight. Its page 15 and I forget the book number but its in Atlantic Reporter which can be found on West Law if you can get into West Law. You can go to the library and use their computer and get into West Law or if somebodys interested in a case and you cant locate it write to Gemini Investments. Ill give the address later on {Gemini Investment Research Group, POB 398, Delmar, Del. 19940} and just ask us for a copy and all I ask you to do is sent a couple of dollars, two, three dollars to cover printing and mailing costs. I dont sell this kind of stuff. Its public information, why would I sell it? It can be found but it can be sometimes very hard to find. I dont know what led us to that case. We stumbled on it but I can tell you that it was well hidden but I asked one of our listeners thats usually on the call that lives in New Jersey if she would run over to Jersey City to that court and see if she could find the old records of that case and get a copy of the original complaint because that would give us an idea of how to file a breach of trust case and breach of fiduciary duty case against public officials. Well, when she got to the court the court told her that they never heard of that case. Its right out of their court in Jersey Citythats where it originated but they said they never heard of it, they dont have any record of it. You see what they do with the important stuff? They hide important stuff. They dont want you to know about it. [caller] It happened in 1955its on Google Scholar. No principle of pleading is better established, not only the rules of our court, but under the practice that preceded it. [Howard] Yeah, sometimes youll find it on things like that and all they do is give you an opinion of what they think about the case but they dont give you a transcript of the courts decision. They dont want you to know about it. [caller] The facts of the complaint are listed right on here. This can be found on Google Scholar and it talks about the plaintiff municipality of their official wanted 3% of the official income from 1907 to 1949 as a condition of their employment and continued employment. [Howard] Yeah, thats what it was about.

[caller]

Its pretty extensive.

[Howard] Um huh, oh, there was a bunch of appeals leading up to the Supreme Court hearing it, a whole bunch of cases involved. It went to several levels before it finally got to the Supreme Court. A.2nd is Atlantic Reporter, 2nd edition and the page number is 8its book 115. If you can pull that and read it you will get a kick out of it and the court even told the people that we do not have to depend on elections to change things in government. We do not have to depend on the attorney general to bring claims against government. We have the power and the right to come into court with claims against them for breach of the fiduciary and trust duties. Well, thats all well and good but how many people feel confident to go do that. This court system is so corrupt and everybody knows it that theyre scared to death of it and I dont blame them too much for not wanting to go there and try to bring these kinds of complaints especially when you go against government because they will retaliate and get nasty and do things to you, threaten you and then follow through with their threats if you dont back off. So theyre worse than any Mafia that you see on television. And, by the way, that television shit about the Mafia is really exaggerated. Theres very little real truth to that being what the Mafia is like. The only truth on there was the Mafia did kill people but youll find out that they killed thieves. They killed people that stole or harmed their peoplethey protected one another. They called themselves a family even though they werent necessarily related. They were a family of business people that looked out for and protected one another and protected others that would pay them a little bit for the protection. Thats where the scheme of police departments and insurances came from. Thats how government learned how to do it. They learned it from the old Mafia and the way they did things. The only difference in government is they kill you by worrying you to death and the Mafia made it quickthey just put a bullet in your brains. The Mafia didnt bother honest decent people. The Mafia only bothered thieves, the people that interfered with their business and their work or tried to steal from them. They never bothered the common folk, the decent people. They protected the decent people. This government turned it around backwards. They go after the decent people and protect the thieves. As a matter of fact, they give the thieves banners and badges of authority like attorney and police officer and military authority and badges of honor like that they give them and then send them out to make sure that everybody cooperates with their scams. Now, listen to their scams, as a fiduciary of the public trust every government has this duty to act with the highest level of honesty and integrity. If the official acquires a piece of property from you whether it be your body, your land, your car, your labor, no matter what if he acquires it through his fiduciary relationship which means his government position where they tell us that we have to register our property. Thats how they acquired it. That establishes a constructive trust. Now, another statement to that case made was, the existence of a fiduciary relation and subsequent abuse of the confidence bestowed under it for the purpose of acquiring property was held sufficient to authorize enforcement of a constructive trust. Now, enforcement of the trust is already established in law so we dont have to go to the court and ask the court to please establish the constructive trust. Its already established by operation of law. We dont have to go to the court and ask the court to exercise any authority to enforce that constructive trust. Its enforced by operation of law. Another statement from that case, principals charging constructive trusts on property acquired by a person in a fiduciary relation is held to extend to his subagents, clerks,

assistants and partners. In other words, we dont have to go after the lawyer that caused this problem. We dont have to go after the clerk at the recording office where we recorded or registered something like the clerk at the DMV or the clerk at the county clerks office or somebody like that specifically. We dont have to go after the little moron that they send out to harass us for taxes called the tax collector or the other little moron that they send out and call him a building permits or zoning officer that comes around and bothers you about your house and tells you, you got to paint the rain gutters. {ask him if hes officially capacitatedi.e., has his office been created by the people or was it created by some department that cannot create departments or offices?} We can go after the whole group because that section, right there, just told us from that case that the subagents and clerks and partners are just as responsible because the constructive trust extends to them. So if they arent really trustees in the beginning theyre co-trustees because of their effective cooperation with the wrong doings of the trustee. Do you follow me? Now, another interesting case and statement is fiduciaries fraudulently using fiduciary funds for his own benefit takes title as trustee. You ever heard of property tax sales on land? You ever heard of mortgage foreclosures by banks? Im sure youre heard of all those things. That fits right in there. A fiduciary fraudulently using the fiduciarys funds for his own benefit takes title as the trustee not that he has a right to because the previous stuff that we just talked about establishes the constructive trust and puts him in that trustee position and he can be held personally liable or the entire group can be held liable. Now, my thoughts were to put together some cases relating to specific items like automobile registration property, land registration and social security registration and put suits together suing them for breach of their fiduciary duty by forcing the private people to register that property with government because government has no right to take the interest in your property that theyre acquiring through this without paying you just compensation for it. That was the approach that I was thinking about. What this group associated with David Clarence has come up with is just throwing them out. Now, he talks about removing them as the executor of the estate. Now, hes on point to some extent. They are in fact acting as executor and administrating the estate of your property, all of your property. That includes your body, thats why they can stick you in jail under phony charges like driving without a license or not paying income tax. Theyve even got control over your body so they can put it in jail. They can take other property from you thats tangible that they can put their hands on and sell it and they do this all the time to us under the pretense that they have a right to do it for the benefit of the trust estate. What I think that Mr. Clarences group has not understood and what came so brilliantly like a light in the darkness to me was that this is just not an estate, its a trust estate. Theyre holding it in a constructive trust. That makes it a trust estate. You dont want to just terminate them as the executor. You want to terminate them as the trustee. Whether you call it executor trustee, administrator trustee, conservator trustee, guardian trustee whichever position theyre claiming that they have, warden trustee, any one of these positions are trustee positions and you want to go above just terminating that position or that office and terminate them as the trustee and you want to start with the top. The top is all officers and employees of the entire state government that youre having to deal with. Now, dont terminate the state next door. Im sure some morons going to start that kind of shenanigans. The state next door to where you live has nothing to do with you. Its the state that you live near, the one by the same name that the state uses. The State of New York is located in Albany, New York. But a lot of people live

in a territory up there called New York so they live near Albany, New York, dont they? They live near the state. They should terminate that states officers and employees as trustees completely because, first of all, the public trust exists and second of all, all these constructive trusts exist. And while youre doing this I would suggest that you would also terminate the United States, all of its officers and employees as trusteesremove them. Now, there is a form for doing this. God bless this group and what theyve put together in this executor letter to remove the executor because theyve really got a fantastic idea and a great approach here. Theyre just not understanding what the rules require to do something like this because they hadnt gotten that far. Im sure if I left them alone and I wasnt here, in another year or two they would have stumbled over enough information to find out a better way to do what theyre doing. But right now, Ive got the information. Id rather save them that year or two and give it to them and this is what Im trying to do is give it to all of you so that everybody gets a grasp of this and understands what can be done. You can terminate them as trustees, them being any government at all, the town government, the county government that you live near. And remember you dont live in the county government. You live in the county by its name. Years ago in some of our efforts to learn how some of this worked I had an old girl friend, is what she was, from my young days that came to work for my wife and I. She stopped being a girl friend long before. And she worked in one of our companies for us for a little while but it was a seasonal company, it was landscaping work. And in the wintertime when the work ran out because grass doesnt grow anymore and gardens dont need weeding any more and shrubs dont need trimming anymore then we didnt have any work for her. She still needed to make some money so she applied for a job at Baltimore County governmentshe got the job. She would then work part time for us in the landscape when the spring came and work with the Baltimore County government on a regular 8 hour day, five day a week job. Well, I asked her if while shes at work would she try to find something for me. I want to see the words that are used establishing the charter for the Baltimore County government. Well, lo and behold, she didnt have any trouble getting it at all. Because she worked there they gave it to her real easy and she brought it over and showed it to me. The very first page, the very first wording said that Baltimore County is a corporate body politic operating by the name of Baltimore County Maryland. Well, think about this. There is a place, a real place, called Baltimore County, Maryland. This corporation established itself with the same identical name as that place making it appear that theyre both the same, doesnt it? Now, you think you live in Baltimore County and as soon as you say, yeah, I live in Baltimore County, they say, oh, see, he said hes part of our corporationa real easy way to trick you into their authority, isnt it? You got to do what we say because you already admitted that youre part of our corporation. You didnt even know that you admitted it because you dont know what the story is. Remember that the Bible says, My people perish for the lack of knowledge. {Mark Twain said that it isnt what you dont know that gets you, but its what you think you know that just isnt so thatll get you.} And Ive talked about this many times in the past on different seminars and conference calls and such that we are not part of the government, that we live near it, not in it. We dont function in it. The explanation that I just gave is why you want to realize what I mean when I say, the county or the state or the city near where you live. You may live in some city like San Francisco but thats a place. You dont really live in the city. The city is the corporate government called the City of San Francisco. So dont admit you live in the city. You say, I live in San

Francisco near the city of San Francisco which is locatedand you give the address downtown of their corporate building. Thats where the city is, thats where the state is, in a corporate building. For instance, in New York its in Albany. In Maryland its in a little rinky dink town called Annapolis. In California its in a rather large town called Sacramento. In Florida its in a town called Tallahassee, I believe. I think thats the capital where the state is located. But you live in Florida, you dont live in the State of Florida. The State of Florida is located in those buildings where that capital is located in that particular city. Thats where the state is. The city is located in those buildings downtown where the government operations come out of and you dont live there unless, of course, you work there. Now, if youre one of the officers or employees then youre one of the people that are in this trust position. I would suggest that you go find a real job because I think government people are going to be in real serious danger one day soon because like I told you the government is going to get violent against the people. And when they do the people in every country are going to retaliate against their government ten times more violently than the government could ever get to be because the governments not as big as the masses of people. I dont know if youve been paying attention to the news but weve just had this kind of a problem in Francethe people showed the force of their power. They rioted out in the streets, they burned government buildings, they killed government people all over a silly little thing that we let happen in this country quite a few years ago. They were going to change the retirement age for collection of social security by two years and the people got mean about it. I dont know where the American people are, theyre asleep, I guess. We let it happen hereits been changed three times. It didnt seem to make any difference here but it sure made a lot of difference in France because those people are a lot more awake and aware of things than the people here in America seem to be. And they went after their government and Im telling you the same thing will happen here. When the government gets too oppressive here finally itll wake the people up and the people will turn back against them and it will be with great might and force, far more that you think this government has. Yeah, they got a bunch of guns. They havent got near as many guns as what are stored in the basements and closets of peoples homes. The ownership of guns in this country outnumbers governments guns probably 150 or 200 to 1 and thats not good odds. So I wouldnt want to be on the governments side when this comes down. Word of advice to anybody that works for the government: go look for an honest job. Get the hell out of that government job. I dont care if your retirement is two years from now. Two years from now you might be dead and not by your own old age death. I want to go through this lesson and make you understand that everything is in this trust arena area. Everything related to us and our property is in the trust arena. Yes, they are executing it and heres how and heres what goes on without our understanding and knowledge. There is no proof, anywhere, that weve been able to find that the capital letter spelling of your name is a registered corporation in the place that the laws require such things to be registered. It isnt registered but it is, in fact, being treated as a corporation. Now, a corporation that is established with no authority is called a de facto corporation. That matters not, because it is still considered to have the full force and effect of being a corporation. So whether its not registered or not is irrelevantits being treated that way. Now, that too is a breach of their fiduciary duty because theyre not acting honestly. Theyre not treating us as natural people and protecting us as beneficiaries like theyre

supposed to do. So, number one breach can be found by looking at the drivers license you have in your pocket and the spelling of your name. You do not spell your name in all capital letters. Thats not what you were taught in schoolthats not what you dobut thats the way its spelled. Look at your loan papers from car loans, credit card things that you have, mortgage documents that you haveyour name is always spelled in capital letters. Look at any other registrations that you have, business registrationsyour name is spelled in capital letters. Your deed information thats registered is spelled in capital letters. Now, some people try to tell you that thats not a corporation. Everybodys entitle to their opinion just like religion. I dont believe any of them but youre entitled to any one of them you want to believe and you dont have to believe what the law says. But Delaware happens to be the number one place here in this continent for registering corporations because its corporate laws are the most relaxed laws. Its filing fees for a corporation are among the cheapest if not the cheapest for filing it. The taxes on it are miniscule and the only other tax that could be imposed on it would be an income tax that might be related to the operations of a foreign corporation doing business out of Delaware in some other area of the world that has taxes to apply to such a thing. But its still cheaper to register in Delaware than it is anywhere else. Its better to register here because of the relaxed laws and Delaware offers something that none of the other states offer and that is an anonymous filing. You dont have to put your name in a corporation. Well, that was the whole stupid idea of corporations to protect you from liability by not connecting you to the corporate function and yet you go get a lawyer to set up a corporation for you and the first thing hell do is put your name in as president. All of a sudden, the liability falls right back on you. So why did you set the corporation up? Why did you trust a lawyer? Weve been taught to, thats why. As Ron White keeps preaching, the comedian, stupid cant be fixed. And, boy, is he right. Anyway, back to Delawares law. Title 8, Delaware Code, corporations the general corporation law. Chapter One, Formation. Section 102, contents of a certificate of incorporation. The certificate of incorporation shall set forth the following: 1. The name of the corporation which shall contain one of the words following: It could be Joe Blow and then one of these words: Association, company, corporation, club, foundation, fund, incorporated, institute, society, union, syndicate. See, even the Mafia can register now with a corporation with a syndicate and/or limited or abbreviations there of with or without punctuations you see that the law does not care about this foolishness that the patriot community throws around all the time about all this punctuation crap, especially punctuations in your name with or without punctuations of like import of foreign counties or jurisdictions provided that the name is written in Roman characters or letters. Now, if you go look back at the history of Roman alphabet it is all capital letters. What theyre telling you is that a corporation is written in capital letters. It is evident, if you know anything at all about corporation functions, that they are treating you as a corporation. The capital letter spelling of your name establishes the existence of that corporation. Now, Mr. Clarence said that they are executing your estate and he is so right because everything that youve registered is registered as a constructive trust in this corporation capital-letterspelled name and it is the estate of that corporation. Now, listen to me and listen close. A corporation is a fiction. It is not real. It has no life. It has no brain. It has no hands. It has no feet. It cannot get up and do anything. It is dormant, inactive, just like a dead thing, unless a live person steps in and moves the corporation to do something. Thats why corporations

have presidents and vice-presidents and secretary-treasurers like my lovely little girl friend in my corporation. Her name is Mary Butterfingers. Shes the secretary-treasurer. She handles all the money and because she has butter fingers all the money slips right out of her fingers into my pocketlove that little girl. She just feeds me all the money I need. Corporations can be a good thing to have if youre going to deal in commerce. It should be done anonymously which is the way I do it. I cant prove I have anything to do with these corporations. My names not in there. Cant prove I own it, dont care to prove that I own it because then I would prove that I would be liable for anything the corporation did. You put fictitious names in there. The law allows that. Then you get a real live person to move things and you teach that person how to sign so that theyre not liable for anything the corporation does and there is a way to do that. Its found in the Uniform Commercial Code in every one of the states in this country, theyve all adopted it in the section on signature. Its Section 4, 401 through, I think its 418a whole bunch of sections in there. And one of the sections is on a representative signature. And the explanation tells you how you can sign as the representative but not assume the liability and it tells you very clearly that if you just sign your name representing that corporation that youve assumed all of its liabilities. Now you know how and why. The debt, the duties are being passed on to you. Youre representing yourself as that corporation by signing your name on any document that has the name spelled in capital letters and then you sign under it. But theres a way to avoid that and the way to avoid it the law says is to first write the name of the corporation fully out then put by, then sign your name or have somebody else sign it which is what I do and then write the word, agent with or without punctuations. None of the punctuations are important. The corporations name, by, the persons signature and the word, agent gives them the authority as the representative agent to move that corporation but does not impose any liability on them. It waives the liability by signing it that way. By signing it with just your name assumes the liability. What have we been taught in school. Just sign things right? No wonder were all responsible for everything and we have to pay for what this fictitious corporation got itself into. The estate property is under the name of this corporation and youre not moving the property. Youre not doing anything with it. Youre not investing it under the law of trusts. The trustee or beneficiary, either one, has a duty to invest the trust property to make profits for the good of the beneficiary. Youre not doing this. So, the state took over as the trustee under this constructive trust concept. They already were in a trust position. They took over, they are operating the trust, investing the trust property, controlling it, having expenses and passing the expenses onto you and they call them taxes and fines and fees like traffic tickets and property tax and income tax. These are all ways of passing the costs onto you, you being the representative are liable for what this stupid corporation does that gets itself into expenses. In the meanwhile there are profits being made off of the investment which the state is putting in their pockets and not giving back to you as the beneficiary simply because youre not doing anything and moving this corporation and handling the estate yourself. Now, it should never exist in the first place. Private property cannot and is not required to be registered with any state agencycannot and is notdid you hear me? There is confounded law written by these scum bag lawyers that make it look like it. For instance, in the property law books all across this country theres a statement that says all property in the state of <you fill in the blank> must be registered. What did I just tell you about where the state is and whos in it? It isnt you. That law does not apply to your land that you bought and paid for. It is not in

the state, it is in a territory by a similar name as the state uses but it is not in the state and they cant make you record it but theyve gotten away with doing it. Theyve duped you into this kind of stuff. Theyve duped into dealing with their banks and borrowing money to buy the landbad thing to do. But we all did it. I did itI dont deny it. My stupidity, Ill admit to it. I dont know how many different mortgages and property transfers with money involved and me being liable to make sure the money was paid even if the transfer was going to be fairly quick through a construction loan and then a mortgage given to somebody else to pay off my construction loans which, by the way, is what a bill of exchange is all about. Its not about the foolishness that some morons are passing around this patriot community. That doesnt work the way the way theyre saying it and is a dangerous thing for you to get yourselves involved in. Stay away from bills of exchange information. But if you want to get into business: I hope some of you out there are young and there is a chance, its a slim chance today, but there is a chance of getting out there and building a business and making some money if you get into something like construction or make loans with the bankthats fine. Its called a construction loan. You give the contract that you have to build a building to the bank and sign it over to them. Thats where the bill of exchange comes in. In exchange for that bill they will give you a certain amount of moneymaybe 90% of the face value of the contract. They will give it to you in increments because they want to make sure that youre actually doing the job and finishing the contracts so that they will be able to collect. So you only get it in increments. But, ultimately, if you do the work and do it successfully and in a workman like manner they will continue giving the payouts until it comes to the final at the end of the job and you will get the last part when they get paid on the collection of the final of the contract. You will get the last part that theyre supposed to give you up to the 90%. Now, thats how a bill of exchange works. You got to give something of value in exchange for something of value. You cant do it the way these screwballs are trying to do this. It doesnt work that way. Every time you do something like this you are giving property to the bank to hold in trust for you creating a constructive trust. The bank better be honest about how they do this and give you your 90%. But you better be honest and do the work, like I said, in a workman like manner and complete it timely so that you do your part honestly because the beneficiary in a situation like that has the same duty of honesty as the trustee has and unfortunately in the registration of an automobile, the registration of a land deed, they turn it around and put you in a trustee/beneficiary position. Youre the beneficiary with a duty of a trustee to protect that property that youre using that theyre holding in their hands for your benefit. And, again, you must be honest and maintain the property up to their rules and regulations. And you know that these statutory codes in all the states are loaded with rules and regulations about how to maintain and operate your automobile, how to maintain and operate your home, how to maintain and operate a business that you get a license from government for. Theyre just loaded with rules and regulations and you better abide by them and if you dont youre going to be held liable because you signed as the little dummy representing this fictitious corporation. You signed as the little dummy representing the borrower in a phony fictitious lending scheme run by the banks. But youll never prove that its phony and fictitious until you show that you did your part honestly and they didnt do their part honestly and impose the constructive trust on them and accuse them of breach of the trust and either sue them for the breach of the trust or just remove them as the trustee and then sue them for the damages they did while they were a trustee. Then youll get

somewhere. I would like to find that original complaint on Jersey City v. Hague because I think it would give us some understanding of how to word a breach of trust complaint but if we never find that I think we can put one together with what weve learned today because in the law of trusts there is a section called the duty of the trustee. And this is where the fiduciary duties come from. The duty of a trustee is to this, this, this, this, this, and thisto not do this and this and this. Whenever you can relate their conduct to that duty and show that they did not abide by that duty you have proven a breach of fiduciary duty and breach of the trust. It doesnt look to me like its very hard. That Jersey City case was quite explanatory that Mr. Hague was using his office to steal money from the employees of Jersey City government. That was not an honest thing to do. That was not a power that was in his authority as the mayor of Jersey City, not part of his duties. It went against his duties and because he was so dishonest he was guilty of breach of his public trust position and breach of his fiduciary duty. Sort of simple, isnt it? Not real complicated. These banks are misrepresenting the paperwork on a loan. They are misrepresenting the papers that they give you called the deed. Its either a warranty deed or a deed of trust that they give. And both of those deeds put you in a position of granting judgment to the bank without even going to court. Its called a confessed judgment. If you read carefully the writing in those documents, the warranty deeds and the deeds of trust, there is a statement in there that says that you waive any right to a protest or dishonor against the bank. That is granting them a confessed judgment if you waive the right to come back at them and accuse them of anything. That in and of itself is a breach of their fiduciary and trust duty. All banks are an agency of the United States government, by the way. Title 31, Section 112, I think, either that or its Title 12. Maybe Ive been quoting this wrongI think I have been. Its not Title 31, its Title 12, United States Code, Section 112 where it says that the banks are an instrumentality of the United States government. Im sorry for any of you that I told it was Title 31. I remember more correctly. My memorys starting to get a little bit better. Thats good. It was Title 12, United States Code. Im sorry, I didnt mean to mislead you. That section of Title 12, Section 112 states that the banks are an agency of Congress of the United States government. As such, they fall under this public trust duty to act honestly and you know and I know that the banks are not acting honestly. For any of you out there that are unaware of some of the research thats been done lately on banking and banking functions the banks do not take one penny out of their pocket and lend it to you and weve proven that beyond a doubt. The banks get you to fill out an application for a loan. That application, believe it or not, is written in the form of a promissory note. Now, in a mortgage agreement they not only get you to fill out the mortgage application which is in the form of a promissory note but they also get you to fill out a promissory note and sign it. So youve got two promissory notes and they deposit both of them. A promissory note is what in a bond is what is known as a demand deposit instrument in the banking industry. In a little bit of study about that we finally found out that a demand deposit instrument means just about exactly what it says. Upon deposit it demands immediate payment. So, it creates the funds in the bank account by paying from this instrument into the account the money that is noted on this document whether its a credit card application or a $5,000 line of credit or its a mortgage for a $300,000 home or whatever it is. The dollar figure that is written on there is immediately created within this bank account when this instrument is deposited. That goes against your signature and your credit. And then they turn around and give you the money that you created by the deposit

of this instrument that you signed and call it a loan and then want you to pay them the whole amount back plus interest. Boy, is that dishonest. Now, if they wanted to be honest and come out here and tell us that this is how the system works and we will lend you $100,000 to buy a house and we want you to pay us $50,000 for doing this that would be fine then they would be honest and that would be an interesting little racket. But this racket is dishonest. It is breach of their trust and fiduciary duties to misrepresent the documents as a loan. There is no loan because a loan involves taking money out of my pocket and giving it to you with the intent that youre going to pay it back someday. Well, if I do that for you I certainly hope youre going to pay it back someday. Im not made of money and, really, neither are the banks. They dont have that much money. All they have is credit and theyre not allowed to lend credit so they dont. They let you use your credit to create the funds and then give you the funds that you created and then call it a loan and charge you the amount all over again plus interest which usually comes out over the long stretch of the time and the amount of interest at about three times what the original purchase price that you borrowed the money for would have been. Thats why I learned a long time ago only in business do you do this when you can pay it back quickly or when youre going to turn the property over in some way quickly you borrow the money to buy 100 automobiles and you put them on a lot for sale and you sell them as quickly as possible and you pay it back to the bank quickly. You borrow the money to buy a piece of land and then borrow some more money to get the building materials and pay labor and you build a building and you put it up for sale and sell it and you turn it over quickly and you give the bank back what you borrowed. Thats businessthat works fine. Why would I go out and buy a 1989 Lincoln Town Car back in 1989 for $33,000 and go to the bank and borrow $30,000 and put $3000 as a down payment and pay monthly rate and pay for probably three or four years on that loan at some monthly rate that in three to four years would amount to probably between $60,000 and $75,000 that I would have paid for that car. You got to be nuts but we did it, didnt we? Were so greedy we want, want, want. Well, Im just as greedy and I wanted a 1989 Lincoln Town carI wanted that automobilebeautiful automobileone of the best looking automobiles that have ever been manufactured in this countrya whole lot better than this maximum ugliness automobiles that they have today and I wanted one. And when I saw what the price was I said, no, no matter how much I want it Im not paying $33,000 for a car much less am I going to pay three times that amount by borrowing the money to buy it just to satisfy my desires. Nope, Ill go without the car. Ten years later I happened to be going down a little country road and at the edge of the driveway theres a beautiful black 89 Lincoln Town car sitting there with a for sale sign on it. I wheeled into the driveway, knocked on the door and asked the fellow what he wanted for it and he said, $3000. Ten years later I bought that big expensive car for $3000, cash, and Ive had it now for eleven years since. Nice car, I really enjoy it. I got what I wanted but I patiently waited so that I could buy it without wasting money. Am I teaching you something about what we should be doing? You pay cash, you wait until you got the case, you wait until the price is right on things. You dont go in debt head over heels just to satisfy your immediate desires. Thats what gets people into the most trouble. But once youre in this trouble we had to learn. I never got into this trouble. I didnt have these kinds of problems because, like I told you, I dont buy very many things on credit. I dont want to pay that three times the price. I dont use credit cards. I pay cash for whatever I get. If I dont have enough cash I wait until I accumulate enough cash. So I never really got myself

into these troubles. But hundreds of people over the years have called me with these problems and it just prompted me and my curiosity to look into this and see what I could learn about it. And even though I was learning what a fraud it was I hadnt yet learned how it fit the trust concept but I did remember something. When I was a youngster most of the banks used that word, trust, in their names and I notice over the years that slowly the names of banks were changing and the word, trust, was being left out and I finally realized that the reason why they are is because you cant trust the banks. They took the word out because theyre not trust worthy any more. Prior to 1933 when gold was in circulation and silver was in circulation, paper was in circulation that was redeemable in gold and silver. The banks actually did lend money. They accrued deposits and loaned deposits. After 1933 Congress made it a law that they could not lend their deposits and that they could not lend credit. So it changed the whole system around. They had to contrive this scheme that theyre using today of depositing your signature, your instrument, and creating the funds and giving you back your own funds. But in order to stay in business and make money they created the rest of this scam of calling it a loan and imposing interest on it and forcing you to pay it and taking the property away if you didnt. When another party like a bank is involved with you in the purchase of property that both of you hold an interest together in that property and that as one as the trustee has no power or right to exclude you from that interest. Now, this definitely fits mortgage foreclosures, doesnt it? They have no right to exclude you from that interest. It probably also fits traffic tickets, property tax, and selling the property for property tax claims as a partner in this money scheme of purchasing the title to something through the credit being deposited to transfer the funds for the purchase of the title of something. The bank becomes a partner with you in the purchase of these goods, whatever they are, whether its cars or houses or whatever. And they have no right, neither party has any right to exclude the interest of the other party and yet when they have these sales they always advertise in the newspaper that the sale is going to be on a certain date and theyre going to sell the right title and interest remember that word, interestto the property known as, and they describe your property. And then they have the sale and they sell it and they give them a phony deed that says that theyre now the owner. Well, theres another court case in here and Im not going to go through here and read all these because its too long, too many involved. But theres another court case in here that says that in a situation where that happens the purchaser is now holding the property in trust for you waiting for you to make an action to recover your property. You like that thought? Im sure theres a couple of people on this line that are listening that have been involved in mortgage foreclosures that would like to know how to do that. Well, it falls under this trust concept and you have to sue them for breach of trust because theyre holding the property for your interest and not giving you the use and enjoyment of the property that you are entitled to. They have to turn it back over to you and give you back your use and enjoyment otherwise theyre breaching their trust duties. This has gotten to sound so simple. Its almost easy. Its probably about 28 years ago, roughly, I was sitting in a courtroom in Annapolis, Maryland watching a fellow try to defend himself in a state tax income tax claim that he willfully failed to file state income taxes and he spent three days trying to argue his case and, of course, letting them put their part of the case on, bringing witnesses for their side and then bringing witnesses for his side and trying to convince a jury that he was not liable to pay the taxes. And as it was sort of winding downback in those days they didnt have all this ridiculous crap about cigarettes that

they have today and you could sit in the hallway of the court on a bench with an ashtray at the edge of the bench and smoke a cigarette. Now I got tired of the rhetoric that was going on. Id seen most of it already and I got up and went out in the hallway and sat on the bench and had a cigarette. Well, right after I did that the court called a brief breakit convened for a little while. I dont know what for. I never did figure that out. But everybody took a break. And these two lawyers that were representing the state came out first and came walking up the hallway right past me and didnt pay a bit of attention to me sitting there. They just kept on talking and one of them said to the other, well, I guess this case is all over except for the cryingthese people really dont know what theyre doing. And I thought to myself, he said they dont know what theyre doing. That implies that there is something, doesnt it that we could be doing but we didnt know enough yet. I have to wonder what is it? And, of course, my curiosity then sent me into the law library digging deep, trying to find what it was. And I said to myself, all this stuff weve learned and all this stuff weve put together to go in there and argue with and none of it works yet. When we find the answers were going to kick ourselves in our own butts because it was so simple. Ill bet you thats what happens. And like I told them on Truth Radio, last night, Im trying to kick myself. Im just getting too old to lift my leg up high enough to kick myself. I might need help. The fellow on Truth Radio volunteered a number of people up there to come and help me. Theyd be glad to kick me. I need to be kicked because Ive been right on the edge of all these pieces for all these years and not seen it. And now that I see it is so simple that I should kick myself. They are breaching their trust duty and they are 100% liable personally. If you want to go sue them and you can throw them out of theirby removing them as the trusteeits that easy. They cant do anything when they no longer have the trustee position. Now, listen to this. A lawyer will tell you that you have to petition the court to remove the trustee. And, indeed, in the law there is a section on petitioning the court for an order to remove the trustee. That is for people like some of you who have a family trust and you appointed Uncle Kenuce as the trustee and Uncle Kenuse gets caught embezzling some of the funds out of the trust and you want to remove him. Thats what thats for. But even in that situation the grantor/creator or trustor as those names all apply to the same person. The one who created the trust has the power to remove the trustee but only for exposed and proven breaches of the trust duty. In the beneficiary position the beneficiary who recognizes breaches of the trust duty has the power to remove the trustee and its just done by a notice sent to them by some form of mail that verifies the delivery. Registered mail is much more expensive but if you want to spend the money thats one way. Certified mail is another way. You dont need return receipt. Request it just certified mail or this new thing, today, delivery confirmation which happens to be the cheapest way, mailing them a notice that they have been removed and then sending a copy of that notice to the Secretary of State of the state that you live near because all corporations and trusts are controlled by the Secretary of the State. And we found a court case, its quite old but again, its still quoted in modern law as ruling case law that a relinquishment of agency or something such as this, a removal of the trustee is not recognizable until notice has been given to the Secretary of State. So its very simple. You send a notice to them. Then you listen to some of the rest of what David Clarence has been talking about, also sending a copy of it that you have removed all state officers and employees which includes the judges, the lawyers and the administrative clerks at the courthouse and you notice that they have been removed as the trustee and they no longer

have the authority to administer any action of any kind in an administrative action against you. Now, lets cover one more very important aspect to this. From 1933 on there have been no courts of law in this country. Law was abolished in the Erie Railroad decision. It was replaced by the appearance of law in equity. Now, I know that thats very confusing because you cant abolish the law and then replace it with law, can you? What they did was they threw out the common law and they threw out the Constitution. You read that case very carefully and it tells you that, that from now on the Constitution will have no meaning and the common law is not recognizable in the courts. That from now on the courts rules will be governed by the law of negotiable instruments. The law of negotiable instruments is international law which is admiralty/maritime. So thats the form of law that replaced the common law and the Constitution and along with that they connected equity to it. Now, equity is not harmful unless its used against you. Equity is there for your benefit as well as for theirs. It is there to protect and guide what the law says and does. Thats the purpose of equity. Equity never associated with admiralty/maritime law prior to 1933. Equity only associated with the common law but if they kept equity but threw out the common law then they had to put the equity along with the law of nations which is admiralty/maritime. All these actions that are being done are really not being done against you. Theyre being done against the thing because thats what an in rem action in admiralty/maritime jurisdiction is. Its an action against the thing. And if you really think which I know is extremely hard to do because if you went to school your head is full of crap theres hardly any brain left to think with. You got to start throwing some of that crap you learned in school out and open up some areas of the brain and get it thinking again and think about something like a traffic ticket. Some little moron wearing a clown suit and a badge wrote you a ticket and says that you were doing sixty miles an hour in a forty mile limit. What? Utterly impossible. Got my name on the ticket, doesnt it? How in the hell could I do sixty miles an hour? No physical way. O.J. Simpson couldnt do sixty miles an hour. We dont do sixty miles an hour. We dont violate laws. The car was doing sixty miles an hour. The action was against the car. When you get into court they prove that to you but you got to be paying attention. The first thing that the cop says when he takes the stand is that on July the fifteenth, 2010 I observed a brown 2-door Chevrolet sedan, license plate number 123 proceeding south on ding-a-ling boulevard at a speed of sixty miles an hour and ding-a-ling boulevard is a forty mile an hour limit and I wrote him a ticket. Did you catch anything there? You go into any traffic case and youll hear that. This is what these little morons with the clown suit on are taught to do and they do it very well when they go into court. They told the court that this was an in rem action against the automobile license plate number 1234 and they told the court that because you have this license that you have registered the car and the state has the interest in the car and the right to control your use of it. And being that you signed for it you are the liable person. That was all told to the court by that little stupid statement that the car was displaying a license plate number 123. The action is against the car. You are going to be held liable for it because you signed for it. Youre going to go to jail or pay the fine or whatever the charge is against you for whatever they claimed you did. Speeding might be a fine. Driving without the license, that could be a jailable offense and youll go to jail because you originally signed for the last license you had and you didnt renew it on time or you signed for a registration and then you didnt renew the registration and you drove the car without a license or a registration and you put the two of them together and you get a fine and time in jail. Youll go, youll suffer and yet the action was not against you. You

were the authorized agent that signed for it. That puts the liability back on you for what the thing did. These actions are all against the thing. The thing could be the corporate fiction, the capital-letter-spelled name. It could be the car. It could be the house. It could be the business that you have a license for. Any thing like that could have done something that violates the laws and the actions are always against the thing but its not admiralty law, its not even maritime law, its commercial law which has the appearance of admiralty/maritime law. Every bit of this is a dishonest way of cheating the people out of their wealth and property. Its a breach of their fiduciary duty. Every action for the collection of taxes, fines or fees whether its income taxes, property taxes, traffic fines, everyone of these things is a breach of their fiduciary duty as it applies to private property. If you work for the government you owe a return for the benefit and privilege that you are receiving of working for the government. Its called a tax. It is a legitimate tax. You owe it. You are not private. You have become public property by going to work for the government. If you are driving a government car or if you are driving a commercial vehicle that you registered for commerce such as a tractor trailer, a bus, a taxi cab and using it to gain profits and you licensed it that way they have a right to impose the fines, fees and taxes upon you. You put yourself in that position. You asked to be in commerce and asked to be regulated. And even though you might have privately bought the bus you put it in commerce for the purpose of making money by transporting passengers and the law rightfully covers the protection of those passengers or the protection of the goods that you may be carrying if youre transporting goods in a truck for other people, not your own. They cannot regulate your own goods but they can regulate your transmitting or transferring of other peoples goods. They have a right to do this. As a matter of fact, this is a duty that they have to protect the rest of us from you in case you might take the truckload of my goods and run off somewhere and selling them to somebody and come back with an empty truck and I lose. Thats why they have the right and that is part of their duties to protect me and the rest of us from thieves. It is not their duty to be the thief and use the courts to steal from us. That is a breach of their duty. You see the difference? If anybodys interested in this whole series here of cases relating to constructive trusts. If youll write to Gemini and ask for it, just ask for the cases on constructive trusts. Now, please remember that. Dont write to me and ask for what Ive got on trusts. You better send a pickup truck if thats what you want. I got enough to fill a pickup truck. If you want, Ive gotten letters: Dear Gemini, Please send me all the information you have. They didnt send a tractor trailer truck so they didnt get anything. I dont know what they want. But I have enough information around here, about a thousand law books, a bus full of photocopies of legal papers, an old school bus, and two offices with seven file boxes in one office and four file boxes in another office full of legal documents. You want it all? Itll fit in a tractor trailer send it. Dont ask such a stupid question. Please be specific and ask for what you need. If youre interest in this stuff on constructive trusts please ask for the case law on constructive trusts and Ill gladly send it to you. The only thing I ask you to do is its several pages, not a whole lot, so just like two dollars for printing costs and mailing costs. The mailing costs in an 8-1/2 by 11 manila envelope is around a dollar. The printing costs might be 50 cents to a dollar. Thats all I ask you to dojust cover my costs. I dont want to make money off of you. I want to help you. I want to enlighten you and give you knowledge so that you dont perish. But please do send a couple dollars. Now, some people are very generous and they ask for a little tiny thing like that and they send me $20. Well,

believe it or not, that money goes toward additional costs of making more photocopies and looking up more information and doing this research. I thank you wonderful people that are good enough to do that because it does help support the work and get more done and sometimes some of that money goes to paying someone else. I have a couple different girls to do typing for me and they read better than I do and I have them do some of the reading and I tell them what Im looking for. I tell them to look for things like how do you do something about a constructive trustlook it up and heres a book on trusts. See if you can find something on it and they will read and read and read and finally theyll find it. The index will give you some indication but, boy, Ill tell you what, its usually buried somewhere inside of something that the index sends you to and it takes some reading and I pay them for their time because I dont have time to do all of this. I do a lot of it but I dont have time to do every bit of it. I made a joke years ago that Im working on my fifth pair of glasses. I actually wore the glass right out of the first four pairs, Ive read so much. Thats only a joke. I know that you cant wear the glass out by looking through it. But Ive done a tremendous amount of reading and research and I have paid other people to help me and I have had volunteer help from all over the country sending me information but when they looked it up and read it, found it and sent it to me I had to read it again. Why send it to them if you dont think Im going to read it? I do read it. It doesnt always make sense. It doesnt always settle in or connect with anything but I dont forget it and like I told you I put all this information on trusts that we collected over the years in the piles of stuff that I got and remembered a lot of it and, boy, when Mr. Clarence brought this subject up all of a sudden lights went off in my head and I said, my God, hes on the right track. I got to go get that stuff out and look at it again. I see what you can do. I know that there was a form in there for removal of the trustee and Im sure that his letter does not match that form because he didnt look up a form. I could tell by the way he wrote it. It looks like a lot of patriot hogwash in there about lawyers and the BAR Association and stuff like that. Thats not the way these kinds of things are done because I have read enough to know that theres a way to do this. You have to show the legal consequence of their conduct that it doesnt match what the law says theyre supposed to do. Something like this has to be written the same way as an indictment is written against you for a criminal charge that youve done. Some of you, Im sure, have been charged with failure to file income tax and if you look at the indictment it spells out what you did and then says that that then and there did violate Section something, something of the United States Code. Thats the way these kinds of things have to be put together. Thats the legal procedure that they recognize and its not hard to learn it. Its just hard to realize that we got to. And Ive seen it, I made enough mistakes and Ive gone into court with all kinds of stuff thinking we were going to be successful when it didnt work. And I created my own cases in a lot of situations. I put myself in jeopardy and created cases, went into court and argued them and I didnt necessarily win them but in a lot of cases I got better and better at it. I came out with a stalemate. They imposed a cost upon me and dropped the rest of the case. I call that a stalemate. They didnt get everything they were looking for. They didnt get much of what they were looking for. And then I learned how to do that for other people and some people have learned it from my teaching and utilized it rather well. I remember one guy, the IRS wanted to put him in jail for twenty years. I got him 20 months. That was the best we could do with what we had at that time but that was better than If wed have left it alone and not brought up the things that we brought up they might not have put in jail for twenty

years but they might have put him in jail for 4 years or 3 years. And as it was, he only got twenty months. So, he came out better than he might have but we still didnt pull it out and the reason we didnt pull it out was because we didnt understand to go back at them for their trust duties and show where they breached it. We didnt know that. As a matter of fact I will ultimately I will probably manage to post {on the google group, people looking for the truth} this stuff on how constructive trusts arise. Well probably post the form, one filled out and one in blank that you could download so that you could watch the one thats filled out and see how to fill yours out and fill out a removal of the trustee. Well put this kind of stuff on things like that and theres no way we can sell this and were not going to try to make a business out of selling this. This is something that every individual has to do and youre the one thats got to describe what the wrongdoing was that the person did to you and its going to be a different story than what happened to another person or whats happened to me or what happened to Dave or any of the rest of us. Youve got to fill that story in and Ill tell you what. Nobody sends enough money to support putting an office staff together to do all this for you. So, we cant do it. So, were not going to do it and charge people. If you cant read this stuff, learn it, understand it, realize how to do it, I would strongly suggest that you pay your taxes, pay your traffic tickets and stay home as much as possible. Stay away from the system as much as possible, dont get yourself in anymore trouble and try to live comfortably. If you grasp it and you understand it then jump into it and do it. It will make you live a lot more comfortably a lot quicker and you wont have to pay the taxes and the fines but you better understand it. You better read it. You better read it five times. You still dont think you understand it, read it five more times. Thats how I learn a lot of this stuff. I dont read it just one time. Sometimes Ill read it over and say, what the hell did that say? And Ill read it again and I still dont know what it said. Ill read it again. Finally, by the time I read it five, six, eight, ten times all of a sudden the lights light up. Oh, I see, because legal stuff is not worded in a simplistic way. It is not direct at all. It is not to the point. It is on some point of law but it is not to the point. It doesnt necessarily say what youre looking for in the words that youre accustomed to using in common language. It says it in legal terms and theyre confusing and you got to grasp some understanding of those legal terms before you can understand it. You got to read it over and over and think about what youre reading. I tell you what I do. Ill read it several different times then I sit back in my chair and I stare at the wall like Im doing nothing and I think about what I just read and I read it enough times to have it almost memorized so I can run through it in my mind and think about it. And as I think about it somehow or another other thoughts come to my mind out of the universe and those thoughts sort of put it in perspective for me and help me to understand it. Some people would call this divine help. I refer to it as divine interference. Werent we having a hell of a good time until God decided to wake us all up and make us realize somethings wrong? He came down and interfered with our good times, didnt He? Well, the good times over because he interfered with it. Stop looking for the good times, stop wishing for the good times we used to have and start paying attention because Im going to tell you something. This creature we call God, Hes quite a powerful entity and Im sure that its about to make a move. Im sure its disgusted with mankind and what weve done to this planet, what weve allowed to happen with ourselves. Im sure that somethings coming, a catastrophic event of some kind in the very near future is going to jar the rest of the

sleeping people into some kind of reality and follow up catastrophic events will probably get rid of mankind before long. {Mankind themselves is taking care of that problem before He gets down here} Some will be taken back as spiritual entities and the rest will be just left to dissipate. I like to hope that Im helping people to get their mind energized enough that they are strong enough mentally which is spiritually to be able to be among the ones that are lifted and not left to break up in little fragments of energy and float off into space as a nothing. Id like to think Im helping you. I dont know if I am or not but Id like to think I am. Alright, next week we will get into more on this trust stuff because theres piles more here for me to go through. Im very familiar with how to write a trust. As a matter of fact we write trusts for people. We set up corporations and trusts and register them in Delaware because Delaware is a unique place to register corporations and a very unique place to register trusts. This is one of the only two states in this country that has what is known as a secret trust, not a pure trust or any of this other patriot foolishnessa secret trust. A trust has no force and effect or a meaning of any kind in the courts for any purpose whatsoever if it is not registered in the jurisdiction where the court is located that is hearing the case related to the property thats in the trust. If its registered in any one of the fifty states then all the states have concurrent jurisdiction to hear the case. So if its registered in Delaware then it becomes good in Louisiana, in California, in Minnesota and even in Delaware or any of the states in between. But it has to be registered. All the other states require upon registration of a trust that you give them a copy of the trust and that gives them all the information to put on a public record of whats in your trust. You think thats a good idea? I dont because that certainly violates my privacy of my private property and maintaining the liberty of using my private property for my benefit, doesnt it? Because that also creates a constructive trust because you have given them the property and the whole trust document to hold in trust for you. So you got a double trust there, dont you? Talk about dishonesty, most of what these people do is completely dishonest. Well, Delaware is a little bit more straight forward and a lot less dishonest. Delaware requires that to register a trust that you give them the name of the trust, the name of the registering agent which in our case is Creative Business Services. The address of Creative Business Services, here in Delaware, because in order to deal with Delaware you have to be located somewhere around Delaware. And the name of the trustee that will be on the trust document and that is all we have to give them to register the trust. They do not require a copy of the trust. It does not give them the authority over the property or any interest in the property of the trust, here in Delaware. Alaska does the same thing but its so far away I dont have any connections up there. I dont deal with Alaska. Anybody else that wants to get involved and do something like this using Alaska on the West Coast side fineI cant handle all of what possibly come in as people become more enlightened and realize what they ought to do. You ought to put your property in your own trust and you ought to register it as a secret trust and you ought to manage it as the trustee even though you may be the beneficiary because a beneficiary can be a trustee as well as a beneficiary under the law of trusts. When we make up these trusts one of the ways that we maintain secrecy is entirely different than the way everybody else writes a trust. Most people just start listing the trust property and run right down the page putting one thing after another after another after another and on to the next page, another, another, another thing and list all the property. And if you have to shoe the trust documents to somebody they get to see all of your property thats listed in

the trust, dont they? We dont do that. When we type up a trust for somebody we create basic concept of the trust in the first couple pages and then we identify the property. Each and every item of property is identified on a separate sheet of paper. That way, if in the future if theres ever questions about any particular property that you have to produce the instrument to show that it is covered by the trust you only produce the first couple of pages establishing the construction of the trust and the one page identifying that particular property. The rest of it still remains secret, doesnt it? If youre smart enough to do that youll keep it secret. I believe in privacy. I believe in the establishment of this country to protect private property. I dont believe in giving all of my information to anybody much less putting it on a stupid computer like so many morons are doing thinking its wonderful to do your banking through the computer to buy things over the computer using your credit card. Youre putting your information out there for the entire public to find it. Now, some of them will tell you that its protected. They have security things. Let me tell you something. I have a partner in one of the businesses that can break any security that theyve got. He creates the securities for them. If he can create them you know darned well he can break them. IF he can do it he knows darned well theres other people that can do it and there are people that are good with a computer that can break any security at all. That thing is not securedont ever believe that it is. Youre just looking for trouble when you put all that private information on that stupid little box. But you do what you want. If youre smart enough to understand what were talking about in protecting your privacy, your private property and your liberty get in touch with us. Just write to Gemini Investments. Well send you information, whatever it is you ask for, but please, like I said, be specific. If you want to know about setting up a trust please ask for information about setting up a secret trust. If you want to know about the constructive trust please ask for information about the constructive trust and next week we will have more information. Or even this week, if you want a copy of Delaware Title 8 Section on corporations describing what is required in a corporation and identifying the fact that it must be done in Roman characters or letters write to us and well send you a copy of that. Theres a good bit of information in there. Its probably about six or eight pages. I only read you that one little part. You might be interested in reading all of the stuff about corporations, you might learn somethingits only six or eight pages. But if thats what you want, please ask for the law on Delaware corporations. Dont ask me for everything we got on corporations because I probably got six or eight law text books on corporations. You want me to send you them? Youre going to have to send a lot of moneythey cost me a fortune. Mr. Clarence called today. I wasnt in and hes calling on a phone thats blocked because hes out on the road somewhere, hes not at home, and he doesnt want to be called back wherever he is, right now. Thats part of the message he left. He left me a message that sometime over the weekend he would like to get together with me and make a conference call with several of the members of his group related to what Ive been talking about which sounds to me like he is interested in learning and I am interested in sharing what I have for anybody thats interested in learning. So, it sounds like were going to get together. Were going to work together and maybe well With their knowledge and my knowledge put together I think well come out with something really important. And then he also said that hes going to be on TalkShoe program sometime Saturday evening. He left that in the message.

And Id be interested in listening again. Ive listened to one of his TalkShoe programs that he did and, boy, Im telling you lights lit up and I said, wow, these people have figured out the easiest way to do this. They just got to know a little more. If you want to maybe next week well get into covering accepted for value and why thats devastatingly wrong. It not only wont work but it can get you in a lot of financial trouble and maybe even stuck in jail depending upon just how far you went with it. The other thing, this stupid stuff of declaring that you name is copyrighted. You cant copyright your name. Copyright was never intended for names and theres a few people in jail for pushing that issue and threatening to take money from people because they violated the copyright that they claim that they had on their name and it ended them up in jail. So thats another thing to stay away from. You wont find that kind of information on www.peoplesrights.com and you wont find that information on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/peoplelookingforthetruth . And if somebody posts that kind of garbage thats the kind of stuff that Im deleting off of there. One more thing then Im going to say goodnight. I dont care if you stay on and talk. I understand a lot of you do that. If you want to have a country club meeting thats fine, you go ahead and do that, this is a teaching class. This part of it is intended for that and thats all Im going to let it be, not a country club meeting, anymore, like it used to be but food for thought. Im going to wait patiently until Sarah Palin publicly declares that shes putting herself in the Republican Party to run for the office of President of the United States. When she does, thats going to stir up a whole flurry of activity. And considering how scared the Democrats are of her Im sure there will be a lot of Democrats putting information out about how they dont like her and the things that shes wrong about and stuff like that which will which will be a real good time to stir up a little bit more of a flurry of activity. And I thought last time when Obama was running and all the rest of that cluster of morons that were running on both parties that I might wait until they decided who was on each party and then announce that I was going to run for president as an independent candidate on a write-in vote and my platform was going to be when Im elected Im going to do what Shakespeare said, the way to clean up a corrupt government is to kill all the lawyers. My platform was going to be that Im going to do what Shakespeare recommended and as soon as Im elected Im going to execute all lawyers and all drug pushing doctors. I thought for sure that would stir up a lot of controversyit probably wont get me very many votes. Now, this time Im thinking about 2012 and I think theres enough people stirred up already in this country. This tea party group is growing constantlyit hasnt stopped. The people havent really relaxed on it. Theyre watching whats going on. This last election for senators and congressmen and governors and state officials and stuff really did show the anger of the people that they want somebody else besides the long-term scum bags that have been in there doing these kinds of things that they recognizing as wrong. So, the people are looking for a change. So, I think this time Im going to announce that Im going to give the American people the first choice that theyve had since 1789 when the Constitution was adopted and this democratic mob took office and started doing these things. You can either vote for the democracy and have a president again and continue with the same kinds of scum bags or we can throw them all out and you can elect me as a dictator and Ill take over and get rid of the entire crowda write-in candidate for dictator. Now, you know Im not going to win but Im going to stir up an awful lot of controversy and open up some

minds by doing it. And I certainly hope I dont win because I dont either want to be president or dictator of an outhouse in Washington, D.C. Notice, I dont have whole lot of respect for them or even for their home office. But think about it. Would you do a write-in vote to vote me in as dictator? If youre a computer literate person with e-mail capabilities or website capabilities would you promote it for me and try to get it out even further than I can get it out? Think about it. I know itll be disturbing. First of all, most religious people would not respect the idea of killing people like lawyers and doctors. A lot of people would think, well, I got a good lawyerI dont want him killed. Yeah, theres no such thing as a good lawyer, you morons. But the worlds full of morons. And of course they think their doctors wonderful because the pain went away because he gave them a drug. But he keeps giving them drugs because the pain keeps coming back because the drugs dont mend the body. So the doctor keeps making money peddling drugs. Hes nothing but a licensed drug pushertime to do away with that, too. Lets go back to real doctors that used to know how to mend the body {who would that be? Doctor Kildare, the witch doctor?} What repaired whats wrong with the body. Im going to put a lot of information out about why drug-pushing doctors are not doing people the right good things and why lawyers are stealing property through things like the information about these constructive trusts and how theyve stolen our property. Its the reason why you should elect me a dictator and do away with this mob rule called democracy. I think it would be rather interesting. Im not going to stress myself over it. I dont really care other than to stir up the controversy and enlighten peoplethats all its really for. I dont have any desire to be the head of a country. Im sure it would never come to be. I dont think thered be enough people in America that would want to have a dictator. Who knows whatll happen? The more we promote it the more information about whats wrong and why its wrong will be getting out to people. Thats whats the important part of doing it.