Michael L Darland, fuels Internet control debate by denying Free Speech to Louis Leclezio. To be Delivered by e-mail and by hand.

Date: To: June 18, 2012 Dr. Hamadoun Tour, Secretary General of the International Telecommunications Union, Place des Nations, 1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland Louis Leclezio The little guy from Africa Should Internet control pass from the US to the UN?

From: Subject:

A number of world powers and the ITU say: Yes. The US says: No. What does the little guy say? Why? What goes on in the real world while America controls the Internet? An actual case discussion below clearly illustrates the unfairness and discrimination at play while the US controls the Internet. An explicit web site www.snocadia-promoter-michael-l-darland.info tells the whole story. That site address should be forwarded to media and to all relevant authorities world wide. Background History: On the one side, representatives of the US establishment are saying that UN control of the Internet would empower governments to clamp down on civil rights and free speech. In Hong Kong, in 2011, Vint Cerf of Google said that proposals to bring the Internet under United Nations' control "holds profound -- and I believe potentially hazardous implications for the future of the Internet and all of its users. Then again, at a sub committee congressional hearing on Thursday, May 31, 2012 in Washington, Vint Cerf testified: "...to say nothing of trampling human rights... users worldwide will be at risk of losing the open and free Internet that has brought so much to so

many." Anyone who cares can voice ideas and opinionsits the fairest, safest and historically most effective way to ensure that good ideas win out and bad ideas die. In an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal earlier this year, Federal Communications Commission member Robert McDowell also warned that some of the countries who belong to the ITU are interested in restraining the essential freedom of the Internet because it causes problems for dictatorships and autocracies. On the other side, ahead of the key WCIT 2012, December meeting in Dubai, where United Nations members will reconsider a 1988 communications treaty, several foreign governments have argued that the treaty needs to be updated, given the growing influence of Internet communications. Dr. Hamadoun Tour, Secretary General of the International Telecommunications Union, the U.N.s telecom authority, said in a recent speech: So much has changed since the 1988 revisions, so the global policy and regulatory framework needs to be updated." Inside the US, the establishment is clearly concerned about people from outside controlling the Internet. Outside the US, governments around the world and the ITU are concerned about the continued control of an International facility by the US. How extremely concerned should the little guy be about the US controlling the Internet? Especially so, when the little guy can have his rights trampled on and he can be denied Free Speech without a trial by US action! The Little Guy: My true to life story as it unfolded between October 2011 and April 2012. While some US heads address self serving words to the gallery, I, Louis Leclezio, the little guy, want to speak about what has actually happened in the real world under US internet control. Before reading any further, please check out www.snocadia.blogspot.com and www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com Does the evidence below attest to an open, free and fair Internet under US control?

Blog has been removed

Sorry, the blog at snocadia.blogspot.com has been removed. This address is not available for new blogs.
Did you expect to see your blog here? See: 'I can't find my blog on the web, where is it?'

Help Centre | Terms of Service | Privacy | Content Policy | Developers Copyright 1999 2012 Google

Blog has been removed

Sorry, the blog at truthremldarland.blogspot.com has been removed. This address is not available for new blogs.
Did you expect to see your blog here? See: 'I can't find my blog on the web, where is it?'

Help Centre | Terms of Service | Privacy | Content Policy | Developers Copyright 1999 2012 Google

That is the reality today while the US controls the Internet. Now, consider Google's notice addressed to me and copied below:

Re: [#1006824847] Notice from Google

The Google Team

removals@google.com

Apr 16

to me
Hello, We'd like to inform you that we've received a court order regarding your document https://drive.google.com/a/google.com/leaf? id=1qSZBosSsd6rYewK9XzxNM8Bpq263hNm64EomWU3IriE&sort=name&layout=list&pid=0BzONtJ1_clUrN2Vh OTM0NzktNmMyYy00YzQzLTk0YjctODg1NWZjMjVmOWE5&cindex=25#. In accordance with the terms of the court order, we've been forced to remove this content. A copy of the court order we received is attached. Thank you for your understanding. Regards,

The Google Team

Request to Google.pdf 45K View Download Is Google discriminating between American citizens and citizens of the world?

Or worse still, as illustrated in this case in point - Is Google discriminating between an American citizen and someone conveniently purported to be from Africa? From the transcript of a hearing lasting less than a few minutes on the particular subject of Internet free speech, it appears that about all an American small town, Ellensburg, attorney, Jeff Slothower, had to do was to hammer Africa, Africa and again Africa within a few other meaningless words for the hammer of the small town Judge to come down, without trial or debate, in favor of denying free speech to the little guy from Africa. Attorney J. Slothower: When he filed it he lived in Africa for a number of years. In fact, he went to Africa and was planning to go to Africa when the agreement was filed.

And that as a matter of law statements and internet postings about Mr. and Mrs. Darland by Leclezios are inflammatory. Then paragraph five, I have entered their orders, imposes a permanent injunction against Mr. Leclezio asking for enjoining and restraining him from continued defamatory comments and internet postings, orders him to remove them, this language we believe will once provided with internet to internet search providers allows them to remove this. (all emphasis above added)
As a matter of law and of fact, none of my posts are either inflammatory or defamatory. All the information I posted on the Internet is true and is published for the public good. As a matter of fact, the ruling denying me free speech is blatantly discriminatory. It was granted to a home town crony attorney by a retired home town Judge, acting as Pro Tem, within minutes, without any trial or due process. According to the transcript of the hearing, the ruling was based on strict hear say. It all took place in the small eastern Washington desert town of Ellensburg (Pop. 18,174 in 2010). Consequently, the action by Google to remove all content from www.snocadia.blogspot.com and www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com upon receipt of a transcript, reflecting so much prejudice is, IMHO, likewise discriminatory. Neither did that small desert US town Court nor did Google, based in the US, grant me or my attorney, Jim McBride, the right to debate the issue. Check out the fully documented facts on www.snocadia-promoter-michael-l-darland.info

Based on the above facts, is the world to understand that any US citizen can go find any kind of a judge from any kind of a one horse desert town to get any kind of an order for Google to abide blindly by and deny free speech to a purported 'African' or any other citizen of the world? Discrimination? What if a world citizen were to find a highly respected and high profile Judge from his country in Africa, to, in turn, instruct Google to reinstate the content that had been removed by Google in a discriminatory way Would Google oblige so readily? While Google operates and collects income world wide Is it discriminatory on Google's part to only obey orders that are issued from any kind of a US court? Yet, these are orders that affect the whole world! Does that portray a small American town as an autocratic dictatorial world power? Worse still, should the world cower down to any kind of a dictatorial autocratic small desert town judge, Michael E. Cooper, merely because he is an American citizen? Is that what Vint Cerf of Google calls: " the open and free and fairest Internet that has brought so much to so many? As a Mauritian African, living in a free, beautiful country, I respect absolute free speech. I realize that an American citizen, with the help of any kind of an American Judge, can color me purple, black, red, yellow or white and add a splash of grey area over my portrait. They can do so ad lib while shutting up my attorney and after conveniently ignoring all my written requests and input. I could not be personally present at that hearing due to health and financial problems. Those problems have been fully discussed at length on my blogs, available on www.snocadia-promoter-michael-l-darland.info and thru certified mails and doctors certificates addressed to all relevant parties. But, I cannot comprehend, nor can I accept that while the US establishment and Vint Cerf of Google talk to the gallery about a supposedly open, free and fair US controlled Internet, Google can arbitrarily deny me the transparency of the Google canvas, my paint brush and my coloring palette. In 2011 and 2012, that desert country town judge and Google have turned me into a muted slave. My lips have been sealed. They have attempted to place me in ball and chains with my hands tied behind my back.

Just like a slave of old, Michael L. Darland, Judge Michael E. Cooper and Google have tried to deny me the right to defend myself in a public arena! They tried to deny me the power of the truth, a fair trial and justice in front of the world court. To the lions and vultures, they tried to dispatch me prematurely without a fair trial and the right of defence. Adding salt to the wound, once I had been so enslaved into silence, written off as finally extinct, Mike Darland would freely use the Google platform to try to ridicule me and gloat: It is a fitting synchronicity that Mauritius is also the birth place of the now extinct Dodo bird. Once Mike Darland of Bellevue believed he had been finally sheltered enough from being exposed to the damning truth, Michael L. Darland was back to living in his make believe world. Fortunately, that major donor to FreedomWorks misjudged the power of the Internet to liberate the downtrodden. Wishful thinking induced Michael L. Darland to misbelieve that I had been extinct. In 2012, Michael L. Darland cannot reserve unto himself the exclusive right to free speech secured thru a kangaroo court order served upon Google and readily accepted by Google. In 2012, I hope that the amazing synchronicity Darland refers to above will endure. Indeed, from the time I advised Darland, in March 2006 that my cancer problems had been confirmed, Darland has wished to see me extinct. But, like the Dodo, even after being extinct for years, his memory lives on. May mine do as well. Before reading any further, please check out: http://snocadia.wordpress.com/tag/michaeldarland/ Someone who knows Michael L. Darland very well, best summed up Michael Darlands character as follows: "Michael is good at thieving Michael is best at covering up his tracks." How many tracks is Michael L. Darland hoping to cover up through this one web publication? Whether any one reading the content of that site gets the impression that it oozes out a suffocating dose of hypocrisy or not, does that site serve to expose and confirm the above opinion regarding Michael L. Darlands character? Does that site underscore the filthy immoral hoax perpetrated on me by Michael L. Darland, the small Ellensburg town Judge Michael E. Cooper and Google when they joined forces in America to deny me free speech in Africa? Should I in Africa be enslaved by the American autocratic dictatorship of a small town Judge who can close such a short hearing involving such a momentous decision saying: Its been my pleasure.?

How telling about Michael L. Darlands character, when one considers that the above publication is dated, by Michael L. Darland, April 17, 2012. That is the day after Google notified me, on April 16, 2012, that my posts had been removed! Did Michael L. Darland believe that once my posts had been removed, he would have the field all to himself to cover up his tracks ad lib? Interestingly, again typical of Michael L. Darland, while he conveniently dates his material April 17, 2012, a Google search reveals that the page referred to above first appeared on May 29, 2012!
This is Google's cache of http://snocadia.wordpress.com/. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on 29 May 2012 18:37:58 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more Text-only version These search terms are highlighted: speech

Why did Michael L. Darland backdate his material? By May 29, 2012, I had published two articles on my www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com In one article on April 21, 2012, I wrote: This odious Kangaroo Court ploy cost me true Justice, hundreds of thousands of dollars and inflicted upon me further irreparable damages. How shameful! In another article on April 24, 2012, I had again written: Does that explain why Michael L. Darland and a small time country town Judge, Michael E. Cooper, conducted a marathon hearing (only days before retiring) to grant to Michael L. Darland all his whims and fancies after the Kangaroo Court of Judge Michael E. Cooper had promptly muzzled my well known and highly respected Seattle attorney Jim McBride who represented me? Michael L. Darland must have liked my reference to a Kangaroo court. In his May 29, 2012 publication, backdated by Darland April 17, 2012, Michael L. Darland copies the term Kangaroo Court that I had previously used on April 21 & 24 2012 in my blog: www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com Likewise Michael L. Darland liked the name Snocadia that I came up with and now claims as his! Likewise Michael L. Darland is alleged to have stolen patent rights; is alleged to have stolen from his shareholders while CEO of Digital Systems, a precursor to Avaya; is alleged to have stolen from another party also suffering from cancer; is alleged to have coerced false affidavits from others than William Popp; is alleged to have stolen, from his own brother and sister, gifts they had lovingly received from their mother. While the above is all hear say, Michael L. Darland has definitely stolen my 26 acre property; has definitely stolen the name Snocadia; has definitely stolen my right to timely medical care; has definitely stolen my precious right to peaceful and enjoyable retirement time by my

children and grand children; has definitely stolen my intellectual property by way of my publications on Blogger; has definitely stolen my right to free speech; And to crown it all, has definitely stolen my sacred right to defend myself in the public court against his putrid attacks on the web! After shamefully engaging in all of the above, what a laughable paradox for Michael L. Darland to speak in the third person on his web site claiming that: Michael Darland loves free speech especially when it is true and accurate. Once my posts had been arbitrarily and discriminatorily removed who could ever check the veracity of Darlands statements against mine? Who could continue to delve into the irrefutable hard evidence I had systematically presented on Scribd for the better good of all? How obvious is it, that from the moment I was denied free speech Darland felt perfectly sheltered from the ugly and sad truth that could serve to convict him once and for all as an alleged repeat criminal. How obvious is it, that from the moment I was denied free speech, Darland felt at liberty to subdue the world to his sole fiction version of this sad story for me? Is it not precisely because my posts do portray a true and accurate picture of Michael L. Darland of Bellevue Washington State, that Mike Darland felt so utterly compelled and obsessed to go to any length to cover up his dirty tracks and have all content published by me removed? Moreover, I never asked, nor did I ever expect any one to believe me on hear say. That is why I meticulously backed up all my statements with overwhelming hard evidence and documents posted on Scribd. That same hard evidence is now available on my new web site: www.snocadia-promoter-michael-l-darland.info Other web sites will follow. They should serve to convict Michael L. Darland once and for all while making the world a safer and freer place. Interestingly it appears that all my posts had to be removed urgently after Michael L. Darland had donated $50,000 to FreedomWorks for reasons of his own. I deal with those likely reasons in detail on my web site under a special chapter titled US Congress & US Senate. I took the trouble to do so for the greater benefit of all US citizens. But Michael L. Darland did not like to be exposed to the truth. That explains why before getting his hasty Court order, Michael L. Darland aka Mike Darland, had even resorted to intimidation and blackmail in his effort to have me remove all the factual incriminating content that I had published about him for the greater good of all. Complete info is available on my web site.

I trust the intelligence of my fellow men. I believe in the right of all to free speech for the benefit of ALL. I ask for the equal right for all to be heard by all. I ask for the right not to have the hard evidence I published on Scribd and Blogger removed by Google/Scribd/Blogger. In a free world, through a supposedly open, free and fair Internet, I welcome the opportunity to pit all the hard facts and concrete evidence that I have on Michael L. Darland against anything Darland chooses to publish on the Internet in vain attempts to either cover up his tracks, defend himself and/or try to color me any color he chooses. On a level playing field, I defy that American citizen to argue away the hard documented evidence that, I, the African, should have an equal right to offer for public scrutiny. Then, through a truly open, free and fair Internet, let the world be judge whos version is fact and whos is fiction. In a free world, through a supposedly open, free and fair Internet, should both sides of the bell not be heard? The greater public court alone and not a small desert town court, presided by a retired Judge, acting Pro Tem, should decide after hearing two gongs for whom the bell should toll. Is anything else not actual discrimination by an American Court and Google? While this case highlights flagrant discrimination, the US establishment and Vint Cerf have no right to pretend that under US control the Internet is open , free and fair . How could the Internet ever be considered open, free and fair after Google has denied me, the little guy from Africa, the right to defend myself in the public arena? Is making such a claim highly hypocritical? Without incurring major expenses to buy and to build my web site, would I be free to use Google/Blogger to expose and to cast Michael L. Darland and his gang under the light that they have elected to project themselves under. Is it discriminatory for Google to afford to an American citizen the exclusive opportunity to bludgeon an African on the Google platform? While Google is discriminating against an African, Africa is one of the fastest growing Internet market!

In ending, if Google, Blogger and Scribd were to see the light from a greater worlds perspective Google, Blogger and Scribd should stop discriminating forthwith. IMHO, while operating around the world, Google, Blogger and Scribd should treat an American citizen and a world citizen, a little guy from Africa' equally. Is it not high time to put a halt to the hypocrisy and for Google, Blogger and Scribd to live up to the words of Vint Cerf? Google, Blogger and Scribd must walk the talk and actually prove that the Internet is truly open, free and fair. Google, Blogger and Scribd must reinstate my posts, my evidentiary documents and compensate me for the damage and added pain they have caused me while I was recovering from a cancer related surgery performed on March 30, 2012. That was the third surgery undergone within six years, as already disclosed in one of my April posts on www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com Upon having the renewed opportunity to read all info originally presented on my posts, what should the world think of an American Judge who closed a short hearing on October 11, 2011 saying: "It's been my pleasure? Would the world think that such a Judge capable of unashamedly proclaiming: "It's been my pleasure" is arrogantly and publicly posting his American prejudice against and discrimination towards a small 'African' guy? Could such a judge ever appear to be impartial after he had hurriedly trampled over the American Constitution and the Bill of Rights, without trial or debate? Would Google, Blogger and Scribd and the rest of the world be well advised to distance themselves from such a judge? Failing which, should Google continue to docilely submit to such a US discriminating court order What should the world think? That the Internet is open, free and fair under US control? And is best to remain there? OR Does my case in point and my plea, from the little guys stand point, highlight the urgent need for the Internet to be controlled by the UN rather than the US for it to be truly open, free and fair for all including the little guy?

After all, could the Internet exist without the little guy? From fast growing Africa Asia and South America? How many thousands of little guys like me join every day from Africa, Asia and South America? Should Google not change its ways, I hope that the hard facts depicted on my web site www.snocadia-promoter-michael-l-darland.info will spur my countrys Government of the Sovereign Republic of Mauritius and other governments to vote in favor of Internet control passing from the US to the UN for the greater good of all. In any event, health permitting, my wife and I look forward to testify at WCIT 2012 in December in Dubai. Yours truly, Louis Leclezio. cc. All relevant parties Free Speech attorneys World media.