Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TANZANIAN
2002 WIOMSA
71
Methane Emission, Sulphide Concentration and Redox Potential Profiles in Mtoni Mangrove Sediment, Tanzania
Thomas J. Lyimo1, Arjan Pol2 and Huub J.M. Op den Camp2
1
Applied Microbiology Unit, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 35060, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; 2 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, University of Nijmegen, Toernooiveld 1, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Key words: mangrove sediment, organic matter, methanogenesis, sulphate reduction, redox potential, bacteria biomass AbstractMangrove forest sediments were investigated with respect to organic matter content, bacterial numbers, methane emission, sulphide concentration and redox potential profiles. The sediments had characteristically high organic matter content (varying from 8 to 30 % of dry weight) and high bacterial numbers (varying from 5 to 20 x 108 cells/g fw). Both values decreased with depth (030 cm). Methane emission, sulphide and redox profiles on the other hand, showed remarkable differences between and among sampling sites. In areas with a high abundance of leaf litter and few trees very high sulphide concentrations were encountered: increasing from about 1 mM at the surface to 25 mM at 3040 cm depth. Redox values were consistently low; from -150 to -200 mV. Near trees, in between the roots, a remarkably lower sulphide concentration was observed in the top 530 cm of the sediment. Methane emission varied from 0 to 500 mol/m2/h. In vitro incubations showed that methanogenic activity extended down to at least 30 cm depth. In other areas where there was no visible leaf litter accumulation and with many aerial roots the sulphide concentration was much lower ( 1 M) in the top 30 cm layer with correspondingly higher redox values (+100 mV to -150 mV). Below 30 cm sulphide concentrations increased to a maximum of 2 mM. Methane emissions from these areas were very low or even negative (-1 to 8 mol/m2/h). In vitro measurements showed CH4 production in the top layer occurring at a rate much higher than estimated from the emissions. The results clearly demonstrate the importance of the anaerobic microbial activity in mangrove sediments and indicate that aerial roots are responsible for a major input of oxygen into the sediment, which speeds up oxidation.
INTRODUCTION
Mangrove forests are usually considered to be high productivity areas that support highly developed detritus-based food webs (Odum & Heald, 1975; Robertson, 1986). The high primary productivity of mangroves implies a high demand for nutrients essential to plant growth and this demand appears to be met by a highly efficient system of nutrient trapping, uptake and recycling (Kristensen et al., 1991; 1992; 1994; Alongi, 1992; 1994 a,b; Alongi
Corresponding author: TJL. E-mail: lyimo@amu.udsm.ac.tz
et al., 1992; 1993; Robertson et al., 1992; Morell & Corredor, 1993; Hemminga et al., 1994; Nedwell et al., 1994). The organisms within mangrove ecosystems, including microorganisms, plants and animals, show complex interactions. Microorganisms are intimately involved in biogeochemical cycling and in many instances are the only biological agents capable of regenerating forms of the elements used by other organisms, particularly plants. The
72
T. J. LYIMO ET AL.
decomposition involves various trophic groups of microorganisms acting in a multi-step process. The first step is an enzymatic hydrolysis of polymeric material to soluble monomeric and oligomeric compounds. Under oxic conditions the soluble compounds are directly mineralised to carbon dioxide and water. Under anoxic conditions various physiological groups are involved in degradation after the initial depolymerisation. Fermentative bacteria convert the products of hydrolysis to a variety of products, mainly short chain fatty acids, carbon dioxide and hydrogen. Further conversion through the action of secondary fermenters, sulphate-reducers, acetogens and methanogens produces the end products CO2, CH4 and H2S, which may escape into the atmosphere. All three are important greenhouse gases. The extent of the fluxes depends on the penetration of oxygen and the activity of aerobic bacteria in the surface layer, which can oxidise sulphide and methane. Hydrogen sulphide can be oxidised to elemental sulphur, thiosulphate or sulphate. Hydrogen sulphide also precipitates easily with metal ions to the corresponding metal sulphide, for instance FeS, which gives many anoxic sediments their black coloration. Methanotrophic bacteria can oxidise CH4 to carbon dioxide. The literature shows that mangrove soils are sulphidic and variable, since their chemistry is regulated by a variety of factors such as texture, tidal range and elevation, redox state, bioturbation intensity, forest type, temperature and rainfall (Lugo & Snedaker, 1974; Alongi et al., 1992; 1993). Different mangrove forest differ in their sulphide concentration because the roots (pneumatophores) of some species of mangrove can oxidise the surrounding soil while others do not have this ability (Nickerson & Thibodeau, 1985; Lacerda et al., 1993). The role of anaerobic processes in mangrove sediment, however, is largely unresolved. Only few studies have dealt with anaerobic decomposition (Benner et al., 1986) sulphate reduction (Kristensen et al., 1991; 1994) and methanogenesis (Ramamurthy et al., 1990; Mohanraju & Natarajan, 1992; Mohanraju et al., 1997) in this ecosystem. There are only a few studies pertaining to depth profile for sulphide concentration and redox potential. Measurements of sulphide and redox
potential with electrodes in undisturbed sediments give better understanding of microbial interactions and sulphur cycling under natural conditions (Visscher et al., 1991). Moreover, most of the available information on anaerobic microbial activities in mangrove sediment is mainly based on studies from North America, Australia and Southeast Asia. In this paper we focus on in situ sulphide and redox profiles as well as methane emissions in sediments from mangroves at Mtoni, Tanzania.
73
3915E
Ba
ga
mo y o Road
Kurasini
Morog oro R oa
d
DAR ES SALAAM CITY CENTRE
HA RB
Kigamboni
650
er yer
oa eR
OU R
Karasini Vijibweni Mtoni Mtoni Kijichi
Ri
Rive Mzin ga
izin ga er Riv
Mbagala
r ve
zi
655
IN
ga
Fig. 1. Location of sampling stations for mangrove sediments near Dar es Salaam city
Station AC resembled station A but had less deep mud and was much closer to land. The dominant mangrove trees were R. mucronata. Station BC was intermediate between stations A and B, closer to land. The dominant trees here were S. alba but they were more scattered. Many small crab holes were observed in this station.
Kilwa
Vijibweni
A AC BC
Mtoni Kijichi
Mangroves Sampling sites
0 500 1000 m
after sampling), the cores were sectioned at 05, 510, 1015, 1520, 2025 and 2530 cm intervals. The organic matter content of the sediment core subsections was calculated as differences in weight between dry weight (80 oC until a constant weight) and ash weight (550 oC for 4 h). Concentrations of calcium, magnesium, manganese, iron, silicon, zinc, phosphorus, sulphur (as sulphate), aluminium, sodium, potassium and chloride in the (sediment subsections) interstitial water were measured with an inductive coupled plasma (ICP)-Atomic emission spectrometer and a flame photometer, FLM3, Radiometer, Copenhagen, as described by Roelofs (1991). The total numbers of bacteria in the sediment subsections were determined using the methods described by Kepner & Pratt (1994).
74
T. J. LYIMO ET AL.
needles of 1 mm tip, 60 cm long (microscale measurements, Netherlands). Calibrations of the electrodes were done as described in the protocol of the manufacturer. Field measurements were done by gently lowering the needle electrodes and reference electrode (Ag/AgCl) into the sediment as described by Vischer et al. (1991).
done by adding the amount produced by each section divided by the surface area covered by the sampler. The most-probable number (MPN) method (3 tube series) was used to compare the numbers of methanogenic archaea in station A and B. The preparation of medium and handling of samples were done as described by Lyimo et al. (2000). A combination of methanogenic substrates; acetate (5 mM), formate (5 mM), methanol (5 mM), trimethylamine (2 mM) and dimethylsulphide (0.6 mM) was used.
RESULTS
Physical-chemical parameters and total bacteria
The salinity of the seawater ranged from 19 to 35 0 /00, the low salinity was caused by intrusion of fresh water especially during the rainy season. Temperature varied from 25 to 32 oC. However, the temperature of the top layer of the sediment during low tide on sunny days ranged from 35 to 39 o C. The pH of the sediment showed no significant differences with depth, varying from 5.5 to 7.1 with an average of 6.6 0.4. The variation of organic matter content with depth in the sediment is indicated in Table 1. The surface sediment samples (010 cm) had significantly higher (P < 0.05, student t-test) organic matter content than the deeper samples (1030 cm). The average water content in the sediment core subsections from 030 cm was 62 12% of the fresh weight (fw).
Table 1. Variations of organic matter and total number of bacteria with depth at station A Number of bacteria (x108) (g fresh weight)-1 n Mean 20 16 14 10 6 Range n 3 3 3 3 3 2
6 14 27 9 6 23 9 6 26 4 6 13 3 3 8 5.5 5 6
75
The concentration of various elements in the interstitial water of the sediments did not show correlation with depth. The mean concentrations for all sub-samples in mM ( SD, n = 13) were as follows: Ca, 7.0 1.2; Mg, 35 6; Mn, 0.003 0.004; Fe, 0.02 0.01; Si, 0.6 0.3; Zn, 0.20 0.05; P, 0.2 0.1; S as SO42-, 21 9; Al, 0.2 0.1; -K, 13 1; Na, 502 38; and Cl, 492 37. The total number of bacteria estimated at different depths intervals is also shown in Table 1. The total counts of bacteria decreased with depth and were significantly higher (P < 0.05) at 05 cm as compared to 1030 cm depth. The numbers of bacteria (g fw)-1 ranged from 2.7 x 109 at the surface to 3 x 108 at 2025 cm depth.
concentration was observed in the top 030 cm of the sediment. A typical example of sulphide and redox potential profiles in the rooted and nonrooted sediments is shown in Fig. 2. At station B, which had no visible leaf litter but had many pneumatophores, the sulphide concentrations were much lower ( 1 mM) in the top 30 cm layer and correspondingly redox values were much higher (+250 mV to -150 mV). Below 30 cm, sulphide concentrations increased to a maximum of 2 mM and redox values decreased to -250 mV. A typical example of sulphide and redox potential profiles from station B is shown in Fig. 3. Generally the low sulphide zone extended deeper in the sediments at points that were adjacent to trees. Despite the very low sulphide concentrations at the surface, oxygen could not be detected in the upper layer (< 2% air saturation). Besides roots, crab holes were abundant and could contribute to the oxygenation of the sediment. Preliminary results using aerated sediment of station B showed that the capacity to oxidise sulphide by far (1000 fold) exceeded the sulphide production rate under anaerobic conditions.
Methane emission
Methane emission was estimated from static chamber experiments. Placing the bottles at random in sulphide-rich areas (Station A) a broad
Table 2. In situ methane emission and sulphide profiles of mangrove sediments from Mtoni, Dar es Salaam Sulphide profiles CH4 emission Station Characteristics A High sulphide smell, many leaves, deep mud, near Avicennia trees Resembles A, less deep mud, closer to land Intermediate of A & B, closer to land, less roots, many small crab holes No sulphide smell, no leaf deposition, many large crab holes, abundant roots mol/m /h
2
Maximum (mM) 2 8 2 25 15 6
Gradient at (cm) 1 20 25 40 <5 5 25 30 45 2550 Remark Non-rooted Rooted Non-rooted Non-rooted Rooted Rooted
79 133
AC BC
51 66 26 91
1 5 0.5 2 0.02 2
1.3
2.0
- 0.72
8.4
76
T. J. LYIMO ET AL.
Sulphide (mM) 0 0 5 10 15 I 20 0 5 10 15 20 II
10
20
Depth (cm)
30
40
50 Non-rooted 60 -250 -150 -50 50 -250 -150 Redox potential (mV) -50 Rooted 50
Fig. 2. Typical sulfide and redox profiles of sediments in non-rooted (I) and rooted (II) areas at station A. Redox profile ( ), sulphide profile ( )
10
20 Depth (cm)
30
40
50
60 -200
200
Fig. 3. A typical example of sulphide and redox profiles of sediments at station B. Redox profile ( ), sulphide profile ( )
range of CH4 emission values varying from -0.6 to 520 mol/m2/h were found (Table 2). Emission of methane by ebullition sometimes impaired accurate rate measurements (Fig. 4). No correlation between the nature (with or without litter, root or non-rooted) of the place (spot) and CH4 production was observed. In the station where the surface sediment was very poor in sulphide (Station B), CH4 emission was much lower or tended to be negative. This may indicate oxidation of CH4 at the oxycline, as a consequence CH4 does not reach the atmosphere. To verify this, anaerobic in vitro incubation was done with samples taken immediately after in vivo measurements. The results of this sediment showed that methane production extended down to at least 30 cm (Fig. 5) at any station. For station A, the in vitro production rate (82.2 53.4 mol CH4/m2/h) was almost the same as in vivo emission rate (113.4 94.2 mol CH4/m2/h). The in vivo rate values that have been considered are only those corresponding with the in vitro measurements. At station B, the in vitro production rate (14.4 2.4 mol CH4/m2/h) was about 10-fold the in vivo emission rate (1.2 0.4 mol CH4/m2/h). This
77
50 45
Methane emission (nmol/cm )
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
50
200
250
Fig. 4. A typical example of time-dependent in situ methane emissions from mangrove sediment. Incubation bottles at station A showing constant emission ( ) and with ebullition ( )
Methane production (nmol/g.fw/h) 0.0 02 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
46
810
1215
Depth (cm)
Fig. 5. A typical example of in vitro methane production rates from sediment core sectioned at various depths; sediment samples from station A and station B. Values are means of two independent incubation bottles
78
T. J. LYIMO ET AL.
could indicate oxidation of CH4 at station B due to the presence of many aerial roots. The number of methanogens in the top layer of the sediment were also estimated and compared between stations A and B. The numbers for both sites were of the same order of magnitude, 4.3 x 105 and 2.4 x 105 cells/g fw for stations A and B, respectively.
DISCUSSION
Mtoni mangrove sediment samples were characterised by a high organic matter content (8 30 %). Other authors (Kristensen et al., 1991; Sotomayor et al., 1994) have reported values ranging from 4 to 16 % in comparable mangrove ecosystems. The major input of organic material in the system is plant litter (e.g. leaves, stems) and roots exudates. During the time of conducting this research there were many recently cut mangrove trees that may have contributed to the observed high organic matter contents. The results for other physical-chemical parameters were within the expected ranges. For example concentration of sulphate was high (21 9 mM) as reported in other marine seawaters and does not appear to be limiting factor for sulphide production. High amounts of organic material support high densities of bacteria. In this study values for total bacterial counts are slightly lower than those reported from other mangrove sediments (Alongi, 1992; Boto et al., 1989) but the general tendency of decreasing with depth is consistent with other findings (Alongi, 1992). The rapid consumption of oxygen by aerobic microorganisms, driven by the high organic matter content, results into anaerobic conditions in the entire sediment column except at the surface. Anaerobic conditions and a high concentration of sulphate in the interstitial water support the growth of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB). The activity of SRB was obvious from the presence of up to 25 mM of sulphide. Oxidation of sulphide at the surface was evidenced by elemental sulphur deposition. The importance of sulphate reduction in the mineralisation of the organic matter has also been clearly demonstrated in laboratory incubations that the sulphide production rate was up to 200 times higher than the CH4 production rate. It was also shown that
the most probable number (MPN) of SRB was 10 times higher compared to MPN of methanogens (Lyimo, unpublished data). The observed sulphide concentrations and redox potentials observed were within the range reported in literature (Nickerson & Thibodeau, 1985; Lacerda et al., 1993; Giani et al., 1996). At station B the steep part of the sulphide gradient was located below 30 cm, which suggests transport upward and a rapid oxidation of sulphide in the surface sediment layer. Station A exhibited much higher sulphide concentrations as compared to station B and other reports on mangrove sediments (Lacerda et al. 1993). This could obviously be due to the high deposition of organic matter in this area, although the station had fewer trees compared to other stations. The sulphide concentration was higher in the top 10 cm of the sediment indicating high production at the surface. The fact that near the trees and in between their roots the sulphide concentration was much lower and increased again below about 30 cm suggests increased oxidation of sulphide by roots. This observation indicates that there was significant contribution from roots in aerating the sediment. Methane emissions were comparable with literature values for mangrove sediments (Barber et al., 1988; Harris et al., 1988; Bartlett et al., 1989; Sotomayor, 1994). At station B methane emission was very low and in some cases emission could not be detected. However, slurry incubations with samples from sediment cores taken from this station produced 10-fold more methane as compared to the field measurements. The results correspond with those of Giani et al. (1996) who studied the Balandra mangrove sediment. The authors could not detect any in vivo emissions but in the laboratory incubation rates of 1 to 23 nmol/ ml sediment/day were estimated. As for sulphide this also suggests a balance between production and oxidation of methane in the rooted area of the forest. Methane emission rates at station A were much higher (up to a hundred-fold) than at station B, and of the same order of magnitude as found for the in vitro production rates. The reason may be due to lack of oxygen input in the sediment at this largely unrooted station, rather than the higher supply of organic material. Further support for this view
79
comes from the fact that the in vitro CH4 production rates for station A were only 6-fold higher than for station B and the MPN of methylotrophic methanogens in the top layer of the sediment were of the same order of magnitude (105 cells/g fw). When data of various stations were combined (Table 2), a correlation between sulphide concentration and methane emission becomes obvious. This may be a result of the simultaneous oxidation of both products in the top layer, rather than differences in organic matter input. It is well known that plants growing in waterlogged soils, including mangrove trees (Scholander et al., 1955; Thibodeau & Nickerson, 1986; Lacerda et al., 1993) frequently evolve gases at the root hair region creating an oxidised rhizosphere within the anaerobic soil environment. This creates a microenvironment whose biogeochemistry differs from the surrounding sediment. This study has shown in the soil around Sonneratia spp. sulphide is virtually absent in the top sediment layer, most likely due to introduction of oxygen by pneumatophores of these trees. Similarly the rhizosphere of A. marina was highly oxidised, to the extent that sulphide was virtually absent. Nickerson & Thibodeau (1985) and Scholander et al. (1955) have demonstrated that A. germinans is able to bring air to roots growing in anaerobic substrate through its root aerenchyma. The findings from the present study imply that anthropogenic disturbance will endanger this ecosystem. The cutting of trees, which evidently had taken place at station A, leaves the area without roots. The lack of roots will result into less aeration of the sediment, and toxic sulphide will start to accumulate to very high concentrations, making the area inhospitable to both animals and plants. This may explain why crabs were absent in station A, which in turn will impair oxygen input via crab holes and diminution and burial of litter. Apart from crabs there was a striking absence of mangrove seedlings at station A. The increase of human pressure in utilisation of Tanzanian mangrove forest (Semesi, 1992; 1998) necessitates further research on the mangrove ecosystem. We recommended that the users of mangrove resources be educated on the negative impacts of clear-cutting and encouraged in more sustainable utilisation.
AcknowledgementsWe are indebted to the late Professor A.K. Semesi who contributed significantly to this study, but passed away before the work could be submitted for publication. We would like to dedicate this manuscript to her. We are grateful for the technical support received from technicians in the Microbiology Laboratory of the University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania as well as the staff of the Microbiology Laboratory of the University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands. The project was financed by the Directorate General for International Cooperation (DGIS), Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands.
REFERENCES
Alongi, D.M. (1992) Vertical profiles of bacterial abundance, productivity and growth rates in coastal sediments of the central Great Barrier Reef lagoon. Mar. Biol. 112: 657663. Alongi, D.M. (1994a) Zonation and seasonality of benthic primary production and community respiration in tropical mangrove forests. Oecologia 98: 320327. Alongi, D.M. (1994b) The role of bacteria in nutrient recycling in tropical mangrove and other coastal benthic ecosystems. Hydrobiology 295: 1932. Alongi, D.M., Boto, K.G. & Robertson, A.I. (1992) Nitrogen and phosphorous cycles. In: Robertson, A.I. and Alongi, D.M. (eds), Tropical Mangrove Ecosystems. AGU, Washington, DC. pp. 251292. Alongi, D.M., Christoffersen, P. & Tirendi, F. (1993) The influence of forest type on microbial-nutrient relationships in tropical mangrove sediments. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 171: 201223. Barber, T.R., Burke, R.A. & Sackett, W.M. (1988) Diffusive flux of methane from warm wetlands. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 2: 411425. Bartlett, D.S., Bartlett, K.B., Hartman, J.M., Harris. R.C., Sebacher, D.I., Pelletier-Travis, R., Dow, D.D. & Brannon, D.P. (1989) Methane emissions from the Florida Everglades, patterns of variability in a regional wetland ecosystem. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 2: 363374. Benner, R. Peele, E.R. & Hodson, R.E. (1986) Microbial utilization of dissolved organic matter from leaves of the red mangrove Rhizophora mangle, in the fresh Creek estuary, Bahamas. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2: 607619. Boto, K.G., Alongi, D.M. & Nott, A.L.J. (1989) Dissolved organic carbon and bacteria in a tropical mangrove system. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 51: 243 251. Giani, L., Bashan, Y., Holguin, G. & Strangmann, A.
80
T. J. LYIMO ET AL.
(1996) Characteristics and methanogenesis of the Balandra lagoon mangrove soils Baja California Suv, Mexico. Geoderma 72: 149160. Harris, R. C., Sebacher, D.I., Bartlett, K.B., Bartlett, D.S. & Crill, P.M. (1988) Sources of atmospheric methane in the South Florida environment. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 2: 231243. Hemminga, M.A., Slim, F.J., Kazungu, J., Gansesen, G.M., Nieuwenhuize J. & Kruyt N.M. (1994) Carbon outwelling from a mangrove forest with adjacent seagrass beds and coral reefs (Gazi Bay, Kenya). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 106: 291301. Kepner, R.L. & Pratt, J.R. (1994) Use of fluorochromes for direct enumeration of total bacteria in environmental samples. Past and present. Microbiol. Rev. 58: 603615. Kristensen, E., Holmer, M. & Bussarawit, N. (1991) Benthic metabolism and sulfate reduction in a Southeast Asian mangrove swamp. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 73: 93103. Kristensen, E., Devol, A.H, Ahmed, S.I. & Saleem, M. (1992) Preliminary assessment of benthic community metabolism in a Southeast Asian mangrove swamp. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 48: 137 145. Kristensen, E., King, G.M., Holmer, M., Banta, G.T., Jensen, M.H., Hansen K. & Bussarawit, N. (1994) Sulfate reduction, acetate turnover and carbon metabolism in sediments of Ao Nam Bor mangrove, Phuket, Thailand. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 109: 245255. Lacerda, L.D., Carvalho, C.E.V., Tanizaki, K.F., Ovalle A.R.C. & Rezende, C.E. (1993) The biogeochemistry and trace metals distribution of mangrove rhizosphere. Biotropica 25: 252257. Lugo A.E. & Snedaker, S.C. (1974) The ecology of mangrove. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 3964. Lyimo, T.J., Pol, A., Op den Camp, H.J.M., Harhangi, H.R. & Vogels, G.D. (2000) Methanosarcina semesiae sp. nov., a dimethylsulfide-utilizing methanogen from mangrove sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50: 171178. Mohanraju, R., Rajagopal, B.S., Daniels L. & Natarajan, R. (1997) Isolation and characterization of a methanogenic bacterium from mangrove sediments. J. Mar. Biotechnol. 5: 147152. Mohanraju, R. & Natarajan, R. (1992) Methanogenic bacteria in mangrove sediments. Hydrobiologia 247: 187193. Morell, J.M. & Corredor, J.E. (1993) Sediment nitrogen trapping in a mangrove lagoon. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci. 37: 203212. Nickerson, N.H. & Thibodeau, F.R. (1985) Association between porewater sulfide concentrations and the
distribution of mangroves. Biogeochemistry 1: 183192. Nedwell, D.B., Blackbum, T.H. & Wiebe, W.J. (1994) Dynamic nature of the turnover of organic carbon, nitrogen and sulphur in the sediments of a Jamaican mangrove forest. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 110: 203212. Odum, W.E. & Heald, E.J. (1975) The detritus-based food web of an estuarine mangrove community. In: Cronin, L.E. (ed.), Estuarine research, Academic Press, New York. pp. 265286. Ramamurthy, T., Mohanraju, R. & Natarajan, R. (1990) Distribution and ecology of methanogenic bacteria in mangrove sediments of Pitchavaram, East Coast of India. Indian J. Mar. Sci.19: 269 273. Robertson, A.I. (1986) Leaf-burying crabs: Their influence on energy flow and export from mixed mangrove forests (Rhizophora spp.) in northeastern Australia. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 102: 237248. Robertson, A.I., Alongi, D.M. & Boto, K.G. (1992) Food chains and carbon fluxes. In: Robertson, A.I. & Alongi D.M. (eds) Tropical mangrove ecosystems. AGU, Washington, DC. pp. 293326. Roelofs, J.G.M. (1991) Inlet of alkaline river water into peaty lowlands: effects on water quality and Stratiotes aloides L. stands. Aquatic Botany 39: 267293. Sotomayor, D., Corredor, J.E. & Morell, J.M. (1994) Methane flux from Mangrove sediments along the southwestern coast of Puerto Rico. Estuaries 17: 140147. Semesi, A.K. (1992) The mangrove resources of the Rufiji Delta, Tanzania. In: Matiza, T. & Chabwela, H.N. (eds), Wetlands conservation conference for Southern Africa. Proc. Southern African Development Coordination Conference, Gaborone, Botswana, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. pp. 157172. Semesi, A.K. (1998) Mangrove management and utilization in Eastern Africa. Ambio 27: 620626. Scholander, P.F., van Dam, L. & Scholander, S.I. (1955) Gas exchange in the roots of mangrove. Amer. J. Bot. 442: 9298. Thibodeau, F.R. & Nickerson, N.H. (1986) Differential oxidation of mangrove substrate by Avicennia germinans and Rhizophora mangle. Amer. J. Bot. 42: 512516. Vischer, P.T., Beukema, J. & van Gemerden, H. (1991) In situ characterization of sediments: Measurements of oxygen and sulfide profiles with a novel combined needle electrode. Limnology and Oceanography 36: 14761480.