Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cachecope Bell
CC3 Oppositebooks.com 2012
Creative Commons 3.0 You are free: to Share to copy, distribute and transmit the work to Remix to adapt the work to make commercial use of the work
Inside my head
Im perfectly serious about this, psychologically. Far too serious for a cartoon commentary actually.. Me, the one speaking, Im just the pilot fish, down here with my words. The whale makes the pictures, mostly. Theres all sorts of research that proves we think things before we could possibly put them into words and rationalise them into justifications and arguments.. Maybe if you dont know what to do next you should wait and see what your whale does. I really like the nice whale.
Actions in my head
Or maybe its like this, going back to metaphors aquatic. Do you ever find yourself telling yourself stories about what youre like? Praising yourself up or calling yourself stupid. There are lots of theories about what were really up to when were doing this, mostly to do with our parents and our consciences. I like to think of a sort of animated Finding Nemo-style, funny, self-important pilot fish and a silent, far wiser, whale. Makes it easier for me to give myself a break.
Game
This wasnt so much about predetermination or anything. Using this metaphor it might seem that the winner and loser are fixed before the game is played. This might be the probability but, of course, games can have lots of outcomes, no point in playing otherwise. This was more about putting game elements into a different metaphor and trying to make them fit. I wanted to get a better idea of what games mean to people and why and how we use them. Not sure this exactly helped but I like that there is a decision-making axis (the bow string) thats both delicate and the key to how the whole thing works. I like that, so expect to see it again.
Idea
My favourite bit about this is the need element. When you only have an idea for a strategy it feels a bit like this. Theres just an arrow tip of effectiveness and you need the tension of the need to fire it. Theres more substance to your solution too but it has to be matched by commitment to participate and a vision of what it is to complete the strategy. Without flights on the back of an arrow its not a system for delivering energy, its just a stick
Timelessness
The punctuationally majestic poet Edward Estlin Cummings described those without love as... Blind sands,at pitiless the mercy of time time time time time... This timelessness is the happy opposite of that. The Buddhists (I imagine them like street gang, always somewhere else, but threatening to appear whenever Im on their territory) say that when two enlightened souls meet they are like two hosts without a guest, able to share a great mutual abundance. (This is actually paraphrasing several bits of thought crammed together, it is, frankly, research so shoddy that it may in fact be an original notion.)
Biters
Whats the point of a shark? To set up a bit of creative tension? The basic function of our mind is to orchestrate survival. To predict and negate threats we need to make models them and, in so doing, take them inside of our systems. This is what the shark is for. Its not a bad thing in itself. Its a placeholder for warnings. This is great, but putting it in charge without any moderation isnt going to work out well.
The Shark
The Buddhists, damn them, might suggest we should ignore the shark completely and work directly with the whale. Its an attractive idea. The empty mastery of the the simpleton genius is described sometimes as the ability to walk along the edge of a razor without being cut. If the sharks purpose is to protect us but it, in fact, deprives us of this extraordinary facility, cant we get rid of our sharks? Could fully integrating this knowledge generate a sort of shark suicide?
The Whale
Does not explain itself
Business plan
Jason Donovan once said, on TV last night, that achieving success wont bring you happiness, but achieving happiness can bring you success. Where did he get that from? Im going to Google it. Oh, I think it was him. I think it was actually Jason Donovan.
Humility
So, so, so close to humiliation. Our Whales like to kick our sharks in the abdomen once in a while. Just to let them know they can change the game if they want. This can be nice but disturbing for a pilot fish, like an earthquake for their value system. However, struggle against it and youre only putting off the inevitable. Sometimes the entirely innocent are emotionally attacked but the very nature of there serenity gives the attack no purchase whatsoever. Whales simply arent afraid of sharks.
Reassurance
We cling to our fears. Our fears keep us safe, we think. When were faced with the terrifying and incomprehensible we often focus on an interim fear that is easier to be afraid of. You often see people obsessing over an entirely inconsequential detail before a big event. Better the fears and the devils that you know than the ones you do not know... However, this can be annoying to our subconscious mind which sees the bigger picture and hasnt got time for fears, not really. Persist with a focus on reassurance and you might get a little bit of self-sabotage going on. How many times have you seen people unconsciously maneuvering to end up with the one thing they believed they were trying to avoid?
Freuds brain
Im not saying any of these ideas are new. The Buddhists, always with the Buddhists, say that enlightenment is like freshly baked bread, the recipe is always the same but the work of the process is something which must be undertaken anew every day. So maybe this is just for me and youll actually have to come up with your own way of thinking about this before its any use to you.
The way you treat yourself - the way you treat others
This works for me because the intent for the two lines is the same but theyve come out slightly differently from each other and maybe thats just because I cant ever reproduce one action exactly, or maybe its because the very act of copying something is different from doing someting spontaneously, which is the way the first one was done can you tell? The second one does look a bit forced to me, thats part of it too.
Self actualisation
The Buddhists, who I cant seem to keep in their box at all, have this saying that enlightenment comes from great faith and great doubt. Now at first, I was like, oh yeah thats all about the back and forth that you get when you try to sit and meditate about something. You go, ok, Im doing this, here I am, sitting around and is this going to work and make me feel happier? Hang on, I shouldnt be asking that question, thats not going to help me achieve the emptiness of enlightenment. But wait, stopping asking that question of myself is the whole point. Im there, Ive stopped pushing myself to encapsulate everything in words. Im free. Except for this narrative Im telling myself about what Im doing, damn, ok start again and try to shut that down too... just stop thinking... That sort of thing was what I thought they were talking about. But then I came across something else about self actualisation and integrity that really interested me. The great faith bit could actually be the faith not to raise these questions of self-doubt, instead of the faith needed to keep answering them. The great doubt could be something that you apply to the ideas that arise from the world, before you let it scare you into a round of worrying and looking for reassurance. Thats a little harder to explain but it has a lot to do with that moment when Buddah touches the ground and lets it Earth all the horror and temptation that is directed at him with a single gesture. Great faith in your right to be yourself, great doubt in the dead-end doubts of fear and desire.
Typical paradigm
We cant even see these any more. We learn the systems when were very young and now we already expect them to turn up for us to interact with. I wonder how many people have taken things too far and ended up doing something criminal or very unhappy because they were expecting an Are you sure confirmation to stop them.. Im not complaining about this. Im just saying.
Do the inconceivable
I actually corrected the spelling of this with my free cheap-o version of Photo-Shop. The authentic one reads Do the inconcievable. I used to think I was dyslexic as a child but now I think I was just a conscientious objector to forced premature articulation. There are several other spelling mistakes throughout this work which are also radical acts of protest. I am not fully sure where they are. But I stand by them.