2009

2012 05

2012 05

UDC

11413

Research on middle level cadre's performance

appraisal system of coal mining enterprises

2009

TSP090102131Q

2012 05
2012 06

2012 06

,
,
,

Abstract
Performance evaluation is the important part of the modern coal mining enterprises to
realize the strategic management objectives, Middle level management staff performance appraisal
is one of the top priorityThe middle level management staff performance appraisal is the
assessment of middle-level cadres manifested in their daily work performance and the ability to
play a

degree. Its core is to promote the improvement of corporate profitability and strength, its

essence is to be done to make the best use, to maximize human resources role Performance
evaluation of the middle managers of production and operations and its huge impact.
The paper introduce Jizhong Energy Fengfeng Group's corporate culture, in-depth analysis
Jizhong Energy blazing performance evaluation of the status quo, and clear the middle level
management personnel performance evaluation of the reasons, Use of performance
management-related knowledge, to build a blazing middle management staff performance
appraisal system, The introduction of scientific calculation of the analytic hierarchy process and
distribution of performance evaluation indicators of the right to weight, Through research, to
enable enterprises to develop a better middle managers in performance appraisal system to play an
active role in the development of enterprises, more conducive to long-term development.
Key Words: Coal enterprise , performance appraisal , middle cadre, Analytic hierarchy process

1 ....................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 ......................................................................................................... 1
1.2 ......................................................................................................... 1
1.2.1 .................................................................................. 1
1.2.2 .................................................................................. 4
1.3 ..................................................................................... 4
1.4 ............................................................................................................ 5
2 ........................................................................................................................ 7
2.1 ................................................................................................. 7
2.1.1 .................................................................................. 7
2.1.2 ...................................................................................... 7
2.1.3 ............................................................................................. 8
2.2 ..................................................................................... 8
2.3 ........................................................................................................... 11
2.3.1 ................................................................... 11
2.3.2 ........................................................................................ 12
2.4 ................................................................................................................... 12
2.5 ................................................................................................................... 14
3 ......................................................... 15
3.1 ........................................................................................... 15
3.1.1 .................................................................... 15
3.1.2 ....................................................................... 15
3.2 ................................................... 16
3.2.1 .................................................................................... 16
3.2.2 ............................................................................ 16
3.2.3 ................................................................................ 17
3.3 ........................... 18
3.4 ........................... 19
3.5 ................................................................................................................... 20
4 ...................................................... 21
4.1 ................................................................................... 21
4.1.1 .................................................................... 21
4.1.2 ................................................................... 21
4.1.3 ................................................... 22
4.2 ........................................................................................................... 22
4.3 ........................................................................................................... 23
4.3.1 .................................................................................... 23

4.3.2 ............................................................................................ 24
4.4 .............................................................................................. 25
4.4.1 ........................................................................ 25
4.4.2 ............................................................... 25
4.4.3 ........................................................... 34
4.5 .................................................................................................. 35
4.6 ....................................................................................... 35
4.7 ........................................................................................... 35
4.8 ....................................................................................................... 37
4.9 .............................................................................................. 37
4.10 ................................................................................. 37
4.11 ................................................................................................................. 38
5 .................................................................................................................................. 39
5.1 ........................................................................................................................... 39
5.2 ................................................................... 39
.......................................................................................................................... 41
........................................................................................................................................ 43
A......................................................................................................................................... 44
B ......................................................................................................................................... 45
..................................................................... 46

1
1.1

1.1[1]
2

1.1
Fig. 1.1 Factors affecting performance

1.2
1.2.1
70

[2]

1911

2
20

1903

20 60

20 60

20 70
1971
[3]
20 80

IBM

3
20 90

1991

[4]
.Christopher Meyer 1994

5P person
positionpast present potential

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

1.2.2
80

1.3
360
4

360

360

1.1

1.2
Fig. 1.2 Conceptual framework for research

1.4
1

2
2.1
2.1.1

[9]

2.1.2
2.1
1

2.1
Fig. 2.1 Performance management process model

1
2
3
4
7

5
6

2.1.3
1

2.2

10

3(BSC)

[10]

KPI

2.2
Fig. 2.2 Balance Scorecard model map
9

IT

4KPI

[11]
5MBO

MBO
2.2
[12]

2.3
Fig. 2.3 MBO implementation of the process map

6360
360 360Degree FeedbackFull-circle appraisal
Multi-source Assessment,

2.1 0 90 180
270

10

2.4

360

Fig. 2.4 360 performance evaluation diagram

2.3
2.3.1

[13].

4
11

2.3.2
.E. 1965

1 ;
2

3
4

2.4

[14]

1976 1980

12

2.5

2.5
Fig.2,5 Performance management Process

13

360

2.5

14

3
3.1
3.1.1
62

100
90
2003 7 2008 6
32
2.9

2011
3000 1136 820

500

2011
27.8

6000
1500 2000
[15]

3.1.2

15

2010
5000 500 ; 2013 8000
800 ; 2015 1
1000 100

3.2
3.2.1

3.2.2

[17]
1

16

3.2.3

[17]

11 12

6

25
25 25 25

11

17

95 90 85
85

3.3

18

3.4
1

[18-20]
2

19

[21]

3.5

20

4
4.1
4.1.1

4.1.2
1

21

4.1.3
1360
360

4.2

360
4.1

22

4.1
Fig. 4.1

360

360performance appraisal plan of middle level cadres

4.3
4.3.1

23

[22]

4.3.2

4.2
4.2
Table 4.2 Middle management performance Evaluation Indicators

24

4.4
4.4.1

Delphi

4.4.2

analytic hierarchy processAHPT.L.Satty

[23]

[24]-[25]

4.4.2.1
1

M [ aij ]n*n

25

4.1

4.1 aij i j n M
Satty
1 9 [26]
4.3
Table 4.3 Judgment Matrix Scaling and its meaning

2,4,6,8

i j

bij

j i

b ji

=1/

bij

M max W M
W

MW max *W
N

Wi 1
i 1

(4.2)

M (aij ) n*n

wij

aij
n

a
i 1

ij

ij=1,2,n

4.3

wi

w
j 1

ij

j=1,2n

26

4.4

wij

wi
n

w
i 1

i=1,2,n

4.5

max

[27]
An>1 CI

CI

max ( A) N
N 1

4.6

CI

RI RI
A CR

CR

CI
RI

4.7

CR<0.01
[28-30]
4.4.2.2

[31-35]

A1A2,A3,A4,A5,A6 W1,W2,W3,W4,W5,W6
4.4
Tab 4.4 The first level index weights system table of Middle level Cadres

A1

A1

A2

A3

A4

A5

A6

1/3

1/5

0.1386

27

A2

1/2

0.2127

A3

1/2

1/3

1/5

1/2

0.0819

A4

0.3824

A5

1/3

1/2

1/3

1/2

0.0920

A6

1/2

1/2

1/2

1/4

0.0923

10.3333

4.6667

13.5

2.4833

11.5

11.5

1 1
1/ 3
2
1/ 5
3
2
W1 *

0.1386
6 10.333 4.6667 13.5 2.4833 11.5 11.5
1 3
1
3
1/ 2
2
2
W 2 *

0.2127
6 10.333 4.6667 13.5 2.4833 11.5 11.5
1 1/ 2
1/ 3
1
1/ 5
1/ 2
2
W 3 *

0.0819
6 10.333 4.6667 13.5 2.4833 11.5 11.5
1 5
2
5
1
3
4
W 4 *

0.3824
6 10.333 4.6667 13.5 2.4833 11.5 11.5
1 1/ 3
1/ 2
2
1/ 3
1
1/ 2
W 5 *

0.0920
6 10.333 4.6667 13.5 2.4833 11.5 11.5
1 1/ 2
1/ 2
1/ 2
1/ 4
2
1
W 6 *

0.0923
6 10.333 4.6667 13.5 2.4833 11.5 11.5
A

0.1386
0.2127

0.0819
W

0.3824
0.0920

0.0923

1
3

1/ 2
AW
5
1/ 3

1/ 2

1/ 3

1/ 5

1/ 2

1/ 3
2

1
5

1/ 5
1

1/ 2

1/ 3

1/ 2 1/ 2 1/ 4

2 0.1386 0.9104
2
2 0.2127 1.4340
1/ 2 2 0.0819 0.5291

3
4 0.3824 2.5555
1 1/ 2 0.0920 0.5820

2
1 0.0923 0.5885
3

28

AW max *W
N

Wi 1
i 1

4.8

1
6

max *
i 1

( AWi )
Wi

1 0.9104
*(

6 0.1386

1.4340

0.2127

0.5291 2.5555 0.5820

)
0.0819 0.3824 0.0920

0.5885
0.0923

=6.5259
A CI

CI

max n

6.5259 6
0.0877
6
4.5 RI
Table 4.5 Average random consistency index RI standard value

RI

0.5149

0.8931

1.1185

1.2494

1.3450

n=6 RI=1.2494,

CR

CI 0.0877

0.0702 0.1
RI 1.2494

A
0.1386,0.2127,0.0819,0.3824,0.0920,0.0923

D11D12D13D14
4.6
Table 4.6 Morality evaluation index weights system table of middle level Cadre
D11

D12

D13

D14

D11

0.4520

D12

1/2

0.3298

D13

1/3

1/4

0.1465

D14

1/5

1/4

1/3

0.0717

1 2 3 5
1

1 4 4 0.4520 1.9096
2
0.3298 1.4286

DW= 1 1
1 3 0.1465 0.4482

3 4
0.0717 0.2934

1 1 1
1

5 4 3
29

DW max *W
N

Wi 1
i 1

4.9

1
4

max *
i 1

(DWi )
Wi

1 1.9096 1.4286 0.4482 0.2934

*(

)
4 0.4520 0.3298 0.1465 0.0717
3.9267
D

max n

3.9267 4
0.0183
n
4
CI 0.0183
CR

0.0205 0.1
RI
0.8931
CI

D
0.4520,0.3298,0.1465,0.0717

N11N12N13,N14
4.7
Table 4.7 Capability evaluation index weights system table of middle level Cadre
N21

N22

N23

N24

N21

1/2

1/3

0.2378

N22

1/4

0.2332

N23

1/3

0.3642

N24

1/4

1/5

0.1647

1/ 2
3
1/ 3 0 . 2 3 7 8
1
2
4 0 . 2 3 3 2
1
1/ 4

NW
1 / 3
5 0 . 3 6 4 2
3
1

1 / 4 1 / 5 1
0 . 1 6 4 7
3

1 . 5 0 1 9
1 . 4 5 8 7
1 . 9 6 6 6

1 . 0 0 9 2

NW max *W
N

Wi 1
i 1

30

4.10

1
4

( NWi )
Wi

max *
i 1

1 1.5019 1.4287 1.9666 1.0092

*(

)
4 0.2378 0.2332 0.3642 0.1647
5.9923
N

max n

4.9932 4
0.2483
n
4
CI 0.2483
CR

0.0912 0.1
RI 0.8931

CI

N
0.2378,0.2332,0.3642,0.1647
Q31Q32

4.8
Table 4.8 Diligentevaluation index weights system table of middle Level Cadres
Q31

Q32

Q31

0.6667

Q32

1/2

0.3333

1.5

1 2 0.6667 1.3333
QW

1/ 2 1 0.3333 0.6667

QW max *W
N

Wi 1
i 1

4.11

1
2

max *
i 1

(QWi )
Wi

1 1.3333 0.6667
*(

)
2 0.6667 0.3333
2.0001
Q

CI

max n
n

2.0001 2
0.00005 0
2

31

0.6667,0.3333
, J41
J42
4.9
Table 4.9 Achievement evaluation index weights system table of middle cadres
J41

J42

J41

0.8

J42

1/4

0.2

1.25

1 4 0.8 1.6
JW

1/ 4 1 0.2 0.4

JW max *W
N

Wi 1
i 1

4.12

1
2

max *
i 1

( JWi )
Wi

1 1.6 0.4
*(

)
2 0.8 0.2
2.0000
J

CI

max n
n

2.0000 2
0
2

J
0.8,0.2

X51X52,X53
4.10
Table 4.10 Learn evaluation index weights system table of middle cadres
X51

X52

X53

X51

1/2

0.3339

X52

0.5679

X53

1/4

1/5

0.0982

3.25

1.7

10

32

1 1/ 2 4 0.3339 1.0107
XW 2
1 5 0.5679 1.7267
1/ 4 1/ 5 1 0.0982 0.2953

XW max *W
N

Wi 1
i 1

4.13

1
3

max *
i 1

( XWi )
Wi

1 1.0107 1.7267 0.2953

*(

)
3 0.3339 0.5679 0.0982
3.0249
X

CI

max n
n

3.0249 3
0.0083 0.1
3

X
0.3339,0.5679,0.0982

L61L62L63
4.11
Table 4.11 Clean evaluation index weights system table of middle cadres
L61

L62

L63

L61

1/2

1/5

0.1485

L62

0.5033

L63

1/3

0.3482

1.8333

4.2

1 1/ 2 1/ 5 0.1485 0.4698
LW 2 1
3 0.5033 1.8449
5 1/ 3 1 0.3482 1.2585

33

LW max *W
N

Wi 1
i 1

4.14

1
3

max *
i 1

( LWi )
Wi

1 0.4698 1.8449 1.2585

*(

)
3 0.1485 0.5033 0.3482
3.1492
L

CI

max n
n

3.1492 3
0.0497 0.1
3

L
0.1485,0.5033,0.3482
4.4.2.3

4.12
Table 4.12 Weights of evaluators

25

25

25

25

40

10

25

25

25

15

15

25

25

25

25

15

15

25

15

15

15

20

15

10

10

10

10

25

15

30

100

100

100

100

100

100

4.4.3

34

4.13
Table 4.13 Standard performance

95

90

85

85

10%

35%

45%

10%

4.5

4.13
4

[36]

4.6

11
12

4.7

Bies Moag

35

4.14
Fig. 4.14 Performance Evaluation flow chart of middle level Cadres

36

[37]

4.8

4.9
1

[37]

4.10

B.

37

[38]

[39]

[40]

4.11

38

5
5.1

5.2

1 360

39

40

1.

. [M]. :, 2007

2.

. 1001 [M]. :, 1998

3.

Douglas Clinton Shi min Chen. Do New Performance Measures Up [M]. Management Accounting,
1998

4.

. [M]. :, 2002:28-32

5.

. [J]. , 2007, (7):122-125

6.

. [Z]. , 2008,12

7.

. [Z]. , 2006

8.

. :[Z]. 2007.9

9.

. [M]. :2007

10.

. [D] . :, 2005

11.

. [J]., 2005, (5):82-84

12.

. [M].:, 2004.

13.

. [M]. :, 2003.

14.

.[M]. :, 2008

15.

http://www.ffjt.com/

16.

. [D]. :, 2007

17.

. [Z]. 2011

18.

. [D]. :, 2011

19.

, . [J]. , 2011,(5):122-123

20.

. [M]. :, 2008.

21.

. [J]. ,
2007,(12):79-80.

22.

. [Z]. 2011

23.

. [D]. :, 2007

24.

. [D]. :, 2007

25.

Andre A.de Wal. Power of Performance Management : How Leading Companies Create Sustained
Value[M]. John Wiley&Sons.Inc.2001.

26.

AHP MATLAB [J]. :,

2006,(5):35-37.
27.

. [M]. :, 2000

28.

. [J]. , 2000,4(2):89-91

29.

. [M]. :,1998

30.

. [M]. :, 2002

31.

[M]. :, 2005

32.

. [M].:, 2001

33.

. [M]. :

41

34.

. [M]. :1988.

35.

. [M]. :2005

36.

. [M]. :2001

37.

. [J].
2008(5):55-57

38.

. [J]. 2007,(8):55-57

39.

. [J]. :, 2002,(3):25-28

40.

, . [M]. : , 2006.

42

43

44

schedule figure for person talk

45

1 Yunbing Hou Xing XiaTaiguo JiaJianming ZhouChanggui Li, Algorithm of route

searching for mine geographic network. Energy Procedia,2011(EI ).
2 . .

1.
2.

46