Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. Attorneys At Law 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000
Maria Crimi Speth (012574) JABURG & WILK, P.C. 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 mcs@jaburgwilk.com (602) 248-1000 David S. Gingras, #021097 Gingras Law Office, PLLC 3941 E. Chandler Blvd., #106-243 Phoenix, AZ 85048 Tel.: (480) 668-3623 Fax: (480) 248-3196 David@GingrasLaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA XCENTRIC VENTURES, L.L.C., Case No. Plaintiff, v. MEDIOLEX LTD., a foreign corporation d/b/a/ COMPLAINTSBOARD.COM; COMPLAINTSBOARD.COM, an unregistered business entity; MARK SCHULTZ, an individual, Defendants. For its Complaint, Plaintiff Xcentric Ventures, L.L.C. alleges as follows: 1. This is a civil action seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief for COMPLAINT
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
various acts of copyright infringement under the copyright laws of the United States (17 U.S.C. 101 et seq.) and for various acts of trademark infringement in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051, et seq., and related state law claims. 2. This Court has jurisdiction under 15 U.S.C. 1121 (trademark); 17 U.S.C.
101 et seq. (copyright); 28 U.S.C. 1331 (federal question); and 28 U.S.C. 1338(a)
10297-44/MCS/DAG/951598_v1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. Attorneys At Law 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000
(copyright). This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over state and common law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a). 3. Venue in this District is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and (c), and/or A substantial part of the acts of infringement complained of
28 U.S.C. 1400(a).
occurred in this District, and certain corporate defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this District. 4. Personal jurisdiction in this District is proper because each defendant,
engaged in acts of copyright infringement within the District of Arizona, and/or intentionally directed tortious conduct at Plaintiff knowing such conduct would cause harm within this District. 5. Plaintiff XCENTRIC VENTURES, L.L.C. (Plaintiff) is an Arizona
limited liability company with its principal place of business in Tempe, Arizona and is a citizen of the State of Arizona. 6. Plaintiff is the operator of the website located at www.RipoffReport.com
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
(the Ripoff Report). The Ripoff Report is widely used by consumers, and works closely with government agencies, attorneys general, federal, state, and local law enforcement, and the news media to help report, identify and prevent consumer fraud and similar conduct. 7. Defendant MEDIOLEX LTD d/b/a COMPLAINTSBOARD.COM
(Mediolex) is a corporation of unknown origin which has registered the domain name www.complaintsboard.com, and which caused the events herein described to occur with knowledge that they would cause harm within the State of Arizona. Upon information and belief, Mediolex also has engaged in continuous, systematic and substantial contacts with the State of Arizona sufficient to confer general and specific personal jurisdiction over it in this District. 8. Defendant COMPLAINTSBOARD.COM is an entity of unknown origin
which the website WWW.COMPLAINTSBOARD.COM claims to be operated by, and which caused the events herein described to occur with knowledge that they would cause harm within the State of Arizona. Upon information and belief, complaintsboard.com 2
10297-44/MCS/DAG/951598_v1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. Attorneys At Law 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000
also has engaged in continuous, systematic and substantial contacts with the State of Arizona sufficient to confer general and specific personal jurisdiction over it in this District. 9. Upon information and belief, Defendant MARK SCHULTZ is a resident of
the country of Latvia, and claims to be a part owner of the website COMPLAINTSBOARD.COM, and caused the events herein described to occur with knowledge that they would cause harm within the State of Arizona. Upon information and belief, Mr. Schultz also has engaged in continuous, systematic and substantial contacts with the State of Arizona sufficient to confer general and specific personal jurisdiction over it in this District.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 10. The Ripoff Report is, among other things, a website upon which consumers
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
may post complaints. Any member of the public with access to a computer and an Internet connection may use the Ripoff Report website to create and publish complaints about companies or individuals who they believe have wronged them in some manner. 11. The Ripoff Report was launched in 1998 and was the only website that
provided consumers with a forum to post complaints about companies 12. When a user posts a complaint on Ripoff Report, the user electronically
signs an agreement that grants to Xcentric an irrevocable, perpetual exclusive license to use, copy, perform, display and distribute the content posted. 13. Complaints published on the Ripoff Report are automatically indexed by
numerous search engines such as Google and such complaints often rank very high in Googles search results. 14. Plaintiff is the owner of various copyrights relating to content appearing on
the Ripoff Report website. 15. Plaintiff is the owner of the federal copyright issued by the United States
Copyright Office Certificate of Registration No. TXu1-574-438 entitled Rip-off Report Content dated March 25, 2008. 3
10297-44/MCS/DAG/951598_v1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. Attorneys At Law 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000
16.
Copyright Office Certificate of Registration No. TXu1-371-920 entitled Group Database Registration for Automated Database Entitled Rip-off Report Database. Unpublished updates from March 5, 2008 May 5, 2008 dated May 20, 2008. 17. Plaintiff is the owner of the registered trademark RIPOFF REPORT, United
States Patent & Trademark Office Registration Number 2958949. 18. Plaintiff is the owner of the pending trademark registration for
CORPORATE ADVOCACY PROGRAM, United States Patent & Trademark Office Serial Number 85460244. 19. Plaintiff is the owner of the registered trademark DONT LET THEM GET
AWAY WITH IT, United States Patent & Trademark Office Registration Number 2824390. 20. Plaintiff is the owner of the common law trademark DONT LET THEM
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
GET AWAY WITH IT, LET THE TRUTH BE KNOWN. 21. On or about December 13, 2006, June 23, 2007, August 18, 2007,
September 1, 2007, September 5, 2007, October 1, 2007, October 5, 2007, October 9, 2007, October 26, 2007 and November 1, 2007, Plaintiff filed fictitious report on its own website about a fictitious business called Leannes Mobile Groom and Board in Fort Smith, Arkansas (the Leannes Posting). The Leannes Posting was made for the purpose of tracking activities of competitors and other businesses with an unlawful intent. There never is and never was a real business called Leannes Mobile Groom and Board.
DEFENDANTS ACTIVITIES 22. On or about June 22, 2006 Defendants or their predecessor purchased the
domain name complaintsboard.com and shortly thereafter launched a website located at complaintsboard.com. 23. The complaintsboard.com website was launched by copying large amounts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. Attorneys At Law 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000
24.
generally purports to be a forum for consumers to post and review complaints about businesses and bad business practices, among other things. 25. The ComplaintsBoard site copied the concept, style, and the content of the
Ripoff Report site. 26. On or around December 17, 2008, Plaintiff initiated a lawsuit in this Court
similar to the present one against COMPLAINTSBOARD.COM for copyright infringement. The case was captioned Xcentric Ventures, LLC v. Elizabeth Arden, Case No. 2:08-cv-02299-HRH (the 2008 Case). 27. In the 2008 Case, the defendants were found to have systematically stolen
copyright-protected content from the Ripoff Report website and published it on the Complaintsboard.com website for the benefit of Defendants. On October 22, 2009, the Court entered Judgment against defendants in the 2008 Case, awarding both monetary damages arising from defendants infringement of Plaintiffs copyright, as well as a permanent injunction. See Judgment, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 28. Plaintiff has taken numerous affirmative steps to ensure that the
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Complaintsboard.com website comply with the Permanent Injunction and cease any further copying from the Ripoff Report website. 29. Since the judgment was entered in the 2008 Case, Defendants have
continued engaging in conduct that violates Plaintiffs rights. 30. Defendants permit user-generated content to be posted on the
Complaintsboard.com website. 31. In many cases, the user-generated content is content that has been
exclusively licensed to Xcentric Ventures, LLC. 32. When consumers post content on Ripoff Report, they enter into an exclusive
license with Xcentric prohibiting them from posting the same content on other websites. 33. Defendants encourage and permit consumers to post content that has been
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. Attorneys At Law 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000
34.
of content that is exclusively licensed to Xcentric. 35. In addition, Defendants have used Xcentrics trademarks on the
Complaintsboard.com website which has caused and is likely to cause consumer confusion. 36. Defendants display the trademark RIPOFF REPORT on the
Complaintsboard.com website. 37. Defendants display the trademark DONT LET THEM GET AWAY
WITH IT on the Complaintsboard.com website. 38. Defendants display the trademark CORPORATE ADVOCACY
PROGRAM on the Complaintsboard.com website. 39. The ComplaintsBoard sites use of Xcentrics trademarks is likely to cause
confusion as to source or sponsorship. 40. Defendants unlawful use of Plaintiffs trademarks has caused substantial
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
actual confusion among consumers who have been misled into believing that Plaintiff is the owner and/or operator of the ComplaintsBoard site when, in fact, this is not true. 41. As a result of the ongoing and pervasive copying of Xcentrics copyright
protected materials and as a result of the ongoing use of Xcentrics trademark on to the ComplaintsBoard site by Defendants, the web traffic to the Ripoff Report website has been greatly reduced. 42. Sometime prior to January 19, 2011, Defendants posted the following
statement on Complaintsboard.com: Leanne's Mobile Groom And Board Are you also a victim of the Leanne's Mobile Groom And Board? Submit a complaint to help other consumers to be educated and don't let them get away with it! 43. Defendants also posted the following statement on Complaintsboard.com:
In case you have experienced any problems with Leannes Mobile Groom and Board please report immediately by filling [sic] a Complaint Form.
6
10297-44/MCS/DAG/951598_v1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. Attorneys At Law 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000
44.
Groom and Board for the sole reason of diverting traffic from the Ripoff Report website to the Complaintsboard.com website.
COUNT ONE (Infringement of Copyright 17 U.S.C. 106.501(a)) 45. Plaintiff incorporates herein by this reference each and every allegation set
forth in this Complaint as though fully set forth below. 46. Defendants have violated Plaintiffs exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C.
106(3) (distribution) by distributing Plaintiffs works without permission 47. Defendants have violated Plaintiffs rights under 17 U.S.C. 106(5)
(display) by publicly displaying Plaintiffs works without permission. 48. Plaintiff is informed and believes that the foregoing acts of infringement
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
have been willful, intentional, and in disregard of and with indifference to the rights of Plaintiff. 49. Defendants infringing activities were not authorized by Plaintiff and were
performed without Plaintiffs knowledge, consent, or permission. 50. Defendants infringing activities were and are done for Defendants
financial gain. 51. Defendants infringing activities have caused Plaintiff to incur actual
damages of not less than $150,000. 52. As the result of Defendants infringement of Plaintiffs exclusive rights,
Plaintiff is entitled to recover from Defendants its actual damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504(b) or statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504(c), whichever is greater. 53. As the result of Defendants infringement of Plaintiffs exclusive rights,
Plaintiff further is entitled to attorneys fees and costs pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 505. 54. Furthermore, the conduct of each Defendant is causing and, unless enjoined
and restrained by this Court, will continue to cause Plaintiff great and irreparable injury that cannot fully be compensated or measured in money. 7
10297-44/MCS/DAG/951598_v1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. Attorneys At Law 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000
55. 56.
Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law. Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 502(a) and 503, Plaintiff is entitled to preliminary
and permanent injunctive relief prohibiting each Defendant from further infringing Plaintiffs copyrighted works.
COUNT TWO (Contributory Infringement of Copyright) 57. Plaintiff incorporates herein by this reference each and every allegation set
forth in this Complaint as though fully set forth below. 58. As set forth more fully herein, Defendants, with knowledge of the infringing
activity, induced, caused or materially contributed to copyright violations by third parties who posted content exclusively licensed to Plaintiff on the Complaintsboards.com website. 59. As a direct and proximate cause of Defendants conduct, Plaintiff suffered
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
COUNT THREE (Trademark Infringement 15 U.S.C. 1125) 60. Plaintiff incorporates herein by this reference each and every allegation set
forth in this Complaint as though fully set forth below. 61. trademarks. 62. Defendants use of Plaintiffs common law trademarks is likely to cause Plaintiffs did not give Defendants consent to use its common law
confusion or to deceive and has caused confusion as to the source or origin of the services. 63. Defendants use of Plaintiffs common law trademarks implies sponsorship
or affiliation between Plaintiff and Defendants. 64. Defendants use of Plaintiffs common law trademarks is a misappropriation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. Attorneys At Law 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000
65.
all of the acts previously alleged in this Complaint. 66. Plaintiff has suffered damages as a result of Defendants infringing activities
in an amount to be proved at trial. 67. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief to prohibit Defendant from
committing any further or additional infringement. 68. Plaintiff is entitled to recover statutory damages and also general, special,
consequential, and incidental damages, including but not limited to lost profits and cost of corrective advertising, and injunctive relief. 69. Defendants acts were committed in bad faith entitling Plaintiff to a
COUNT FOUR (Trademark Infringement 15 U.S.C. 1114) 70. Plaintiff incorporates herein by this reference each and every allegation set
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
forth in this Complaint as though fully set forth below. 71. 72. Plaintiffs did not give Defendants consent to use its registered trademarks. Defendants use of Plaintiffs registered trademarks is likely to cause
confusion or to deceive and has caused confusion as to the source or origin of the services. 73. Defendants use of Plaintiffs registered trademarks implies sponsorship or
affiliation between Plaintiff and Defendants. 74. Defendants use of Plaintiffs registered trademarks is a misappropriation of
the goodwill that Plaintiff has accumulated in its trademarks. 75. Defendants have infringed upon Plaintiffs registered trademarks through all
of the acts previously alleged in this Complaint. 76. Plaintiff has suffered damages as a result of Defendants infringing activities
in an amount to be proved at trial. 77. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief to prohibit Defendant from
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. Attorneys At Law 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000
78.
consequential, and incidental damages, including but not limited to lost profits and cost of corrective advertising, and injunctive relief. 79. Defendants acts were committed in bad faith entitling Plaintiff to a
COUNT FIVE (Unfair Competition) 80. Plaintiff incorporates herein by this reference each and every allegation set
forth in all paragraphs as though fully set forth below. 81. The acts of Defendant amount to an unauthorized interference with the
normal operation of Plaintiffs business in order to divert a material portion of the profit, with special advantage to Defendant in the competition because of the fact that Defendant has avoided the time and expense of building its own content and generating its own traffic. 82. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants unfair competition, Plaintiff
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
has suffered damages. 83. 41. Defendants unfair competition has caused, and continues to cause,
Plaintiff to sustain irreparable damages, loss and injury, for which Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law. 84. 42. Plaintiff is entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that judgment be entered in its favor and against each Defendant as follows: 1. For Plaintiffs actual damages and Defendants profits, or statutory
damages, as Plaintiff may elect, for infringement of each copyrighted work pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504; 10
10297-44/MCS/DAG/951598_v1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. Attorneys At Law 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000
2. 1117; 3. 1116; 4.
For injunctive relief pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 502(a) and 503 and 15 U.S.C.
For Plaintiffs costs in this action pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504 and/or 15 U.S.C. 1117(a);
5.
For Plaintiffs reasonable attorneys fees incurred pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504 and 15 U.S.C. 1117; and
6.
For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
DATED this 20th day of January, 2012. JABURG & WILK, P.C.
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11
10297-44/MCS/DAG/951598_v1