United States District Court District of Connecticut

Anthony McKnight Sr. Plaintiff, v. State of Connecticut et. al., Defendants, Date: July 3, 2012 File No: 3:10cv1471(MRK)

Plaintiffs July 3, 2012 Motion to Reconsider Court Memorandum of Decision 1.) The plaintiff, Anthony McKnight Sr., at this time, wishes to correct and/ or withdraw all amended complaint, and memorandum in support of amended complaint documents, and have the court strike such from the record for the foregoing reasons. 2.) By virtue of the signature on the Dismissal Memorandum signed and issued by the court, the court in fact considers the plaintiff a slave contrary to the plaintiffs pleadings and attempts to obtain justice, equality and all preserved and exercised by Jewish, Irish, Italian and all other European ethnic persuasions. 3.) By signature of the court, the judge of the court does not consider himself in the category of slave in which he places the plaintiff.(Please see Plaintiffs Memorandum In Support, filed July 3, 2012). 4.) As the plaintiff has submitted several documents, and the court by virtue of the Memorandum of Decision has chosen to classify the plaintiff as a slave, in bondage, and as inventory. This act is contrary to the classification of Michael Cozzolino of which the plaintiff is seeking equal benefits and station under the laws of the state, the fourteenth amendment, and other provisions of the constitution.. 5.) At all times in plaintiffs submission, it was made clear that the intent of the Complaint filed in United States District Court, was an attempt to gain equal rights to that of Caucasian Officers similarly situated as it relates to benefits provided for in Connecticut General Statute 5-142(a) as enacted at the plaintiffs date of injury in 1993. 6.) As the plaintiff is concerned with the now probable incarceration shown through the

intent of the aforementioned document, the plaintiff also submits in appendix his Last Will in the event the court decides to dispose of the plaintiff as slave inventory.(Please See Attachment D). 7.) The plaintiff chooses to withdraw the Amended Complaint, and the Memorandum in Support of the Amended complaint as these recommendations offered by the court is viewed as an attempt to further bound the plaintiff into the slave doctrine and policies of the defendant, state of Connecticut. (Please see attachment E Slave Policy and Connecticut Senate Bill 5529). 8.) The plaintiff requests that all references made to Anthony McKnight Sr., as ANTHONY MCKNIGHT, OR ANTHONY MCKNIGHT SR., cease and desist(Please See Social Services, Appendix C).. 9.) The plaintiff requests that the court in matters regarding the plaintiff, and referring to complaint in the instant matter before the court be discontinued in the Roman Law, Maritime tradition of slavery. 10.) The plaintiff was only made aware of the intentions of the defendant and court through the reviewing of Blacks Law Dictionary. 11.) Upon the examination of the documents issued by the defendant following the request for extension of time. The defendant has continued to forward slave documents to the plaintiff. 12.) The plaintiff respectfully voids all contracts that imply that the plaintiff accepts being a slave, inventory or any other depiction of the plaintiff as the property of the defendant to dispose of or do as they will. 13.) The defendants in their correspondence envelope to plaintiff refers to the plaintiff as Anthony McKnight Sr. 14.) The defendants deceitfully has been issuing to the plaintiff and submitting documents to the court referencing the plaintiff as ANTHONY MCKNIGHT SR., as adjoining materials. 15.) The plaintiff at no time prior to the last extension request granted defendant, had any notion or idea that this was the intent of the defendants. 16.) The plaintiff submitted to this court transcripts, rulings and findings of the defendant Workers Compensation Commission, which were submitted to this court for

consideration, as defendants did in fact admit on the record that they in fact treated similarly situated Caucasian officer Michael Cozzolino in manners different from the plaintiff (Please see attached document issued by Retirement Benefits Division. This was included in the appendix of complaint as well). 17.) For all of the reasons mentioned in the aforementioned paragraphs and motions pleaded by the plaintiff regarding equal rights. The plaintiff respectfully requests that this court orders the defendants to process and pay all benefits owed the plaintiff as was bestowed upon Caucasian/White people similarly situated under the laws of the state.

Respectfully submitted this _____ Day of July, 2012

By:_______________________________ Anthony McKnight Sr..

Certification This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been sent via email this day of June and will be mailed via U.S. Mail to the Defendant, State of Connecticut, Office of the Attorney General, 55 Elm Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06460. On The Day of July 2012.