Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • BC 466737 The Corrupt Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles in False Vexatious Litigant (Corrupt Court Judges)

    Uploaded by

    Jose Salazar
    223 views4 pages
    The Law is what the Judge on the Bench says the law is, regardless of the evidence, of the cases on record, of common sense, of the rules of the court, of the code of civil procedure. If Judge Hickok made a ruling using a fake case, it amounts as planting a gun, or drugs on any citizen of the United States. For years and years, the Los Angeles Superior Court is where Corruption is rampant by some clerks, court clerks and some judges that receive bribes to tip the balance in favor of represented civilians. It is in fact a white country club that one can ONLY receive substantive justice if you hire an Officer of the Court! Then, pray that the Judge on the bench, an attorney wearing a black robe, is not corrupt like DeVanon, Hickok, Miller, Drewry, Dodson, Levine, and others. Judge Glennon at the Van Nuys Courthouse said it clearly: "the old way of "doing business" in the court is over". He was forced to step down from my case! the system is protecting some crook judges!!! DeVanon was removed for his lies, and not because of the budget! for proof of his lies: "He never contacted the court" this is a lie that cost me my house! and then "let me get some", as DeVanon was soliciting money from an investment of $113,262.25 made at sonia maria mercado's bank with settlement money of my brother, who was killed at county jail!

    Original Title

    Bc 466737 the Corrupt Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles in False Vexatious Litigant (Corrupt Court Judges)

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Law is what the Judge on the Bench says the law is, regardless of the evidence, of the cases on record, of common sense, of the rules of the court, of the code of civil procedure. If Judge Hickok made a ruling using a fake case, it amounts as planting a gun, or drugs on any citizen of the United States. For years and years, the Los Angeles Superior Court is where Corruption is rampant by some clerks, court clerks and some judges that receive bribes to tip the balance in favor of represented civilians. It is in fact a white country club that one can ONLY receive substantive justice if you hire an Officer of the Court! Then, pray that the Judge on the bench, an attorney wearing a black robe, is not corrupt like DeVanon, Hickok, Miller, Drewry, Dodson, Levine, and others. Judge Glennon at the Van Nuys Courthouse said it clearly: "the old way of "doing business" in the court is over". He was forced to step down from my case! the system is protecting some crook judges!!! DeVanon was removed for his lies, and not because of the budget! for proof of his lies: "He never contacted the court" this is a lie that cost me my house! and then "let me get some", as DeVanon was soliciting money from an investment of $113,262.25 made at sonia maria mercado's bank with settlement money of my brother, who was killed at county jail!

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    223 views4 pages

    BC 466737 The Corrupt Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles in False Vexatious Litigant (Corrupt Court Judges)

    Uploaded by

    Jose Salazar
    The Law is what the Judge on the Bench says the law is, regardless of the evidence, of the cases on record, of common sense, of the rules of the court, of the code of civil procedure. If Judge Hickok made a ruling using a fake case, it amounts as planting a gun, or drugs on any citizen of the United States. For years and years, the Los Angeles Superior Court is where Corruption is rampant by some clerks, court clerks and some judges that receive bribes to tip the balance in favor of represented civilians. It is in fact a white country club that one can ONLY receive substantive justice if you hire an Officer of the Court! Then, pray that the Judge on the bench, an attorney wearing a black robe, is not corrupt like DeVanon, Hickok, Miller, Drewry, Dodson, Levine, and others. Judge Glennon at the Van Nuys Courthouse said it clearly: "the old way of "doing business" in the court is over". He was forced to step down from my case! the system is protecting some crook judges!!! DeVanon was removed for his lies, and not because of the budget! for proof of his lies: "He never contacted the court" this is a lie that cost me my house! and then "let me get some", as DeVanon was soliciting money from an investment of $113,262.25 made at sonia maria mercado's bank with settlement money of my brother, who was killed at county jail!

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,

    DATE:

    COUNTY

    OF LOS ANGELES
    DEPT. 1

    06/29/12 CAROLYN B. KUHL


    JUDGEII JUDGE PRO TEM

    HONORABLE HONORABLE

    R. AQUINO

    DEPUTY CLERK ELECTRONIC RECORDING Reporter MONITOR

    J. O'NEAL, 2:30 pmlBC466737

    C.A.

    Deputy Sheriff"

    NONE
    Plaintiff Counsel

    (NO LEGAL FILE)

    NO APPEARANCE

    JOSE CASTANEDA
    Defendant

    NO APPEARANCE

    VS

    Counsel

    ESTATE OF ROBERT FEE WAIVER

    BERKE ET AL

    PENDING/GRANTED

    NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

    COURT ORDER

    Joseph Castaneda was deemed a vexatious litigant by the Los Angeles Superior Court in Case No. BC466737 pursuant to Code of civil Procedure Section 391 and was barred from filing new litigation without leave of court pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 391.7. Plaintiff's exhibit 7. On 4/2/12, Plaintiff submitted a "Motion and Opposition to Illegal, Corrupt Order by the Court on March 28, 2012." On 4/5/12, Plaintiff submitted supplemental papers requesting judicial notice of certain cases and for sanctions. The court has reviewed all of Plaintiff's papers. Plaintiff's request to reverse Judge Hickok's order is denied. This court cannot vacate a ruling by another judicial officer finding that Plaintiff was a vexatious litigant. It is improper for one trial judge to review the decision of another trial judge. This rule is designed to preserve the integrity of the courts and to prevent forum shopping. Geddes v. Superior Court (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 417, 425-426j In re Alberto (2002) 102 Cal.App. 4th 421. As such, Plaintiff's request to reverse Judge Hickok's order and for another evidentiary hearing to review the evidence on which Judge MINUTES ENTERED 06/29/12 COUNTY CLERK

    Page

    of

    DEPT.

    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,


    DATE:

    COUNTY

    OF LOS ANGELES
    DEPT.

    06/29/12 CAROLYN B. KUHL


    JUDGE JUDGE PRO TEM
    II

    HONORABLE HONORABLE

    R. AQUINO

    DEPUTY CLERK

    ELECTRONIC

    RECORDING

    MONITOR

    J. O'NEALr

    C.A.

    Deputy Sheriffll

    NONE
    Plaintiff Counsel Defendant

    Reporter

    (NO LEGAL FILE) 2:30 pmlBC466737 JOSE CASTANEDA VS ESTATE OF ROBERT BERKE ET AL FEE WAIVER PENDING/GRANTED

    NO APPEARANCE NO APPEARANCE

    Counsel

    NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

    Hickok

    relied

    is denied.

    Plaintiff's motion to consolidate pending and dismissed cases filed in the Northeast Districtr Pasadena; the Southwest Districtr Torrance and the Central District is also denied. The request is properly made after all cases have been related into a single departmentr and must be determined by that department. L.A. County Superior Court Rule 3.3. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions for conduct in connection with the underlying Motion for an Order Finding Defendant to be a Vexatious Litigant is denied as that matter is properly brought before the trial court. AdditionallYr sanctions under Code of Civil Procedure Section 128.5 is denied as that statute does not apply to conduct arising from claims initiated after 12/31/94. Olmstead v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 804r 807. Plaintiff's request for sanctions under Code of Civil Procedure Section 128.7 is denied on the additional ground that Plaintiff did not comply with the procedural requirements of that statute requiring that the motion be made separately and be filed with the court 21 days after service of the motion on opposing parties. California Code of Civil Procedure Section 128.7. Based on the foregoingr Plaintiff's motion is MINUTES ENTERED 06/29/12 COUNTY CLERK

    Page

    2 of

    DEPT.

    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,


    DATE:

    COUNTY

    OF LOS ANGELES
    DEPT. 1

    06/29/12 CAROLYN B. KUHL


    JUDGEII JUDGE PRO TEM

    HONORABLE HONORABLE

    R. AQUINO

    DEPUTY CLERK ELECTRONIC RECORDING MONITOR

    J. O'NEAL, 2:30 pmlBC466737

    C.A.

    Deputy Sheriffll

    NONE
    Plaintiff Counsel

    Reporter

    (NO LEGAL FILE)

    NO APPEARANCE NO APPEARANCE

    JOSE CASTANEDA
    Defendant

    VS ESTATE OF ROBERT BERKE ET AL FEE WAIVER PENDING/GRANTED

    Counsel

    NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

    denied

    in its entirety.

    The Clerk is to give notice. CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

    I, the below-named Executive Officer/Clerk of the above-entitled court, do hereby certify that I am not a party to the cause herein, and that on this date I served the minute order upon each party or counsel named below by placing the document for collection and mailing so as to cause it to be deposited in the United States mail at the courthouse in Los Angeles, California, one copy of the original filed/entered herein in a separate sealed envelope to each address as shown below with the postage thereon fully prepaid, in accordance with standard court practices. Dated: 6/29/12 Exec~ive Officer/Clerk

    John A. ctarke, By: --~~~_

    i!'~NI
    .. R.

    AQUINO

    Page

    3 of

    DEPT. 1

    MINUTES ENTERED 06/29/12 COUNTY CLERK

    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES


    DATE:

    06/29/12 CAROLYN B. KUHL


    JUDGEII

    DEPT. 1
    R. AQUINO
    DEPUTY ELECTRONIC CLERK RECORDING Reporter MONITOR

    HONORABLE HONORABLE

    JUDGE PRO TEM

    J. O'NEAL, 2:30 pmlBC466737

    C.A.

    Deputy Sheriff II

    NONE
    Plaintiff Counsel

    (NO LEGAL FILE)

    NO APPEARANCE NO APPEARANCE

    JOSE CASTANEDA
    Defendant

    VS ESTATE OF ROBERT BERKE ET AL FEE WAIVER PENDING/GRANTED

    Counsel

    NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

    JOSE CASTANEDA 1377 RUTAN WAY PASADENA, CA ,91104 R. SAMUEL PAZ LAW OFFICES OF R. SAMUEL PAZ 5711 WEST SLAUSON AVENUE, SUITE 100 CULVER CITY, CA 90230 STEPHEN R. RYKOFF, 11355 WEST OLYMPIC
    LOS ANGELES, CA

    ESQ. BOULEVARD,

    SUITE 100

    90064,

    SARAH L. OVERTON, ESQ. CUMMINGS, MCLCLOREY, DAVIS, ACHO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 3801 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 560 RIVERSIDE, CA 92501

    Page

    4 of

    DEPT. 1

    MINUTES ENTERED 06/29/12 COUNTY CLERK

    You might also like