Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MNO Perspective
Cannibalization Conclusions
Overview
A
MVNO is a company that provides mobile phone services but does not have its own licensed frequency allocation of radio spectrum, [] - Wikipedia Almost one third of mobile subscribers in the Netherlands are customers of virtual operators - Dutch analyst house Telecom Paper The MVNO business continues to exceed expectations. In 2010, the four alliances combined nearly doubled their contribution to the total Celcom revenue, [] - Source: Axiata 2010 Annual report
Overview
Current status on Eastern European countries
MVNOs' share in Bulgaria, Hungary and Poland rather small MVNOs unable to compete with MNOs in terms of pricing, service offering and quality - In Poland, MVNOs struggle with churn and high mobile termination rates - In Hungary, bundling of mobile with fixed, cable TV and Internet helped reduce churn.
Infocom
Overview
MVNO Types
Expats/ foreign workers
Religious interests
Enterprise verticals
Segmentation
VAS
Lifestyle
Distribution
Brand
M2M apps
Differentiation
Data/Content
POS Roaming
MVNOs Challenges
Top business challenges
What are the top business challenges for MVNOs?
50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0%
MVNOs Challenges
Business challenges
Radio Access
Core Network
Billing
Customer Care
Marketing
Sales
MNO MNO
MNO MNO MNO
Service Provider MVNO
Enhanced Service Provider Full Infrastructure MVNO (Thick/Heavy MVNO)
MVNE MVNE
MVNO
MVNO
MVNO as opportunity
MNOs increasingly see the marketing value that well chosen MVNOs bring to them
Increase in market size through better targeting / segmentation Incremental revenues in weak segments for the MNO
Successful MNOs are starting to see the benefit of MVNOs for growth MVNOs can increase market size with products targeted to specific audiences
Reach customers outside the Operators core markets without damaging own brand Reach customers who would never become your customers, for whatever reason
Attack new segments without costly development of new sub-brands Drive net additions, revenue and traffic without high acquisition costs
Ineffective targeting or fencing of MVNO propositions may lead to mass churn Intentional abuse of loopholes by partners to attack beyond agreed segments
Risk to stimulate competition by other MNOs, resulting in Operators rate reductions Additional CAPEX and OPEX may be required to successfully support MVNOs
Risks
The operator has strong position/high segment market share MVNO partnership not suitable given
small potential and opportunity costs
The operator currently has low segment market share Small base but high ARPU, requiring
customized propositions, marketing and channels
The operator currently has high segment market share Only consider if MVNO can reduce cost to serve and increase margins, with impositions of tight controls The Operator currently has low segment market share Large opportunity and ideal for MVNOs if the operator is truly unable to effectively capture using own brands
Will compete directly with the Operator and may not be worthwhile given limited returns Offer basic reseller model with very low margins Partner must have strong segment expertise and differentiated services Offer flexible model depending on type of service (e.g. voice, VAS, IDD) and inherent partner strengths High risk of cannibalization requires the Operator management and back end control JV model for control with low margins to MVNO Attack MVNOs, requiring compelling propositions and strong segment focus Strong fencing to avoid churn from high risk segments; JV model for management control
Opportunities
Conclusions
MVNOs can bring a completely new perspective to the market MVNO cannot succeed without full support from MNOs MNOs cannot give support to MVNOs unless they believe in this business model Regulator can ease the licensing but cannot force MVNOs setup Hopefully there will be some MVNOs in Romania in the next 5 years
Thank you!
ioana.serban@computaris.com www.computaris.com