Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. BACKGROUND
Financialization and globalization have intensified the harmful consequences of capitalism, resulting in a broad spectrum of collateral and direct damage to all areas of human life and the natural environment as a whole. The financial crisis, economic crisis, food crisis, redistribution crisis, democracy crisis and values crisis are all interconnected, and are inherent to the current economic system. Not only do these crises destroy our livelihood, they destroy that of the future generations. Their casualties include ecosystems, personal relationships, and human capital; as well as trust, solidarity, creativity, and democracy. The economic system is no longer being shaped and regulated; rather, it regulates and shapes the political and democratic system itself. It imposes its values and goals on society and nature, showing more and more characteristics of a totalitarian system. The present system is based on measuring economic values, achievements and success with monetary indicators that really tell us very little about what is truly essential to the wellbeing of all human beings and the environment in which we live. Neither the GDP on the macroeconomic level, nor a companys financial benefit on the microeconomic level can do so. One key dimension of the ongoing crises is the translation of all existing values into -1-
monetary values. Money, however, should only facilitate economic activity; its accumulation should not represent an ultimate goal. The capitalist code of values is an expression of prevailing patriarchal structures, particularly with regard to competition (a more precise translation from the Latin would be counterpetition) and pushing individual interests while ignoring all non-monetary results, including negative consequences. Currently, the generation of profit and counter-petition are the fundamental factors in the capitalist market system and the assumed basic motivation for all economic activity. Emphasis on this set of values does not encourage other values and behaviors that allow interpersonal relationships to grow and flourish; the present economic system promotes egoism, greed, avarice, carelessness and irresponsibility rather than trust, compassion, responsibility, cooperation, and reciprocity. It rewards asocial behavior (and thus the wrong values), while simultaneously ignoring and thereby punishing social and virtuous behavior. One can make money by forcing foreclosures of the homes of bankrupt families, but not by assisting and aiding them. A farmer can make considerably more profit using pesticides and GMOs than by growing food organically. Allocating funds and resources to harmful energy sources such as oil, coal, or nuclear power is cheaper and more profitable than investing in renewable and green energies. The most striking characteristics of this system are the missing ties: The Economy is disconnected from human values, technology is disconnected from nature, and human beings are disconnected from their emotions. Surprisingly, the system relies on a paradigm of human behavior that assserts that egoism and counter-petition are a natural component of our genetic makeup. However, contemporary scientific research shows that, on the contrary, cooperation is the more fundamental principle of evolution. Moreover, it has been proven that cooperation is a stronger motivation for people than counter-petition. In fact, it was shown that fulfilling relationships are our strongest motivator, and make us happier than material wealth, power, or (economic) success. The time has come: According to an opinion poll of the Bertelsmann foundation in August, 2010, 88% of the German and 90% of the Austrian population ask for a new economic order, People not only ask for reform in keeping with the system, they ask for a completely new system. The CWE meets this need by reversing the polarity of motives: Businesses are to be rewarded for cooperation instead of competition and the creation of profit.
New legal incentives will initiate a shift from competition and profit-orientation to cooperation and the pursuit of the common good. Entrepreneurial success will be redefined, from financial profit maximization to the common welfare. As a result, companies will be motivated to cooperate instead of competing against one another. Growth and expansion in monetary terms will no longer serve as a goal, as economic success will no longer be measured with monetary indicators (GDP, financial profit). What should now grow is common welfare, and because this goal is virtuous, it is no longer possible to pursue it to an extreme! There is no such thing as too much common welfare: We can work on improving relationships, social justice, co-determination, ecological health, and gender equality endlessly. As growth and expansion are relativized in the CWE, companies will be able to strive to reach their optimal size by growing or shrinking. A sound legal basis will, for instance, prohibit hostile takeovers. Therefore, companies will not face disadvantages simply because they cease looking at expansion as an end in itself. Economy will be re-embedded into society in the same way that society is embedded into the ecosystem and the spiritual universe. Economic activity will be linked to the peoples needs, their emotions and common values, and to the natural environment.
cannot be compensated by points in another value category. An electronic calculation program is used to facilitate processing and to check weighting in the Balance. Knock-out Criteria punish extremely harmful acts to common welfare that are still legal. Companies exercising hostile takeovers, generating electricity by nuclear power, genetically modifying seeds or constructing large-scale power plants in ecologically sensitive regions receive zero points in a whole category of values, regardless of other achievements in this category. Those achievements will still be indicated, but not rewarded. The Common Welfare Points are awarded exclusively for measurable Common Welfare Criteria, and companies can decide which criteria they will accept, and to what extent. This means that points are awarded only for accepted standards that exceed those set by law. The purpose is as follows: Today, most companies are far from the common welfare ideal (best possible environmental protection, co-determination of staff and other stakeholders, justly distributed income, gender equality). Theoretically, corresponding minimum standards could be formulated in order to oblige companies to behave ideally. However, companies' self-interest (egoism) drives them to fight increases in legally binding standards with all their power. Keep higher standards voluntary while legally rewarding those companies that achieve them (tax incentives, customs duties, interest rates, public contracts, etc) could change this. In this manner, more and more companies would begin to promote this gentle political redirection of entrepreneurial aspiration towards common welfare. The Common Welfare Balance can initiate a process that guides companies from their current state to the target state in accordance with market conditions. The Common Welfare Balance serves as the catalyst in this process: The more companies apply Common Welfare Criteria, approach, and reach the Common Welfare Goals, the more plausible it will become to translate criteria from the Common Welfare Balance into legal minimum standards, thus making room for newer and stricter voluntary Common Welfare Criteria. In this way, the whole entrepreneurial landscape would move towards common welfare, and those companies that keep the old set of values would eventually run the risk of going bankrupt!
Companies are motivated to achieve the best possible Common Welfare Score with numerous legal incentives. The entire process operates on a voluntary basis, removing the need for a board of examiners and excess bureaucracy. The Common Welfare Balance guides the behavior of companies without creating the need for additional regulation requirements.
Similar to the separation of the consulting business and the examination of financial data, the Common Welfare Consulting and Auditing is divided by law. During the initial phase (2011), pioneer companies that voluntarily generate the Common Welfare Balance assess one another. In the event that they achieve a total of more than 600 points, they are subsequently assessed by a member of the Platform Common Welfare Consultants. It is also likely that, due to the complexity of the subject matter, audit teams will eventually be established to replace individual auditors. Audit teams would include experts from different areas in order to handle complex matters with increased security and efficacy.
LEGAL BENEFITS
The higher the Common Welfare Score, the more legal advantages are granted to a certain company, e.g.: - - - - - Lower taxes Reduced customs duties (e.g Fair Trade) Loans on more favorable terms Priority in public procurement Research cooperation with public universities
These benefits allow "successful" businesses to more easily cover their (increased) expenses. These standards also legally value ethical behavior and activity, whereas at present, unethical behavior, irresponsibility and carelessness are systemically rewarded. This leads to the effect that traditional, unfairly traded, unethical, imported products are cheaper than organic, fairly traded, ethical, and regional products. The goal of the CWE is that fairly traded, organic, ecological and regional products become cheaper than those produced and traded unethically. This process will allow the rules of the market to correspond to our values.
1. Investment (with social and/or ecological benefit) 2. Loan repayment 3. Accrued liabilities (to a limited extent) 4. Distribution of profits to employees (up to 20 times the minimum wage) 5. Interest-free loans to other companies It may not be used for: 1. Profit distribution to shareholders that are not employed with the company 2. Risky financial investments (which will cease to be) the money must be brought to the Democratic Bank or another common welfare bank 3. Hostile acquisition and takeover of another company 4. Donations to political parties and candidates Complying with these standards will eliminate the harmful and negative effects of profit maximization. Moreover, companies profits will be used for the benefit of the society as a whole Point no. 1, which prohibits the sharing of profits with non-employees, is intended to alleviate the consequences of capitalism. Those who wish to earn money must work for it in the CWE! This will make things simpler, because a) businesses will not compete to minimize costs, b) persons will be allowed a sabbatical year for every decade of work while still receiving a basic salary, and c) income and wealth will be more evenly distributed than it is today.
The aforementioned provisions would be insufficient to create total economic equality, but they would certainly contribute considerably to reduce inequality and create more equal opportunities than we see today. Businesses would be co-owned and co-managed by the -6-
people. Responsibility and risk would not rest on the shoulders of a few, like today (although is some prominent cases, taxpayers have borne the ultimate responsibility), but would be divided among many. These provisions are preliminary. They are intended as proposals to be discussed in a broad participatory bottom-up process and accepted or rejected democratically by the sovereign (=the people), e.g. via referendum.
uncompassionate, socially incompetent, narcissist and addictive characters have become CEOs. This is a fatal selection mechanism. Those who behave in the most inhumane manner are quickest to climb the ladder. The Common Welfare Economy reverses the polarity from the pursuit of profits and "counterpetition" to the pursuit of the common good and cooperation. Hence, individuals who behave in a socially responsible, competent, empathic, and compassionate manner, and are socially and ecologically oriented, will be tomorrows top managers. As they act and lead companies by emphasizing the maximization of common welfare, they will serve as new role models for business leaders.
V. DEMOCRATIC BANKS
Democratic banks are organized as democratic commons, and will provide basic financial services and will serve without profit orientation to guarantee savings, grant loans on favorable terms, and provide free checking accounts. Financial markets as we know them today will cease to exist: investments banks, rating agencies, funds, derivatives, stock markets will be closed. Joint stock corporations will be replaced by company structures that allow for public participation. Non-profit orientation means that banks do not pay dividends to owners, nor do they use interest rates to generate profit. Money is a public good; therefore, excessive money will be redistributed for the public benefit. Additionally, the bank grants loans at low interest rates, creating new and more jobs, reducing the unemployment rate, and leading to higher incomes achieved through work much more valuable than interest rates on savings accounts. The bank must also evaluate the social and ecological value-added of all requested loans. It would then charge lower interest rates accordingly. These range from negative up to zero per cent interest rates depending on the Common Welfare Balance Score of the requesting company and the investments social and ecological value-added. The foundation of a Democratic Bank has already begun in Austria. More than 150 persons are cooperating actively to establish this bank, and a total of more than 3000 individuals support the project. Additional information in German can be found under: www.demokratische-bank.at.
parameters of the common welfare in the constitutions. The people have the final word, via referendum. Additionally, a number of other conventions will be summoned to further develop democracy: an education convention, a media convention, a convention for services of common interest, and, most importantly: a convention for developing and deepening democracy. Public goods will be reorganized as democratic commons. These include businesses that provide basic services in the sectors of education, health, social welfare, mobility, energy, communication, and banking. They are public property. This means it is not the government, but the people, who exercise authority over these sovereign goods. Anchoring the values of the CWE and passing them on to the in the next generations will be realized by introducing five new compulsory subjects to public education: values and ethics, "emotionology", communication, democracy, environmental education/nature and wilderness.
forming their own NGOs for this purpose. Those advocating the CWE do not just sit around they act. Join the process! Change the world! www.common-welfare-economy.org
-10-