You are on page 1of 5

Complete text on: www.scribd.

com/cristcarter

ANTIDEMOCRACY FASCIST INDECENCY, DISCRIMINATION AND DEMOCRACY


by Cristian Carter http://cristcarter4.spaces.live.com www.scribd.com/cristcarter English versin by Daniel Lara

The pro democratic, universal, human rights values reason is the lighthouse, the healthy and free light of decent thinking; the keys are respect for life, dignity, and freedom. Any discourse which is opposite to human rights and democratic values (fascism) is indecent, evil, primitive, wicked, stupid, unbearable; and it is a sort of slight in a democratic state, and the ones who do this, for instance: as a way of discrimination, must be toughly sanctioned, in order to protect democracy, since unconscious people on human rights and democratic values, who cause severe suffering and attempt against the bases of the democratic states. This is impermissible in a healthy democratic society, due to the attempts against this democratic state are made inside. For instance: penal sanctions, indemnities, justified causal of dismissal, declaration of institutional unconstitutionality, forbiddance of working and confiscation by illicit association, and missing the chance of getting any positions as government, academia, companies, etc. TYPICAL ANTIDEMOCRATIC FASCIST DISCOURSES: Religious discourses about homosexuality as sin (evil), in which the rights of homosexual majorities are apparently discriminated for instance, for CIVIL marriage (considering as an overcome issue that sexuality is complex and more than 80% of people has a homosexual tendency, according to Kinsey and Focault). This tendency is

Cristian Carter http://cristcarter4.spaces.live.com

Complete text on: www.scribd.com/cristcarter

great, and it is false and ignorant to say that LGTBs are a minority, it is normal and is naturally developed, nobody is forced to love and desire anyone else from its own sex; also, therefore, and as a general knowledge, most of the priests have a homosexual tendency, which is good, but not hypocritical; because of cloister and self-repression, much of them develop severe psychopathologies, and become deviant and pedophile. But, unless that percentage would be inverse, and the most of them were straight (which is not like that), in a democratic state, anyway, the civil rights, social and cultural, and the human rights must be respected, although just for two, and protection, recognition and opportunities for integral, social and personal development must be provided, while respectful of values and rights of a democratic state, values that are also universal, such as life and respect for peoples dignity, their physical and psychological, etc. It is something irrational (stupid) to say We do not discriminate, and say, at the same time, that homosexuality is abnormal, unnatural and a sin, since it is an insult to intelligence, a typical fascist antidemocratic thinking, which is manipulative, tending to sanctions of these institutions, whatever its doctrine would be (Christian, Muslim, etc., while keeping those discourses), since those irrational wicked antidemocratic ideas have caused and do causes suffering to millions of people, and are used to forbid their human, civil and human rights, and the healthy social recognition which are proper for them. We know that those ideals in legal or social norms have even caused deaths and tortures, when those wicked ideas have been carried out. Otherwise, the existence of gay marriage doesnt force any of the little straight people that really exist to marry anyone else from its own sex, and nothing can affect them, except if two men kiss or have a baby as happens in million households do affect them, which is related to homophobia, created by sexual traumas or a vacuum in democratic values. In other words: IGNORANCE. Another example is that religions use the freedom and non-discrimination as a manipulative pseudo-discourse (false logics). Even though, this is also irrational in pursuit of reason and democratic values, since there is no justification to attempt against the bases of the democratic state, values and fundamental human rights, such as dignity and freedom of others, which is denied with those antidemocrat irrational ideas about sexuality, discrimination and affecting in a physical (the case of Daniel Zamudio), psychological and normatively others, because they use their wicked factual power to prohibit their human rights, their development and happiness. So, do we really want social peace with such a level of inequality? I explain this as an abacus about the irrationalism and the lack of presentation of the religious discourse, and nobody can (the church or the Nazis) demand respect and freedom to express their antidemocrat idea such as sexual discrimination, unless as public
Cristian Carter http://cristcarter4.spaces.live.com

Complete text on: www.scribd.com/cristcarter

arguments and pressure to authorities, using fear to sanction free people, because their sayings attempt against the State itself. In this sense, nobody can pretend respect and freedom of saying that, because of attempting against its religious or personal beliefs can forbid the marriage of the homosexual, the heterosexuals, the blacks, the whites, the foreigners and the ones who professes a different religions; all the arguments for that denials are not rationally presentable in pursuit of democratic values and human rights; therefore, the State sanctions this. In the other hand, the freedom of the homosexuals doesnt and wont affect the freedom of the one who is said to be straight. Lets remind that 1/5 of the population lives homosexual relationships and had formed a family with children, so only the legal recognition of human rights in democracy is enough. If there is any excess to anyone, regardless of their sexual condition, law must be applied against them. Fear is , therefore, not an rational, nor an acceptable argument. Lets remember that a democratic state is secular and would never be identified nor related with religion, and social arguments are based on reasoning, i.e. scientifically accepted reasons, such as human rights, democratic and sexual values in psychological terms. A decent democrat authority cannot yield to the fear for those corrupt institutions and fascist thoughts, although trying to disguise the evilness of their arguments that cause so much suffering against other arguments of goodness.such as those drugs dealers who give stuff to the whole population for free. That is why religions dont reply to reasons, but to believes and prejudices created to rule and manipulate other for power, lacking of capacity of thinking on democratic superior values and discovering the truth in them. Citing Marx, he says: Religion is opium of the people, drug for the stupid ones. It is a fact that the one who bases his/her life on prejudices or the others discourse, but in the reason, especially respecting human rights, irrationally thinks and acts. So, religious arguments, specifically in these issues, are not a matter for respect and taking into account in a democratic state, since they are opposite to their values and human rights, such as freedom, dignity, equality, and non-discrimination. They would rather be reserved in the internal level, because an agreement cannot be made from it. A relationship between democratic reason and religious prejudices cannot be made, so the religious authorities want to take over the ignorant people, in order to avoid the power of the State and culture and analysis on those topics. To believe in God is something healthy and good, as something positive, of love and healthy energy, but religions are sources of power and corruption based on absurdities and hypocritical manipulation. Furthermore, a life based on the Bible, the
Cristian Carter http://cristcarter4.spaces.live.com

Complete text on: www.scribd.com/cristcarter

Koran, or the Torah, is irrational itself, since those texts are guides created to religious order and power, not to the truth of reason and meditation For Christians, people must be sheep rather than thinking beings. The truth is love and respect for life, solidarity, freedom, dignity and equality, which religions trespass, manipulating on the basis of wicked arguments, as demonstrated in sexuality and equality. So, it is just easy to offend anyone else and telling him/her that he/she will go to hell for note believing in their God or religion; that is absurd and evidences the wicked manipulation. About this point, note how truth through corrupt manipulation is transformed and disfigured, in which good and evil is passed by manipulable people (which dont think on the core of the things good for evil, and evil for good). This is also the case in politics and advertising: If you eat at a certain restaurant or purchase this product, you secure happiness and happiness, left-wingers are pigs, LGBTs are pervert and wanton, people are good, people are bad, blacks are delinquent, wealthy whites are decent, etc. So, they wickedly manipulate taking advantage of fear, loneliness and search for abominable knowledge, to the non-thinking mass. In this sense, a fascist would say that those thoughts are wicked, opposite to God, and insists on pseudo-arguments disguised in what he believes its true. But a good clever person understands the previous sayings about institutional manipulation based on fear (hell) and lack of respect to democratic values, especially the embosom discrimination; because somebody clever bases his/her life in pro democratic universal values reason, life, love and positive ideas, and not in preconceived ideas about religion based on fear and nonsense. In addition, as already said, it is proved that the spiritual relationship with God, energy and superior forces really exists in the one who believe in values from love and democracy. That is why it is something logical to believe that, meanwhile conscious, independence, freedom and greatness advances in the human being in pursuit of love, happiness and democracy religions are outlaw naturally or by order of power of genuine democratic states.

Another typical insane fascist thinking is the one defending dictatorships, right-wing (Satan Pinochet) or left-wing (Beelzebub Castro or Lucifer Chavez), no matter how its defense discourse is (economical, order, etc.), they cannot be accepted, because of

Cristian Carter http://cristcarter4.spaces.live.com

Complete text on: www.scribd.com/cristcarter

the severe suffering and the attempts against life and physical psychological integrity, and the freedom which cause those diabolical regimes. There are also classic discriminative discourses by race or color. So, a Mapuche or anyone else which has a native family name is roughly discriminated, as well as if a person has dark skin or black hair. Undoubtedly, this topic has experienced advances in discussion, especially after all the damage caused by Nazis. Even though, this is disguisedly present in this 21st Century, in which is supposed that rational humans have a more elevated conscious. No more nonsense and fascist indecency (each and every antidemocratic thought can be regarded as fascist). It is such a shame for mankind that those basic topics are still dealt with, after thousands of years of evolution, which, therefore, must be overcome, for all the worlds happiness. While the precepts of respect of life, truth, transparency, dignity, equality, solidarity and freedom for everybody are not enforced, this vicious circle of hate, hypocrisy, resentment, depression and stress will continue affecting each and every one of us. Only empathy, love, solidarity democratic values will enable the truth happiness of the human being who needs society for everything. In this text, I recall to think about these all important topics in life. This is the duty and the responsibility of everybody. Read more about sexuality, democracy, wealth, God, ethics, human rights, at: http://cristcarter4.spaces.live.com or www.scribd.com/cristcarter

Cristian Carter http://cristcarter4.spaces.live.com

You might also like