Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
$4.5 $4.8
billion billion
FUNDING CUT*
Sequestration would roll back Education Department funding** below the level in
* Totals include Head Start. ** Total discretionary funding excluding Pell Grants. Source: NEA calculations using federal agency budget data and based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
(billions)
2003
8.97
million
9.35
million
$40 $38
'03 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED*
The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating educational services and eliminating or reducing financial aid for this number of students attending schools preK-12 as well as postsecondary schools
The additional number of students (pre-K to postsecondary) enrolled today than in 2003:
74,600
80,500
5.4
million
The rise in costs in providing K-12 services since 2003:
25%
Applying the Center on Budget & Policy Priorities' Estimate Funding Cut (in millions)* Students Affected* Potential Job Losses*
Program
Students Affected*
U.S. Department of Education Programs Elementary & Secondary Education Grants to Local Educational Agencies (ESEA Title I, Part A) School Improvement State Grants (ESEA section 1003(g))
State Agency Programs: Migrant (ESEA I-C) and Neglected & Delinquent (ESEA I-D)
$1,132.3 41.6 34.6 90.0 192.4 89.8 5.1 14.0 57.1 232.6 1,889.4
1,668,300 63,700 40,600 74,100 --130,700 66,500 371,100 349,600 216,400 2,981,000 **
14,920 560 450 1,210 2,550 1,830 70 200 670 2,860 25,320
$1,219.4 44.8 37.3 96.9 207.2 96.7 5.5 15.1 61.5 250.5 2,034.8
1,796,600 68,600 43,700 79,800 --140,800 71,700 399,600 376,500 233,100 3,210,400 **
16,090 610 480 1,330 2,780 1,970 70 210 750 3,080 27,370
Impact Aid Basic Support Payments (ESEA VIII section 8003(b)) Improving Teacher Quality State Grants (ESEA II, Part A) 21st Century Community Learning Centers (ESEA IV-B) Education for Homeless Children and Youths (MVHAA Title VII-B) Rural Education (ESEA VI-B) English Language Acquisition (ESEA III, Part A) All Other Elementary & Secondary Education Subtotal, Elementary & Secondary Education Special Education Special Education Grants to States (IDEA-B-611) Preschool grants (IDEA-B-619) Grants for infants and families (IDEA-C) All Other Special Education Subtotal, Special Education Rehabilitation Services and Disability Research Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants (RA Title I-A and Title I-C) All Other Rehabilitation Services and Disability Research Subtotal, Rehabilitation Services and Disability Research Career, Technical, and Adult Education Career and Technical Education State Grants (Carl D. Perkins CTEA Title I)
Adult Basic and Literacy Education State Grants (AEFLA and WIA section 503)
*Rounded estimates. ** Totals may include some duplication. Some students may receive services under more than one program. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. Updated on June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
All Other Career, Technical, and Adult Education Subtotal, Career, Technical, and Adult Education Federal Student Financial Assistance Federal Pell Grants (HEA IV-A-1) Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants (HEA IV-A-3) Federal Work-Study (HEA IV-C) All Other Federal Student Financial Assistance Subtotal, Federal Student Financial Assistance Higher Education Federal TRIO Programs (HEA IV-A-2, Chapter 1) All Other Higher Education Subtotal, Higher Education Institute of Education Sciences Departmental Management Total, U.S. Department of Education Programs Other Federal Education-Related Programs Head Start (HSA section 639 ) Total, Federal Education-Related Programs
621.5 $4,463.9
74,200 8,968,500 **
28,390 74,560
669.4 $4,791.4
80,000 9,345,800 **
30,590 80,480
students currently being served by state, NEA calculated an average cost per student (per state). NEA then applied this average cost per student to the state's reduced funding level, post-sequestration, to identify the number of students that would remain unserved due to less funding. The exception to this approach was federal student financial assistance programs. NEA assumed that all students currently receiving aid would be affected to varying degrees by any reduction in federal support.
For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$1.1 $1.2
billion billion
FUNDING CUT
(billions)
2007
1.67
million
1.80
million
$11 $10
'07 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating extra instructional services for this number of students who are struggling academically, particularly students in high-poverty schools
The additional number of students receiving Title I services today than in 2007:
1.2
million
The rise in costs in providing Title I services since 2007:
14,900
16,100
21%
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in millions) $18.0 2.8 24.1 12.1 130.2 11.9 9.3 3.1 3.1 54.0 38.3 3.3 4.5 50.9 21.7 7.4 8.9 17.1 22.0 4.1 14.9 17.8 42.3 13.6 14.4 19.0 3.2 5.8 7.9 3.0 25.8 9.1 82.9 31.1 2.6 47.0 12.9 11.9 46.8 3.9 16.6 3.1 21.7 106.3 7.6 2.5 19.2 17.7 7.6 18.5 2.5 35.2 11.3 0.0 $1,132.3
Students Affected 27,660 3,000 21,970 21,050 270,560 16,300 8,970 4,520 4,430 87,330 67,800 8,680 8,550 54,910 17,840 7,970 10,490 29,130 36,910 2,360 11,990 25,500 47,950 14,040 30,490 21,470 3,690 7,700 11,380 1,740 31,580 16,430 78,620 41,720 1,740 54,980 29,580 16,870 48,780 4,210 21,010 2,450 48,480 252,920 11,430 3,730 17,950 17,370 9,960 20,360 2,890 38,290 10,520 1,668,250
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$42
million
thousand
$45
million
thousand
(millions)
2008
FUNDING CUT
64
69
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to denying targeted, turnaround services for this number of students who attend schools that need the most help in boosting academic achievement
15,500
The percentage of eligible schools receiving grants:
550
600
8%
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in thousands) $654 103 909 447 4,660 440 301 122 145 2,180 1,516 139 158 1,889 732 224 325 652 805 152 536 619 1,550 467 542 713 129 180 287 117 856 328 3,280 1,141 98 1,673 446 431 1,545 141 645 126 795 3,922 236 96 708 620 267 621 94 1,456 402 0 $41,617
Students Affected
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$35
million
thousand
$37
million
thousand
(millions)
2000
$400
$375
FUNDING CUT
$350
41
44
$325
'00 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating services for this number of students who are migratory, attending community day programs, or in State-run institutions and correctional facilities
(millions)
2001
Neglected & Delinquent (ESEA I-D)
$52
450
480
State Agency Programs: Migrant (ESEA I-C) and Neglected & Delinquent (ESEA I-D)
Applying CBO's Estimate Applying the Center on Budget & Policy Priorities' Estimate Potential Job Losses 290 500 1,350 550 15,930 550 330 120 65 2,390 780 180 370 310 320 190 310 500 560 50 510 160 690 160 140 240 110 300 70 80 410 80 1,000 550 80 290 95 1,360 720 170 580 45 200 4,300 220 110 910 1,020 95 160 70 50 40,620 4 3 11 5 105 9 2 1 1 30 11 1 5 2 7 3 19 12 5 2 1 3 9 2 2 3 1 7 1 1 3 1 9 11 0 4 2 10 9 0 2 2 1 95 3 1 3 14 1 1 1 1 445 Funding Cut (in thousands) $264 643 712 503 11,747 675 224 66 102 2,161 803 100 365 267 539 187 1,057 741 364 123 178 363 832 205 162 251 99 488 58 54 342 112 1,129 693 28 315 163 973 889 43 174 86 92 5,439 246 108 219 1,434 89 113 75 51 105 $37,251 Students Affected 310 540 1,450 600 17,150 590 360 130 70 2,570 840 200 400 340 340 200 330 540 600 55 550 170 740 180 150 260 115 320 75 85 440 85 1,070 590 85 310 100 1,470 770 180 620 50 220 4,630 240 120 980 1,090 100 170 75 55 43,710 Potential Job Losses 4 3 12 6 110 10 2 1 1 35 12 1 6 3 8 3 20 13 5 2 1 4 9 2 2 4 1 8 1 1 3 2 10 12 0 4 3 11 10 0 3 2 1 100 3 1 3 15 1 1 1 1 476
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in thousands) $245 597 661 467 10,908 627 208 61 95 2,006 745 93 339 248 501 174 981 688 338 115 165 337 772 191 151 233 92 454 54 50 318 104 1,048 643 26 293 151 904 825 40 161 80 85 5,050 228 101 204 1,332 83 105 70 47 98 $34,590
Students Affected
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$90
million
thousand
$97
million
thousand
(billions)
2004
$1.16 $1.12
FUNDING CUT
$1.08
74
80
$1.04 $1.00
'04 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to shifting the costs for educating this number of students from the federal government to local school districts
The cut in the average payment per federally-connected student under the sequester:
1,200
1,300
$100
since 2004:
31%
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in thousands) $213 11,207 13,786 24 4,971 1,400 332 2 67 465 1,687 3,523 443 1,464 9 22 1,913 53 650 165 395 32 339 1,478 128 1,715 3,416 1,524 234 1 915 7,657 1,801 1,113 2,298 114 2,761 245 67 115 114 4,069 292 7,975 599 1 2,776 3,305 1 973 1,006 107 15 $89,976
Students Affected 1,710 1,540 3,450 190 4,320 1,530 410 30 310 3,460 2,940 2,020 300 1,070 210 20 720 710 560 140 3,280 120 180 350 450 530 740 510 860 10 390 1,950 5,840 3,470 390 860 2,670 140 1,120 190 1,140 730 1,170 5,600 920 10 8,510 2,910 5 360 430 2,500 140 74,115
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Sequestration would reduce funding to its lowest level since inception in 2002:
(billions)
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$192 $207
million million
FUNDING CUT
$71
million
$77
million
$2.25 $2.00
'02 '13
The decline in the number of class size reduction teachers supported with Title II-A funds since 2002:
2,550
2,800
54%
The drop in average allocation per class size reduction teacher since 2002, adjusted for inflation:
$1,400
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in millions) $3.0 0.9 3.0 1.8 21.1 2.1 1.8 0.9 0.9 8.6 5.0 0.9 0.9 7.7 3.2 1.5 1.5 2.9 4.2 0.9 2.7 3.4 7.5 2.6 2.8 3.2 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 4.3 1.5 15.3 4.2 0.9 7.1 2.2 1.8 7.7 0.9 2.4 0.9 3.3 15.6 1.3 0.9 3.4 3.1 1.6 3.1 0.9 5.8 1.9 3.8 $192.4
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$90
million
$97
million
(billions)
2008
$1.20 $1.15
FUNDING CUT
$1.10
131
thousand
141
thousand
$1.05 $1.00
'08 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating before- and after-school services and summer school programs for this number of students, most of which attend high-need, high-poverty schools
The additional number of students receiving expanded-learning-time services today than in 2008:
125
thousand
1,800
2,000
10%
since 2008:
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in millions) $1.4 0.4 1.9 0.9 9.7 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 4.5 3.1 0.4 0.4 3.9 1.5 0.5 0.7 1.4 1.7 0.4 1.1 1.3 3.2 1.0 1.1 1.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.4 1.8 0.7 6.8 2.4 0.4 3.5 0.9 0.9 3.2 0.4 1.3 0.4 1.7 8.1 0.5 0.4 1.5 1.3 0.6 1.3 0.4 3.0 0.9 0.9 $89.8
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$5.1 $5.5
million million
FUNDING CUT
(millions)
2004
thousand
67
thousand
72
$58 $56
'04 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating a range of services to facilitate the enrollment, attendance, and success in school for this number of students who are homeless
The additional number of homeless children receiving services today than in 2004:
501
thousand
65
70
143%
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in thousands) $83 13 103 51 583 51 36 15 15 270 182 17 19 215 93 28 40 75 97 18 69 72 178 58 62 78 15 24 39 14 105 42 378 143 13 202 56 54 197 17 77 15 99 476 33 13 81 77 31 81 13 144 56 70 $5,083
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$14
million
$15
million
(millions)
2002
$180
FUNDING CUT
$170
$160
371
thousand
400
thousand
$150
'02 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating a range of educational services for this number of students who attend small, rural schools or rural schools with high concentrations of students in poverty
1.7
million
Share of of the national school enrollment increase occurring in rural districts:
200
and other support staff
210
70%
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in thousands) $322 28 309 369 859 179 90 4 0 198 558 0 97 548 113 382 301 455 257 198 0 111 388 280 543 676 417 339 9 194 161 191 268 381 72 307 976 205 135 8 215 90 302 1,398 66 0 181 251 202 270 2 0 70 $13,977
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$57
million
$61
million
(billions)
2006
FUNDING CUT
$700 $680
350
thousand
377
thousand
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating language instruction educational programs for this number of English learners
670
750
22% or more 20% or more
Increase in English learners in each of 5 states (2005-10) Increase in immigrants in each of 7 states (2008-10)
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in thousands) $305 83 1,438 245 12,698 778 453 97 61 3,380 1,195 275 153 2,229 653 253 322 292 240 57 786 1,024 831 675 129 398 11 210 691 73 1,706 318 4,364 1,209 7 754 354 603 1,117 191 351 58 446 7,969 378 4 913 1,365 48 520 0 266 286 3,712 $56,970
Students Affected 1,460 1,210 8,750 2,100 113,280 8,360 2,360 540 370 19,410 5,800 1,410 1,220 12,050 3,750 1,640 2,540 1,760 980 340 3,900 3,470 5,020 5,060 370 1,310 30 1,600 6,770 290 4,240 4,500 18,180 8,660 50 3,110 2,640 4,130 2,320 510 2,460 280 2,370 57,010 3,630 10 7,660 7,270 120 3,100 0 180 349,580
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$903 $973
million million
FUNDING CUT
(billions)
2006
459
thousand
495
thousand
$10.2 $9.8
'06 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to shifting the cost of educating this number of students with special needs from the federal government to states and school districts
11,700
12,600
27%
The federal share of the excess costs of educating students with disabilities in 2013 would fall to near 2001 levels:
14.5%
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in millions) $14.3 2.9 14.8 8.8 96.6 12.2 10.5 2.7 1.4 49.8 25.9 3.1 4.4 39.9 20.3 9.6 8.4 12.4 14.9 4.3 15.8 22.4 31.5 14.9 9.5 17.9 2.9 5.9 5.6 3.7 28.5 7.2 59.8 25.7 2.2 34.5 11.6 10.2 33.6 3.4 13.9 2.6 18.6 77.3 8.6 2.1 22.2 17.4 6.0 16.4 2.2 9.1 2.7 0.0 $903.1
Students Affected 5,900 1,260 8,760 4,090 47,290 5,750 4,750 1,300 870 26,240 12,740 1,370 1,850 21,020 11,620 4,820 4,440 6,660 5,720 2,240 7,150 11,900 15,440 8,500 4,250 8,770 1,190 3,090 3,240 2,110 16,950 3,260 30,720 13,140 900 18,690 7,010 5,650 20,820 1,770 7,030 1,210 8,450 31,580 4,830 960 11,450 8,970 3,110 8,570 930 8,880 240 459,450
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$29
million
thousand
$31
million
thousand
(millions)
1994
$400 $375
FUNDING CUT
$350
58
62
$325 $300
'94 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to shifting the costs of educating this number of preschool children with special needs from the federal government to states and school districts
The additional number of children receiving special education services today than in 1994:
256
thousand
The rise in costs in providing special education services since 1994:
370
400
112%
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in thousands) $428 97 408 410 2,937 379 375 96 19 1,412 749 76 167 1,350 681 305 332 781 495 192 510 757 960 568 323 458 90 173 171 119 870 244 2,582 865 62 957 278 295 1,069 128 546 112 527 1,741 272 66 698 625 267 725 81 239 $29,066
Students Affected
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$35
million
thousand
$37
million
thousand
(millions)
2002
FUNDING CUT
28
30
$375 $350
'02 '13
CHILDREN AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating early intervention services for this number of infants and toddlers with disabilities
The additional number of children receiving special education services today than in 2002:
123
thousand
The rise in costs in providing special education services since 2002:
450
490
49%
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in thousands) $493 169 732 317 4,082 551 319 169 169 1,727 1,102 169 196 1,342 696 325 333 455 510 169 589 589 950 572 339 628 169 214 303 169 866 234 1,877 1,018 169 1,153 428 383 1,171 169 488 169 657 3,117 431 169 822 715 169 574 169 360 672 $34,531
Children Affected
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants (RA Title I-A and Title I-C)
The failure of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to produce a bill identifying budgetary savings of at least $1.2 trillion over ten years (2012-2021) has triggered an automatic spending reduction process that includes sequestration (the cancellation of budgetary resources) to take effect on January 2, 2013, as stipulated in the Budget Control Act of 2011. For fiscal year 2013, automatic, across-the-board budget cuts will be applied to almost all federal education programs. The Congressional
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$252 $259
million million
FUNDING CUT
(billions)
2009
thousand
80
thousand
82
$2.90 $2.80
'09 '13
INDIVIDUALS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating services for this number of individuals with significant disabilities that prepare them for and engage them in gainful employment to the extent of their capabilities
1,600
1,750
thousand
29
9%
Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants (RA Title I-A and Title I-C)
Applying CBO's Estimate Applying the Center on Budget & Policy Priorities' Estimate Potential Job Losses 40 7 25 35 125 18 11 5 7 65 65 6 11 40 25 18 13 30 25 9 30 30 40 30 40 20 6 15 8 7 20 11 55 65 7 40 25 16 85 6 55 5 45 105 20 8 50 25 20 20 5 80 30 1,604 Funding Cut (in millions) $5.1 0.9 5.2 3.1 24.4 3.4 1.8 0.9 1.1 14.0 8.6 1.0 1.5 9.2 6.3 2.7 2.3 4.7 4.5 1.3 3.4 3.9 9.2 4.0 3.5 5.5 1.0 1.5 1.8 1.0 4.8 2.0 12.1 8.8 0.9 10.9 3.6 3.2 10.8 0.9 4.7 0.9 6.1 20.1 2.6 0.9 5.5 4.5 2.2 5.0 0.9 5.9 3.7 0.9 $258.5 Individuals Affected 3,180 180 920 1,250 6,100 800 370 230 380 3,670 1,950 370 730 2,020 1,360 1,070 850 1,840 1,590 300 1,150 2,010 2,930 1,090 1,250 1,530 380 530 330 380 1,830 640 5,620 3,690 320 2,170 1,270 490 5,200 380 2,860 210 1,220 4,970 1,580 570 1,710 1,130 770 1,750 270 2,170 790 82,350 Potential Job Losses 45 7 30 40 130 20 11 5 8 70 70 6 11 45 25 20 13 35 25 10 35 35 45 35 45 25 7 15 9 7 20 11 60 70 7 45 30 16 90 6 60 5 50 110 25 8 55 25 25 25 5 85 30 1,747
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in millions) $4.9 0.8 5.1 3.0 23.8 3.3 1.7 0.8 1.1 13.6 8.3 1.0 1.5 8.9 6.1 2.7 2.3 4.6 4.4 1.3 3.3 3.8 9.0 3.9 3.4 5.3 0.9 1.5 1.8 0.9 4.7 2.0 11.8 8.6 0.8 10.6 3.5 3.2 10.5 0.9 4.6 0.8 6.0 19.6 2.5 0.8 5.4 4.4 2.1 4.9 0.8 5.7 3.6 0.9 $252.0
Individuals Affected 3,100 180 900 1,220 5,950 780 360 230 370 3,580 1,900 360 710 1,970 1,320 1,040 830 1,800 1,550 290 1,120 1,960 2,860 1,060 1,220 1,490 370 520 320 370 1,780 630 5,480 3,600 320 2,120 1,240 480 5,070 370 2,790 200 1,190 4,850 1,540 550 1,670 1,100 750 1,710 260 2,120 770 80,320
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Career & Technical Education State Grants (Carl D. Perkins CTEA Title I)
The failure of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to produce a bill identifying budgetary savings of at least $1.2 trillion over ten years (2012-2021) has triggered an automatic spending reduction process that includes sequestration (the cancellation of budgetary resources) to take effect on January 2, 2013, as stipulated in the Budget Control Act of 2011. For fiscal year 2013, automatic, across-the-board budget cuts will be applied to almost all federal education programs. The Congressional
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$88
million
$94
million
(billions)
1999
$1.2
FUNDING CUT
$1.1
$1.0
945
thousand
1,017
thousand
$0.9
'99 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating career and technical education programs in high schools, technical schools, and community colleges for this number of students
The additional number of students enrolled today in career and technical education programs than in 1999:
2.5
million
1,200
1,300
The rise in costs in providing career and technical education programs since 1999:
77%
Career and Technical Education State Grants (Carl D. Perkins CTEA Title I)
Applying CBO's Estimate Applying the Center on Budget & Policy Priorities' Estimate Potential Job Losses 25 2 25 13 90 18 7 4 3 60 40 5 7 35 30 13 15 25 25 6 13 17 35 17 16 30 6 9 5 7 20 10 50 45 5 45 20 12 40 4 20 7 30 125 13 6 30 19 11 20 5 35 30 1,204 Funding Cut (in millions) $1.8 0.4 1.7 1.0 9.9 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.4 4.3 2.7 0.5 0.6 3.6 2.2 1.1 0.9 1.6 1.9 0.5 1.4 1.6 3.2 1.5 1.2 1.9 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 1.9 0.7 4.7 2.6 0.4 3.9 1.4 1.1 3.7 0.5 1.5 0.4 2.0 7.4 1.1 0.4 2.1 1.8 0.8 1.9 0.4 1.7 1.6 0.0 $94.3 Students Affected 22,180 1,900 19,240 11,140 173,580 11,720 11,440 3,140 250 49,830 39,960 3,160 8,090 42,870 8,240 12,280 6,790 16,620 16,770 1,440 15,340 9,920 22,770 13,800 13,000 16,580 1,540 11,970 6,720 1,770 14,650 8,210 28,690 56,250 2,560 22,590 12,130 9,810 13,720 1,740 20,710 3,250 18,710 109,250 14,170 790 31,920 42,960 5,540 20,830 2,090 2,740 1,017,360 Potential Job Losses 26 2 26 13 95 19 8 4 3 65 45 6 8 40 32 14 16 27 27 7 14 18 40 19 17 30 6 10 6 7 20 10 51 47 5 50 22 13 45 4 22 7 32 135 14 6 31 20 12 21 5 36 30 1,291
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in millions) $1.6 0.4 1.5 1.0 9.2 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.4 4.0 2.5 0.4 0.5 3.3 2.0 1.0 0.9 1.5 1.8 0.4 1.3 1.5 3.0 1.4 1.1 1.8 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.4 1.8 0.7 4.4 2.5 0.4 3.6 1.3 1.1 3.5 0.4 1.4 0.4 1.8 6.9 1.0 0.4 2.0 1.7 0.7 1.7 0.4 1.6 1.5 0.0 $87.6
Students Affected 20,600 1,770 17,870 10,340 161,190 10,880 10,620 2,910 230 46,270 37,110 2,940 7,510 39,810 7,650 11,410 6,300 15,430 15,580 1,330 14,250 9,220 21,140 12,810 12,070 15,400 1,430 11,110 6,240 1,640 13,600 7,630 26,640 52,230 2,380 20,980 11,260 9,110 12,740 1,620 19,230 3,020 17,370 101,450 13,160 740 29,640 39,890 5,140 19,340 1,940 2,540 944,710
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Adult Basic and Literacy Education State Grants (AEFLA & WIA sec. 503)
The failure of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to produce a bill identifying budgetary savings of at least $1.2 trillion over ten years (2012-2021) has triggered an automatic spending reduction process that includes sequestration (the cancellation of budgetary resources) to take effect on January 2, 2013, as stipulated in the Budget Control Act of 2011. For fiscal year 2013, automatic, across-the-board budget cuts will be applied to almost all federal education programs. The Congressional
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$46
million
$50
million
(millions)
2001
$650 $600
FUNDING CUT
$550
196
thousand
211
thousand
$500 $450
'01 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating programs that provide adult basic education, English literacy, adult secondary education, workplace literacy, and family literacy services for this number of adults
million
30
670
730
The portion of the adult population that has limited quantitative skills:
22%
Adult Basic & Literacy Education State Grants (AEFLA and WIA section 503)
Applying CBO's Estimate Applying the Center on Budget & Policy Priorities' Estimate Potential Job Losses 14 0 17 6 75 9 5 1 1 55 25 2 3 18 12 5 6 14 12 2 7 9 14 6 9 12 2 3 6 2 11 5 35 25 1 18 9 5 18 2 11 2 17 90 3 1 17 9 5 6 1 22 2 670 260 1,770 2,660 50,430 1,160 2,270 420 320 21,270 6,150 730 610 8,800 3,280 810 730 3,280 2,170 760 2,740 1,750 2,300 3,760 1,670 2,950 260 690 700 470 2,670 1,870 10,860 9,920 150 4,120 1,500 1,920 4,300 540 4,440 250 3,020 6,890 2,120 140 2,540 5,300 780 1,940 230 2,770 130 195,510 Funding Cut (in thousands) $822 88 1,000 491 7,643 584 468 140 110 3,285 1,557 179 199 1,820 847 309 316 763 780 155 811 863 1,171 513 534 782 110 204 480 143 1,333 354 3,553 1,474 86 1,365 519 473 1,559 195 727 102 1,016 4,693 267 79 1,153 805 326 578 69 1,050 133 905 $49,979 Students Affected 2,090 280 1,910 2,860 54,310 1,250 2,450 450 350 22,900 6,630 780 660 9,480 3,530 870 780 3,530 2,340 810 2,960 1,890 2,480 4,050 1,800 3,170 280 740 750 510 2,880 2,010 11,700 10,680 160 4,440 1,620 2,070 4,630 580 4,790 270 3,250 7,420 2,280 150 2,730 5,700 850 2,090 250 2,990 140 210,570 Potential Job Losses 15 0 18 6 80 10 5 2 1 60 25 3 3 20 13 5 7 15 13 2 7 10 15 7 9 13 2 4 6 2 12 5 36 30 1 20 9 6 20 2 12 2 18 100 4 1 20 10 5 7 1 25 3 728
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in thousands) $763 81 928 456 7,097 542 434 130 102 3,050 1,446 167 184 1,690 786 287 293 708 724 144 753 801 1,088 476 496 726 102 189 446 133 1,238 328 3,299 1,369 80 1,267 482 439 1,447 181 675 95 943 4,358 248 73 1,071 748 303 536 64 975 123 841 $46,409
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$57
million
$62
million
(millions)
2001
$800 $750
FUNDING CUT
$700
1.39
million
1.39
million
$650 $600
'01 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut would likely reduce need-based aid for all current recipients; and, is equivalent to eliminating aid for more than 108,000 and 116,000 students (applying CBO's and CBPP's estimates, respectively)
221
thousand
560
610
113%
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in thousands) $944 63 1,413 361 5,998 800 676 119 560 2,751 1,336 115 148 3,030 1,230 1,063 417 757 549 517 797 2,181 2,021 1,311 606 1,015 126 285 167 370 1,206 284 4,411 1,301 210 2,357 531 783 3,257 455 752 219 982 3,281 312 402 1,144 948 368 1,233 81 1,028 29 $57,299
Students Affected 17,670 2,590 28,450 8,310 172,170 17,580 14,030 3,990 6,910 80,510 33,910 1,830 4,910 56,250 33,550 29,780 12,150 21,830 15,010 10,490 20,400 38,450 53,450 26,550 13,960 24,130 2,960 6,680 3,250 8,150 29,590 5,740 98,900 24,240 5,120 60,920 12,330 16,060 70,120 11,020 13,130 4,740 27,310 76,410 13,470 5,000 33,330 23,380 7,900 28,460 2,310 49,310 1,270 1,389,960
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$76
million
$82
million
(millions)
2000
FUNDING CUT
683
thousand
683
thousand
$850 $800
'00 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut would likely reduce need-based aid for all current recipients; and, is equivalent to eliminating part-time employment for more than 53,000 and 57,000 students (applying CBO's and CBPP's estimates, respectively)
The average aid as a share of a student's tuition, fees, room, and board in 2000:
730
800
15% 8%
The average aid as a share of a student's tuition, fees, room, and board in 2013 (post-sequester):
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in thousands) $1,281 67 912 584 7,840 990 854 123 850 3,255 1,829 169 198 4,090 1,636 1,102 632 1,105 1,131 608 1,190 3,497 2,410 1,529 904 1,578 248 428 185 500 1,497 529 7,137 1,800 254 3,001 782 1,044 4,140 568 975 320 1,370 3,976 394 449 1,529 1,213 499 1,406 95 1,416 66 $76,181
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Education budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$66
million
thousand
$71
million
thousand
(millions)
2002
$950
FUNDING CUT
$850
$750
62
67
$650
'02 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating outreach and support services to encourage enrollment in and completion of postsecondary education for this number of needy individuals, many who are first-generation college students
670
730
164
The potential number of projects that would lose funding in 2013 (post-sequester):
236
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in thousands) $2,429 179 771 1,704 6,624 1,071 361 256 437 1,704 1,505 433 512 2,682 888 1,262 1,037 1,596 1,518 562 948 1,486 1,551 1,562 835 1,327 689 680 520 193 898 750 2,742 1,830 409 1,839 1,896 850 1,667 176 1,390 264 1,252 4,579 615 364 1,175 1,326 644 1,594 280 1,254 397 0 $65,515
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that nonexempt programs would be reduced by 7.8 pecent in 2013. A more detailed analysis conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) indicates that nonexempt, nondefense discretionary programs and nonexempt mandatory programs would be reduced by 8.4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The impact of an across-the-board reduction under both CBO's and CBPP's estimates is presented here. Since appropriations for fiscal year 2013 (which begins on October 1, 2012) will not be determined for many months, the estimates are based on current, or 2012, funding levels.
Source: NEA calculations using U.S. Department of Health & Human Services budget data based on the reports, Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, September 12, 2011; and, How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised April 27, 2012. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3
$622 $669
million million
FUNDING CUT
(billions)
2010
thousand
74
thousand
80
$7.0 $6.6
'10 '13
STUDENTS AFFECTED
The funding cut is equivalent to eliminating funded enrollment slots that offer comprehensive early learning and development services for this number of children from low-income families
The additional number of children under age 5 in poverty today than in 2010:
732
thousand
The percentage of eligible children actually enrolled in Head Start and Early Head Start:
28,400
30,600
23%
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Outlying Areas/Indians Other National
Funding Cut (in millions) $9.8 1.1 9.5 5.9 75.0 6.3 4.6 1.2 2.2 24.5 15.5 2.0 2.1 24.6 9.0 4.6 4.7 9.8 13.1 2.5 7.0 9.6 21.0 6.6 14.1 10.9 1.9 3.3 2.3 1.2 11.7 4.9 38.7 13.4 1.6 22.4 7.6 5.5 20.5 2.0 7.8 1.7 10.7 43.8 3.5 1.2 9.0 9.2 4.6 8.2 1.1 21.8 44.4 20.1 $621.5
Source: NEA calculations from U.S. Department of Education budget data based on analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or TZembar@nea.org. As of June 1, 2012.
F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 3