Professional Documents
Culture Documents
There are several inventions..some experiments and some modifications occurring on dental materials just to get a perfect material
Butits said that if u want to beat a perfect thing than not only u have to be perfectit requires more than that
LETS DISCUSS ON
CONTENT
INTRODUCTION HISTORY USES CLASSIFICATION COMPOSITION
INTRODUCTION
They are highly crosslinked polymeric materials reinforced by a dispersion of glass,crystalline or resin filler particles or short fibres bound to the matrix by silane coupling agents. It may be defined as a system composed of a mixture of two or more macromolecule which are essentially insoluble in each other and differ in form .
History
In 1962 Dr. Ray Bowen developed a new type of material known as composite resin. The main innovation was a resin matrix of Bisphenol-A-Glycidyl Methacrylate (Bis-GMA) and a fillers agents. (silica,quartz,glass).
classification
1.Based on polymerization method Self cured. light cured,UV light cured ,Visible light cured Dual light cured.
2. According to Anusavice (Phillips) Based on size of filler particles Conventional 8-12 um Small particle 1-5 um Microfilled 0.04-0.4 um Hybrid 0.6-1.0 um
3.Acco. To Marzoak 6 generations of composites:First generation of composite Second generation of composite Third generation of composite Fourth generation of composite Fifth generation of composite Sixth generation of composite 4. Based on matrix composition Bis-GMA UDMA Bis-EMA TEGDMA Other resin
5) Based on Radiopacity Radiopaque Glasses with barium, strontium, or lithium Ytterbium fluoride (YF3) Not radiopaque 6 ) Based on mode of supply : 2 paste system -base & reactor. Chemically activated Single paste & liquid -chemically cured. Single paste system -supplied in syringes. Light activated. Disposable capsules -compomers
7)According to Graham J. Mount; W.R. Hume : T ype 1 - Macrofilled composite resin T ype 2 - Microfilled composites resin Type 3 hybrid composite resin
Midifill-1-10m
Minifill-.01-.1m.
Microfill -0.04-0.4m
Nanofill-.005-.01m
Composition
Resin matrix
BIS-GMA resin is the base for composite. Diluents are added to increase flow and handling characteristics or provide cross linking for improved strength. Common examples are: RESIN:- BIS-GMA bisphenol glycidylmethacrylate DILUENTS:- MMA methylmethacrylate BIS-DMA bisphenol dimethacrylate UDMA urethane dimethacrylate CROSS LINK DILUENTS TEGDMA triethylene glycol dimethacrylate EGDMA ethylene glycol dimethacrylate
FILLERS
If the composite is made up of the resin matrix AND fillers, it is called Filled Resin
Benefits of fillers(1) reinforcement of the matrix resin, resulting in increased hardness, strength, and decreased wear
(2) reduction in polymerization shrinkage (3) reduction in thermal expansion and contraction (4) improved workability by increasing viscosity (5) reduction in water sorption, softening, and staining
Types of fillers used Ground quartzMakes restoration difficult to polish and cause abrasion of opposing teeth and restorations Colloidal silica Used in microfilled composites Thicken the resin Glasses of ceramic containing heavy metals Radiopacity eg.Barium
Coupling Agent
Chemical bond
filler particle - resin matrix
transfers stresses
Bis-GMA
CH3-C-C-O-CH2-CH2-CH2-Si-OH O Silane
Inhibitors
Prevents spontaneous polymer formation
heat light
UV absorbers
prevent discoloration acts like a sunscreen
Benzophenone
Visible-Light Activation
Camphorquinone
most common photoinitiator
absorbs blue light
400 - 500 nm range
Initiator reacts with amine activator Forms free radicals Initiates addition polymerization
O CH2=C-C-O-CH2CH-CH2O CH3 OH CH3 -CCH3 O OCH2CHCH2O-C-C=CH2 OH CH3
Bis-GMA
Polymerization mechanism
Two paste system Base paste benzoyl peroxide initiator Catalyst paste tertiary amine activator (N,N-dimethyl-p-toludine)
Earliest system---UV light activated system Limitations Limited penetration of light into resin
PAC lamps. PAC lamps use a xenon gas that is ionized to produce a plasma. The high-intensity white light is filtered to remove heat and to allow blue light (400 to 500 nm) to be emitted. Argon laser lamps- have the highest intensity and emit at a single wave length.lamps currently avaialble emit 490 nm
Dual Cure
Consists of 2 light curable pastes
Benzoperioxide and aromatic tertiary amine Light curing promoted by amine/CQ combination Chemical- amine/BPO interaction
When polymerising resin through tooth structure exposure time should be increased by a factor of 2 3 to compensate for reduction in light intensity For halogen lamps light intensity can decrease depending on quality and age of light source,orientation of light tip,distance between light tip and restoration and presence of contamination,such as composite residue on light tip
Despite the many advantages of light cured resins,there is still need for chemically cured composites for eg chemicaly cured materials can be used with reliable results as luting agent under metallic restorations.
Polymerization
Initiation
production of reactive free radicals
typically with light for restorative materials
Propagation
hundreds of monomer units polymer network 50 60% degree of conversion
Termination
Craig Restorative Dental Materials 2002
C=C C=C
C=C
C=C
C=C
C=C
polymeriza tion C= C C= C
C= C
C= C
C= C C=C
C= C
C= C C=C
C= C C=C
C= C C=C
C= C
Ferraca ne
Degree of conversion
DC is a measure of percentage of carbon-carbon double bonds that have been converted to single bonds to form polymeric resin The higher the DC the better the strength,wear,resistance
Conversion values of 50%-70% are achieved at room temperature for both types of curing system
Polymerization Shrinkage
Composites exhibit shrinkage while hardening. More common when the restoration has extended onto root surface results in gap formation. Most imp regarding the effects of polymerization shrinkage is C-factor.
C--FACTOR
The C-factor is the ratio of bonded (flow-inactive) to unbonded or free (flowactive) surfaces.
Higher the C-factor , greater is the potential for bond disruption from polymerization effects. Class IV with C-factor 0.2 is at low risk compared to class I with C-factor 5 is at high risk.
Incremental technique overcomes both limited depth of cure and residual stress concentration.
Properties
Compressive strengthFour to five times greater than that of unfilled resins ( 250-300 Mpa) Tensile strengthDouble than of unfilled acrylic resins (50 65 Mpa) Elastic modulusFour to six times greater (8-15 Gpa) Hardness Considerably greater (55 KHN) than that of unfilled resins Coefficient of thermal expansionHigh filler resin ratio reduces the CTE significantly.
Esthetics Polishing result in rough surface Selective wear of softer resin matrix
Tendency to stain
Radiopacity
Tendency to discolor
Rough surface tends to stain
Microfilled composites
Developed to overcome surface roughness of conventional composites
CompositionSmoother surface is due to the incorporation of microfillers. Colloidal silica is used as the microfiller 200300 times smaller than the average particle in traditional composites Filler particles consists of pulverized composite filler particles
Properties
Inferior physical and mechanical properties to those of traditional composites
40 80 % of the restorative material is made up of resin Increased surface smoothness
Compressive strength250- 350 Mpa. Tensile strength30- 50 Mpa. Lowest among composites Hardness 25- 30 KHN. Thermal Expansion Coefficienthighest among composite resins
Clinical considerations
Choice of restoration for anterior teeth. Greater potential for fracture in class 4 and class 2 restorations. Chipping occurs at margins.
Composition Smaller size fillers usedColloidal silica - present in small amounts ( 5 wt % ) to adjust paste viscosity Heavy metal glasses . Ground quartz also used Filler content 65 70 vol % or 80 90 %
Properties
Due to higher filler content the best physical and mechanical properties are observed
Tensile strengthDouble that of microfilled and 1.5 times greater than that of traditional composites ( 75- 90 Mpa )
Hardness Similar to conventional composites ( 50 60 KHN) Thermal expansion coefficientTwice that of tooth structure
Esthetics Better surface smoothness than conventional because of small and highly packed fillers
Radiopacity Composites containing heavy metal glasses as fillers are radio-opaque which is an important property in restoration of posterior teeth
Clinical considerations
In stress bearing areas such as class 4 and class 2 restorations Resin of choice for aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth For restoring sub gingival areas
Hybrid composite
Developed in an effort to obtain even better surface smoothness than that provided by the small particle composite.
Composition 2 kinds of fillersColloidal silica present in higher concentrations 10 20 wt % Heavy metal glasses Constituting 75 % Average particle size 0.4 1.0 m
Properties
Range between conventional and small particle Superior to microfilled composites Compressive strengthSlightly less than that of small particle composite(300 350 Mpa )
Radiopacity Presence of heavy metal glasses makes the hybrid more radio-opaque than enamel
Clinical considerations
Used for anterior restorations including class 4 because of its smooth surface and good strength
Flowable composites
Modification of SPF and Hybrid composites. Reduced filler level Clinical considerations-
Fissure sealants.