Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presented by : Group 3 Nila Lohita (PGP/14/284) Rohith Acharya (PGP/14/292) Santanu Chowdhury (PGP/14/297) Vardhan Singh (PGP/14/311) Mukesh Meena (PGP/14/219)
60% The traction PT and PU elevator have market share of 40% Demand for elevator equipment is going to shrink by 15% by 2000 Choice of elevator is not an important aspect for constructors as not much price can be obtained during selling or renting of apartments Market is highly price sensitive and is facing a cut throat price war among competitors Buying decision is mostly taken by general contractor (50%), architect (40%) and property developer (10%) The contractors are high in number (around 20000)
Load(kg)
630
630
630
630
630
Motor Size
11
5.5
5.5
5.5
3.5
50
35
35
35
15
7500
5000
5000
5000
2500
200
3.5
3.5
Weight (kg)
650
430
430
430
190
11
11
11
Simple
Simple
More complex
Most Complex
Simple
Price (DM)
60000
75000
80000
120000-200000
revenue generation EcoDisc gave elevator ride comfort similar to gearless drive system EcoDisc is extremely energy efficient compared to hydraulic and traction thus saving on energy cost No potential fire and environmental hazards as it doesnt use oil like hydraulic elevators Installation time is 60hrs less than the simplest elevator thus saving on set up cost
capture 10% market share of Hydraulic PH in the first 2 years followed by 15% in the next 2 years and finally 20% in the last 2 years As Monospace is similar to Traction, it will capture 25% of Traction PU market share in the first two years, 30% in the next 2 years and finally 35% in the last 2 years As Monospace price is kept close to the Traction PT, it will capture 15% market share in the first 2 years, 20% in the next 2 years and finally 25% in the last 2 years The estimate of market share shows that
1995
Total Units Hydraulic PH Traction PU Traction PT 15500 9300 4133 2067
1996
15004.29 9002.575 4001 2001
1997
14524.44 8714.661 3873 1937
1998
14059.93 8435.956 3749 1875
1999
13610.27 8166.164 3629 1815
2000
13175 7905 3513 1757
Monospace Share in Hydraulic PH Share in Traction PU Share in Traction PT Total Market Share 930 1033 310 2273 14.67% 900 1000 300 2201 14.67% 1307 1162 387 2856 19.67% 1265 1125 375 2765 19.67% 1633 1270 454 3357 24.67% 1581 1230 439 3250 24.67%
service contracts Service contract revenue is worth 1.7 times the sales revenue A marketing spend of around 5 million DM in the first 2 years will fetch a sales of 490 million DM in first 2 years In DM) ('1000 subsequent time, the advertisement spend can be 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 decreased as the elevator sells mostly on word of Revenue 181866.7 176050.3 228517.8 221209.5 268576.1 259986.7 mouth
Revenue from service Total Revenue 309173.3 491040 299285.6 475335.9 388480.2 616998 376056.2 597265.7 456579.3 725155.3 441977.3 701964
any erosion in market share will result in tough reaction Competitors can cut price of the existing models of hydraulic PH and Traction PU and PT (V1) Competitors can cut the price of after sales service (V2) Competitors can imitate the Monospace and launch similar products in the market KONEs response: Price cut of competitors can be thwarted by showing the value proposition of Mono Space- reduction in operating and set up expenses A cut in after sales service price can be initiated from KONEs end as retaliation to the competitor steps First mover advantage will help KONE to produce more units and lower the cost of production through economies of scale
relationship based selling of elevators and word of mouth as the decision makers are highly fragmented The Sales force of KONE in Germany is too small to achieve the forecasted sales figure (23 full time and 20 half time employees) Less presence in advertisements specially mass media Decreasing profit margin will make it difficult to support a large marketing campaign for Monospace in the first year Managing the Weaknesses: Recruit efficient sales person both full and half time Advertise in mass media to spread the value
Thank You