Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8/5/12
ARTICLE 1169
Those obliged to deliver or to do something incur in delay from the time the obligee judicially or extra-judicially demands from them the fulfillment of their obligation.
8/5/12
8/5/12
What isdelay ?
ACCORDING TO LAW: 1. Ordinary delay
the failure to perform an obligation on time which failure constitutes a breach of the obligation
8/5/12
Art.
obligations personal
obligations
8/5/12
Art.
8/5/12
8/5/12
Art.
pay interest. If no extra-judicial demand, interest runs from the filing of the complaint. In other obligations, pay damages.
2. Obligations to deliver a determinate thing,
liable for fortuitous events. If debtor can prove that loss would have resulted even if he had not been in default, the court may equitably mitigate the damages (Art. 8/5/12 2215[4]) Art.
as it should be performed
3. Creditor refuses the performance without
just cause
8/5/12
Art.
obligation
2.
3. He bears the risk of loss of the thing due 4. If the obligation is to pay money, the debtor
When demand is not necessary to put the debtor obligation so provides in delay 1. When the
2. When the law so provides 3. When time is of the essence
8/5/12
Art.
When demand is not necessary to put the debtor in delay useless 4. When demand would be
5. When there is performance by a party in reciprocal obligations
8/5/12
Art.
The grounds for liability in the nonperformance of obligations include fraud, negligence, delay, and contravention of the terms of the contract. These are provided for in Articles 1170, 1171, 1172, 1173 and 1174
8/5/12
ARTICLE 1170
Those who in the performance of their obligations are guilty of fraud, negligence, or delay and those who in any manner contravene the tenor thereof, are 8/5/12 liable for damages.
Art.
8/5/12
Art. 1233 - A debt shall not be understood to have been paid unless the thing or service in which the obligation consists has been
Art. 1191 - The injured party may choose between the fulfillment and the rescission of the obligation, with the payment of damages in either case. He may also 8/5/12 Art. seek rescission, even
Grounds for Liability: Negligence ( fault or culpa) Any voluntary act or omission, there being no
KINDS OF NEGLIGENCE:
malice, which prevents the normal fulfillment of an obligation 1. Quasi-Delict (Culpa aquiliana/culpa extra contractual)- source of obligation 2. Contractual Negligence (Culpa Contractual)negligence in the performance of a contract
8/5/12
Art.
Negligence merely an
Negligence must be
Art.
8/5/12
Art.
8/5/12
Art.
Grounds for Liability: Fraud and Negligence distinguished FRAUDis deliberate NEGLIGENCE There
intention to cause damage There is no deliberate intention to cause Liability cannot be damage mitigated
Liability may be Waiver for future
mitigated fraud is void Waiver for future It must be clearly negligence may be proved while allowed in certain cases
8/5/12 It is presumed from Art.
ARTICLE 1171
Responsibility arising from the fraud is demandable in all obligations. Any waiver of an action for future fraud is void.
8/5/12
RESPONSIBILITY ARISING FROM FRAUD -demandable with respect to all kinds of obligations . -damages to be awarded cannot be mitigated or reduced as courts are not given the power WAIVER OF ACTION FOR FUTURE FRAUD -void as if there is no waiver WAIVER OF ACTION FOR PAST FRAUD -can can theconsidered an valid waiver be be subject of a act of
generosity and magnanimity
8/5/12
Art.
ARTICLE 1172
Responsibility arising from negligence in performance of every kind of obligation is also demandable, but such liability may be regulated by the courts, according to 8/5/12 the
RESPONSIBILITY ARISING FROM NEGLIGENCE: -debtor is also liable for damages resulting from his negligence -courts are given the power in fixing the measures of damages
NEGLIGENCE is a question which must necessarily depend upon the circumstances of the particular case.
8/5/12
Art.
exercise of extraordinary diligence as in the case of common carriers (Art. 1733) par.)
8/5/12
Art.
Art.
8/5/12
Art.
ARTICLE 1173
The fault or negligence of the obligor consists in the omission of that diligence which is required by the nature of the obligation and corresponds with the circumstances of 8/5/12 the
8/5/12
Art.
FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED
1. NAME OF OBLIGATION 1. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PERSON
1. CIRCUMSTANCES OF TIME
8/5/12
Art.
writing
by law in the particular case e.g. extraordinary diligence required of common carriers
3. If both the contract and law are silent, then
8/5/12
Art.