Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Standard Storyline:
State and UC General Funds and Student Fees Adjusted for Enrollment Growth
0.350%
0.300%
0.250%
0.200%
1985-86 1987-88 1989-90 1991-92 1993-94 1995-96 1997-98 1999-00 2001-02 2003-04 2005-06
State General Fund Student fees Endowment payout Some private support Indirect Cost Recovery on grants Miscellaneous
Not Included
Sponsored projects
Last time that UC was relatively healthy A recent benchmark of educational quality
The Compact permanently reduces the fraction of core funds the State provides
State Funds / Core Funding 70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
2001-2 2002-3 2003-4 2004-5 2005-6 2006-7 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11
2001-02 funding
So that even with large annual fee increases, UCs core budget is permanently cut by about 25%
State Funding: The Compact vs. 2001-level Funding (Millions) 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000
2001-2 2002-3 2003-4 2004-5 2005-6 2006-7 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11
2001-02 funding
3.9%
4.4% 11.1%
6.4%
4.3%
45.7%
16.7%
60.9%
28.1%
State Funds
ICR
Endowment
Private
Other
State Funds
ICR
Endowment
Private
Other
3.
The Compact will not allow UCs state funding to recover to 2001 Pathway, but locks in decline The gap between returning to the 2001 Pathway and the 07-08 budget request is $1.1 billion A return to traditional UC quality (1990 Pathway) would require over $2 billion in additional funding
Re Key Question I: Does the Compact allow the core UC budget to recover to pre-cut levels? Answer: No, not by a long shot
Key Question II: How could UC make up for continued shortfalls in state funding?
To reach 2001 Pathway: Increases in federal and private research funding? Relatively small future increases, and research is costly Private fundraising? Need to raise $25 billion in three years, on top of current $7 billion endowment, with no decrease in state funding Fee increases? If state funding maintained but not increased, need to raise fees to $15,000-18,000 per year by 2010
Answer: Only huge fee increases could make up for lagging state funding
UC at the Crossroads
1. 2.
3.
Extended Compact: fees up ~8% per year, no recovery to 2001 Pathway 2001 Pathway: attainable, but at current level of state funding this requires raising fees to $15-18,000 in three years and large continuing increases thereafter 1990 Pathway: would restore full-quality core operations, but remains way over the horizon
Senate Conclusions
1.
UCs quality depends on getting back to 2001 Pathway Getting there with fee increases would change UCs character to preserve its quality Preserving UC as a great public university requires a greater investment of public funds
2.
3.