Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Purpose
Background and Theory of Valplast Flexible Partials Case Histories and Special Applications Planning Successful Valplast Restorations
Metal and Acrylic became standard but only for about 10 years. Metal frame design became more scientific and standardized.
Limitations of Materials
Metal Frames display the clasps The partial requires routine patient maintenance and modification to remain stable.
Downward Force
As space opens under saddle, rocking motion distorts clasps and enhances hinging effect.
Free-End Design
The Distal Extension or Free-End Saddle restoration poses a greater challenge because it is partly supported by the tooth and partly by the residual ridge
The Forces
Longitudinal Axis
Lateral Force
The challenge of Conventional RPD design is to balance the requirements of retention and support while minimizing damage to natural dentition and the supporting ridge.
Drawbacks
Requires precise guideplane prep Very accurate surveying required Modified or Altered Cast Impression recommended Requires routine maintenance and reline Fails easily with improper preparation
Valplast came into development during this time Improvements are intended to address process, functional and aesthetic limitations Simple, safe and effective.
The Valplast approach is to address the requirement of retention and support by leveraging flexible base properties with simple designs.
Advantages of Valplast
Aesthetics are obvious. The metal clasp is eliminated entirely The natural translucency blends in with the gum tissue.
Functional Solution
Flexibility acts a stressbreaker to disengage forces on individual saddles.
Balanced distribution of forces over the edentulous areas Elimination of unnecessary stresses on remaining natural teeth
Tissue Conditioning: The Flexibility of the resin allows the partial to create a gentle stimulation of the gum improving circulation and tissue vitality. Stress Relief: The Flexibility of the resin eliminates the fulcrum effects that produces a network of damaging stresses throughout a conventional rigid partial. Wolffs Law: Under normal physiological stress, bone mass stabilizes at normal levels. Under excessive stress, mass increases, and under low stress, bone resorbs.
Case Histories
All theories mean something only if they really work in practice. The following case histories illustrate a small sample of the practical results.
Patient received Valplast Maxillary partial in December, 1985. Partial last adjusted in March, 1986. Photos taken May, 1997.
Typical Cases
Excellent esthetics
Instead of a metal clasp, Valplast partial dentures utilize a flexible nylon extension.
Special Applications
Oral Carcinoma
These thin Valplast flanges are less bulky and more comfortable than conventional acrylic.
The flexible flanges are excellent in cases which have inoperable or large undercuts.
Aesthetic Correction
Flange provides gingival architecture, restores speech and improves mastication efficiency.
Special Needs
Athletes Police and Firefighters Military Personnel Prisoners and Prison Officers Any person who might be exposed to harm or injury
Perfection?
Does Valplast solve all the problems of partial restoration?
We believe that no product can solve all the problems of partial restoration. The key is to solve as many as possible in a simple way that is affordable for the patient. We have focussed on improvements over conventional partials in Aesthetics, Function, Durability, and Longevity.
For realas long as the mouth undergoes slow, healthy, gradual change, the partial will remain functional. Patient comfort is a good guide of function. Only drastic or abnormal changes in the mouth require addition, rebase, or a new partial. Valplast resin is created so that material failure does not become a factor in causing appliance failure
Indications
Valplast partials can be offered whenever a conventional partial is considered. Additionally, Valplast can be used in most cases where metal and/or acrylic is not usable or preferable. We have not encountered any limits to restoration with Valplast not solved by an experienced technician.
Indications
Valplast has a flexural modulus of 475 MPa at Body Temperature This is the appropriate degree of flexibility for the partial to function in a predictable way WHEN DESIGNED AND FABRICATED CORRECTLY Other flexible type resins have drastically different flexural properties and may not be usable in this application
Recap of Advantages
Aesthetics Confidence Durability Simplicity Reliable Lab Processes Clinically non-invasive Lab-Manufacturer Cooperation
Impression Technique
Alginate
impression material minimizes compression of alveolar mucosa and muscle formations Mucostatic Impression Required
Insertion Procedure
Partial
must be immersed in hot water prior to insertion Slight increase in flexibility minimizes the patients reaction to the first unfamiliar sensation
Adjustment Abrasives
Valplast partials are pink. But thats all they have in common with acrylic. If grinding needs to take place, carbide burs and acrylic instruments should not be used. Instead, using a rapid, light shaving motion, use:
Vulcanite Burs Green and Pink mounted stones
Stain Resistance
Valplast is Denser than Acrylic Translucency will show surface deposits more easily Polishing technique is critical to long term stain resistance. Brown Tripoli must be used to smooth the surface properly.
Cleaning
We recommend the use of ValClean because it works better than anything available in drug stores. Eventually, drug store cleaners will leave a film, and a dull, lifeless surface. Consistent use of Val-Clean will preserve and even restore the intended appearance of the partial.
Tooth Additions
Alginate impression with case in place Remove any deposits, pastes, or lubricants before pouring model. Counter model and bite Forward to laboratory for processing
Small welded additions can be made at the clinical lab with simple equipment and proper training
Reline/Rebase
Rubber Base reline impression, closed mouth Pick-up overall alginate impression Pour model and forward to laboratory