Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Purpose
Goal --
Planning influencing the
02/23/09
Army’s Program, Budget 1
Army Planning Guidance
Using MAPIT to Focus Analysis
Illustrative and
High level of resourcing but
low level of importance tonot
Importance (APGM)
Actual MDEP Analysis
Mission Area Capabilities
8
Most Important
Relative Resourcing of MDEP
7 FPMM
FPMC MDEPs
MDEPRequirement
FPHG
6 RJS1
RB12
5 FPLB FPSA
FPHC FPFE
FPSN
FL6P FPFR
FPEF FPDT
FPDERG04 RH01
FL6Y FPMH
2 MT5Y
FPSM
FPHB
FPER
RA35
FPEP
FPMA MX5T
Relative
RJC5 FPDP
1 RF02
FPFB
FPSC
FPJBFPJC
FLTTRF01
FL8G
RD16 FPQFFPFP
FPEG
FPDH
FPDD
FPFJ
FPLK FPEH
FPEL
FPJA
RD15 RN04
FASP
FTRC
RA08 RD12
RJT7FPLCRJL7 FPLF FPDQ
FPLR
RK12
RL02
RL11
RL07
RL04
AR1R
RK01
SPDP
FPFD
E3RC
RA09
FPDG
FPEE
RK14
RD13RJC0 FL6Q
FPLE
FADI
RE04 RB03
FPQS RJS2
FL8D FPDL
RJT0
RK15
FPED
TAFM
RK13
RK17
FPLP
RL03
MSECRK16
FPFK
MXET
VARY
VTRD
RK10
RN13
RK02
RK11RJC7
RF03
RN08 RK20
MS4B
RK03
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relative
Relative MDEP Importance
Importance of MDEP to(MA)
Least Important
MDEPS Mission Area Capabilities High level of importance to
Mission Area Capabilities but
low level of resourcing
02/23/09 2
The Army Plan
and Program - Budget Cycle
Jan 00 Apr 00 Jul 00 Sep 00 Jan 01 Apr 01 Jul 01 Sep 01
Jan 02
PresB PresB
POM PB ud POM PB ud
issue D FY02- issue D FY 03
s 03 s
POM BES POM BES
FY02- FY02- FY FY 03
07 03 03
POM BES prep POM prep - BES prep POM
prep 07 pre
FY02-03 Update FY03 p
FY02-07 FY03-07
FY 04-
Section III. 09
APGM
(-- Dec 2000) The
Section II.
Army Plan
Army
Guidance Plan
(-- Oct 2000) FY03-17
Section I.
Army Strategic Planning Update
Guidance
02/23/09 (-- Jun 2000) 3
The Army Plan
Background
F O R C E
For Official Use Only
XXI
December 1995
02/23/09 4
The Army Plan
Overview
Section I
Army Strategic Planning
Guidance (ASPG) DAMO-SS
Feedback Section II
• Relates National, OSD, and Army Planning Guidance
Joint strategic guidance (APG) DAMO-ZR
• Provides Army leadership’s • Expands upon Mission
vision and guidance Areas from ASPG
• Identifies capabilities to
accomplish missions
SA & CSA
approve each Section Section II
Section III Feedback
Army
Army Programming Guid.
Planning
Memo (APGM) PAED
Guidance
Section II
• Uses capabilities from
- Annex -
APG
• Identifies objectives and
resource tasks by PEG
02/23/09 5
The Army Plan
Incorporates Transformation Strategy
“WHAT WE WILL LOOK LIKE” Section Long-term strategy
I. ‘sets azimuth’
Army The ASPG
12 OCT 99 Army Section Mid-term capabilities
Vision END STATE II.
Plan APG
Transform 15 JAN 00
RESPONSIBILITIES / TERMS OF REFERENCE
BDE TRANSFORMATION ation
MILESTONES
Campaign METRICS / ASSESSMENT PROCESS
MONITOR MECHANISM
NOT PROGRAMMATIC,Plan
BUT FEEDS PROGRAMMATICS
02/23/09 6
The Army Plan Strategic Nuclear War
o
Disaster Relief
Domestic
Civil Support
Security Assistance
Arms C
Spectrum of Deploy,
Control
Peace
Building Fight, and
Environmental
Operations Peace Support Win
Making Homeland MTWs
Defense
Conduct
Spectrum of Peace
SSC
Operation
s
Provide Peace
Counter
Domesti Drug
Enforcement
7 Mission Areas --
Nation Show of
c Assistance Force Sanctions Responsive &
Support Non-Combatant
Enforcement
Dominant
Humanitarian Peace
Evacuation
Keeping
Occupations
across the
DCSOPS
Army Planning Guidance
MTOF Process Considers MTOF Scenarios
s
CINC TAP ProcesSection
s II
Intent
rio Army
e na Strategic
e sc Theater
Us Objectives - Planning
Mission Task Organized T OF
Strategic
Force Theater s e M JTL sks Guidanc
Concept U U Ta e- Annex -
(MTOF) Regional P
Scenarios TA
Essential in
Peace Enforcement - Balkans UJTL
Noncombatant Evacuation J TL Tasks
U
Operation - Nigeria e
Peacekeeping - Peru/Ecuador Us Conditions
Peacekeeping - Sinai
Humanitarian Assistance - Congo
Maritime Interdiction Operation - Iran Standards
Counter Drug - Columbia
Consequence Management TAA
National Missile Defense TOF Force
Critical Infrastructure Protection
Structure
Disaster Relief
Universal Joint
Base Engagement Force MTOF
Task List
Base Generating Force
Major Theater War
(UJTL)
Army Planning Guidance
Uses “METL-like” Structure
7 Mission Areas
Prioritizes
02/23/09 9
Army Planning Guidance
Provides Capabilities-Based Planning
Planning Programming/Budgeting
A Task may be required
in more than one Mission Area; and Reducing or eliminating resources for
a Capability may be required in a Task or Capability in one Mission Area,
more than one Task does not change requirement for the same
Task or Capability in another MA
Co-leads at
Mission Area Level ADCSOPS DAMO-ZR
(MG Kensinger) (COL Palmatier)
OBJ 1 OBJ 1
Task 1 Task 2
Sub-OBJ 1 Sub-OBJ 2
MDEP A MDEP C
MDEP B MDEP D
7 FPMM
FPMC MDEPs
MDEPRequirement
FPHG
6 RJS1
RB12
5 FPLB FPSA
FPHC FPFE
FPSN
FL6P FPFR
FPEF FPDT
FPDERG04 RH01
FL6Y FPMH
2 MT5Y
FPSM
FPHB
FPER
RA35
FPEP
FPMA MX5T
Relative
RJC5 FPDP
1 RF02
FPFB
FPSC
FPJBFPJC
FLTTRF01
FL8G
RD16 FPQFFPFP
FPEG
FPDH
FPDD
FPFJ
FPLK FPEH
FPEL
FPJA
RD15 RN04
FASP
FTRC
RA08 RD12
RJT7FPLCRJL7 FPLF FPDQ
FPLR
RK12
RL02
RL11
RL07
RL04
AR1R
RK01
SPDP
FPFD
E3RC
RA09
FPDG
FPEE
RK14
RD13RJC0 FL6Q
FPLE
FADI
RE04 RB03
FPQS RJS2
FL8D FPDL
RJT0
RK15
FPED
TAFM
RK13
RK17
FPLP
RL03
MSECRK16
FPFK
MXET
VARY
VTRD
RK10
RN13
RK02
RK11RJC7
RF03
RN08 RK20
MS4B
RK03
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relative
Relative MDEP Importance
Importance of MDEP to(MA)
Least Important
MDEPS Mission Area Capabilities High level of importance to
Mission Area Capabilities but
low level of resourcing
02/23/09 14
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF MAPIT
Prioritized MDEPs
(Based on Mission Area)
02/23/09 15
The Army Plan
and Program - Budget Cycle
Jan 00 Apr 00 Jul 00 Sep 00 Jan 01 Apr 01 Jul 01 Sep 01
Jan 02
PresB PresB
POM PB ud POM PB ud
issue D FY02- issue D FY 03
s 03 s
POM BES POM BES
FY02- FY02- FY FY 03
07 03 03
POM BES prep POM prep - BES prep POM
prep 07 pre
FY02-03 Update FY03 p
FY02-07 FY03-07
FY 04-
Section III. 09
APGM
(-- Dec 2000) The
Section II.
Army Plan
Army
Guidance Plan
(-- Oct 2000) FY03-17
Section I.
Army Strategic Planning Update
Guidance
02/23/09 (-- Jun 2000) 16
The Army Plan
Summary
• Provides operationally mission-oriented
planning guidance
• Incorporates Transformation Strategy
• Integrates SECRETARIAT, ARSTAF
and MACOM inputs
• Links Planning Capabilities to
Programming MDEPs