You are on page 1of 16

POLITICAL DYNASTY

Click to edit Master subtitle style REPO RTED BY:

SI BE CH U A O

P O LI C A L D Y N A S TY TI I underst s ood as a lneage of i heredi ary t successi on t o an essent aly sam e posi i i l t on. Fam iy l m em bers f l olow one anot her t t o he posi i t on.

A rul er i n a dynast y i s som et m es i ref erred t o as ad yn ast, but t s t hi erm i al s so used t descri any m em ber of a o be rei ng gni f iy am l w ho ret nssuccessi ai onri s t ght o a t hrone.
Click to edit Master subtitle style

The t erm "dynast i som et m es " s i used t o ref er t oagnat cdescendant i s of areal ' m s m onarchs, and som et m es t i o t hose w ho hol d successi on ri s ght t hroughcognat croyal i descent . The t erm can t heref ore descri be overl appi ng but di i st nct set of s peopl e.

D yn asti M arri e c ag i s one t hat com ples w i h i t m onarchi house cal l rest ct ons, so aw ri i t hat t he descendant are elgi e t i s i bl o nheri t t he t hrone and/ or ot herroyal pri l vieges.

W H A T D O ES TH E P H I P P I ES S A Y LI N A B O U T P O LI C A L TI D Y N A S TY ?

The 1987 Const t i i ut on of t he Republc of t Phii nes: Art cl 2 i he lppi i e - ecl D arati on of P ri ci l n p es an d S tate P ol ci i es, Sect on 26 st es i at t : hat Th e S tate sh al g u aran tee l eq u al access to op p ortu n i es for p u b l c ti i servi ce, an d p roh i i b t p ol ti i cal d yn asti as m ay es b e d efi ed b y l . n aw

Thi provi on cl s si earl prohi t y bi s t he exi ence of polt cal dynast es st ii i i t n he count ry t precl o ude equal access t publc servi o i ce and t he ri ght of peopl t choose i t e o n he l ocal el i ect on. H ow ever, i i not t s self execut ory, m eani ng t he provi on needs an i pl ent ng si m em i Click to edit Master subtitle style l bef aw ore i can be appled. t i

W hie t l here i st l no enact l s il ed aw f or t hese provi ons, si t he Const t i i ut on has provi ded t hat al l el i of i al f ect ve fci s, rom congressm en t m uni pal counciors, be lm i ed o ci l i t t t o hree consecut ve t i erm s. The i dea w as t lam i t o i t he pow er of polt calcl ii ans.

N ow , t he Const t i i ut on passed t he enact ent of t m hese provi ons t si o t Congress but t realt i t he he i y s hat t he dom i nant m em bers of t heH ouse bel ong t o polt cal ii dynast es, i w hi ch cannot be expect ed t l sl e t r ow n o egi at hei dem i as a polt calent t se ii i y.

I t n he14t Congress, t h here i a s decrease i n t he num ber of l sl ors com i egi at ng f rom polt cal ii f ii am les but t s does not m ean, hi how ever, t hat t hey don' rul t e because t hey st l do. il

Accordi t ng oG M A new s research, t here i at l s east 76 percent of t he l sl i egi at ve represent i at ves w hi ch bel ongs t o polt cal ii f ii am les com pared t t o he 83% of t hel ast Congress, st l, il 76% of t he el edH ouse ect Represent i at vescom es f rom polt cal ii f ii w hi i st l a l am les ch s il arge m argi n t t 24% of t non- i i f iy o he he polt cal am l m em bers.

Li of P ol ti st i cal C l s an

LU C M A N C LA N Lanao delSur

D I A P O R O C LA N Lanao delN ort M e

TAPOS. THE END. AHH-UHHM.

You might also like